Prediction of nutritive values, morphology and agronomic characteristics in forage maize using two applications of NIRS spectrometry

References

• AOAC. 1983. Official methods of analysis of AOAC. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe KR, Pell R, Seasholtz MB. 1998. Chemometrics: a practical guide. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Budakli Çarpici E, Çelik N, Bayram G. 2010. Yield and quality of forage maize as influenced by plant density and nitrogen rate. Tur J Field Crops. 15:128–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger J, Geladi P. 2007. Spectral pre-treatments of hyperspectral near infrared images: analysis of diffuse reflectance scattering. J Near Infrared Spectros. 15:29–38. doi: 10.1255/jnirs.717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campo L, Monteagudo AB, Salleres B, Castro P, Moreno-Gonzalez J. 2013. NIRS determination of non-structural carbohydrates, water soluble carbohydrates and other nutritive quality traits in whole plant maize with wide range variability. Span J Agricult Res. 11:463–471. doi: 10.5424/sjar/2013112-3316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai WH, Udén P. 1998. An alternative oven method combined with different detergent strengths in the analysis of neutral detergent fibre. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 74:281–288. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00187-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox WJ, Cherney DJR. 2001a. Influence of brown midrib, leafy and transgenic hybrids on corn forage production. Agron J. 93:790–796. doi: 10.2134/agronj2001.934790x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox WJ, Cherney DJR. 2001b. Yield and quality of forage maize as influenced by plant density and nitrogen rate effects on corn silage. Agron J. 93:597–602. doi: 10.2134/agronj2001.933597x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzolino D, Fassio A, Fernandez E, Restaino E, La Manna A. 2006. Measurement of chemical composition in wet whole maize silage by visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 129:329–336. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boever JL, Cottyn BG, De Brabander DL, Vanacker JM, Boucqué C. 1997. Prediction of the feeding value of maize silages by chemical parameters, in vitro digestibility and NIRS. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 66:211–222. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(96)01101-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairey NA. 1983. Yield, quality and development of forage maize as influenced by dates of planting and harvesting. Can J Plant Sci. 63:157–168. doi: 10.4141/cjps83-015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorani F, Schurr U. 2013. Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 64:267–91. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grahn H, Geladi P, editors. 2007. Techniques and applications of hyperspectral image analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hagman J, Halling MA, Dryler K. 2016. Stråsäd, trindsäd, oljeväxter och potatis (Cereals, pulses, oilseeds and potaoes). Sortval 2016 (Vaiety selection 2016). Institutionen för växtproduktionsekologi (Department of Crop Production Ecology), Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet (Swedish University of Agriculture), Uppsala in Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Hetta M, Mussadiq Z, Gustavsson A-M, Swensson C. 2012. Effects of hybrid and maturity on performance and nutritive characteristics of forage maize at high latitudes, estimated using the gas production technique. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 171:20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizsan SJ, Mussadiq Z, Hetta M, Ramin M, Nyholm L, Huhtanen P. 2014. Predicting feeding value of forage maize hybrids harvested at different maturities and sites. J Anim Feed Sci. 23:269–278. doi: 10.22358/jafs/65690/2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson K, Bengtsson S. 1983. Bestämning av lätttillgängliga kolhydrater i växtmaterial. Metodbeskrivning, Vol.22. Statens Lantbrukskemiska Laboratorium, Uppsala. (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren E. 1979. The nutritional value of roughages determined in vitro and by laboratory methods. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition, Report No. 45. Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Hana L. 2006. Prediction of chemical parameters in maize silage by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. J Near Infrar Spectros. 14:333–339. doi: 10.1255/jnirs.685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussadiq Z, Gustavsson A-M, Geladi P, Swensson C, Hetta M. 2013. Multivariate models of the predicted milk yield and forage quality in maize depending on growing site, plant maturity, proportion and nutritional quality of morphological fractions. Acta Agricult Scand A Anim Sci. 20:407–413.
   Google Scholar
• Mussadiq Z, Hetta M, Swensson C, Gustavsson A-M. 2012. Plant development, agronomic performance and nutritive value of forage maize depending on hybrid and marginal site conditions at high latitudes. Acta Agricult Scand, B Plant Sci. 62:420–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næs T, Isaksson T, Fearn T, Davies, T. 2002. A user friendly guide to multivariate calibration and classification. Chichester: NIR Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nkurunziza L, Kornher A, Hetta M, Halling M, Weih M, Eckersten H. 2014. Crop genotype-environment modelling to evaluate forage maize cultivars under climate variability. Acta Agricult Scand B-Soil Plant Sci. 64:56–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, DL. 1983. Genetics and breeding of maize with extra leaves above the ear. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference; 1983 Dec. 7–8; Washington, DC: American Seed Trade Association.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Volkers KC, Wachendorf M, Loges R, Jovanovic NJ, Taube F. 2003. Prediction of the quality of forage maize by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Animal Feed Sci Technol. 109:183–194. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00173-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams PC. 1987. Implementation of near-infrared technology. In: Williams P, Norris K, editors. Near-infrared technology. In the agricultural and food industries. 2nd ed. St. Paul (MN): American Association of Cereal Chemists; p. 145–169.
   Google Scholar
• Zscheischler J, Estler MC, Staudacherm W, Gross F, Burgstaller G, Streyl H, Rechmann T. 1990. Maize handbook: environmentally-friendly cultivation, cost-effective utilization. Frankfurt Main: DLG-Verlag; p. 320.
   Google Scholar