585
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

On-farm welfare assessment of dairy goat farms using animal-based indicators: the example of 30 commercial farms in Portugal

, , , &
Pages 43-55 | Received 28 Jul 2015, Accepted 27 Jun 2016, Published online: 26 Jul 2016

References

  • Ajuda, I., Vieira, A. & Stilwell, G. (2014). Are there differences in dairy goats’ claws’ temperature, before and after trimming? Paper presented at the IEEE international symposium on medical measurements and applications (MeMeA), June 11–12, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Alawa, J., Ngele, M. & Ogwu, D. (2000) Chronic caprine mastitis in Nigerian goat breeds: microbiological flora and histopathological findings. Small Ruminant Research, 35(3), 203–207. doi: 10.1016/S0921-4488(99)00099-1
  • Alban, L. (1995) Lameness in Danish dairy cows: frequency and possible risk factors. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 22(3), 213–225. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(94)00411-B
  • Anzuino, K., Bell, N. J., Bazeley, K. J. & Nicol, C. J. (2010) Assessment of welfare on 24 commercial UK dairy goat farms based on direct observations. Veterinary Record, 167(20), 774–780. doi: 10.1136/vr.c5892
  • AWIN. (2015) AWIN welfare assessment protocol for goats. Accessed 28 May 2015, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.13130/AWIN_goats_2015
  • Bartussek, H. (1999) A review of the animal needs index (ANI) for the assessment of animals’ well-being in the housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation. Livestock Production Science, 61(2–3), 179–192. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00067-6
  • Battini, M., Barbieri, S., Vieira, A. Stilwell, G. & Mattiello, S. (2016a) Results of testing the prototype of the AWIN welfare assessment protocol for dairy goats in 30 intensive farms in Northern Italy. Italian Journal of Animal Science. doi:10.1080/1828051X.2016.1150795
  • Battini, M., Peric, T., Ajuda, I., Vieira, A., Grosso, L., Barbieri, S. Stilwell, G., Prandi, A., Comin, A., Tubaro, F. & Mattiello, S. (2015a) Hair coat condition: A valid and reliable indicator for on-farm welfare assessment in adult dairy goats. Small Ruminant Research, 123(2–3), 197–203. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.12.009
  • Battini, M., Stilwell, G., Vieira, A., Barbieri, S., Canali, E. & Mattiello, S. (2015b) On-farm welfare assessment protocol for adult dairy goats in intensive production systems. Animals, 5, 934–950. doi:10.3390/ani5040393
  • Blokhuis, H., Miele, M., Veissier, I. & Jones, B. (eds.) (2013) Improving Farm Animal Welfare. Science and Society Working Together: The Welfare Quality Approach (Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publisher).
  • Botreau, R., Veissier, I., Butterworth, A., Bracke, M. & Keeling, L. (2007) Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 16, 225–228.
  • Bracke, M. B. M., Spruijt, B. M., Metz, J. H. M. & Schouten, W. G. P. (2002) Decision support system for overall welfare assessment in pregnant sows a: Model structure and weighting procedure. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 1819–1834.
  • Bruni, G. & Zanatta, G. (2009) Capre, c’è un foraggio per ogni fase produttiva. L’Informatore Agrario, 29(Suppl. A), 16–20.
  • Capdeville, J. & Veissier, I. (2001) A method of assessing welfare in loose housed dairy cows at farm level, focusing on animal observations. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science, 51(sup030), 62–68. doi: 10.1080/090647001316923081
  • Caroprese, M., Albenzio, M. & Sevi, A. (2015) The sustainability of sheep and goat production systems. In A. Vastola (ed.) The Sustainability of Agro-food and Natural Resource Systems in the Mediterranean Basin (Cham: Springer International Publishing AG), pp. 65–75.
  • Colditz, I. G., Ferguson, D. M., Collins, T., Matthews, L. & Hemsworth, P. H. (2014) A prototype tool to enable farmers to measure and improve the welfare performance of the farm animal enterprise: The unified field index. Animals, 4(3), 446–462. doi: 10.3390/ani4030446
  • De Rosa, G., Grasso, F., Pacelli, C., Napolitano, F. & Winckler, C. (2009) The welfare of dairy buffalo. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8(1), 103–116. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.103
  • Dubeuf, J. P. (2010) Characteristics and diversity of the dairy goat production systems and industry around the world. Tecnologia & Ciência Agropecuária, 4(4), 25–31.
  • Dubeuf, J. P., Morand-Fehr, P. & Rubino, R. (2004) Situation, changes and future of goat industry around the world. Small Ruminant Research, 51(2), 165–173. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.08.007
  • Dwyer, C. (2009) The behaviour of sheep and goats. In P. Jensen (ed.) The Ethology of Domestic Animals: An Introductory Text, Modular Texts. 2nd ed. (Wallingford: CABI Publishing), pp. 161–176.
  • Ekesbo, I. (ed.) (2011) Farm Animal Behaviour: Characteristics for Assessment of Health and Welfare (Oxfordshire: CABI Publishing).
  • Escareño, L., Salinas-Gonzalez, H., Wurzinger, M., Iñiguez, L., Sölkner, J. & Meza-Herrera, C. (2012) Dairy goat production systems. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 45(1), 17–34. doi: 10.1007/s11250-012-0246-6
  • European Commission. (2011) Evaluation of CAP measures for the sheep and goat sector. Tender No. AGRI 2010 EVAL 02.
  • European Food Safety Authority. (2012) Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. The EFSA Journal, 10(6), 2767 [29 pp.]. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2767
  • Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., Paik, M. C. (2003) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 3rd ed. (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons).
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division. (2015). FAOSTAT, Accessed 5 January 2015, available at: http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QA/E
  • Gibbons, J., Vasseur, E., Rushen, J. & de Passillé, A. (2012) A training programme to ensure high repeatability of injury scoring of dairy cows. Animal Welfare, 21(3), 379–388. doi: 10.7120/09627286.21.3.379
  • Grosso, L., Battini, M., Wemelsfelder, F., Barbieri, S., Minero, M., Dalla Costa, E., Mattiello, S. (2016) Qualitative behaviour assessment of dairy goats in different housing conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 180, 51–57. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2016.04.013
  • Jackson, K. M. & Hackett, D. (2007) A note: The effects of human handling on heart girth, behaviour and milk quality in dairy goats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 108, 332–336. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.01.011
  • Johnsen, P. F., Johannesson, T. & Sandøe, P. (2001) Assessment of farm animal welfare at herd level: Many goals, many methods. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science, 51(sup030), 26–33. doi: 10.1080/090647001316923027
  • Jones, T., Feber, R., Hemery, G., Cook, P., James, K., Lamberth, C. & Dawkins, M. (2006) Welfare and environmental benefits of integrating commercially viable free-range broiler chickens into newly planted woodland: A UK case study. Agricultural Systems, 94(2), 177–188. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2006.08.007
  • Katsoulos, P. D. & Christodoulopoulos, G. (2009) Prevalence of lameness and of associated claw disorders in Greek dairy cattle industry. Livestock Science, 122(2), 354–358. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.09.012
  • Krebs, S., Danuser, J. & Regula, G. (2001) Using a herd health monitoring system in the assessment of welfare. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science, 51(sup030), 78–81. doi: 10.1080/090647001316923117
  • Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310
  • Marchewka, J., Estevez, I., Vezzoli, G., Ferrante, V. & Makagon, M. M. (2015) The transect method: A novel approach to on-farm welfare assessment of commercial turkeys. Poultry Science, 94(1), 7–16. doi: 10.3382/ps/peu026
  • Martin, P. & Bateson, P. (2007) Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Martínez, A. M., Vega-Pla, J. L., León, J. M., Camacho, M. E., Delgado, J. V. & Ribeiro, M. N. (2010) Is the Murciano-Granadina a single goat breed? A molecular genetics approach. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 62(5), 1191–1198. doi: 10.1590/S0102-09352010000500023
  • Mattiello, S., Battini, M., Andreoli, E., Minero, M., Barbieri, S. & Canali, E. (2010) Avoidance distance test in goats: A comparison with its application in cows. Small Ruminant Research, 91(2–3), 215–218. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.03.002
  • Mattiello, S., Klotz, C., Baroli, D., Minero, M., Ferrante, V. & Canali, E. (2009) Welfare problems in alpine dairy cattle farms in Alto Adige (Eastern Italian Alps). Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8(Suppl. 2), 628–630.
  • Mattiello, S., Villa, S. & Cioccarelli, G. (2008) Il benessere negli allevamenti caprini del fondovalle valtellinese. Quaderno So Zoo Alp, 5, 179–188.
  • Miranda-de la Lama, G. C. & Mattiello, S. (2010) The importance of social behaviour for goat welfare in livestock farming. Small Ruminant Research, 90(1–3), 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.01.006
  • Morgan, F., Massouras, T., Barbosa, M., Roseiro, L., Ravasco, F., Kandarakis, I., Bonnin, V., Fistakoris, M., Anifantakis, E., Jaubert, G. & Raynal-Ljutovac, K. (2003) Characteristics of goat milk collected from small and medium enterprises in Greece, Portugal and France. Small Ruminant Research, 47(1), 39–49. doi: 10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00252-3
  • Mullan, S., Edwards, S. A., Butterworth, A., Whay, H. R., & Main, D. C. J. (2011) Inter-observer reliability testing of pig welfare outcome measures proposed for inclusion within farm assurance schemes. The Veterinary Journal, 190(2), e100–e109. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.01.012
  • Muri, K., Leine, N. & Valle, P. S. (2016) Welfare effects of a disease eradication programme for dairy goats. Animal, 10(2), 333–341. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115000762
  • Muri, K., Stubsjøen, S. M. & Valle, P. S. (2013) Development and testing of an on-farm welfare assessment protocol for dairy goats. Animal Welfare, 22(3), 385–400. doi: 10.7120/09627286.22.3.385
  • Napolitano, F., De Rosa, G., Serrapica, M. & Braghieri, A. (2015) A continuous recording approach to qualitative behaviour assessment in dairy buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 166, 35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.017
  • Paterna, A., Contreras, A., Gómez-Martín, A., Amores, J., Tatay-Dualde, J., Prats-van der Ham, M. & De la Fe, C., Corrales, J. C. & Sánchez, A. (2014) The diagnosis of mastitis and contagious agalactia in dairy goats. Small Ruminant Research, 121(1), 36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.12.002
  • Plesch, G., Broerkens, N., Laister, S., Winckler, C. & Knierim, U. (2010) Reliability and feasibility of selected measures concerning resting behaviour for the on-farm welfare assessment in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 126(1–2), 19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.05.003
  • Sahlu, T. & Goetsch, A. L. (2005) A foresight on goat research. Small Ruminant Research, 60(1–2), 7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.002
  • Sans, E., Federici, J., Dahlke, F. & Molento, C. (2014) Evaluation of free-range broilers using the Welfare Quality® protocol. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 16(3), 297–306. doi: 10.1590/1516-635x1603297-306
  • Scott, E. M., Nolan, A. M. & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (2001) Conceptual and methodological issues related to welfare assessment: A framework for measurement. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science, 51(sup030), 5–10. doi: 10.1080/090647001316922983
  • Shrout, P. E. (1998) Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 7(3), 301–317. doi: 10.1191/096228098672090967
  • Sinn, R. & Rudenberg, P. (2008) Raising Goats for Milk and Meat (Arkansas: Heifer International).
  • Smith, M. C. & Sherman, D. M. (2009) Goat Medicine (Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell).
  • Stafford, K. & Gregory, N. (2008) Implications of intensification of pastoral animal production on animal welfare. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 56(6), 274–280. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2008.36847
  • Stookey, J. M. (1994) Is intensive dairy production compatible with animal welfare? Proceedings of the western dairy Canadian dairy seminar. Advances in Dairy Technology, 6, 209–219.
  • Temple, D., Manteca, X., Dalmau, A. & Velarde, A. (2013) Assessment of test–retest reliability of animal-based measures on growing pig farms. Livestock Science, 151(1), 35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.10.012
  • Vieira, A., Brandão, S., Monteiro, A. Ajuda, I. & Stilwell, G. (2015) Development and validation of a visual body condition scoring system for dairy goats with picture-based training. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(9), 6597–6608. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9428
  • Waiblinger, S., Knierim, U. & Winckler, C. (2001) The development of an epidemiologically based on-farm welfare assessment system for use with dairy cows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science, 51(sup030), 73–77. doi: 10.1080/090647001316923108
  • Webster, A. J. F. (2009) The virtuous bicycle: A delivery vehicle for improved farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 18, 141–147.
  • Welfare Quality®. (2009) Welfare Quality® Assessment Protocol for Cattle (Lelystad: Welfare Quality® Consortium).
  • Wemelsfelder, F. & Lawrence, A. B. (2001) Qualitative assessment of animal behaviour as an on-farm welfare-monitoring tool. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science, 51(sup030), 21–25. doi: 10.1080/090647001300004763
  • Whay, H. R. (2007) The journey to animal welfare improvement. Animal Welfare, 16(2), 117–122.
  • Willeberg, P. (1991). Animal welfare studies: Epidemiological considerations. Paper presented at proceedings of the Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, April 17–19, London.
  • Winckler, C., Capdeville, J., Gebresenbet, G.; Hörning, B.; Roiha, U., Tosi, M. & Waiblinger, S. (2003) Selection of parameters for on-farm welfare-assessment protocols in cattle and buffalo. Animal Welfare, 12(4), 619–624.
  • Winckler, C. & Willen, S. (2001) The reliability and repeatability of a lameness scoring system for use as an indicator of welfare in dairy cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science, 51, 103–110. doi: 10.1080/090647001316923162
  • Woodward, M. (2013) Epidemiology: Study Design and Data Analysis 3rd ed. (Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.