References
- Alper, M. (2013). Making space in the makerspace: Building a mixed-ability maker culture. Interaction Design and Children Conference, New York, NY, USA. https://teethingontech.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/idc13-workshop_meryl-alper.pdf
- Alper, M. (2017). Introduction. In Giving Voice (pp. 1–34). MIT Press.
- Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The new industrial revolution.Random House.
- Bar-El, D., Davison, L., Large, T., & Worsley, M. (2018). Tangicraft: A Multimodal Interface for Minecraft. 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility,(ASSETS) 2018, Galway, Ireland, October 22-24, 456-458.
- Barnes, C. (2012). Understanding the social model of disability. Routledge.
- Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2004). Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research. Disability Press Leeds.
- Bennett, C. L., Brady, E., & Branham, S. M. (2018). Interdependence as a frame for assistive technology research and design. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 161–173). Galway, Ireland. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236348
- Bigham, J. P., & Carrington, P. (2018). Learning from the front: People with disabilities as early adopters of AI. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Conference of the Human Computer Interaction Consortium(HCIC). HCIC.
- Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making’in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors (pp. 1–21). Transcript Publishers.
- Blikstein, P., & Worsley, M. (2016). Children are not hackers: Building a culture of powerful ideas, deep learning, and equity in the maker movement. In Y. Kafai & K. Peppler (Eds.), Makeology (Vol. 1, pp. 64–80). Routledge.
- Brady, T., Salas, C., Nuriddin, A., Rodgers, W., & Subramaniam, M. (2014). MakeAbility: Creating accessible makerspace events in a public library. Public Library Quarterly, 33(4), 330–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2014.970425
- Buechley, L. (2013). Thinking about Making. Fablearn 2013 Closing Address. Stanford University. http://edstream.stanford.edu/Video/Play/883b61dd951d4d3f90abeec65eead2911d
- Buehler, E., Comrie, N., Hofmann, M., McDonald, S., & Hurst, A. (2016). Investigating the Implications of 3D Printing in Special Education. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 8(3), 11:1–11: 28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2870640
- Carrington, P., Chang, J.-M., Chang, K., Hornback, C., Hurst, A., & Kane, S. K. (2016). The gest-rest family: Exploring input possibilities for wheelchair armrests. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 8(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2873062
- Carrington, P., Hosmer, S., Yeh, T., Hurst, A., & Kane, S. K. (2015). “Like this, but better”: Supporting Novices’ design and fabrication of 3D models using existing objects. In Proceedings of. IConference 2015. Newport Beach, CA, USA. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/73670%5Cnfile:///Users/dlaics/Dropbox/Apps/Library.papers3/Files/08/0837B871-A110-4719-8D70-A88E60831472.pdf%5Cnpapers3://publication/uuid/39F512E3-B92F-4799-93F9-9F0068F8168B
- Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. sage.
- Collective, B. M., & Shaw, D. (2012). Makey Makey: Improvising tangible and nature-based user interfaces. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (pp. 367–370). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2148131.2148219
- Das, M., Borgos-Rodriguez, K., & Piper, A. M. (2020). Weaving by touch: A case analysis of accessible making. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2020). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
- Davis, L. (1997). Constructing normalcy: The bell curve, the novel, and the invention of the disabled body in the nineteenth century. The Disability Studies Reader, 3, 3–19
- Davis, L. (2013). Introduction: Normality, power, and culture. The Disability Studies Reader, 4, 1–14. http://ieas-szeged.hu/downtherabbithole/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Lennard-J.-Davis-ed.-The-Disability-Studies-Reader-Routledge-2014.pdf#page=15
- Davis, N. A. (2005). Invisible disability. Ethics, 116(1), 153–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/453151
- Dougherty, D. (2013). The maker mindset. InDesign, Make, Play: Growing the next generation of STEM Innovators. Routledge. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=4iAmadd3AJYC&oi=fnd&pg=PA7&dq=The+maker+mindset&ots=XJmsHckire&sig=F412Op2tb720XBQ8m_tx9hhJtrE
- Eglash, R., Bennett, A., O’donnell, C., Jennings, S., & Cintorino, M. (2006). Culturally situated design tools: Ethnocomputing from field site to classroom. American Anthropologist, 108(2), 347–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2006.108.2.347
- Fields, D. A., Kafai, Y., Nakajima, T., Goode, J., & Margolis, J. (2018). Putting making into high school computer science classrooms: Promoting equity in teaching and learning with electronic textiles in exploring computer science. Equity and Excellence in Education, 51(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2018.1436998
- Freire, P. (1978). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury publishing USA.
- Gellenbeck, E. (2005). Integrating accessibility into the computer science curriculum. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(1), 267–273. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/1088791.1088837
- Goodley, D. (2016). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. Sage.
- Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28(3), 300–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3166.3170
- Hamidi, F., Kumar, S., Dorfman, M., Ojo, F., Kottapalli, M., & Hurst, A. (2019). SenseBox : A DIY prototyping platform to create audio interfaces for therapy. Tangible Embodied Interaction, ( 1).
- Hatch, M. (2014). The maker movement manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. McGraw Hill.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135
- Hurst, A., & Kane, S. (2013). Making “Making” accessible. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 635–638). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485883
- Hurst, A., & Tobias, J. (2011). Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility ASSETS 11(pp. 11–18). Dundee, Scotland. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2049536.2049541
- Kafai, Y., Searle, K., Martinez, C., & Brayboy, B. (2014). Ethnocomputing with electronic textiles: Culturally responsive open design to broaden participation in computing in American Indian youth and communities. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 241–246). Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Klipper, B. (2014). Making makerspaces work for everyone. Children & Libraries, 12(3), 5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5860/cal.12n3.05
- Ko, A. J., & Ladner, R. E. (2016). AccessComputing promotes teaching accessibility. ACM Inroads, 7(4), 65–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2968453
- Ladner, R. (2014). Design for user empowerment. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’14 (pp. 5–6). Toronto, Canada. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2580090
- Ladner, R. E., & Burgstahler, S. (2015). Increasing the participation of individuals with disabilities in computing. Communications of the ACM, 58(12), 33–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2835961
- Ladner, R. E., & May, M. (2017). Teaching accessibility. In Proceedings of the Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, ITiCSE (pp. 691–692). Bologna, Italy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017804
- Lazar, A., Cornejo, R., Edasis, C., & Piper, A. M. (2016). Designing for the third hand : Empowering Older Adults with Cognitive Impairments through Creating and Sharing.In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’16) (pp. 1047–1058). Brisbane, Australia. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901854
- Lazar, A., Edasis, C., & Piper, A. M. (2017). A critical lens on dementia and design in HCI. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’17 (pp. 2175–2188). Denver, CO, USA. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025522
- Leong, C. W., Chen, L., Feng, G., Lee, C. M., & Mulholland, M. (2015). Utilizing depth sensors for analyzing multimodal presentations: Hardware, software and toolkits. ICMI 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, (3), 547–556. Seattly, WA, USA. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2818346.2830605
- Levitt, J. M. (2017). Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated: In response to Mike Oliver. Disability & Society, 32(4), 589–594. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1300390
- Ludi, S. (2007). Introducing accessibility requirements through external stakeholder utilization in an undergraduate requirements engineering course. In 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’07) (pp. 736–743). Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Makezine. (2016). Blind arduino project proves you don’t need to see to build electronics, 1–10.
- Mankoff, J., Hayes, G. R., & Kasnitz, D. (2010). Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 3–10). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878807
- Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press.
- Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the Maker Movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1099
- Mott, M. E., Bennett, E. J., Cutrell, C. L., & Morris, M. R. (2018). Understanding the accessibility of smartphone photography for people with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 520: 1–520:12). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174094
- Mott, M. E., Vatavu, R.-D., Kane, S. K., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2016). Smart touch: Improving touch accuracy for people with motor impairments with template matching. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1934–1946). San Jose, CA, USA. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858390
- Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
- Oliver, M. (2017). Defining impairment and disability: Issues at stake. Disability and equality law (pp. 3–18). New York, NY, USA: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315094861
- Oliver, M., & Sapey, B. (1999). Social work with disabled people. Macmillan International Higher Education.
- Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc.
- Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (Vol. 36, pp. 1–11). New York, NY, USA: Ablex Publishing .
- Pinkard, N., Erete, S., Martin, C. K., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2017). Digital youth divas : Exploring narrative-driven curriculum to spark middle school girls’ interest in computational activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8406(May), 10508406.2017.1307199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1307199
- Poor, G. M., Leventhal, L. M., Barnes, J., Hutchings, D. R., Albee, P., & Campbell, L. (2012). No user left behind: Including accessibility in student projects and the impact on CS students’ attitudes. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 12(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2160547.2160548
- Putnam, C., Dahman, M., Rose, E., Cheng, J., & Bradford, G. (2016). Best practices for teaching accessibility in university classrooms: Cultivating awareness, understanding, and appreciation for diverse users. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 8(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2831424
- Ringland, K. E., Boyd, L., Faucett, H., Cullen, A. L. L., & Hayes, G. R. (2017). Making in minecraft: A means of self-expression for youth with autism. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 340–345). Stanford, CA, USA. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079749
- Ringland, K. E., Wolf, C. T., Boyd, L. E., Baldwin, M. S., & Hayes, G. R. (2016). Would you be mine: Appropriating minecraft as an assistive technology for youth with autism. Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS ’16 (pp. 33–41). Reno, NV, USA. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982172
- Rosmaita, B. J. (2006). Accessibility first! A new approach to web design. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 270–274). Memphis, TN, US.
- Rubin, J., & Chisnell, D. (2008). How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. Handbook of Usability Testing, 17(2), 348. http://ccftp.scu.edu.cn:8090/Download/efa2417b-08ba-438a-b814-92db3dde0eb6.pdf
- Scott, K. A., Sheridan, K. M., & Clark, K. (2015). Culturally responsive computing: A theory revisited. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(4), 412–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.924966
- Scott, K. A., & White, M. A. (2013). COMPUGIRLS’standpoint: Culturally responsive computing and its effect on girls of color. Urban Education, 48(5), 657–681. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913491219
- Searle, K. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2015). Culturally responsive making with American Indian girls: Bridging the identity gap in crafting and computing with electronic textiles. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on GenderIT (pp. 9–16). Philadeplia, PA, USA.
- Shinohara, K., Bennett, C. L., Pratt, W., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2018). Tenets for Social Accessibility. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 11(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3178855
- Shinohara, K., Bennett, C. L., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2016). How designing for people with and without disabilities shapes student design thinking. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 229–237). Reno, NV, USA.
- Shinohara, K., Kawas, S., Ko, A. J., & Ladner, R. E. (2018). Who teaches accessibility? A survey of US computing faculty. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 197–202). Baltimode, MD, USA.
- Shinohara, K., Wobbrock, J. O., Pratt, W., & Golisano, B. T. (2018). Incorporating social factors in accessible design. ASSETS 2018 - Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 2(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236346
- Silverman, A. M. (2015). The perils of playing blind: Problems with blindness simulation and a better way to teach about blindness.
- Siu, A. F., Miele, J., & Follmer, S. (2018). An accessible CAD workflow using programming of 3D models and preview rendering in A 2. 5D shape display. ASSETS 2018 - Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 24–26). Galway, Ireland. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3240996
- Stangl, A., & Yeh, T. (2015). Transcribing across the senses: Community efforts to create 3D printable accessible tactile pictures for young children with visual impairments. Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (pp. 127–137. Lisbon, Portugal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809854
- Stangl, A. J., Kothari, E., Jain, S. D., Yeh, T., Grauman, K., & Gurari, D. (2018). BrowseWithMe: An online clothes shopping assistant for people with visual impairments. Proceedings of the 20th International {ACM} {SIGACCESS} Conference on Computers and Accessibility, {ASSETS} 2018, Galway, Ireland, October 22-24, 107–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236337
- Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. A. K., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206
- Waller, A., Hanson, V. L., & Sloan, D. (2009). Including accessibility within and beyond undergraduate computing courses. In Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (pp. 155–162). Pittsburgh, PA, USA:ACM
- Wobbrock, J. O., Kane, S. K., Gajos, K. Z., Harada, S., & Froehlich, J. (2011). Ability-based design: Concept, principles and examples. ACM Transactions On, 3(3), 1–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1952383.1952384
- Worsley, M., Bar-El, D., Davison, L., Large, T., & Mwiti, T. (2018). Multimodal interfaces for inclusive learning.In Penstein Rosé C. et al. (eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10948. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_73