Connecting beliefs, mindsets, anxiety and self-efficacy in computer science learning: an instrument for capturing secondary school students’ self-beliefs

References

• Apiola, M., & Sutinen, E. (2020, November). Mindset and study performance: New scales and research directions. In Proceedings of the 20th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (pp. 1–9).
   Google Scholar
• Astrachan, O., & Briggs, A. (2012, June). The CS principles project. ACM Inroads, 3(2), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/2189835.2189849
   Google Scholar
• Ball, T., Chatra, A., de Halleux, P., Hodges, S., Moskal, M., & Russell, J. (2019, October). Microsoft makecode: Embedded programming for education, in blocks and typescript. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on SPLASH-E, Athens, Greece (pp. 7–12).
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. WH Freeman, Times Books, Henry Holt & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Burnette, J. L., Hoyt, C. L., Russell, V. M., Lawson, B., Dweck, C. S., & Finkel, E. (2020). A growth mind-set intervention improves interest but not academic performance in the field of computer science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619841631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Craig, T., & Collier-Reed, B. (2020). A framework for using learning theories to inform ‘growth mindset’ activities. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1562118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspersen, M. E. (2022). Informatics as a Fundamental Discipline in General Education: The Danish Perspective. In H.Werthner, E.Prem, E. A. Lee, & C. Ghezzi (Eds.), Perspectives on Digital Humanism (pp. 191–200). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86144-5_26
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-F., Cannady, M. A., Schunn, C., & Dorph, R. (2017a). Measures Technical Brief: Competency Beliefs in STEM. Activation Lab. http://www.activationlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/CompetencyBeliefs_STEMReport_20170403.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. F., Cannady, M. A., Schunn, C., & Dorph, R. (2017b). Measures technical brief: Values in STEM. Activation Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-F., Cannady, M. A., Schunn, C., & Dorph, R. (2017c). Measures Technical Brief: Values in STEM. Activation Lab. http://www.activationlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Values_STEM-Report_20170403.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Decker, A., & McGill, M. M. (2019, February). A topical review of evaluation instruments for computing education. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Minneapolis, MN, USA (pp. 558–564).
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, B., & Elliott Tew, A. (2015). Empirical validation and application of the computing attitudes survey. Computer Science Education, 25(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1014142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorph, R., Bathgate, M. E., Schunn, C. D., & Cannady, M. A. (2018). When I grow up: The relationship of science learning activation to STEM career preferences. International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 1034–1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1360532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorph, R., Cannady, M. A., & Schunn, C. D. (2016). How science learning activation enables success for youth in science learning experiences. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 20(8), 49–85.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology press.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Cai, Y. (2009). Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: Reconsidering structural relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 499–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, D. A., Kafai, Y., Nakajima, T., Goode, J., & Margolis, J. (2018). Putting making into high school computer science classrooms: Promoting equity in teaching and learning with electronic textiles in exploring computer science. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2018.1436998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanigan, A. E., Peteranetz, M. S., Shell, D. F., & Soh, L. K. (2022). Shifting beliefs in computer science: Change in CS student mindsets. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 22(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3471574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flapan, J., Ryoo, J. J., & Hadad, R. (2020, March). Building systemic capacity to scale and sustain equity in computer science through multi-stakeholder professional development. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Portland, OR, USA (Vol. 1, pp. 1–8). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, J., Chapman, G., & Margolis, J. (2012). Beyond curriculum: The exploring computer science program. ACM Inroads, 3(2), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/2189835.2189851
   Google Scholar
• Goode, J., & Margolis, J. (2011). Exploring computer science: A case study of school reform. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993069.1993076
   Google Scholar
• Gorson, J., & O’Rourke, E. (2019, July). How do students talk about intelligence? An investigation of motivation, self-efficacy, and mindsets in computer science. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, Toronto, ON, Canada (pp. 21–29).
   Google Scholar
• Harel, I. E., & Papert, S. E. (1991). Constructionism. Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Harter, S. (1999). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2016). Connected gaming: What making video games can teach us about learning and literacy. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., Lui, D. A., Walker, J. T., Shaw, M. S., Jayathirtha, G., Nakajima, T. M. … Goode, J., Giang, M. T. (2019, February). Stitching the loop with electronic textiles: Promoting equity in high school students’ competencies and perceptions of computer science. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM technical symposium on computer science education, Minneapolis, MN, USA (pp. 1176–1182).
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., & Proctor, C. (2022). A revaluation of computational thinking in K–12 education: Moving toward computational literacies. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211057904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2017). The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kench, D., Hazelhurst, S., & Otulaja, F. (2016, July). Grit and growth mindset among high school students in a computer programming project: A mixed methods study. In Annual Conference of the Southern African Computer Lecturers’ Association (pp. 187–194). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnunen, P., & Simon, B. (2010, August). Experiencing programming assignments in CS1: The emotional toll. In Proceedings of the Sixth international workshop on Computing education research, Aarhus, Denmark. (pp. 77–86).
   Google Scholar
• Lishinski, A., & Yadav, A. (2019). Motivation, Attitudes, and Dispositions. In S. Fincher & A. Robins (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pp. 801-826). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108654555.029
   Google Scholar
• Loksa, D., Ko, A. J., Jernigan, W., Oleson, A., Mendez, C. J., & Burnett, M. M. (2016, May). Programming, problem solving, and self-awareness: Effects of explicit guidance. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, USA (pp. 1449–1461).
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, E. (2014, July). Promoting constructive mindsets for overcoming failure in computer science education. In Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research, Glasgow, United Kingdom (pp. 159–160).
   Google Scholar
• Malmi, L., Sheard, J., Kinnunen, P., & Sinclair, J. (2020, August). Theories and models of emotions, attitudes, and self-efficacy in the context of programming education. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM conference on international computing education research, Virtual Event, New Zealand (pp. 36–47).
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J. (2017). Stuck in the shallow end, updated edition: Education, race, and computing. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., Goode, J., & Flapan, J. (2017). A Critical Crossroads for Computer Science for All: “Identifying Talent” or “Building Talent,” and What Difference Does It Make? In Y. Rankin & J. Thomas (Eds.), Moving Students of Color from Consumers to Producers of Technology (pp. 1-23) IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2005-4.ch001
   Google Scholar
• Margulieux, L., Ketenci, T. A., & Decker, A. (2019). Review of measurements used in computing education research and suggestions for increasing standardization. Computer Science Education, 29(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1562145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGill, M. M., Decker, A., McKlin, T., & Haynie, K. (2019, February). A gap analysis of noncognitive constructs in evaluation instruments designed for computing education. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Minneapolis, MN, USA (pp. 706–712).
   Google Scholar
• Morales-Navarro, L., Fields, D. A., Giang, M., & Kafai, Y. B. (2023). Designing bugs or doing another project: Effects on secondary students’ self-beliefs in computer science. In P. Blikstein, A. Van Aalst, R. Kizito, & K. Brennan (Eds.). Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2023. Montréal, Canada: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Morales-Navarro, L., Fields, D. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2021). Growing Mindsets: Debugging by Design to Promote Students’ Growth Mindset Practices in Computer Science Class. In E. de Vries, Y. Hod, & J. Ahn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2021. (pp. 362–369). Bochum, Germany: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, L., & Thomas, L. (2008, June). Dangers of a fixed mindset: Implications of self-theories research for computer science education. In Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, Madrid, Spain (pp. 271–275).
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, K., & Bergin, S. (2016, November). The role of anxiety when learning to program: A systematic review of the literature. In Proceedings of the 16th koli calling international conference on computing education research, Koli, Finland (pp. 61–70).
   Google Scholar
• Oleson, A., Wortzman, B., & Ko, A. J. (2020). On the role of design in K-12 computing education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 21(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3427594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przybylla, M., & Romeike, R. (2014). Physical computing and its scope – Towards a constructionist computer science curriculum with physical computing. Informatics in Education, 13(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2014.14
   Google Scholar
• Quille, K., & Bergin, S. (2020, June). Promoting a growth mindset in CS1: Does one size fit all? A pilot study. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Trondheim, Norway (pp. 12–18).
   Google Scholar
• Rangel, J. G. C., King, M., & Muldner, K. (2020). An incremental mindset intervention increases effort during programming activities but not performance. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 20(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repenning, A., Webb, D. C., Koh, K. H., Nickerson, H., Miller, S. B., Brand, C., Her Many Horses, I. … Basawapatna, A., Gluck, F., Grover, R., Gutiérrez, K, Repenning, N. (2015). Scalable game design: A strategy to bring systemic computer science education to schools through game design and simulation creation. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 15(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A. … Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., Kafai, Y. B. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryoo, J. J. (2019). Pedagogy that supports computer science for all. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 19(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M. J., & Ghinea, G. (2013). On the domain-specificity of mindsets: The relationship between aptitude beliefs and programming practice. IEEE Transactions on Education, 57(3), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2013.2288700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M. J., & Ghinea, G. (2014, July). Measuring enrichment: The assembly and validation of an instrument to assess student self-beliefs in CS1. In Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research, Glasgow, Scotland, UK (pp. 123–130).
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. S., Fields, D. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2019). Connecting with computer science: Electronic textile portfolios as ideational identity resources for high school students. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 21(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v21i1.1740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. F., & Capuzzi, G. (2019). Using a mindset intervention to reduce anxiety in the statistics classroom. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(3), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719836641
   Google Scholar
• Steinhorst, P., Petersen, A., & Vahrenhold, J. (2020, August). Revisiting self-efficacy in introductory programming. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, Virtual Event, New Zealand (pp. 158–169).
   Google Scholar
• Stout, J. G., & Blaney, J. M. (2017). “But it doesn’t come naturally”: How effort expenditure shapes the benefit of growth mindset on women’s sense of intellectual belonging in computing. Computer Science Education, 27(3–4), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1437115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent‐ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2017). The increasingly important role of science competency beliefs for science learning in girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 790–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waite, J., & Sentance, S. (2021). Teaching programming in schools: A review of approaches and strategies. Raspberry Pi Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Washington, A. N., Grays, S., & Dasmohapatra, S. (2016, June). The computer science attitude and identity survey (CSAIS): A novel tool for measuring the impact of ethnic identity in underrepresented computer science students. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2019). Transitioning from introductory block-based and text-based environments to professional programming languages in high school computer science classrooms. Computers & Education, 142, 103646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, D. M. (2020). Using goal setting assignments to promote a growth mindset in IT students. Information Systems Education Journal, 18(4), 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self concept. In Volume 2: Theory and research on selected topics. University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar