Flowering time control in rice by introducing Arabidopsis clock-associated PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR 5

References

• Ainsworth EA, Long SP. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy. New Phytol. 2005 Feb;165(2):351–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terashima I, Yanagisawa S, Sakakibara H. Plant responses to CO2: background and perspectives. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014 Feb;55(2):237–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamori W, Kondo E, Sugiura D, et al. Enhanced leaf photosynthesis as a target to increase grain yield: insights from transgenic rice lines with variable Rieske FeS protein content in the cytochrome b(6)/f complex. Plant Cell Environ. 2016 Jan;39(1):80–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa C, Hatanaka T, Misoo S, et al. Functional incorporation of sorghum small subunit increases the catalytic turnover rate of rubisco in transgenic rice. Plant Physiol. 2011 Jul;156(3):1603–1611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Noguchi K, Ono N, et al. Overexpression of plasma membrane H+-ATPase in guard cells promotes light-induced stomatal opening and enhances plant growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 7;111(1):533–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebeish R, Niessen M, Thiruveedhi K, et al. Chloroplastic photorespiratory bypass increases photosynthesis and biomass production in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Biotechnol. 2007 May;25(5):593–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa T, Sakai H, Tokida T, et al. Rice cultivar responses to elevated CO2 at two free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) sites in Japan. Funct Plant Biol. 2013;40(2):148–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner A, Beales J, Faure S, et al. The pseudo-response regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley. Science. 2005 Nov 11;310(5750):1031–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy RL, Klein RR, Morishige DT, et al. Coincident light and clock regulation of pseudoresponse regulator protein 37 (PRR37) controls photoperiodic flowering in sorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 27;108(39):16469–16474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamichi N, Takao S, Kudo T, et al. Improvement of Arabidopsis biomass and cold, drought and salinity stress tolerance by modified circadian clock-associated PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORs. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016 MAY;57(5):1085–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redei G. Supervital mutants of Arabidopsis. Genetics. 1962 Apr;47(4):443–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi Y, Kaya H, Goto K, et al. A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Science. 1999 Dec 3;286(5446):1960–1962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardailsky I, Shukla VK, Ahn JH, et al. Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science. 1999 Dec 3;286(5446):1962–1965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanovsky MJ, Kay SA. Molecular basis of seasonal time measurement in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2002 Sep 19;419(6904):308–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imaizumi T, Kay SA. Photoperiodic control of flowering: not only by coincidence. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;Nov;11(11):550–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makino S, Kiba T, Imamura A, et al. Genes encoding pseudo-response regulators: insight into His-to-Asp phosphorelay and circadian rhythm in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000 Jun;41(6):791–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizuno T, Nakamichi N. Pseudo-Response Regulators (PRRs) or True Oscillator Components (TOCs). Plant Cell Physiol. 2005 May;46(5):677–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiba T, Henriques R, Sakakibara H, et al. Targeted degradation of PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR5 by an SCFZTL complex regulates clock function and photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2007 Aug;19(8):2516–2530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WY, Fujiwara S, Suh SS, et al. ZEITLUPE is a circadian photoreceptor stabilized by GIGANTEA in blue light. Nature. 2007 Sep 20;449(7160):356–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito AN, Matsuo H, Kuwata K, et al. Structure-function study of a novel inhibitor of the Casein kinase 1 family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Direct. 2019 Sep;3(9):e00172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ono A, Sato A, Fujimoto KJ, et al. 3,4-dibromo-7-azaindole modulates Arabidopsis circadian clock by inhibiting Casein kinase 1 activity. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019 Nov 1;60(11):2360–2368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uehara TN, Mizutani Y, Kuwata K, et al. Casein kinase 1 family regulates PRR5 and TOC1 in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 4;116(23):11528–11536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara S, Wang L, Han L, et al. Post-translational regulation of the Arabidopsis circadian clock through selective proteolysis and phosphorylation of pseudo-response regulator proteins. J Biol Chem. 2008 Aug 22;283(34):23073–23083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendron JM, Pruneda-Paz JL, Doherty CJ, et al. Arabidopsis circadian clock protein, TOC1, is a DNA-binding transcription factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 6;109(8):3167–3172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamichi N, Kiba T, Kamioka M, et al. Transcriptional repressor PRR5 directly regulates clock-output pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17123–17128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamichi N, Kiba T, Henriques R, et al. PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS 9, 7, and 5 are transcriptional repressors in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell. 2010 Mar;22(3):594–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Kim J, Somers DE. Transcriptional corepressor TOPLESS complexes with pseudoresponse regulator proteins and histone deacetylases to regulate circadian transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):761–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toda Y, Kudo T, Kinoshita T, et al. Evolutionary insight into the clock-associated PRR5 transcriptional network of flowering plants. Sci Rep-Uk. 2019;27:9.
   Google Scholar
• Murakami M, Matsushika A, Ashikari M, et al. Circadian-associated rice pseudo response regulators (OsPRRs): insight into the control of flowering time. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2005 Feb;69(2):410–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamichi N. Adaptation to the local environment by modifications of the photoperiod response in crops. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015 Apr;56(4):594–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito S, Niwa Y, Nakamichi N, et al. Insight into missing genetic links between two evening-expressed pseudo-response regulator genes TOC1 and PRR5 in the circadian clock-controlled circuitry in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008 Feb;49(2):201–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beales J, Turner A, Griffiths S, et al. A pseudo-response regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Sep;115(5):721–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto Y, Sato E, Shimizu T, et al. Comparative genetic studies on the APRR5 and APRR7 genes belonging to the APRR1/TOC1 quintet implicated in circadian rhythm, control of flowering time, and early photomorphogenesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003 Nov;44(11):1119–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsushika A, Murakami M, Ito S, et al. Characterization of Circadian-associated pseudo-response regulators: I. Comparative studies on a series of transgenic lines misexpressing five distinctive PRR genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007 Feb;71(2):527–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami M, Yamashino T, Mizuno T. Characterization of circadian-associated APRR3 pseudo-response regulator belonging to the APRR1/TOC1 quintet in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004 May;45(5):645–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo BH, Yoo SC, Park JW, et al. Natural variation in OsPRR37 regulates heading date and contributes to rice cultivation at a wide range of latitudes. Mol Plant. 2013 May 27;6(6):1877–1888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li MW, Liu W, Lam HM, et al. Characterization of two growth period QTLs reveals modification of PRR3 genes during soybean domestication. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019 Feb;60(2):407–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yano M, Sasaki T. Genetic and molecular dissection of quantitative traits in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 1997 Sep;35(1–2):145–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto T, Kuboki Y, Lin SY, et al. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci Hd-1, Hd-2 and Hd-3,controlling heading date of rice, as single Mendelian factors. Theor Appl Genet. 1998;97:37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamichi N, Kita M, Niinuma K, et al. Arabidopsis clock-associated pseudo-response regulators PRR9, PRR7 and PRR5 coordinately and positively regulate flowering time through the canonical CONSTANS-dependent photoperiodic pathway. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007 Jun;48(6):822–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imaizumi T, Schultz TF, Harmon FG, et al. FKF1 F-box protein mediates cyclic degradation of a repressor of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Science. 2005 Jul 8;309(5732):293–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song YH, Smith RW, To BJ, et al. FKF1 conveys timing information for CONSTANS stabilization in photoperiodic flowering. Science. 2012 May 25;336(6084):1045–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayama R, Sarid-Krebs L, Richter R, et al. PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATORs stabilize CONSTANS protein to promote flowering in response to day length. EMBO J. 2017 Apr 3;36(7):904–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985 Jul;39(4):783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In: Bryson V, Vogel HJ, editors. Evolving genes and proteins. New York: Academic Press; 1965. p. 97–166.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jul;33(7):1870–1874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentoku N, Sato Y, Matsuoka M. Overexpression of rice OSH genes induces ectopic shoots on leaf sheaths of transgenic rice plants. Dev Biol. 2000 Apr 15;220(2):358–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudo T, Makita N, Kojima M, et al. Cytokinin activity of cis-zeatin and phenotypic alterations induced by overexpression of putative cis-Zeatin-O-glucosyltransferase in rice. Plant Physiol. 2012 Sep;160(1):319–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komiya R, Ikegami A, Tamaki S, et al. Hd3a and RFT1 are essential for flowering in rice. Development. 2008 Feb;135(4):767–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi Y, et al. Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under short-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002 Oct;43(10):1096–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayama R, Yokoi S, Tamaki S, et al. Adaptation of photoperiodic control pathways produces short-day flowering in rice. Nature. 2003 Apr 17;422(6933):719–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito H, Ogiso-Tanaka E, Okumoto Y, et al. Ef7 encodes an ELF3-like protein and promotes rice flowering by negatively regulating the floral repressor gene Ghd7 under both short- and long-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012 Apr;53(4):717–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izawa T, Mihara M, Suzuki Y, et al. Os-GIGANTEA confers robust diurnal rhythms on the global transcriptome of rice in the field. Plant Cell. 2011 May;13(23):1741–1755.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor N, Challinor A, Droutsas I, et al. Integrating plant science and crop modeling: assessment of the impact of climate change on soybean and maize production. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017 Nov;58(11):1833–1847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar