GAINING ACCESS TO THE MEDIA: SOME ISSUES AND CASES

FOOTNOTES

• 1974 . An early version of this paper was presented at the Speech Communication Association of Pennsylvania convention, Pittsburg, October
   Google Scholar
• 1964 . New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Justice Brennan's often cited quote, 376 U.S. 254, 170
   Google Scholar
• 1971 . Business Executives' Move for Vietnam Peace v. F.C.C. 450 F.2d 642 (D.C. Cir
   Google Scholar
• 1970 . Chicago Joint Bd. v. Chicago Tribune Co. 435 F.2d 470 (7th cir
   Google Scholar
• 1972 . Cornell Law Review , 419 See generally Botein, “Access to Cable Television,”
   Google Scholar
• Barron , Jerome A. 1967 . “Access to the Press: A First Amendment Right,” 80 . Harvard Law Review , (June p. 1648; also see Douglas F. Duchek, comment, “Constitutional Law: The Right of Access to the Press,” 50 Nebraska Law Review 120 (1970); Robert L. Beals, Note, “Freedom of Expression in the Media: The Public's Claim for a Right of Access,” 33 Ohio State Law Journal 151 (1972)
   Google Scholar
• Becker , Samuel L. April 1974 . April , 10 “Mass Communication and the First Amendment: An American Dilemma,” Keynote address, ECA, p
   Google Scholar
• Barron , Jerome A. 1973 . Freedom of the Press for Whom? The Right of Access to the Mass Media 336 Bloomington , Indiana : Indiana University Press . (p
   Google Scholar
• Barron . 1644 “Access to the Press,” p
   Google Scholar
• Barron . Freedom of the Press for Whom? 12 p
   Google Scholar
• 1971 . “Newspaper Regulation and the Public Interest: The Unmasking of a Myth,” 32 ” . In University of Pittsburgh Law Review 605 D. Michael Stroud, p
   Google Scholar
• 1653 lbid., p
   Google Scholar
• Ibid. 1653 p
   Google Scholar
• Key , M. O. 1961 . Public Opinion and American Democracy 378 – 387 .
   Google Scholar
• Lange , David L. 1973 . “The Role of the Access Doctrine in the Regulation of the Mass Media: A Critical Review and Assessment,” . North Carolina Law Review , 52 (November, p. 7
   Google Scholar
• Lange, p. 3
   Google Scholar
• 1966 . Free Speech: Responsible Communication Under Law 67 New York : Bobbs-Merrill . Robert O'Neil,(p
   Google Scholar
• 1941 . Mayflower Broadcasting Co. v. F.C.C. , 340
   Google Scholar
• 75 O'Neil, p
   Google Scholar
• Barron . 1666 “Access to the Press,” p
   Google Scholar
• Barron . Freedom of the Press 327 p
   Google Scholar
• Ibid. 55 p
   Google Scholar
• Barron . 1678 “Access to the Press,” p
   Google Scholar
• 601 – 603 . Stroud
   Google Scholar
• 10 – 14 . Lange
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, p. 603
   Google Scholar
• Ibid. 39 p., 83
   Google Scholar
• Ibid. 85 p
   Google Scholar
• 605 – 606 . Stroud
   Google Scholar
• 10 – 14 . Lange
   Google Scholar
• Antieau , Chester J. 1969 . Modern Constitutional Law: The Individual and the Government 4 Rochester , New York : The Lawyers Co-operative publishing Co. . v. 1(p
   Google Scholar
• Knepprath , H. E. Nov. 1968 . “Free, Freer, Freest Speech,” . Today's Speech , 16 (4) p. 41
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen , Thomas R. 1960 . “Persuasion and Human Rights,” . In WSJ 204 24 Autumn p
   Google Scholar
• Barron . 1678 “Access to the Press,” p
   Google Scholar
• In re Kay 83 Cal. Rptr., 692; 148 (1970)
   Google Scholar
• 1965 . Cox v. Louisiana 379 U.S. 536 578
   Google Scholar
• 1974 . AP Wire Service, May 3, Phoenix, Arizona
   Google Scholar
• Redfield , Robert . 39 Feb. 1953 . “The Difficulty Duty of Speech,” . In OJS 8 p.; also see The Right Not to Listen, Virginia Commission on Constitutional. Government, Richmond, 1964
   Google Scholar
• 1890 . Harvard Law Review 192 – 220 . Special attention is paid to the issues of privacy in Louis D. Brandeis and Samuel D. Warren,”The Right of Privacy,” v. 4(5) pp.; William Zelermeyer, Invasion of Privacy, (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1956); and Don R. Pember, Privacy and the Press, (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1972)
   Google Scholar
• 1974 . “Book Reviews,” . Today's Speech , 22 Ruth McGaffey,(1) Winter
   Google Scholar
• Rice , George P. 57 Dec. 1961 . “The Right to Be Silent,” . In QJS 350 p
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee . Apr. 1967 . Free Speech in the United States, cited in Franklyn Haiman, “The Rhetoric of the Streets: Some Legal and Ethical Considerations,” . QJS , 52 (2) pp. 99–114
   Google Scholar
• Kamin , Alfred . 1966 . “Residential Picketing and the First Amendment,” . Northwestern University Law Review , 61 May-June p. 182
   Google Scholar
• Haiman . 101 “The Rhetoric of the Streets,” p
   Google Scholar
• 1972 . Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner 407 U.S. 551
   Google Scholar
• Kane , Peter J. 1974 . “Freedom of Expression in Shopping Centers . Today's Speech , 22 (3) Summer p. 48
   Google Scholar
• Benson , Thomas W. and Johnson , Bonnie . Sept. 1968 . 40 “The Rhetoric of Resistance: Confrontation with the Warmakers,” Today's Speech, 16(3) p
   Google Scholar
• Otto Windt , Theodore Jr. Feb. 1972 . “The Diatribe: Last Resort for Protest,” . QJS , 58 (1) pp. 1, 8
   Google Scholar
• Scott , Robert L. and Smith , Donald K. Feb. 1969 . “The Rhetoric of Confrontation,” . QJS , 55 AlSO see examples in (1) p. 7; James Andrews, “Confrontation at Columbia: A Case Study in Coercive Rhetoric,” QJS 55(1)Feb. 1969, p. 9
   Google Scholar
• Haiman , Franklyn S. 113 “The Rhetoric of the Streets,” p
   Google Scholar
• Bosmajian , Haig A. 1970 . “Speech and the First Amendment,” . Today's Speech , 18 (4) Fall pp. 3–11
   Google Scholar
• 1965 . Cox v. Louisiana , 379 U.S. 559 13 L Ed 2d 487, 85 S Ct 453; Evan A. Davis, “Symbolic Conduct,” Columbia Law Review 68(6), pp. 1094–1095; Stromberg v. California 283 U.S. 351 (1931); United States v. O'Brien 88 S Ct 1673 (1968)
   Google Scholar
• 1972 . Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner 407 U.S. 551
   Google Scholar
• 1966 . Burnside v. Byers 367 F.2d 744
   Google Scholar
• 1970 . Significant Decisions of the Supreme Court: 1969–70 Term 12 – 13 . Schacht v. The United States, 398 U.S. 58 cited in Paul C. Bartholomew, American Enterprise Institute, Special Analysis #23
   Google Scholar
• 1967 . “ Fed. Dist. Ct., cited in Peter Kane, “Freedom of Speech for Public School Students,” . In Speech Teacher 21 – 28 . Hodes v. Neimowitz, 20(1)Jan. 1971
   Google Scholar
• 1967 . People v. Street 20 N.Y., 2d 231 229 N.E. 2d 187, 282 NYS 2d 491
   Google Scholar
• Davis . 1103 – 1104 .
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter , Charles M. Jr. and McGaffey , Ruth . 1971 . “Freedom of Speech . CSSJ , 22 Called for previously by (1) Spr. pp. 5–10
   Google Scholar
• Davis . 1091 p
   Google Scholar
• “ Ibid. ” . In Ibid. 1112 p.
   Google Scholar
• “ Ibid. ” . In Ibid. 1116
   Google Scholar
• “ Ibid. ” . In Ibid. 1117
   Google Scholar
• “ Ibid. ” . In Ibid. 1117
   Google Scholar
• 1970 . Today's Speech , 18 These include: Haig A. Bosmajian, “Speech and the First Amendment,”(4) Fall pp. 9–10; Roger Baldwin, “Freedom of Speech: Issues and Cases,” QJS 52(2) Apr. 1966, pp. 186–190; Rossiter and McGaffey; and Chester J. Antieau, Modern Constitutional Law, v. 1 (Rochester, N.Y.: The Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Co., 1969), p. 6
   Google Scholar
• Political Freedom 25 See also Meiklejohn, p.; Claude L. Heathcock, The United States Constitution in Perspective, (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1968), p. 191; Baldwin, p. 186
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman , Jethro . 1967 . Understanding Our Constitution 124 New York : Walker and Co. . (p.
   Google Scholar
• 1949 . Kovac v. Cooper Justice Frankfurter disagrees with preferred position doctrine in 336 U.S. 77
   Google Scholar
• Schenk v. The United States, 249 U.S. 47, 52
   Google Scholar
• 1920 . Pierce v. The United States 252 U.S. 239
   Google Scholar
• 1942 . Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire 315 U.S. 568
   Google Scholar
• Ibid. 568 p
   Google Scholar
• Ibid. 568 p
   Google Scholar
• Saia v. New York 334 U.S. 558, 92 L Ed 1574, 68 S Ct 1148
   Google Scholar
• Davis . 1103 – 1104 .
   Google Scholar
• Dennis et al. v. The United States 341 U.S. 494
   Google Scholar
• 70 – 73 . O'Neil
   Google Scholar
• 1971 . U.S.L.W. Green v. FCC, 39 2741 (June 18
   Google Scholar
• 1973 . U.S.L.W. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National Committee, 41 1183 (May 29
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe , Louis L. 1972 . “The Editorial Responsibility of the Broadcaster: Reflections on Fairness and Access,” 85 . Harvard Law Review , 768 Glen O. Robinson, “The FCC and the First Amendment: Observations on 40 Years of Radio and Television Regulation,” 62 Minnesota Law Review 67 (1967); Clifton Daniel, “Light of Access to Mass Media—Government Obligations to Enforce First Amendment?” 48(4) Texas Law Review, 783–790
   Google Scholar
• 1942 . Valentine v. Christenson For rebuttals to this attack, see 316 U.S. 52; Breard v. Alexandra, 341 U.S. 662 (1951); Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Human Relations Commission, 41 U.S.L.W. 1198(June 21, 1973); Harry J. Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights, U.S.L.W. 42 (50), pp. 5116–5123.'
   Google Scholar
• 1933 . Shuck v. Carroll Daily Herald 215 Iowa 1276, 247 N.W. 813
   Google Scholar
• 1913 . Mack v. Costello 32 S.D. 511, 143 N.W. 950
   Google Scholar
• 1963 . Mid-West Electric Company Inc. v. West Texas Chamber of Commerce 369 S.W. 2d 842
   Google Scholar
• 1953 . Wall v. World Publishing Co. 2 263 P. d 1010 (Okla.; Lord v. Winchester Star, Inc., 346 Mass. 764, 190 N.E. 2d 875 (1963)
   Google Scholar
• 1974 . U.S.L.W. 5098 – 5105 . The Miami Herald Publishing Co., A Division of Knight Newspapers, Inc., 42 pp. (June 25
   Google Scholar
• Ibid. 5099 p
   Google Scholar
• 1974 . The New York Times 1 CXXIII, No. 42, 522 (June 26, pp., 18
   Google Scholar
• 1939 . Hague v. CIO U.S. 1234
   Google Scholar
• 1946 . Marsh v. Alabama 326 U.S. 501
   Google Scholar
• 1968 . Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza 391 U.S. 308
   Google Scholar
• 1972 . Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner, 407 U.S. 551
   Google Scholar
• Lange, p. 34
   Google Scholar
• 1972 . Central Hardware Co. v. NLRB 40 U.S.L.W. 4826 (June 33 L. Ed. 2d 122
   Google Scholar
• Lange, p. 14
   Google Scholar
• 1951 . Pennis v. United States 341 U.S. 494, 584
   Google Scholar