Social interactions and practices that positively influenced women’s retention in their computer science major

References

• Ashcraft, C., Eger, E., & Friend, M. (2012). Girls in IT: The facts. National Center for Boulder, CO. http://girlsschools.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Girls-in-IT-The-Facts.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Back, M. (2011). Legitimate peripheral participation and language learning: Two Quichua learners in a transnational community. Language Learning, 61(4), 1039–1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00662.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, L. J., McDowell, C., & Kalahar, K. (2009). Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major. Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1145/1508865.1508923
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbow, R. J., & Vivyan, E. (2016). Gender and belonging in undergraduate computer science: A comparative case study of student experiences in gateway courses (WCER Working Paper No. 2016-2). University of Wisconsin–Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/working-papers
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, S. (2014). Why are women underrepresented in computer science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education, 24(2–3), 153–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2014.963363
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, S., DeKeuster, M., Walter, K., Colar, M., & Holcomb, C. (2005). Changes in CS students’ attitudes towards CS over time: An examination of gender differences. Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 392–396. https://doi.org/10.1145/1047344.1047475
   Google Scholar
• Biggers, M., Brauer, A., & Yilmaz, T. (2008). Student perceptions of computer science: A retention study comparing graduating seniors with CS leavers. Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 402–406. https://doi.org/10.1145/1352135.1352274
   Google Scholar
• Binkerd, C. L., & Moore, M. D. (2002). Women/minorities in computer science: Where are they? No attention no retention. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 17(5), 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Blaney, J. M. (2021). Retaining upward-transfer women in computing majors. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 28(1), 125–144. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/montezuma/jarcc/2021/00000028/00000001/art00010
   Google Scholar
• Blaney, J. M., & Barrett, J. (2022). Advancing gender equity and sense of belonging in computing: Are documented best practices representative of upward transfer students? Community College Journal of Research and Practice 46(9), 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2021.1896396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaney, J. M., & Stout, J. G. (2017). Examining the relationship between introductory computing course experiences, self-efficacy, and belonging among first-generation college women. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 69–74). https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017751
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Andreae, P., Biddle, R., & Tempero, E. (1997). Women in introductory computer science: Experience at Victoria University of Wellington. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1145/268084.268128
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Bunderson, E. D., & Christensen, M. E. (1995). An analysis of retention problems for female students in university computer science programs. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1995.10782148
   Google Scholar
• Buysse, V., Sparkman, K. L., & Wesley, P. W. (2003). Communities of practice: Connecting what we know with what we do. Exceptional Children, 69(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290306900301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzetto-More, N. A., Ukoha, O., & Rustagi, N. (2010). Unlocking the barriers to women and minorities in computer science and information systems studies: Results from a multi-methodological study conducted at two minority serving institutions. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 9(9), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.28945/1167
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, J. L., & Tomaszewski, L. (2007). Navigating the good old boys club: Women, marginality, and communities of practice in a military non-profit organization. Studies in Continuing Education, 29(3), 259–276 https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370701403324.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, A., & Gurm, B. (2016). Transformative communities of practice. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning eJournal, 9(1), 1–2. https://td.journals.psu.edu/td/article/view/1055/515
   Google Scholar
• Catolino, G., Palomba, F., Tamburri, D. A., Serebrenik, A., & Ferrucci, F. (2019, May). Gender diversity and women in software teams: How do they affect community smells? In 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS) (pp. 11–20). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ceglie, R. J. (2009). Science from the periphery: Identity, persistence, and participation by women of color pursuing science degrees [ Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut]. https://search.proquest.com/docview/304871058/abstract/1C372F15525472FPQ/1
   Google Scholar
• Census Bureau U.S. (2017) American factfinder—Results. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk
   Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kim, S. (2011). Classrooms matter: The design of virtual classrooms influences gender disparities in computer science classes. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1825–1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L. (2013). The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles, 69(1–2), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0296-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, research & practice, 15(3), 241.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., & Trayhurn, D. (2000). Gender and computing: Not the same old problem. British Educational Research Journal, 26(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/014119200109525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohoon, J. M. 2001. Toward improving female retention in the computer science major. Communications of the ACM, 44(5), 108–114. 374367. https://doi.org/10.1145/374308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohoon, J. M. (2002a). Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1145/543812.543829
   Google Scholar
• Cohoon, J. M. (2002b). Women in CS and biology. Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1145/563340.563370
   Google Scholar
• Cohoon, J. M. (2006). Just get over it or just get on with it? Retaining women in undergraduate computing. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohoon, J. M., & Aspray, W. (2006). A critical review of the research on women’s participation in postsecondary education. In J. M. Cohoon & W. Aspray (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation (pp. 137–180). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, C. S., & Stockton, C. M. (2018). The central role of theory in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1609406918797475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918797475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Computing Research Association. (2016 November 7). Generation CS: Report on CS enrollment. CRA. https://cra.org/data/generation-cs/
   Google Scholar
• Cottam, J. A., Menzel, S., & Greenblatt, J. (2011). Tutoring for retention. Proceeding of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953227
   Google Scholar
• Crow, D. (2014 February 7). Why every child should learn to code. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/07/year-of-code-dan-crowsongkick
   Google Scholar
• Cuny, J., & Aspray, W. (2002). Recruitment and retention of women graduate students in computer science and engineering: Results of a workshop organized by the computing research association. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin - Women and Computing, 34(2), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1145/543812.543852
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, D. C. E. (2013). From legitimate peripheral participation to full participation? Investigating the career paths of mature physiotherapy students in a context of changing NHS employment opportunities [ Doctoral dissertation, Manchester Metropolitan University]. https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/315694/
   Google Scholar
• Dee, H. M., Petrie, K. E., Boyle, R. D., & Pau, R. (2009). Why are we still here? Experiences of successful women in computing. Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1145/1562877.1562951
   Google Scholar
• Denner, J., Werner, L., O’Connor, L., & Glassman, J. (2014). Community college men and women: A test of three widely held beliefs about who pursues computer science. Community College Review, 42(4), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552114535624
   Google Scholar
• DuBow, W. (2013). Diversity in computing: Why it matters and how organizations can achieve it. Computer, 46(3), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2013.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBow, W., Kaminsky, A., & Weidler-Lewis, J. (2017). Multiple factors converge to influence women’s persistence in computing: A qualitative analysis. Computing in Science & Engineering, 19(3), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2017.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidelman, L., & Hazzan, O. (2005). Factors influencing the shrinking pipeline in high schools: A sector-based analysis of the Israeli high school system. Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 406–410. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1047478
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., and Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago. http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo12182616.html
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, A., Margolis, J., & Miller, F. (1997). Undergraduate women in computer science: Experience, motivation and culture. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 29(1), 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/268085.268127
   Google Scholar
• Fokum, D. T., Coore, D. N., & Lewis-Fokum, Y. E. (2016). The performance of female computer science students across three Caribbean Islands. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, 419–424. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844566
   Google Scholar
• Frieze, C., & Quesenberry, J. (2015). Kicking butt in computer science: Women in computing at Carnegie Mellon University. Dog Ear Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Frieze, C., Quesenberry, J. L., Kemp, E., & Velázquez, A. (2012). Diversity or difference? New research supports the case for a cultural perspective on women in computing. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(4), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9335-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galpin, V. (2002). Women in computing around the world. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/543812.543839
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Gokhale, A. A., & Stier, K. (2004). Closing the gender gap in technical disciplines: An investigative study. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 10(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v10.i2.30
   Google Scholar
• Guldberg, K., & Mackness, J. (2009). Foundations of communities of practice: Enablers and barriers to participation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 528–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00327.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürer, D., & Camp, T. (2002). An ACM-W literature review on women in computing. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1145/543812.543844
   Google Scholar
• Guzdial, M., & Tew, A. E. (2006). Imagineering inauthentic legitimate peripheral participation: An instructional design approach for motivating computing education. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Computing Education Research, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1151588.1151597
   Google Scholar
• Hemmasi, M., & Csanda, C. M. (2009). The effectiveness of communities of practice: An empirical study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(2), 262–279. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40604647
   Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C. (2012). What is a community of practice and how can we support it? In S. Land & D. Jonassen (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 286–302). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J., & Meyerhoff, M. (1999). The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society, 28(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740459900202X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. L., II., Drummond, D. L., & Camara, S. (2007). What is qualitative research? Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 8(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459430701617879
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor, A., & Gardner-McCune, C. (2018). Considerations for switching: Exploring factors behind CS students’ desire to leave a CS major. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 290–295. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197113
   Google Scholar
• Katz, S., Allbritton, D., Aronis, J., Wilson, C., & Soffa, M. L. (2006). Gender, achievement, and persistence in an undergraduate computer science program. SIGMIS Database, 37(4), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/1185335.1185344
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (2009). The practice of learning. In J. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists in their own words (pp. 200–208). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625510.002
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laxton, R., & Applebee, A. C. (2010). Developing communities of practice around eLearning and project management. Journal of Distance Education, 24(1), 123–142. https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/604
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, K. J., Sax, L. J., & Zimmerman, H. B. (2016). Women planning to major in computer science: Who are they and what makes them unique? Computer Science Education, 26(4), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2016.1271536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. J. (1997). Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition theory: Social, neurological and semiotic perspectives (pp. 37–56). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. M., Anderson, R. E., & Yasuhara, K. (2016 August). “I Don’t Code All Day” fitting in computer science when the stereotypes don’t fit. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference on international computing education research (pp. 23–32).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. L., Smith, W. J., Bélanger, F., & Harrington, K. V. (2008). Are technical and soft skills required? The use of structural equation modeling to examine factors leading to retention in the CS major. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Computing Education Research, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/1404520.1404530
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P. C., & Graham, I. D. (2009). Evolution of Wenger’s concept of community of practice. Implementation Science, 4(1), 1–8. https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu, M. L., & Blanc, L. (1996). On the retention of female computer science students. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/236452.236486
   Google Scholar
• Loos, S., Menzel, S., & Poparad, M. (2005). Three perspectives on peer tutoring for CS1. Proceedings of the Midwest Celebration of Women in Computing conference. http://www.cs.indiana.edu/cgi-pub/midwic/papers/uploads/loos.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Main, J. B., & Schimpf, C. (2017). The underrepresentation of women in computing fields: A synthesis of literature using a life course perspective. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(4), 296–304. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2017.2704060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., Fisher, A., & Miller, F. H. 2000. Anatomy of interest: Women in undergraduate computer science. Women Studies Quarterly, 28, Special Issue Women Science, 104–126. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40004448
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medel, P., & Pournaghshband, V. (2017). Eliminating gender bias in computer science education materials. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017794
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, E. M., Barron, B., & O’Connor, K. M. (2006). Images of self and others as computer users: The role of gender and experience. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00182.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. revised and expanded from “case study research in education”. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, H. E., Crenshaw, T. L., Chambers, E. W., & Heeren, C. (2018). Diversity across a decade: A case study on undergraduate computing culture at the University of Illinois. Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159497
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014). Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milesi, C., Perez-Felkner, L., Brown, K., & Schneider, B. (2017). Engagement, persistence, and gender in computer science: Results of a smartphone ESM study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 602. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miliszewska, I., Barker, G., Henderson, F., & Sztendur, E. (2006). The issue of gender equity in computer science – What students say. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.28945/237
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, C. A., & Hutinger, J. L. (2008). At the tipping point? Role of formal faculty mentoring in changing university research cultures. Journal of In-Service Education, 34(2), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580801951012
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine. (2017). Assessing and responding to the growth of computer science undergraduate enrollments. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24926
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2018). Higher education in science and engineering. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/higher-education-in-science-and-engineering/graduate-education-enrollment-and-degrees-in-the-united-states
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2019). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2019. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/digest/field-of-degree-women#computer-sciences
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K., & Veltri, N. F. (2011). Women in information technology careers: A person-process-context-time framework. In Proceedings of ECIS. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2011/53
   Google Scholar
• Nett, B. (2008). A community of practice among tutors enabling student participation in a seminar preparation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9031-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyquist, J. D., Manning, L., Wulff, D. H., Austin, A. E., Sprague, J., Fraser, P. K., Calcagno, C., & Woodford, B. (1999). On the road to becoming a professor: The graduate student experience. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 31(3), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389909602686
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406919899220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojokoh, B. A., Adeola, O. S., Isinkaye, F. O., & Abraham, C. (2014). Career choices in information and communication technology among South Western Nigerian women. Journal of Global Information Management, 22(2), 48–77. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2014040104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantic, K. (2020). Retention of Women in Computer Science: Why Women Persist in Their Computer Science Majors [ Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University]. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8935&context=etd
   Google Scholar
• Pantic, K., & Clarke-Midura, J. (2019). Factors that influence retention of women in the computer science major: A systematic literature review. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 25(2), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2019024384
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd) ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Probst, G., & Borzillo, S. (2008). Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal, 26(5), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Ragsdale, S. (2013). Pursuing and completing an undergraduate computing degree from a female perspective: A quantitative and qualitative approach. CEC Theses and Dissertations. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/gscis_etd/279
   Google Scholar
• Redmond, K., Evans, S., & Sahami, M. (2013). A large-scale quantitative study of women in computer science at Stanford University. Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 439–444. https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445326
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. R. H., McGill, T. J., & Hyland, P. N. (2012). Attrition from Australian ICT degrees: Why women leave. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference, 123, 15–24. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2483716.2483719
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174299.008
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosson, M. B., Carroll, J. M., & Sinha, H. (2011). Orientation of undergraduates toward careers in the computer and information sciences: Gender, self-efficacy and social support. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 11(3), 14:1–14:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037276.2037278
   Google Scholar
• Rubio, M. A., Romero-Zaliz, R., Mañoso, C., & De madrid, A. P. (2015). Closing the gender gap in an introductory programming course. Computers & Education, 82, 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Blaney, J., Lehman, K., Rodriguez, S., George, K., & Zavala, C. (2018). Sense of belonging in computing: The role of introductory courses for women and underrepresented minority students. Social Sciences, 7(8), 122.
   Google Scholar
• Schinzel, B. (1999). The contingent construction of the relationship between gender and computer science. 1999 International Symposium on Technology and Society - Women and Technology: Historical, Societal, and Professional Perspectives. Proceedings. Networking the World (Cat. No. 99CH37005), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.1999.787351
   Google Scholar
• Schnabel, R. B. (2013). Personal reflections on gender diversity in computing. Computer, 46(3), 62–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2013.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W., & Resnick, M. (1999). “Thick” authenticity: New media and authentic learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(2), 215–1995.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, K., Allen, K. R., Scheckler, R., & Darlington, L. (2007). Women in computer- related majors: A critical synthesis of research and theory from 1994 to 2005. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 500–533. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2009). Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger and communities of practice. Infed.Org. http://infed.org/mobi/jean-lave-etienne-wenger-and-communities-of-practice/
   Google Scholar
• Staehr, L., Martin, M., & Byrne, G. (2000). Improving the retention rates of women in computing: An intervention program. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 2(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.2190/0ND1-AU2E-QQL1-1V7F
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, C., Derbenwick Miller, A., Alvarado, C., Barker, L., Barr, V., Camp, T., Frieze, C., Lewis, C., Cannon Mindell, E., Limbird, L., Richardson, D., Sahami, M., Villa, E., Walker, H., & Zweben, S. (2018). Retention in computer science undergraduate programs in the U.S.: Data challenges and promising interventions. Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2005). Structural and epistemic parameters in communities of practice. Organization Science, 16(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauth, E. (2011). What can we learn from gender research? Seven lessons for business research methods. The Electronic Journal of Business Methods, 9(1), 1–9. http://www.ejbrm.com/volume9/issue1
   Google Scholar
• Urian, B. (2021 November 1). Utah computer science graduates aren’t fast enough for silicon slope demands | new funding expected as remedy. Tech Times. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/267367/20211101/utah-computer-science-graduates-arent-fast-enough-silicon-slope-demands.htm
   Google Scholar
• Varma, R. (2010). Computing self-efficacy among women in India. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v16.i3.40
   Google Scholar
• Varma, R., & Hahn, H. (2007). Gender differences in students’ experiences in computing education in the United States. International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(2), 361–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma, R., & Kapur, D. (2015). Decoding femininity in computer science in India. Communications of the ACM, 58(5), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2663339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilescu, B., Posnett, D., Ray, B., van den Brand, M. G., Serebrenik, A., Devanbu, P., & Filkov, V. (2015, April). Gender and tenure diversity in GitHub teams. Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3789–3798).
   Google Scholar
• Vee, A. (2013). Understanding computer programming as a literacy. Literacy in Composition Studies, 1(2), 42–64.
   Google Scholar
• Vilner, T., & Zur, E. (2006). Once she makes it, she is there: Gender differences in computer science study. Proceedings of the 11th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1145/1140124.1140185
   Google Scholar
• Vitores, A., & Gil-Juárez, A. (2016). The trouble with ‘women in computing’: A critical examination of the deployment of research on the gender gap in computer science. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(6), 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1087309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Hejazi Moghadam, S., & Tiffany-Morales, J. (2017 August). Social perceptions in computer science and implications for diverse students. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on international computing education research (pp. 47–55).
   Google Scholar
• Wasburn, M. H., & Miller, S. G. (2006). Still a chilly climate for women students in technology: A case study. In S. V. Rosser & M. F. Fox (Eds.), Women, gender, and technology (pp. 60–79). University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998a). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998b). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2009). A social theory of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists … in their own words (pp. 209–218). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 179–198). Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_11
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Seven principles for cultivating communities of practice. Harvard Business Press. https://www.clearwatervic.com.au/user-data/resource-files/7Principles_Community-of-Practice.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Introduction to communities of practice. http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. C. (2002). A study of factors promoting success in computer science including gender differences. Computer Science Education, 12(1–2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1076/csed.12.1.141.8211
   Google Scholar
• Wojnar, D. M., & Swanson, K. M. (2007). Phenomenology: An exploration. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 25(3), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010106295172F
   PubMedGoogle Scholar