Human-Centered augmented translation: against antagonistic dualisms

References

• Alicea, B. (2018). An integrative introduction to human augmentation science. ArXiv abs/1804.10521: n.pag., https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.10521.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Angelone, E. (2010). Uncertainty, uncertainty management and metacognitive problems solving in the translation task. In G. M. Shreve, & E. Angelone (Eds.), Translation and cognition (pp. 17–40). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bavelier, D., Savulescu, J., Fried, L. P., Friedmann, T., Lathan, C. E., Schürle, S., & Beard, J. R. (2019). Rethinking human enhancement as collective welfarism. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 204–206. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0545-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrum, N., & Savelescu, J. (2008). Introduction: Human enhancement ethics: The state of the debate. In J. Savelescu, & N. Bostrum (Eds.), Human enhancement (pp. 1–22). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann, J., Wiesinger, C. K., & Ciobanu, D. I. (2022). Error annotation in post-editing machine translation: Investigating the impact of text-to-speech technology. In Helena Moniz, Lieve Macken, Andrew Rufener, Loïc Barrault, Marta R. Costa-jussà, Christophe Declercq, Maarit Koponen, Ellie Kemp, Spyridon Pilos, Mikel L. Forcada, Carolina Scarton, Joachim Van den Bogaert, Joke Daems, Arda Tezcan, Bram Vanroy, & Margot Fonteyne (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (pp. 249–257). European Association for Machine Translation.
   Google Scholar
• Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Allas, T., Hjartar, K., Manyika, P., Sjatil, E., & Shigina, I. (2019b). Tech for good: using technology to smooth disruption and improve well-being. McKinsey Global Institute Discussion Paper, Retrieved October 23, 2022, from https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/tech-for-good-using-technology-to-smooth-disruption-and-improve-well-being
   Google Scholar
• Bughin, J., Pissarides, C., & Hazan, E. (2019a). Measuring the welfare effects of AI and automation. McKinsey Global Institute (Online). Retrieved October 23, 2022, from https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/overview/in-the-news/measuring-the-welfare-effects-of-ai-and-automation
   Google Scholar
• Bundgaard, K., Paulsen Christensen, T., & Schjoldager, A. (2016). Translator-computer interaction in action: An observational process study of computer-aided translation. Journal of Specialised Translation, 25, 106–130.
   Google Scholar
• Bywood, L., Georgakopoulou, P., & Etchegoyhen, T. (2017). Embracing the threat: Machine translation as a solution for subtitling. Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory & Practice, 25(3), 492–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadwell, P., O’Brien, S., & Teixeira, C. S. C. (2017). Resistance and accommodation: Factors for the (non-)adoption of machine translation among professional translators. Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, 26(3), 301–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castilho, S., & Resende, N. (2022). Post-editese in literary translations. Information, 13(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13020066
   Google Scholar
• Ehrensberger-Dow, M., & Massey, G. (2019). Le traducteur et la machine. Mieux travailler ensemble? In É Lavaut-Olléon, & M. Zimina (Eds.), Des mots aux actes. No. 8. Traduction et technologie, regards croisés sur de nouvelles pratiques (pp. 47–62). Classiques Garnier.
   Google Scholar
• Engelbart, D. C. (1962). Augmenting human intellect: a conceptual framework. RI Summary Report AFOSR-3223. Prepared for: Director of Information Sciences, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Washington,US. Contract AF 49(638)-1024, SRI Project No. 3578 (AUGMENT, 3906). Retrieved October 23, 2022, from https://bit.ly/3ATbqNn
   Google Scholar
• Gaddis Rose, M. (1979). Translation as problem-solving. Translation Review, 3(1), 20–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07374836.1979.10523556
   Google Scholar
• Guerberof-Arenas, A., & Toral, A. (2022). Creativity in translation: Machine translation as a constraint for literary texts. Translation Spaces, Online First (March 2022), 11(2), 184–212. https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.21025.gue
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna J. 1985. A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism for the 1980s. Socialist Review 80, 15(2), 65–107.
   Google Scholar
• Heer, J. (2019). Agency plus automation: Designing artificial intelligence into interactive systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(6), 1844–1850. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807184115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen, K., & Ruokonen, M. (2017). Love letters or hate mail? Translators’ technology acceptance in the light of their emotional narratives. In D. Kenny (Ed.), Human issues in translation technology (pp. 8–24). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lommel, A., & DePalma, D. A. (2021). Augmented translation: how artificial intelligence drives productivity and efficiency for the language industry. Common Sense Advisory Report, February 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S., Diaz, G., Sancristobal, E., Gil, R., Castro, M., & Peire, J. (2011). New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1893–1906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorkens, J. (2020). A tiny cog in a large machine: Digital taylorism in the translation industry. Translation Spaces, 9(1), 12–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.00019.moo
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz Martín, R., & Olalla-Soler, C. (2022). Translating is not (only) problem solving. JosTrans – Journal of Specialised Translation, 38, 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes Vieira, L. (2020). Automation anxiety and translators. Translation Studies, 13(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2018.1543613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurminen, M. (2019). Decision-making, risk, and gist machine translation in the work of patent professionals. In Proceedings of The 8th workshop on patent and scientific literature translation (pp. 32–42). Dublin, Ireland. European Association for Machine Translation. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-7204
   Google Scholar
• Nurminen, M. (2020). Raw machine translation use by patent professionals: A case of situated cognition. Translation, Cognition and Behavior, 3(1), 100–121. https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00036.nur
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, S., Ehrensberger-Dow, M., Hasler, M., & Connolly, M. (2017). Irritating CAT Tool Features that Matter to Translators. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, (56), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v0i56.97229
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, S. (2012). Translation as human-computer interaction. Translation Spaces, 1, 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.1.05obr
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, S., Cadwell, P., & Lokot, T. (2022). Parallel pandemic spaces: Translation, trust and social media. In T. K. Lee, & D. Wang (Eds.), Translation and social media communication in the age of the pandemic (pp. 62–77). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, S., & Conlan, C. (2019). Moving towards personalising translation technology. In H. V. Dam, M. N. Brøgger, & K. K. Zethsen (Eds.), Moving boundaries in translation studies (pp. 81–97). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olohan, M. (2011). Translators and translation technology: The dance of agency. Translation Studies, 4(3), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2011.589656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordorica, S. (2020). Why technology will not replace professional translators, Forbes.com, Retrieved October 23, 2022, from https://bit.ly/3BqD1ax
   Google Scholar
• O’Thomas, M. (2017). Humanum ex Machina: Translation in the post-global posthuman world. Target, 29(2), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.29.2.05oth
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, R. (2023). 5 tedious non-translation tasks ChatGPT can do amazingly well. Next Level: The ATA Business Practices Blog. May 2023. Online: https://www.atanet.org/business-strategies/5-tedious-non-translation-tasks-chatgpt- can-do-amazingly-well/
   Google Scholar
• Pym, A., Ayvazyan, N., & Prioleau, J. M. (2022). Should raw machine translation be used for public-health information? Suggestions for a multilingual policy in Catalonia. Just: Journal of Language Rights and Minorities, 1, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.7203/Just.1.24880
   Google Scholar
• Raisamo, R., Rakkolainen, I., Majaranta, P., Salminen, K., Rantala, J., & Farooq, A. (2019). Human augmentation: Past, present and future. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 131, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risku, H., & Windhager, F. (2015). Extended translation: A socio-cognitive research agenda. In M. Ehrensberger-Dow, S. Göpferich, & S. O'Brien (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity in translation and interpreting process research (pp. 35–47). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, H., Thunberg, H., & Vainikainen, M.-P. (2017). Making the invisible observable by augmented reality in informal science education context. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, Communication and Public Engagement, 7(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2016.1254358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schögler, R. Y. (2019). Circulation of academic thought. Rethinking translation in the academic field. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, C. Y. Y. (2015). Problem-solving and decision-making in translation revision: Two case studies. Across Languages and Cultures, 16(1), 87–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. (2020a). Human-centered artificial intelligence: Three fresh ideas. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 12(3), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00131
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. (2020b). Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: Guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 10(4), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. (2020c). Design lessons from AI’s two grand goals: Human emulation and useful applications. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 1(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2020.2992669
   Google Scholar
• Stanney, K., Winslow, B., Hale, K., & Schmorrow, D. (2015). Augmented cognition. In D. A. Boehm-Davis, F. T. Durso, & J. D. Lee (Eds.), APA handbook of human systems integration (pp. 329–343). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Toral, A. (2019). Post-editese: An exacerbated translationese. Paper presented at the 17th Machine Translation Summit, https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.00900
   Google Scholar
• Wacjman, J. (2004). Technofeminism. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (2012). Reconstructing man and machine: A note on sociological critiques of cognitivism. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 303–320). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zapata, J. (2014). Exploring multimodality for translator-computer interaction. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on multimodal interaction, 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1145/2663204.2666280
   Google Scholar