The strange case of The Big Bang Theory and its extra-ordinary Italian audiovisual translation: a multimodal corpus-based analysis

References

• Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Attardo, S. (2002). Translation and humor: An approach based on the general theory of verbal humor. The Translator, 8, 173–193.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. (1993). Corpus linguistics and translation studies: Implications and applications. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli, (Eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair (pp. 233–250). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Baldry, A., & Thibault P.J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: A multimedia toolkit and coursebook. London/Oakville: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Balirano, G. (2007). The perception of diasporic humour: Indian English on TV. Catania: AG Edizioni.
   Google Scholar
• Balirano, G., & Corduas, M. (2008). Detecting semiotically-expressed humor in diasporic TV productions. Humor, 21, 227–251.10.1515/HUMOR.2008.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsignori, V., Bruti, S., & Masi, S. (2008). Formulae across languages: English greetings, leave-takings and good wishes in dubbed Italian. In A. Serban, A. Matamala, & J.M. Lavaur, (Eds.), Audiovisual translation in close-up (pp. 23–44). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, A.J. (1973). Funniness of jokes, canned laughter and recall performance. Sociometry, 36, 569–578.10.2307/2786252
   Google Scholar
• Chiaro, D. (2006). Verbally expressed humour on screen: Reflections on translation and reception. Journal of Specialised Translation, 6, 198–208.
   Google Scholar
• Chuck Lorre Productions (Executive Producer), & Cendrowski, M. (Director). (2007– 2012). The big bang theory [TV Series]. , United States: Warner Bros Television
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R., Goetsch, D., Litt, D. (Writers), & Cendrowski, M. (Director). (2007). The Middle-Earth Paradigm [TV series, season 1, episode 6]. In Chuck Lorre Productions (Executive Producer), The Big Bang Theory. , United States: Warner Bros Television.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2005). Communities of practice: Legitimacy not choice. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(4), 557–581.10.1111/j.1360-6441.2005.00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRusha, J. (2011, February 11). Good question: Is ‘The Big Bang Theory’ science real? CBS Minnesota. Retrieved from http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2011/02/17/good-question-is-the-big-bang-theory-science-real/.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–490.10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional grammar. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, S., Haggar D., Doyle T., Rosenstock R. (Writers), & Cendrowski, M. (Director). (2008). The Cooper-Nowitzki Theorem [TV series, season 2, episode 6]. In Chuck Lorre Productions (Executive Producer), The Big Bang Theory. , United States: Warner Bros Television.
   Google Scholar
• Freddi, M., & Pavesi, M., (Eds.). (2009). Analysing audiovisual dialogue: Linguistic and translational insights. Bologna: CLUEB.
   Google Scholar
• Goetsch, D., Litt, D., Cohen, R. (Writers), & Cendrowski, M. (Director). (2007). The Big Bran Hypothesis [TV series, season 1, episode 1]. In Chuck Lorre Productions (Executive Producer), The Big Bang Theory. , United States: Warner Bros Television.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. (2nd ed.). London and Melbourne: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neurath, O. (1921). Anti-spengler. Munich: G.D.W. Callwey.
   Google Scholar
• Quaglio, P. (2009). Television dialogue: The sitcom friends vs. natural conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht/Boston, MA/Lancaster: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Thibault, P. (2000). The multimodal transcription of a television advertisement: Theory and practice. In A. Baldry (Ed.), Multimodality and multimediality in the distance learning age (311–385). , Campobasso: Lampo.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar