References
- American Institute of Physics. (2020). The time is now: Systemic changes to increase African Americans with bachelor’s degrees in physics and astronomy. The AIP National Task Force to elevate African American Representation in Undergraduate Physics & Astronomy. https://www.aip.org/sites/default/files/aipcorp/files/teamup-full-report.pdf
- ATLAS Collaboration. (2012). Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Physics Letters B, 716(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020
- Barthelemy, R. S., McCormick, M., & Henderson, C. (2016). Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: Graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020119
- Bonilla-Silva, E. (2004). From bi-racial to tri-racial: Towards a new system of racial stratification in the USA. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(6), 931–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000268530
- Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
- Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2011). Quebrando fronteras: Trends among Latino and Latina undergraduate engineers. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 10(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192711402354
- Dasgupta, N., Scircle, M. M., & Hunsinger, M. (2015). Female peers in small work groups enhance women’s motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(16), 4988–4993. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422822112
- Ensmenger, N. L. (2012). The computer boys take over: Computers, programmers, and the politics of technical expertise. MIT Press.
- Esmonde, I., & Booker, A. (2016). Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning. Routledge.
- Featherstone, H., Crespo, S., Jilk, L. M., Oslund, J. A., Parks, A. N., & Wood, M. B. (2011). Smarter together! Collaboration and equity in the elementary math classroom. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Flores, N., & Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
- Gillborn, D., Warmington, P., & Demack, S. (2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, ‘big data’ and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417
- Goldberg, D. T. (1993). Racist culture: Philosophy and the politics of meaning. Blackwell Publishers.
- Goode, J., & Margolis, J. (2011). Exploring computer science: A case study of school reform. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 11(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993069.1993076
- Gresalfi, M., Martin, T., Hand, V., & Greeno, J. (2009). Constructing competence: An analysis of student participation in the activity systems of mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9141-5
- Gutiérrez, R. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: Toward a new equity research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2&3), 145–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_4
- Hyater-Adams, S., Fracchiolla, C., Finkelstein, N., & Hinko, K. (2018). Critical look at physics identity: An operationalized framework for examining race and physics identity. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 010132. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.010132
- Irving, P. W., Obsniuk, M. J., & Caballero, M. D. (2017). P3: A practice focused learning environment. European Journal of Physics, 38(5), 055701. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aa7529
- Johnson, A., Ong, M., Ko, L. T., Smith, J., & Hodari, A. (2017). Common challenges faced by women of color in physics, and actions faculty can take to minimize those challenges. The Physics Teacher, 55(6), 356–360. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4999731
- K–12 Computer Science Framework. (2016). http://www.k12cs.org
- Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2011). How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: Understanding the trajectories of identity and engagement for two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.595881
- Lewis, C., Bruno, P., Raygoza, J., & Wang, J. (2019). Alignment of goals and perceptions of computing predicts students’ sense of belonging in computing. In R. McCartney, A. Petersen, A. Robins, & A. Moskal (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2019 ACM conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 11-19). ICER.
- Lewis, C. M., Shah, N., & Falkner, K. (2019). Equity and diversity. In S. Fincher & A. Robins (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research (pp. 481–510). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lewis, K. L., Stout, J. G., Pollock, S. J., Finkelstein, N. D., & Ito, T. A. (2016). Fitting in or opting out: A review of key social-psychological factors influencing a sense of belonging for women in physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020110. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.12.020110
- Margolis, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Holme, J. J., & Nao, K. (2008). Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. MIT Press.
- McGee, E. O., & Martin, D. B. (2011). “You would not believe what i have to go through to prove my intellectual value!” Stereotype management among academically successful Black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1347–1389. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211423972
- Miliszewska, I., Barker, G., Henderson, F., & Sztendur, E. (2006). The issue of gender equity in computer science–what students say. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.28945/237
- Nasir, N. S., & Cooks, J. (2009). Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01027.x
- National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators 2018. NSB-2018-1. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved fromhttps://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/
- Philip, T. M., Bang, M., & Jackson, K. (2018). Articulating the ‘how’, the ‘for what’, the ‘for whom’, and the ‘with whom’ in concert: A call to broaden the benchmarks of our scholarship. Cognition & Instruction, 36(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1413530
- Pinkard, N., Erete, S., Martin, C. K., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2017). Digital youth divas: Exploring narrative-driven curriculum to spark middle school girls’ interest in computational activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 477–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1307199
- Reinholz, D. L., & Shah, N. (2018). Equity analytics: A methodological approach for quantifying participation patterns in mathematics classroom discourse. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 140–177. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.49.2.0140
- Rosa, K., & Mensah, F. M. (2016). Educational pathways of Black women physicists: Stories of experiencing and overcoming obstacles in life. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020113. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.12.020113
- Ryoo, J., Goode, J., & Margolis, J. (2015). It takes a village: Supporting inquiry- and equity-oriented computer science pedagogy through a professional learning community. Computer Science Education, 25(4), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1130952
- Sengupta-Irving, T. (2014). Affinity through mathematical activity: Cultivating democratic learning communities. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 7(2), 31–54.
- Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004
- Shah, N. (2017). Race, ideology, and academic ability: A relational analysis of racial narratives in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–42.
- Shah, N. (2019). “Asians are good at math” Is not a compliment: STEM success as a threat to personhood. Harvard Educational Review, 89(4), 661–686. doi:10.17763/1943-5045-89.4.661 4
- Shah, N., & Lewis, C. M. (2019). Amplifying and attenuating inequity in collaborative learning: Toward an analytical framework. Cognition and instruction, 37(4), 423–452 doi:10.1080/07370008.2019.1631825
- Shah, N., & Leonardo, Z. (2016). Learning discourses of race and mathematics in classroom interaction: A poststructural perspective. In I. Esmonde & A. Booker (Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning (pp. 50–69). New York, NY: Routledge
- Traxler, A. L., Cid, X. C., Blue, J., & Barthelemy, R. (2016). Enriching gender in physics education research: A binary past and a complex future. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020114. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.12.020114
- Vakil, S. (2018). Ethics, identity, and political vision: Toward a justice-centered approach to equity in computer science education. Harvard Educational Review, 88(1), 26–52. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-88.1.26
- Vakil, S., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2019). Exploring politicized trust in a racially diverse computer science classroom. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592846
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.