Repellency of insecticides and the effect of thiacloprid on bumble bee colony development in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) seed crops

References

• Aamlid TS. 2018. Frøavl av rødkløver. Dyrkingsveiledning Mai 2018. [Seed production of red clover. Grower manual May 2018]. Http://froavl.no. Norwegian.
   Google Scholar
• Aamlid TS, Andersen A, Lindemark PO, Øverland JI, Breivik L, Kise S, Jørgensen S, Susort Å, Steensohn AA. 2010. Bekjemping av snutebiller i frøeng av rødkløver. [Control of weevils in red clover seed crops]. Bioforsk Fokus. 1:212–217. Norwegian.
   Google Scholar
• Blacquière T, Smagghe G, van Gestel CAM, Mommaerts V. 2012. Neonicotinoids in bees: a review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessment. Ecotoxicology. 21:973–992. doi: 10.1007/s10646-012-0863-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommarco R, Lundin O, Smith HG, Rundlöf M. 2012. Drastic historic shifts in bumble-bee community composition in Sweden. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci. 279:309–315. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brødsgård CJ, Hansen H. 2002. Bi-bestøvning af rødkløver. [Honey bee pollination of red clover]. Grøn Viden. Markbrug nr. 257. Juni 2002. 4 pp. Danish.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen A. 2016. Handbook of analytical methods for pesticide residues. Ås: Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Decourtye A, Devillers J. 2010. Ecotoxicity of neonicotinoid insecticides to bees. In: Thany SH, editor. Insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. 1st ed. New York: Springer; p. 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont YL, Damgaard C, Simonsen V. 2011. Quantitative historical change in bumblebee (Bombus spp.) assemblages of red clover fields. PLoS ONE. 6(9):e25172. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklima. 2019. Meteorological data collected from http://eklima.met.no/.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis C P, Whitehorn P KJ, David A, Goulson D. 2017. The neonicotinoid insecticide thiacloprid impacts upon bumble bee colony development under field conditions. Environ Sci Technol. 51:1727–1732. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN15662. 2008. Foods of plant origin – Determination of pesticide residues using GC-MS and/or LC-MS/MS following acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and clean-up by dispersive SPE – QuEChERS-method. ISBN 9780580584411. 84 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Goulson D. 2010. Bumble bees behaviour, ecology and conservation. Second ed. Oxford: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Goulson D, Lye GC, Darvill B. 2008. Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annu Rev Entomol. 53:191–208. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulson D, Nicholls E, Botías C, Rotheray EL. 2015. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science. 347:1255957. doi: 10.1126/science.1255957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havstad LT, Åström J, Øverland JI, Valand S, Hetland O, Susort Å. 2015. Bedre pollinering av rødkløver [Improved pollination of red clover]. Jord- og plantekultur. Bioforsk Fokus. 10(1):224–232. Norwegian.
   Google Scholar
• Henry M, Beguin M, Requier F, Rollin O, Odoux J, Aupinel P, Aptel J, Tchamitchian S, Decourtye AA. 2012. A common pesticide Decreases Foraging Success and Survival in honey bees. Science. 336:348–350. doi: 10.1126/science.1215039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwasa T, Motoyama N, Ambrose JT, Roe JR. 2004. Mechanism for the differential toxicity of neonicotinoid insecticides in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Crop Prot. 23:371–378. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2003.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeschke P, Nauen R, Schindler M, Elbert A. 2011. Overview of the status and global strategy for neonicotinoids. J Agric Food Chem. 59:2897–2908. doi: 10.1021/jf101303g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karise R, Viik E, Mänd M. 2007. Impact of alpha-cypremethrin on honey bees foraging on spring oilseed rape Brassica napus flowers in field conditions. Pest Manage Sci. 63:1085–1089. doi: 10.1002/ps.1445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolařík P, Rotrekl J. 2013. Regulation of the abundance of clover seed weevils, Apion spp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in a seed stand of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). J Entomol Acarol Res. 45:105–109. doi: 10.4081/jear.2013.e19
   Google Scholar
• Konzmann S, Lunau K. 2014. Divergent rules for pollen and nectar foraging bumblebees – a laboratory study with artificial flowers offering diluted nectar substitute and pollen surrogate. PLoS ONE. 9(3):e91900. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laycock I, Lenthall KM, Barratt AT, Cresswell JE. 2012. Effects of imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid pesticide, on reproduction in worker bumble bees (Bombus terrestris). Ecotoxicology. 21:1937–1945. doi: 10.1007/s10646-012-0927-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LMT. 2019. Meteorological data collected from http://lmt.nibio.no.
   Google Scholar
• Lundin O. 2013. Ecology and management of crop pollination and pest control. Insights from red clover seed production. Doctoral Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. SLU Service/Repro. 54 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lundin O, Rundlöf M, Smith HG, Bommarco R. 2012. Towards integrated pest management in red clover seed production. J Econ Entomol. 105:1620–1628. doi: 10.1603/EC12179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloof JE, Inouye DW. 2000. Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists? Ecology, 81(10): 2651–2661. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2651:ANRCOM]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer DF, Lunden JD. 1997. Effects of imidacloprid insecticide on three bee pollinators. Horticultur Sci. 29:93–97.
   Google Scholar
• Mommaerts V, Reynders S, Boulet J, Besard L, Sterk G, Smagghe G. 2010. Risk assessment for side-effects of neonicotinoids against bumble bees with and without impairing foraging behaviour. Ecotoxicology. 19:207–215. doi: 10.1007/s10646-009-0406-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller-Beilschmidt D. 1990. Toxicology and environmental fate of synthetic pyrethroids. J Pestic Reform. 10:32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Norli HR, Christiansen A, Deribe E. 2011. Application of QuEChERS method for extraction of persistent organic pollutants in fish tissue and analysis by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 1218: 7234–7241. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.08.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norsk frøavlerlag. 2018. Tilleggsetikett Off-label. Biscaya OD 240 – tiakloprid [Additional label. Biscaya OD 240 – thiacloprid]. https://www.froavlerlaget.no/Off_label/Tilleggsetikett/Biscaya_OD_240_godkjent_tilleggsetikett.pdf. Norwegian.
   Google Scholar
• Öberg S, Gjershaug JO, Staverløkk A, Åström J, Ødegaard F. 2013. Framdriftsrapport 2012 fra utviklingsprosjekt: Naturindeks; videreutvikling av kunnskapsgrunnlaget for humler og sommerfugler [Progress report 2012 from development project: Nature Index; extending the knowledge base for bumble bees and butterflies]. NINA Minirapport 418. 18 s. Norwegian.
   Google Scholar
• Ødegaard F, Gjershaug JO, Öberg S, Mjelde A. 2009. Status for humler (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombus spp.) i Norge i 2010 [Status of bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombus spp.) in Norway in 2010]. Fauna. 62(4):94–104. Norwegian.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen TR. 2010. Bekämpa och reglera i vallfrö [control and regulation in seed production]. Svensk Frötidning. 3(10):35–36. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE. 2010. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol. 25:345–353. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnieks FLW. 2000. How far do bees forage. Bee Improv. 6:10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rundlöf M, Lundin O, Bommarco R. 2018. Annual flower strips support pollinators and potentially enhance red clover seed yield. Ecol Evol. 8:7974–7985. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. 2015. Base SAS® 9.4 procedures guide. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schmuck R, Stadler T, Schmidt HW. 2003. Field relevance of a synergistic effect observed in the laboratory between an EBI fungicide and a chloronicotinyl insecticide in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L, Hymenoptera). Pest Manage Sci. 59:279–286. doi: 10.1002/ps.626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shires SW, Le Blanc J, Murray A, Forbes S, Debray P. 1984. A field trial to assess the effects of a new pyrethroid insecticide, WL85871, on foraging honeybees in oilseed rape. J Apic Res. 23:217–226. doi: 10.1080/00218839.1984.11100636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley DA, Garratt MPD, Wickens JB, Wickens VJ, Potts SG, Raine NE. 2015. Neonicotinoid pesticide exposure impairs crop pollination services provided by bumble bees. Nature. 528:548–550. doi: 10.1038/nature16167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout JC, Allen JA, Goulson D. 2000. Nectar robbing, forager efficiency and seed set: bumble bees foraging on the self-incompatible plant Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae). Acta Oecol. 21:277–283. doi: 10.1016/S1146-609X(00)01085-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tison L, Hahn ML, Holtz S, Rößner A, Greggers U, Bischoff G, Menzel R. 2016. Honey bees’ Behavior Is impaired by Chronic exposure to the neonicotinoid thiacloprid in the field. Environ Sci Technol. 50:7218–7227. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson HM. 2001. Assessing the exposure and toxicity of pesticides to bumble bees (Bombus sp. Apidologie. 32:305–321. doi: 10.1051/apido:2001131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson HM. 2003. Behavioural effects of pesticides in bees – their potential for use in risk assessment. Ecotoxicology. 12:317–330. doi: 10.1023/A:1022575315413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wermuth KH, Dupont YL. 2010. Effects of field characteristics on abundance of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) and seed yield in red clover fields. Apidologie. 41:657–666. doi: 10.1051/apido/2010038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehorn PR, O'Connor S, Wackers FL, Goulson D. 2012. Neonicotinoid pesticide Reduces bumble bee colony growth and Queen production. Science. 336(6079):351–352. doi: 10.1126/science.1215025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RD. 1931. Methods and technique of breeding red clover, white clover and lucerne. Imperial Bureau of Plant Genetics. Herbage Plants. 3:46–77.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock BA, Bullock JM, Shore RF, Heard MS, Pereira MG, Redhead J, Ridding L, Dean H, Sleep D, Henrys P, et al. 2017. Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees. Science. 356:1393–1395. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock BA, Isaac NJ, Bullock JM, Roy DB, Garthwaite DG, Crowe A, Pywell RF. 2016. Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England. Nat Commun. 7:12459. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wratt EC. 1968. The pollinating activities of bumble bees and honey bees in relation to temperature, competing forage plants, and competition from other foragers. J Apic Res. 7(2):61–66. doi: 10.1080/00218839.1968.11100190
   Google Scholar