Characterisation of sweet stem sorghum genotypes for bio-ethanol production

References

• Akhtar MS, Oki Y, Adachi T, Khan MHR. 2007. Analyses of the genetic parameters (variability, heritability, genetic advance, relationship of yield and yield contributing characters) for some plant traits among brassica cultivars under phosphorus starved environmental cues. J Fac Environ Sci Tech. 12:91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Ali MA, Abbas A, Awan SI, Jabran K, Gardezi SDA. 2011. Correlated response of various morpho-physiological characters with grain yield in sorghum landraces at different growth phases. J Anim Plant Sci. 21:671–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali MA, Jabran K, Awan SI, Abbas A, Zulkiffal M, Acet T, Farooq J, Rehman A. 2011. Morpho-physiological diversity and its implications for improving drought tolerance in grain sorghum at different growth stages. Aust J Crop Sci. 5:311–320.
   Google Scholar
• Anami SE, Zhang LM, Xia Y, Zhang YM, Liu ZQ, Jing HC. 2015a. Sweet sorghum ideotypes: genetic improvement of the biofuel syndrome. Food Energy Secur. 4:159–177. doi: 10.1002/fes3.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anami SE, Zhang LM, Xia Y, Zhang YM, Liu ZQ, Jing HC. 2015b. Sweet sorghum ideotypes: genetic improvement of stress tolerance. Food Energy Secur. 4:3–24. doi: 10.1002/fes3.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangarwa KS, Grewal RP, Lodhi GP, Thakral NK. 1989. Association analysis for some quantitative traits in forage sorghum. Indian J Hered. 21:25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Burton GW. 1952. Quantitative inheritance in grasses 1952. Proceedings of the 6th Grassland conference; August 17–23; Pennsylvania State College p. 227–283.
   Google Scholar
• Calvino M, Messing J. 2012. Sweet sorghum as a model system for bioenergy crops. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 23:323–329. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran WG, Cox M. 1957. Experimental designs. New York (NY): John Wiley and Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer CS, Wehner TC. 2000. Path analysis of the correlation between fruit number and plant traits of cucumber populations. HortScience. 35:708–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey DR, Lu KH. 1959. A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agron J. 51:515–518. doi: 10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100090002x
   Google Scholar
• Eggleston G, Cole M, Andrzejewski B. 2013. New commercially viable processing technologies for the production of sugar feedstocks from sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) for manufacture of biofuels and bioproducts. Sugar Tech. 15:232–249. doi: 10.1007/s12355-013-0229-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elangovan M, Kiran-babu P, Seetharama N, Patil JV. 2014. Genetic diversity and heritability characters associated in sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Sugar Tech. 16:200–210. doi: 10.1007/s12355-013-0262-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Naim AM, Ibrahim IM, Abdel Rahman ME, Ibrahim EA. 2012. Evaluation of some local sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor L. Moench) genotypes in rain-fed. Int J Plant Res. 2:15–20. doi: 10.5923/j.plant.20120201.03
   Google Scholar
• Ezeaku IE, Mohammed SG. 2006. Character association and path analysis in grain sorghum. Afr J Biotechnol. 5:1337–1340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh S, Fazlullah AK, Suresh M, Senthil N. 1995. Character associated for ethanol yield in sweet sorghum. Madras Agric Cult J. 82:361–363.
   Google Scholar
• Godbharle AR, More AW, Ambekar SS. 2010. Genetic variability and correlation studies in elite ‘B’ and ‘R’ lines in kharif sorghum. Electron J Plant Breed. 1:989–993.
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraj M, Selvi B, Rajarathinam S, Sumathi P. 2011. Genetic variability and heritability of grain yield components and grain mineral concentration in India’s pearl millet (Pennisetum Glaucum (L) R. Br.) accessions. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev. 11:4758–4772.
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraj M, Shanmugasundaram P, Muthiah AR. 2010. Estimates of genetic parameters for yield and yield attributes in elite lines and popular cultivars of India’s pearl millet. Afr J Agric Res. 5:3060–3064.
   Google Scholar
• Hallauer A, Miranda J. 1981. Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa City (IA): Press, Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Hlophe HB. 2014. Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) response to supplemental irrigation in different growth stages [master’s thesis]. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Insan RR, Wirnas D, Trikoesoemaningtyas. 2016. Estimation of genetic parameters and selection of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) RILS F5 derived from single seed descent. Int J Agron Agric Res. 8:95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. 1955. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agron J. 47:314–318. doi: 10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x
   Google Scholar
• Kassahun A, Habtamu Z, Geremew B. 2015. Variability for yield, yield related traits and association among traits of sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor (L.) Moench) varieties in Wollo, Ethiopia. J Plant Breed Crop Sci. 7:125–133.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar CVS, Umakanth AV, Kotastane TV, Sreelakshmi CH. 2012. Character association and path analysis for qualitative traits in sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). J Res. 40:90–93.
   Google Scholar
• Lekgari A, Dweikat I. 2014. Assessment of genetic variability of 142 sweet sorghum germplasm of diverse origin with molecular and morphological markers. Open J Ecol. 4:371–393. doi: 10.4236/oje.2014.47034
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi GMR, Nunes JAR, Parrella RAC, Teixeira DHL, Bruzi AT, Durães NNL, Fagundes TG. 2015. Path analysis of agro-industrial traits in sweet sorghum. Genet Mol Res. 14:16392–16402. doi: 10.4238/2015.December.9.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makanda I. 2009. Combining ability and heterosis for stem sugar traits and grain yield components in dual-purpose sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) germplasm [PhD thesis]. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal.
   Google Scholar
• Mangena P. 2014. Breeding gains, cytoplasmic effects and path coefficient analysis in pro-vitamin A maize hybrids [master’s thesis]. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur S, Umakanth AV, Tonapi VA, Sharma R, Sharma MK. 2017. Sweet sorghum as biofuel feedstock: recent advances and available resources. Biotechnol Biofuels. 10:146–165. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0834-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey K, Thoma D. 2017. Life cycle assessment of sweet sorghum as feedstock for second-generation biofuel production [honors thesis]. Fayetteville (AR): University of Arkansas.
   Google Scholar
• Mujaju C, Chakauya E. 2008. Morphological variation of sorghum landrace accessions on-farm in semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe. Int J Botany. 4:376–382. doi: 10.3923/ijb.2008.376.382
   Google Scholar
• Mullet J, Morishige D, McCormick R, Truong S, Hilley J, McKinley B, Anderson R, Olson SN, Rooney W. 2014. Energy sorghum—a genetic model for the design of C4 grass bioenergy crops. J Exp Bot. 65:3479–3489. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwadzingeni L, Shimelis H, Tesfay S, Tsilo TJ. 2016. Screening of bread wheat genotypes for drought tolerance using phenotypic and proline analyses. Front Plant Sci. 7:1276. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naphade DS. 1972. Correlation and path analysis for some characters contributing to fodder yield in sorghum. Indian J Agric Sci. 42:790–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. 1964. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
   Google Scholar
• Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. 1989. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
   Google Scholar
• Payne RW, Murray DA, Harding SA, Baird DB, Soutar DM. 2011. An introduction to GenStat for Windows. 14th ed. Hemel Hempstead: VSN International.
   Google Scholar
• Potdukhe NR, Shekar VB, Thote SG, Wanjari SS, Ingle RW. 1994. Estimates of genetic divergence, correlation coefficient and path analysis in grain yield in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Crop Res. 7:402–406.
   Google Scholar
• Prakasham RS, Nagaiah D, Vinutha KS, Uma A, Chiranjeevi T, Umakanth AV, Srinivasa Rao P, Yan N. 2014. Sorghum biomass: a novel renewable carbon source for industrial bio-products. Biofuels. 5:159–174. doi: 10.4155/bfs.13.74
   Google Scholar
• Prasad S, Kumar A, Muralikrishna KS. 2013. Assessment of ethanol yield associated characters in sweet sorghum. Maydica. 58:299–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnavathi C, Chakravarthy S, Komala V, Chavan U, Patil J. 2011. Sweet sorghum as feedstock for biofuel production: a review. Sugar Tech. 13:399–407. doi: 10.1007/s12355-011-0112-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy DCS, Audilakshmi S, Seetharama N. 2009. Genetic variability and divergence for DUS testing traits in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Indian J Agric Sci. 79:286–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regassa TH, Wortmann CS. 2014. Sweet sorghum as a bioenergy crop: literature review. Biomass Bioenergy. 64:348–355. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson H, Comstock RE, Harvey P. 1949. Estimates of heritability and the degree of dominance in corn. Agron J. 41:353–359. doi: 10.2134/agronj1949.00021962004100080005x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sami RA, Yeye MY, Usman IS, Hassan LB, Usman M. 2013. Studies on genetic variability in some sweet sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor L. Moench) genotypes. Acad Res J. 1:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Shukla S, Bhargava A, Chatterjee A, Sirivastava J, Singh N, Singh NP. 2006. Mineral profile and variability in vegetable amaranth (Amaranthus tricolor). Foods Hum Nutr. 61:23–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RK, Chaudhary BD. 1979. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha S, Kumaravadivel N. 2016. Understanding genetic diversity of sorghum using quantitative traits. Scientifica. 2016:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2016/3075023
   Google Scholar
• Tesfamichael A, Githiri SM, Kasili R, Araia W, Nyende AB. 2015. Genetic variation among sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) landraces from Eritrea under post-flowering drought stress conditions. Am J Plant Sci. 6:1410–1424. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2015.69141
   Google Scholar
• Tesfaye WM, Adugna W, Tsige G. 2014. Correlation and path coefficient analysis among yield component traits of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica Carinata a. Brun) at Adet, Northwestern, Ethiopia. J Plant Sci. 2:89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderlip RL, Reeves HE. 1972. Growth stages of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor, (L.) Moench.]1. Agron J. 64:13–16. doi: 10.2134/agronj1972.00021962006400010005x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermerris W. 2011. Survey of genomics approaches to improve bioenergy traits in maize, sorghum and sugarcane free access. J Integr Plant Biol. 53:105–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.01020.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright S. 1921. Systems of mating. Genetics. 6:111–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yaqoob M, Hussain N, Rashid A. 2015. Genetic variability and heritability analysis for yield and morphological traits in sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor L. Moench) genotypes. J Agric Res. 53:331–343.
   Google Scholar