Considering foreignization and domestication in EU legal translation: a corpus-based study

References

• Baaij, C. J. W. (2015). EU translation and the burden of legal knowledge. In S. Šarčević (Ed.), Language and culture in EU law. Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 109–121). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Baaij, C. J. W. (2018). Legal integration and language diversity. Rethinking translation in EU lawmaking. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bajčić, M. (2009). The search for Croatian equivalents for EU terms in competition law. In S. Šarčević (Ed.), Legal language in action: Translation, terminology, drafting and procedural issues (pp. 215–231). Globus.
   Google Scholar
• Bajčić, M. (2018). The role of EU legal English in shaping EU legal culture. International Journal of Law and Language JLL, 7, 8–24. https://doi.org/10.14762/jll.2018.008
   Google Scholar
• Bajčić, M., & Martinović, A. (2018). A mutual learning exercise in terminology and multilingual law. In S. Marino, L. Biel, M. Bajčić, & V. Sosoni (Eds.), Language and law. The role of language and translation in EU competition Law (pp. 207–223). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bajčić, M., & Stepanić, M. (2010). (Ne)dosljednost pri prevođenju pojmova iz prava tržišnog natjecanja Europske unije. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 60(3-4), 747–772.
   Google Scholar
• Bankole, A. (2006). Dealing with abbreviations. Translation. Translation Journal, 10(4). https://translationjournal.net/journal/38acronyms.htm
   Google Scholar
• Biel, Ł. (2008). Legal terminology in translation practice: Dictionaries, googling or discussion forums? SKASE Journal of Translation and Iinterpretation, 3/1, 22–38.
   Google Scholar
• Biel, Ł. (2014). Lost in the Eurofog: The textual fit of EU translated law. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Biel, Ł. (2019). Theoretical and methodological challenges in researching EU legal translation. In I. Simonnæs & M. Kritiansen (Eds.), Legal translation. Current issues and challenges in research, methods and applications (pp. 25–39). Frank & Timme. http://www.frank-timme.de/verlag/verlagsprogramm/buch/verlagsprogramm/bd-149-ingrid-simonnaes-marita-kristiansen-eds-legal-translation/backPID/forum-fuer-fachspra-chen-forschung.html
   Google Scholar
• Biel, L., Biernacka, A., & Jopek-Bosiacka, A. (2018). Collocations of terms in EU competition law: A corpus analysis of EU English collocations. In S. Marino, L. Biel, M. Bajčić, & V. Sosoni (Eds.), Language and law. The role of language and translation in EU competition law (pp. 249–274). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Biel, Ł., & Sosoni, V. (2018). EU legal culture and translation. International Journal of Language and Law JLL, 7, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.14762/jll.2018.001
   Google Scholar
• Bratanić, M., & Lončar, M. (2015). The myth of EU terminology harmonization on national and EU level. In S. Šarčević (Ed.), Language and culture in EU law. Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 207–219). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Doczekalska, A. (2018). Legal languages in contact: EU legislative drafting and its consequences for judicial interpretation. In S. Marino, L. Biel, M. Bajčić, & V. Sosoni (Eds.), Language and law. The role of language and translation in EU competition law (pp. 163–179). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Interinstitutional style guide. http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e774ea2a-ef84-4bf6-be92-c9ebebf91c1b.0018.03/DOC_2
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). English style guide: A handbook for authors and translators in the European Commission. Available at ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/styleguide_english_dgt_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Felici, A. (2015). Translating EU legislation from a Lingua Franca: Advantages and disadvantages. In S. Šarčević (Ed.), Language and culture in EU Law. Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 123–141). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Garzone, G. (2000). Legal translation and functionalist approaches: A contradiction in terms? ASTTI/ETI, 395–414.
   Google Scholar
• Gotti, M. (2003). Specialized discourse: Linguistic features and Changing conventions. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgariff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Jan Michelfeit, J., Richly, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The sketch engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, K. (2000). Institutional Illusions. Translating in the EU Commission. The Translator, 6(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2000.10799055
   Google Scholar
• Ljubešić, N., & Klubička, F. (2014). {bs,hr,sr}WaC – Web corpora of Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian. In F. Bildhauer & R. Schäfer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Web as Corpus Workshop (WaC-9) (pp. 29–35). Association of Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Mori, L. (2018). Observing eurolects. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Nida, E. (1964). Toward a science of translating. With special reference to principles and procedures involved in Bible translating. E.J. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Nida, E. (2001). Language and culture-contexts in translation. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ožbot, M. (2016). O drugačnosti prevodov in drugačnosti njihovega sodobnega raziskovanja. In Z. Sosič (Ed.), Drugačnost v slovenskem jeziku, literaturi in kulturi: 52. Seminar slovenskega jezika, literature in kulture (pp. 28–37). Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete.
   Google Scholar
• Paolucci, S. (2017). Foreignising and domesticating strategies in translating legal texts. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2017-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto Ramos, F. (2014). International and supranational law in translation: From multilingual lawmaking to adjudication. The Translator, 20(3), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2014.904080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto Ramos, F., & Morales, A. (2019). Terminological innovation and harmonization in international organizations: Can too many cooks spoil the broth? In I. Simonnæs & M. Kristiansen (Eds.), Legal translation: Current issues and challenges in research, methods and applications (pp. 87–110). Frank & Timme.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. (1997). Translation and empire. Postcolonial theories explained. St. Jerome Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Šarčević, S. (1997). New approach to legal translation. Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Šarčević, S. (2015). Basic principles of term formation in the multilingual and multicultural context of EU law. In S. Šarčević (Ed.), Language and culture in EU law. Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 183–206). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Šarčević, S., & Bajčić, M. (2009). Zur Notwendigkeit der Erarbeitung einer einheitlichen kroatischen Terminologie für EU-Rechtsbegriffe. Collected Papers of the Rijeka Law Faculty, 30(2), 810–826.
   Google Scholar
• Schleiermacher, F. (1838/2012). Über die verschiedenen Methoden des Übersetzens. In Sämtliche Werke, Dritte Abteilung: Zur Philosophie, vol. 2 (pp. 207–245). Reimer.
   Google Scholar
• Sosoni, V. (2018). Language and translation in EU competition law: Insights from English, Greek, Italian and Spanish versions of legislative texts. In S. Marino, L. Biel, M. Bajčić, & V. Sosoni (Eds.), Language and law. The role of language and translation in EU competition law (pp. 179–205). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal language. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trosborg, A. (1997). Translating hybrid political texts. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Text typology and translation (pp. 145–158). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Turk, M., & Opašić, M. (2008). Linguistic borrowing and purism in the Croatian language. Suvremena Lingvistika, 65(1), 73–88.
   Google Scholar
• Venuti, L. (1995). The translator’s invisibility. A history of translation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, E., Bech, S., & Martínez, J. M. (2002). Translating for the European Union institutions. Translation practices explained. St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, W. (2010). Brief study on domestication and foreignization in translation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(1), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.1.77-80
   Google Scholar