Classifying Movies Based on Audience Perceptions: MTI Framework and Box Office Performance

REFERENCES

• Altman, R. (1996). Cinema and genre. In G. Nowell-Smith (Ed.), The Oxford history of world cinema (pp. 257–277). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, B. A., & Gordon, T. F. (1987). Movie Genres: Toward A Conceptualized Model And Standardized Definitions. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics and the Law (vol. 3, pp. 12–33). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bagella, M., & Becchetti, L. (1999). The determinants of motion picture box office performance: Evidence from movies produced in Italy. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23, 237–256.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Basuroy, S., Chatterjee, S., & Ravid, S. A. (2003). How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets. Journal of Marketing, 67, 103–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, S. M., Kelley, J. M., & Jozefowicz, J. J. (2009). A blueprint for success in the US film industry. Applied Economics, 41, 589–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (2004). Strategic organizational diagnosis and design: The dynamics of fit (3rd ed). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Buscombe, E. (1970). The idea of genre in the American cinema. Screen, 11, 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2000). An introduction to genre theory. Retrieved from http://www.aber.ac.uk/∼mcswww/Documents/intgenre/chandler_genre_theory.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chang, B.-H., & Ki, E.-J. (2005). Devising a practical model for predicting theatrical movie success: Focusing on the experience good property. Journal of Media Economics, 18, 247–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Hand, C., & Snell, M. C. (2002). What makes a blockbuster? Economic analysis of film success in the United Kingdom. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23, 343–354.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva, I. (1998). Consumer selection of motion pictures. In B. R. Litman (Ed.), The motion picture mega-industry (pp. 144–171). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Desai, K. K., & Basuroy, S. (2005). Interactive influence of genre familiarity, star power, and critics' reviews in the cultural goods industry: The case of motion pictures. Psychology and Marketing, 22, 203–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, W. W. (2000). Film genre 2000: New critical essays. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19, 230–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberse, A., & Eliashberg, J. (2003). Demand and supply dynamics for sequentially released products in international markets: The case of motion pictures. Marketing Science, 22, 329–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliashberg, J., Elberse, A., & Leenders, M. A. A. M. (2006). The motion picture industry: Critical issues in practice, current research, and new research directions. Marketing Science, 25, 638–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliashberg, J., Jonker, J., Sawhney, M. S., & Wierenga, B. (2000). MOVIEMOD: An implementable decision-support system for prerelease market evaluation of motion pictures. Marketing Science, 19, 226–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliashberg, J., & Sawhney, M. S. (1994). Modeling goes to Hollywood: Predicting individual differences in movie enjoyment. Management Science, 40, 1151–1173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliashberg, J., & Shugan, S. M. (1997). Film critics: Influencers or predictors? Journal of Marketing, 61, 68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. The Academy of Management Journal, 54, 393–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, B. K. (1977). Film genre: Theory and criticism. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, R. (2005). Multibillion dollar baby. Businessweek. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_10/b3923110_mz020.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Handel, L. A. (1950). Hollywood looks at its audience. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau, T., Houston, M. B., & Sridhar, S. (2006). Can good marketing carry a bad product? Evidence from the motion picture industry. Marketing Letters, 17, 205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau, T., Houston, M. B., & Walsh, G. (2006). The differing roles of success drivers across sequential channels: An application to the motion picture industry. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 559–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau, T., Houston, M. B., & Walsh, G. (2007). Determinants of motion picture box office and profitability: An interrelationship approach. Review of Managerial Science, 1, 65–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. L., & Franke, G. R. (1986). Correspondence analysis: Graphical representation of categorical data in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, E. K. (2004). Classification and categorization: A difference that makes a difference. Library Trends, 52, 515–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B. (2002). Movie contents business. Seoul, Korea: MJ Media.
   Google Scholar
• Klastorin, T. D. (1983). Assessing cluster analysis results. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 92–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langford, B. (2005). Film genre: Hollywood and beyond. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F. (2006). Cultural discount and cross-culture predictability: Examining the box office performance of American movies in Hong Kong. Journal of Media Economics, 19, 259–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenders, M. A. A. M., & Eliashberg, J. (2011). The antecedents and consequences of restrictive age-based ratings in the global motion picture industry. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28, 367–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, B. R. (1983). Predicting success of theatrical movies: An empirical study. The Journal of Popular Culture, 16, 159–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, B. R., & Kohl, L. S. (1989). Predicting financial success of motion pictures: The '80s experience. Journal of Media Economics, 2, 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (2006). Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70, 74–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1996). Configurations revised. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 505–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, S., Bergey, P. K., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Dynamic effects among movie ratings, movie revenues, and viewer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 74, 108–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, I. B., & Briggs, K. C. (1943). Myers-Briggs indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psycholotiest.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, S. (2000). Genre and Hollywood. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neelamegham, R., & Chintagunta, P. (1999). A Bayesian model to forecast new product performance in domestic and international markets. Marketing Science, 18, 115–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olney, T. J., Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1991). Consumer responses to advertising: The effects of ad content, emotions, and attitude toward the ad on viewing time. The Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 440–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prag, J., & Casavant, J. (1994). An empirical study of the determinants of revenues and marketing expenditures in the motion picture industry. Journal of Cultural Economics, 18, 217–235.
   Google Scholar
• Sawhney, M. S., & Eliashberg, J. (1996). A parsimonious model for forecasting gross box-office revenues of motion pictures. Marketing Science, 15, 113–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sochay, S. (1994). Predicting the performance of motion pictures. Journal of Media Economics, 7(4), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Stam, R. (2000). Film theory: An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer, J. (2003). Movie blockbusters. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, E. S. (1996). Emotion and the structure of narrative film: Film as an emotion machine. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, N., Butler, M., & De'Armond, D. (2005). The determinants of domestic box office performance in the motion picture industry. Southwestern Economic Review, 32, 137–148.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, W. T., Seigerman, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (1993). The role of actors and actresses in the success of films: How much is a movie star worth? Journal of Cultural Economics, 17(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, G. (2004). Uncertainty and contractual hazard in the film industry: Managing adversarial collaboration with dominant suppliers. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9, 402–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, E. W., & Kim, T.-Y. (2003). The critical trade-off: identity assignment and box-office success in the feature film industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 27–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar