Developing computational thinking collaboratively: the nexus of computational practices within small groups

References

• Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone. Learning & Leading with Te Chnol O Gy, 38(6), 20–23. Retrieved 2018-11-11, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ918910
   Google Scholar
• Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011, February). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
   Google Scholar
• Bause, I. M., Brich, I. R., Wesslein, A.-K., & Hesse, F. W. (2018). Using technological functions on a multi-touch table and their affordances to counteract biases and foster collaborative problem solving. International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 13(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9271-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaya, T., & Zur, E. (2007). Collaborative programming projects in an advanced CS course. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 22(6), 126–135. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1231091.1231112
   Google Scholar
• Berland, M., & Lee, V. R. (2011). Collaborative strategic board games as a site for distributed computational thinking. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 1(2), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgbl.2011040105
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., Balch, C., & Chung, M. (2014). Creative computing. Harvard Graduate School of Education. CC BY-SA 4.0
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April 13–17). New Frameworks for Studying and Assessing the Development of Computational Thinking [Paper presentation]. 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada (Vol. 1).
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Q. (2012). The markings of a new pencil: Introducing programming-as-writing in the middle school classroom. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 4(2), 121–135. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ985683
   Google Scholar
• Cansu, S. K., & Cansu, F. K. (2019). An overview of computational thinking. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 3(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v3i1.53
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, B. (2015). Understanding Collaborative Computational Thinking. In The eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER '15), New York, NY, USA (pp. 251–252). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2787622.2787736
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, B., Bart, A. C., & Kafura, D. (2018). Analysis of collaborative learning in a computational thinking class. In The 49th ACM technical symposium on computer science education, New York, NY, USA (pp. 143–148). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159470
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, A., & Williams, L. (2000). Extreme programming examined. The costs and benefits of pair programming. USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Curzon, P., Bell, T., Waite, J., & Dorling, M. (2019). Computational thinking. In S. A. Fincher & A. V. Robins (Eds.), The cambridge hand book of computing edu c ation research (pp. 513–546). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denner, J., Werner, L., Campe, S., & Ortiz, E. Pair programming: Under what conditions is it advantageous for middle school students? (2014). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2014.888272
   Google Scholar
• Fields, D. A., Giang, M., & Kafai, Y. B. (2013). Understanding collaborative practices in the scratch online community: Patterns of participation among youth designers. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, & M. Nathan (Eds.), To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time, and scale: CSCL 2013 conference proceedings, Madison, WI, USA (Vol. 1, pp. 200–207).
   Google Scholar
• Fields, D. A., Kafai, Y. B., & Giang, M. T. (2017, August). Youth computational participation in the wild: Understanding experience and equity in participating and programming in the online scratch community. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3123815
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S., & Kabayadondo, Z. (2016). Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners, and classrooms. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiff, S., Holt, D. V., & Funke, J. (2013). Perspectives on problem solving in educational assessment: Analytical, interactive, and collaborative problem solving. The Journal of Problem Solving, 5(2), 71–91. http://cogprints.org/9041/
   Google Scholar
• Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 322. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. M. (2016). Learning by taking apart: Deconstructing code by reading, tracing, and debugging. In The 17th annual conference on information technology education (pp. 148–153). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2978192.2978231
   Google Scholar
• Grover, S., Cooper, S., & Pea, R. (2014). Assessing computational learning in K-12. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education (pp. 57–62). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, S., Pea, R., & Cooper, S. (2015). Designing for deeper learning in a blended computer science course for middle school students. Computer Science Education, 25(2), 199–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1033142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, S., Pea, R., & Cooper, S. (2016). Factors influencing computer science learning in middle school. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM technical symposium on computing science education (pp. 552–557). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K., Paavola, S., Kangas, K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2013). Sociocultural perspectives on collaborative learning. In Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver, Clark A. Chinn, Carol K. K. Chan, & Angela M. O’Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (p. 17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hao, J., Liu, L., von Davier, A. A., & P. C, Kyllonen. (2017). Initial steps towards a standardized assessment for collaborative problem solving (CPS): Practical challenges and strategies. In A. von Davier, M. Zhu, & P. Kyllonen (Eds.), Innovative assessment of collaboration (pp. 135–156). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33261-1_9
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008855526312
   Google Scholar
• Herro, D., Quigley, C., Plank, H., & Abimbade, O. (2021). Understanding students’ social interactions during making activities designed to promote computational thinking. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022067120211884824 Retrieved from
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, T.-C., Chang, S.-C., & Hung, Y.-T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126(November), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J. (2020). Exploring computational thinking practices through collaborative design activities. In C. Girvan, J. R. Byrne, B. Tangney, & V. Dagiené (Eds.), Constructionism 2020 (pp. 95–96).
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J., & Peppler, K. (2019). Studying computational thinking through collaborative design activities with scratch. In K. Lund, E. Lavoué, & G. P. Niccolai (Eds.), A wide lens: Combining embodied, enactive, extended, and embedded learning in collaborative settings: International conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2019 (pp. 933–935). https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/4572
   Google Scholar
• K-12 Computer Science Framework Steering Committee. (2016). K-12 computer science framework (Tech. Rep.). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2013). The social turn in K-12 programming: moving from computational thinking to computational participation. In 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, New York, NY, USA (pp. 603–608). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445373
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., Lee, E., Searle, K., Fields, D., Kaplan, E., & Lui, D. (2014). A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: Introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Edu C Ation (TOCE), 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavitha, R., & Ahmed, M. I. (2013). Knowledge sharing through pair programming in learning environments: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 20(20), 319–333. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1055467
   Google Scholar
• Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. What knowledge is of most worth. (2013). Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2013.10784716
   Google Scholar
• Kevin Keith, P., Sullivan, F. R., & Pham, D. (2019). Roles, collaboration, and the development of computational thinking in a robotics learning environment. In S.-C. Kong & H. Abelson Eds., Computational thinking education Retrieved from (pp. 223–245). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6528-713.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., & Kreijns, K. (2005). Enhancing sociability of computer-supported col-laborative learning environments. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication (pp. 169–191). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodner, J. L. (2007). The roles of scripts in promoting collaborative discourse in learning by design. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning (Vol. 6, pp. 237–262). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, S.-C. (2019). Components and methods of evaluating computational thinking for fostering creative problem-solvers in senior primary school education. In Siu-Cheung Kong & Harold Abelson(Eds.), Computational thinking education (pp. 119–141). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, S.-C., Chiu, M. M., & Lai, M. (2018). A study of primary school students’ interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking education. Computers & Education, 127, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawanto, K., Close, K., Ames, C., & Brasiel, S. (2017). Exploring strengths and weaknesses in middle school students’ computational thinking in Scratch. In P. J. Rich & C. B. Hodges Eds., Emerging resarch, practice, and policy on computational thinking Retrieved from (pp. 307–326). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_19.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., & Werner, L. (2011). Computational thinking for youth in practice. Acm Inroads, 2(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929902
   Google Scholar
• Lei, H., Chiu, M. M., Li, F., Wang, X., & Geng, Y.-J. (2020, November). Computational thinking and academic achievement: A meta-analysis among students. Children and Youth Services Review, 118(118), 105439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105439
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J. M.-C., & Liu, S.-F. (2012). An investigation into parent-child collaboration in learning computer programming. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 162–173. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.15.1.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannila, L., Dagiene, V., Demo, B., Grgurina, N., Mirolo, C., Rolandsson, L., & Settle, A. (2014). Computational Thinking in K-9 Education. In The Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference (ITiCSE-WGR '14), New York, NY, USA (pp. 1–29). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445373
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, C., Werner, L., Bullock, H., & Fernald, J. (2002). The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course. In The 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '02), New York, Ny, USA (pp. 38–42). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445373
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance (Vol. 14). Prentice-Hall Engle- wood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, E. M., & Higgins, S. E. (2013). Collaborative learning with multi-touch technology: Developing adaptive expertise. Learning and Instruction, 25, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagappan, N., Williams, L., Ferzli, M., Wiebe, E., Yang, K., Miller, C., & Balik, S. (2003). Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(1), 359–362. https://doi.org/10.1145/792548.612006
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2010) . Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of compu- tational thinking. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012) . A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, cross- cutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, J. T. (1998). The case for collaborative programming. Communications of the ACM, 41(3), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/272287.272333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, H. F., Jr, & Schacter, J. (1997). Test Specifications for Problem-Solving Assessment. Los Angeles, CA.: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED418103
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 collaborative problem-solving framework. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/component/9789264281820-8-en
   Google Scholar
• Ras, E., Krkovic, K., Greiff, S., Tobias, E., & Maquil, V. (2014). Moving towards the assessment of collaborative problem solving skills with a tangible user interface. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(4), 95–104. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1043191.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rees, A., García-Peñalvo, F., Jormanainen, I., Tuul, M., & Reimann, D. (2016). An overview of the most relevant literature on coding and computational thinking with emphasis on the relevant issues for teachers. TACCLE3 Consortium. http://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/688
   Google Scholar
• Repenning, A., Webb, D., & Ioannidou, A. (2010). Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools. In 41st ACM technical symposiumon computer science education (pp. 265–269). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734357
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., & Kafai, Y. (2009, November). Scratch: Programming for All. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Román-González, M., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2019). Combining assessment tools for a comprehensive evaluation of computational thinking interventions. In S.-C. Kong & H. Abelson Eds., Computational thinking education Retrieved from (pp. 79–98). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6528-76.
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
   Google Scholar
• Scoular, C., Care, E., & Hesse, F. W. (2017). Designs for operationalizing collaborative problem solving for automated assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 54(1), 12–35. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jedm.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seehorn, D., Carey, S., Fuschetto, B., Lee, I., Moix, D., O’Grady-Cunniff, D., & Verno, A. (2011). CSTA K–12 computer science standards: Revised 2011 (Tech. Rep.). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Seehorn, D., & Clayborn, L. (2017). CSTA K-12 CS standards for all. In 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, New York, NY, USA (pp. 730). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3022341
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, M., & Martin, F. (2015, June). The assessment of mobile computational thinking. Journal of Computer Science and College, 30(6), 53–59. Evansville, IN, USA: Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2753024.2753037
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017, November). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22(22), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Sommerville, I. (2010). Software engineering (9th ed.). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., & Birchmeier, Z. (2003). Group creativity and collective choice. In Paul B. Paulus & Bernard A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 85–109). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. Group collaboration in assessment: Multiple objectives, processes, and outcomes. (1995). Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737017002239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (2013). Information processing approaches to collaborative learning. In Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver, Clark A. Chinn, Carol K. K. Chan, & Angela O'Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 19–40). Rout- ledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016, February). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science class- rooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3. https://participativelearning.org/pluginfile.php/636/mod_resource/content/3/Learningasasocialsystem.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Werner, L., Denner, J., Campe, S., & Kawamoto, D. C. (2012). The fairy performance assessment: Measuring computational thinking in middle school. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 215–220). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157200
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D., Contractor, N., Poole, M. S., Srivastava, J., & Cai, D. The virtual worlds exploratorium: Using large-scale data and computational techniques for communication research. (2011). Communication Methods and Measures, 5(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2011.568373
   Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2006, March). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (n.d.). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147
   Google Scholar
• Zahn, C., Krauskopf, K., Hesse, F. W., & Pea, R. (2010). Digital video tools in the classroom: How to support meaningful collaboration and critical advanced thinking of students? In Myint Swe Khine & Issa M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning (pp. 503–523). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, B., Wang, Q., Chen, J., & Li, Y. An exploration of three-dimensional integrated assessment for computational thinking. (2016). Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(4), 562–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115608444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar