Out of our minds: a review of sociocultural cognition theory

References

• Anderson, J. A., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25, 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Situative versus cognitive perspectives: Form versus substance. Educational Researcher, 26, 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A., van der Hoek, A., Ossher, H., & Petre, M. (2012). Guest editors’ introduction: Studying professional software design. IEEE Software, 29, 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Ari, M. (2004). Situated learning in computer science education. Computer Science Education, 14, 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Bilda, Z., Gero, J. S., & Purcell, T. (2006). To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Studies, 27, 587–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobrow, D., & Collins, A. (Eds.). (1975). Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booch, G. (2011). Draw me a picture. IEEE Software, 28, 6–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organizational Science, 2, 40–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning: Four lectures on mind and culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cherubini, M., Venolia, G., DeLine, R., & Ko, A. J. (2007). Let’s go to the whiteboard: How and why software developers use drawings. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems – CHI ‘07 (Vol. 1, pp. 557–566). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2001). Natural-born cyborgs? In M. Beynon, C. Nehaniv, & K. Dautenhahn (Eds.), CT ‘01 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on cognitive technology: Instruments of mind (pp. 17–24). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28, 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1998). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M. (2001a). What is tacit knowledge. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 107–119). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M. (2001b). Tacit knowledge, trust and the Q of Sapphire. Social Studies of Science, 31, 71–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15, 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Dekel, U., & Herbsleb, J. (2007). Notation and representation in collaborative object-oriented design: An observational study. In OOPSLA ‘07: Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on object-oriented programming systems and applications (pp. 261–280). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. (1972). What computers can’t do. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Mostrom, J. E., Ratcliffe, M., & Zander, C. (2006). Can graduating students design software systems? In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education (SIGCSE ‘06) (pp. 403–407). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Revised ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gawande, A. (2009). The checklist manifesto. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. (Eds.). (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 123–143.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26, 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, P. (1979). The logic of frames. In D. Metzing (Ed.), Frame conceptions and text understanding (pp. 287–295). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1983). Understanding micronesian navigation. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 191–225). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1993). Learning to navigate. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 35–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kavakli, M., & Gero, J. (2002). The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: A case study on novice and expert designers. Design Studies, 23, 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kavakli, M., Scrivener, A., & Ball, L. (1998). Structure in idea sketching behaviour. Design Studies, 19, 485–571.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L. (2012). Rethinking design thinking: Part 2. Design and Culture, 4, 129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artficial Intelligence, 73, 31–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobelsdorf, M., Isohanni, E., & Tenenberg, J. (2012). The reasons might be different: Why students and teachers do not use visualization tools. In Proceedings of the 12th Koli Calling international conference on computing education research (Koli Calling ‘12) (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kolikant, Y. B.-D., & Ben-Ari, M. (2008). Fertile zones of cultural encounter in computer science education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (2011). Apprenticeship in critical ethnographic practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 141–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. (1981). A framework for representing knowledge: Philosophy, psychology, and artificial intelligence. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design (pp. 111–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A. (1981, Summer). The knowledge level. AI Magazine, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1976). Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19, 113–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, T. (1997). What organizes our problem solving activities? In L. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays in situated cognition (pp. 288–311). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D., & Bruner, J. (1996). Folk psychology and folk pedagogy. In D. Olson & J. Bruner (Eds.), Handbook of education in human development (pp. 9–27). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, N. (1987). Comprehension strategies in programming. In G. Olson, S. Sheppard, & E. Soloway (Eds.), Empirical studies of programmers: Second workshop (pp. 100–113). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Petre, M., van der Hoek, A., & Baker, A. (2010). Editorial. Design Studies, 31, 533–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning. In R. Ripple & N. Rockcastle (Eds.), Piaget rediscovered (pp. 7–20). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. (1998). Drawings and the design process. Design Studies, 19, 389–430.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L., Levine, J., & Teasley, S. (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, P., & Aydede, M. (2008). A short primer on situated cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 3–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, P., & Aydede, M. (Eds.). (2009). Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, A. (2010). Learning edge momentum: A new account of outcomes in CS1. Computer Science Education, 20, 37–71.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (1999). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Arauz, R. M., Correa-Chavez, M., & Angelillo, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. (1997). Graphing: Cognitive ability or practice? Science Education, 81, 91–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68, 35–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. Anderson, J. Spiro, & W. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools: A sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. In K. Littleon & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp. 144–161). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, S. (1999). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 9–40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1990, January). Is the brain’s mind a computer program? Scientific American, pp. 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, B. (2001). A comparison of programming languages and algebraic notation as expressive languages for physics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6, 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Soloway, E., Bonar, J., & Ehrlich, K. (1983). Cognitive strategies and looping constructs: An empirical study. Communications of the ACM, 26, 853–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soloway, E., & Ehrlich, K. (1984). Empirical studies of programming knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-10, 595–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefik, A., Hundhausen, C., & Patterson, R. (2011). An empirical investigation into the design of auditory cues to enhance computer program comprehension. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 69, 820–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefik, A., & Siebert, S. (2013). An empirical investigation into programming language syntax. Transactions on Computing Education, 13(4). Article 19.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenberg, J., Fincher, S., Blaha, K., Bouvier, D. J., Chen, T.-Y., Chinn, D., ... VanDeGrift, T. (2005). Students designing software: A multi-national, multi-institutional study. Informatics in Education, 4, 143–162.
   Google Scholar
• The Quorum Programming Language. (n.d.). Retrieved October 21, 2013, from http://quorumlanguage.com/
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., Kruger, A., & Ratner, H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 495–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribble, E. (2005). Distributing cognition in the globe. Shakespeare Quarterly, 56, 135–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, C., Verstijnen, I., & Hekkert, P. (1999). Common unconscious dynamics underlie common conscious effects: A case study in the interactive nature of perception and creation. In S. Jordan (Ed.), Modeling consciousness across the disciplines (pp. 179–218). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Verstijnen, M., Hennessey, J. M., van Leeuwen, C., Hamel, R., Goldschmidt, G., Verstijnen, I. M., & van Leeuwen, C. (1998). Sketching and creative discovery. Design Studies, 19, 519–546.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1981). The instrumental method in psychology. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. (1988). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1984). Understanding computers and cognition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, W. (1975). What’s in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In D. Bobrow, & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 35–82). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar