Identifying fluency parameters for a machine-learning-based automated interpreting assessment system

References

• Bakti, M. (2009). Speech disfluencies in simultaneous interpretation. In C. R. O. M. Dries DE (Ed.), Selected papers of the CETRA research seminar in translation studies 2008 (pp. 1–17). Leuven University Press. Retrieved March 5, 2022, from http://www.kuleuven.be/cetra/papers/papers.html Accessed 5th Mar 2021
   Google Scholar
• Bendazzoli, C., Sandrelli, A., & Russo, M. (2011). Disfluencies in simultaneous interpreting: A corpus-based analysis. In A. Kruger, K. Wallmach, & J. Munday (Eds.), Corpus-based translation studies: Research and applications (pp. 282–306). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S., Loper, E., & Klein, E. (2009). Processing raw text. In J. Steele (Ed.), Natural language processing with python (pp. 79–112). O'ReillyMedia Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-010-9124-x
   Google Scholar
• Bühler, H. (1986). Linguistic (semantic) and extra-linguistic (pragmatic) criteria for the evaluation of conference interpretation and interpreters. Multilingua - Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 5(4), 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1986.5.4.231
   Google Scholar
• Goldman-Eisler, F. (1958). The predictability of words in context and the length of pauses in speech. Language and Speech, 1(3), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383095800100308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosjean, F., & Deschamps, A. (1972). Analyse des variables temporelles du français spontané. Phonetica, 26(3), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259407
   Google Scholar
• Grosjean, F., & Deschamps, A. (1973). Analyse des variables temporelles du français spontané. Phonetica, 28(3-4), 191–226. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259456
   Google Scholar
• Grosjean, F., & Deschamps, A. (1975). Analyse contrastive des variables temporelles de l’anglais et du français: Vitesse de parole et variables composantes, phénomènes d’hésitation. Phonetica, 31(3-4), 144–184. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259667
   Google Scholar
• Han, C., Chen, S., Fu, R., & Fan, Q. (2020). Modelling the relationship between utterance fluency and raters’ perceived fluency of consecutive interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 22(2), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00040.han
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebbali, A. (2020). olsrr: Tools for Building OLS Regression Models. R package version 0.5.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=olsrr
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, I. (1993). Conference interpretation: Expectations of different user groups. The Interpreters Newsletter, 5, 13–21. http://hdl.handle.net/10077/4908
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, I. (2002). Conference interpreting: Quality in the ears of the user. Meta, 46(2), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.7202/003364ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macías, M. P. (2006). Probing quality criteria in simultaneous interpreting: The role of silent pauses in fluency. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 8(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.8.1.03pra
   Google Scholar
• Mead, P. (2005). Methodological issues in the study of interpreters’ fluency. The Interpreters Newsletter, 13, 39–63. http://hdl.handle.net/10077/2469
   Google Scholar
• Petite, C. (2005). Evidence of repair mechanisms in simultaneous interpreting: A corpus-based analysis. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 7(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.7.1.03pet
   Google Scholar
• Pöchhacker, F. (2016). Introducing interpreting studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315649573
   Google Scholar
• Pöchhacker, F., & Zwischenberger, C. (2010). Survey on quality and role: Conference interpreters’ expectations and self-perceptions. AIIC Communicate! Spring, 2010(53). http://aiic.net/p/3405
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Raupach, M. (2011). Temporal variables in first and second language speech production. In H. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech: Studies in honour of Frieda Goldman-Eisler (pp. 263–270). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110816570.263
   Google Scholar
• Riggenbach, H. (1991). Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, 14(4), 423–441. https://www.R-project.org/ https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851357
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure and performance testing, in: Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–273). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tissi, B. (2000). Silent pauses and disfluencies in simultaneous interpretation: A descriptive analysis. The Interpreters Newsletter, 10, 103–127. http://hdl.handle.net/10077/2455
   Google Scholar
• Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Random and mixed effects. In J. Chambers & W. Eddy (Eds.), Modern applied statistics with S. statistics and computing (pp. 271–300). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2_10
   Google Scholar
• Wang, B., & Li, T. (2015). An empirical study of pauses in Chinese-English simultaneous interpreting. Perspectives, 23(1), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2014.948885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, W., & van Heuven, V. J. (2017). Predicting judged fluency of consecutive interpreting from acoustic measures: Potential for automated assessment and pedagogic implications. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 19(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.19.1.03yu
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar