Relationship between spring triticale physiological traits and productivity changes as affected by different N rates

References

• Cai J, Jiang D, Liu F, Dai T, Cao W. 2011. Effects of split nitrogen fertilization on post-anthesis photoassimilates. Nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield in malting Barley. Acta Agric Scand B. 61:410–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammarano D, Fitzgerald G, Basso B, Chen D, Grace P, O’Leary G. 2011. Remote estimation of chlorophyll on two wheat cultivars in two rainfed environments. Crop Pasture Sci. 62:269–275. doi: 10.1071/CP10100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casa R, Varella H, Buis S, Guerif M, De Solan B, Baret F. 2012. Forcing a wheat crop model with LAI data to access agronomic variables: evaluation of the impact of model and LAI uncertainties and comparison with an empirical approach. Eur J Agron. 37:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2011.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eudes F, editor. 2015. Triticale. Lethbridge: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. 2012. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; [cited 2016 Aug 4]. Available from: http://faostat3.fao.org/home/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez A, Bermejo V, Gimeno BS. 2010. Effect of different physiological traits on grain yield in barley grown under irrigated and terminal water deficit conditions. J Agr Sci. 148:319–328. doi: 10.1017/S0021859610000031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janušauskaitė D. 2009. The effect of fertilization intensity on spring triticale productivity and chlorophyll index in foliage. Zemdirbyste–Agriculture. 96:110–123. (In Lithuanian, with English summary).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janušauskaitė D. 2014. Analysis of grain yield and its components in spring triticale under different N fertilization regimes. Zemdirbyste–Agriculture. 101:381–388. doi: 10.13080/z-a.2014.101.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janušauskaite D, Auškalniene O. 2014. Photosynthetic traits of spring barley throughout development stages under field conditions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 45:284–296. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2013.861910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaji HM, Dąbrowski P, Cetner MD, Samborska IA, Łukasik I, Brestic M, Zivcak M. 2016. A comparison between different chlorophyll content meters under nutrients deficiency conditions. J Plant Nutr. 16. doi:10.1080/01904167.2016.1263323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendal E. 2015. Relationship between chlorophyll and other features in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) using SPAD and biplot analyses. J Agric Sci Tech. 17:1873–1886.
   Google Scholar
• Kozak M, Kang MS, Stępień M. 2007. Causal pathways when independent variables are co-related: new interpretational possibilities. Plant Soil Environ. 53:267–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulig B, Lepiarczyk A, Oleksy A, Kołodziejczyk M. 2010. The effect of tillage system and forecrop on the yield and values of LAI and SPAD indices of spring wheat. Eur J Agron. 33:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2010.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepiarczyk A, Kulig B, Stepnik K. 2005. The influence of simplified soil cultivation and forecrop on the development LAI of selected cultivars of winter wheat in cereal crop rotation. Fragmenta Agronomica. 2:98–105. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Lestingi A, Bovera F, De Giorgio D, Ventrella D, Tateo A. 2010. Effects of tillage and nitrogen fertilisation on triticale grain yield, chemical composition and nutritive value. J Sci Food Agr. 90:2440–2446. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Liu L, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhang J. 2012. Agronomic and physiological performance of high-yielding wheat and rice in the lower reaches of Yangtze River of China. Field Crops Res. 133:119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie RH, Bremer E, Middleton AB, Beres B, Yoder C, Hietamaa C, Pfiffner P, Kereliuk G, Pauly D, Henriquez B. 2014. Agronomic practices for bioethanol production from spring triticale in Alberta. Can J Plant Sci. 94:15–22. doi: 10.4141/cjps2013-112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger MJ, Shkaruba AD, Jongman RHG, Bunce RGH. 2012. Descriptions of the European environmental zones and strata. Wageningen: Alterra.
   Google Scholar
• Meier U, editor. 2001. Growth stages of mono-and dicotyledonous plants – BBCH monograph. Available from: http://pub.jki.bund.de/index.php/BBCH/issue/view/161.
   Google Scholar
• Nakano H, Morita S, Kusuda O, Sasaki Y. 2010. Leaf blade dry weight and leaf area index × SPAD value at anthesis can be used to estimate nitrogen application rate at anthesis required to obtain target protein content of grain in bread wheat. Plant Prod Sci. 13:297–306. doi: 10.1626/pps.13.297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peymaninia Y, Valizadeh M, Shahryari R, Ahmadizadeh M, Habibpour M. 2012. Relationship among morpho-physiological traits in bread wheat against drought stress at presence of a leonardite derived humic fertilizer under greenhouse condition. Int Res J Appl Basic Sci. 3:822–830.
   Google Scholar
• Poblaciones MJ, Lopez-Bellido L, Lopez-Bellido RJ. 2009. Field estimation of technological bread-making quality in wheat. Field Crops Res. 112:253–259. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rharrabti Y, Villegas D, Garcia del Moral LF, Aparicio N, Elhani S, Royo C. 2001. Environmental and genetic determination of protein content and grain yield in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Plant Breed. 120:381–388. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2001.00628.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronga D, Lovelli S, Zaccardelli M, Perrone D, Ulrici A, Francia E, Milc J, Pecchioni N. 2015. Physiological responses of processing tomato in organic and conventional Mediterranean cropping systems. Sci Hortic. 190:161–172. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roques SE, Kindred DR, Clarke S. 2016. Triticale out-performs wheat on range of UK soils with a similar nitrogen requirement. J Agr Sci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859616000356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleem MF, Ma BL, Voldeng H, Wang TC. 2010. Nitrogen nutrition on leaf chlorophyll, canopy reflectance, grain protein and grain yield of wheat varieties with contrasting grain protein concentration. J Plant Nutr. 33:1681–1695. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2010.496891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. 1989. Statistical methods. 9th ed. Ames (IA): Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang G, Bronson KF, Thorp KR, Mon J, Badaruddin M. 2014. Multiple leaf measurements improve effectiveness of chlorophyll meter for durum wheat nitrogen management. Crop Sci. 54:817–826. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildırım M, Kılıç H, Kendal E, Karahan T. 2010. Applicability of chlorophyll meter readings as yield predictor in durum wheat. J Plant Nutr. 34:151–164. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2011.533319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao D, Yang T, An S. 2012. Effects of crop residue cover resulting from tillage practices on LAI estimation of wheat canopies using remote sensing. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform. 14:169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2011.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar