Cyanobacterial multi-copy chromosomes and their replication

References

• Oliver NJ, Rabinovitch-Deere CA, Carroll AL, et al. Cyanobacterial metabolic engineering for biofuel and chemical production. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2016;35:43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozzi NE, Oliver JW, Atsumi S. Cyanobacteria as a platform for biofuel production. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2013;1:7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watanabe S, Ozawa H, Kato H, et al. Carbon-free production of 2-deoxy-scyllo-inosose (DOI) in cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2018;82(1):161–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder BJ, Chisholm SW. Cell cycle regulation in marine Synechococcus sp. strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61(2):708–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbage CD, Binder BJ. Relationship between cell cycle and light-limited growth rate in oceanic Prochlorococcus (MIT9312) and Synechococcus (WH8103) (Cyanobacteria). J Phycol. 2007;43:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori T, Binder B, Johnson CH. Circadian gating of cell division in cyanobacteria growing with average doubling times of less than 24 hours. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(19):10183–10188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann N, Carr NG. Control of macromolecular composition and cell division in the blue-green algae Anacystis nidulans. J Gen Microbiol. 1974;83(2):399–405.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minton KW. DNA repair in the extremely radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Mol Microbiol. 1994;13(1):9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohtani N, Tomita M, Itaya M. An extreme thermophile, Thermus thermophilus, is a polyploid bacterium. J Bacteriol. 2010;192(20):5499–5505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komaki K, Ishikawa H. Intracellular bacterial symbionts of aphids possess many genomic copies per bacterium. J Mol Evol. 1999;48(6):717–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobiason DM, Seifert HS. The obligate human pathogen, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, is polyploid. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(6):e185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresler V, Montgomery WL, Fishelson L, et al. Gigantism in a bacterium, Epulopiscium fishelsoni, correlates with complex patterns in arrangement, quantity, and segregation of DNA. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(21):5601–5611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendich AJ. Why do chloroplasts and mitochondria contain so many copies of their genome? Bioessays. 1987;6(6):279–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuroiwa T. The replication, the replication, differentiation, and inheritance of plastids with emphasis on the concept of organelle nuclei. Int Rev Cytol. 1991;128:1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hildenbrand C, Stock T, Lange C, et al. Genome copy numbers and gene conversion in methanogenic archaea. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(3):734–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuert S, Allers T, Spohn G, et al. Regulated polyploidy in halophilic archaea. PLoS One. 2006;1:e92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaans SK, van der Oost J, Kengen SW. The chromosome copy number of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakarensis KOD1. Extremophiles. 2015;19(4):741–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Miao D, Zhang F, et al. Characterization of the minimal replicon of pHM300 and independent copy number control of major and minor chromosomes of Haloferax mediterranei. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013;339(1):66–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe S, Ohbayashi R, Kanesaki Y, et al. Intensive DNA replication and metabolism during the lag phase in cyanobacteria. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0136800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe S, Ohbayashi R, Shiwa Y, et al. Light-dependent and asynchronous replication of cyanobacterial multi-copy chromosomes. Mol Microbiol. 2012;83(4):856–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griese M, Lange C, Soppa J. Ploidy in cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011;323(2):124–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labarre J, Chauvat F, Thuriaux P. Insertional mutagenesis by random cloning of antibiotic resistance genes into the genome of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis strain PCC 6803. J Bacteriol. 1989;171(6):3449–3457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerulla K, Ludt K, Soppa J. The ploidy level of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 is highly variable and is influenced by growth phase and by chemical and physical external parameters. Microbiology. 2016;162(5):730–739.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klotz A, Georg J, Bučinská L, et al. Awakening of a dormant cyanobacterium from nitrogen chlorosis reveals a genetically determined program. Curr Biol. 2016;26(21):2862–2872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärtner K, Klähn S, Watanabe S, et al. Cytosine N4-methylation via M.Ssp6803II is involved in the regulation of transcription, fine-tuning of DNA replication and DNA repair in the cyanobacterium. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent EC, Hitchcock A, Johansson SA, et al. Evidence for polyploidy in the globally important diazotroph Trichodesmium. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016;363:21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi A, Ruiz M, Zhang CC. Oxidative stress in cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009;33(2):258–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter E, Subramaniam A, Capone D. Biomass and primary productivity of the cyanobacterium Trichodesmium spp. in the tropical N Atlantic ocean. Deep-Sea Res Pt I. 2004;52(9):1787–1788.
   Google Scholar
• Ohbayashi R, Nakamachi A, Hatakeyama TS, et al. Coordination of polyploid chromosome replication with cell size and growth in a cyanobacterium. MBio. 2019;10:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng XY, O’Shea EK. Cyanobacteria maintain constant protein concentration despite genome copy-number variation. Cell Rep. 2017;19(3):497–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster JS, Singh AK, Rothschild LJ, et al. Growth-phase dependent differential gene expression in Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 and regulation by a group 2 sigma factor. Arch Microbiol. 2007;187(4):265–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broedel SE, Wolf RE. Growth-phase-dependent induction of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC7942. Gene. 1991;109(1):71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandeau de Marsac N, Houmard J. Adaptation of cyanobacteria to environmental stimuli: new steps towards molecular mechanisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1993;104(1):119–189.
   Google Scholar
• Zerulla K, Soppa J. Polyploidy in haloarchaea: advantages for growth and survival. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludt K, Soppa J. Polyploidy in halophilic archaea: regulation, evolutionary advantages, and gene conversion. Biochem Soc Trans. 2019;47(3):933–944.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golden SS, Canales SR. Cyanobacterial circadian clocks–timing is everything. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2003;1(3):191–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Pando BF, Dong G, et al. Circadian gating of the cell cycle revealed in single cyanobacterial cells. Science. 2010;327(5972):1522–1526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong G, Golden SS. How a cyanobacterium tells time. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2008;11(6):541–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori T. Cell division cycles and circadian rhythms. In: Ditty J, Mackey S, Johnson C, editors. Bacterial circadian programs. Berlin:Springer; 2009. p. 183–204.
   Google Scholar
• Ochoa de Alda JA, Esteban R, Diago ML, et al. The plastid ancestor originated among one of the major cyanobacterial lineages. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powikrowska M, Oetke S, Jensen PE, et al. Dynamic composition, shaping and organization of plastid nucleoids. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai A, Takano H, Kuroiwa T. Organelle nuclei in higher plants: structure, composition, function, and evolution. Int Rev Cytol. 2004;238:59–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabeya Y, Miyagishima SY. Chloroplast DNA replication is regulated by the redox state independently of chloroplast division in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 2013;161(4):2102–2112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner BJ, Rapp JC, Mullet JE. Plastid transcription activity and DNA copy number increase early in barley chloroplast development. Plant Physiol. 1989;89(3):1011–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamppa GK, Elliot LV, Bendich AJ. Changes in chloroplast number during pea leaf development: an analysis of a protoplast population. Planta. 1980;148(5):437–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boffey SA, Ellis JR, Selldén G, et al. Chloroplast division and DNA synthesis in light-grown wheat leaves. Plant Physiol. 1979;64(3):502–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenburg DJ, Bendich AJ. Changes in the structure of DNA molecules and the amount of DNA per plastid during chloroplast development in maize. J Mol Biol. 2004;344(5):1311–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowan BA, Oldenburg DJ, Bendich AJ. RecA maintains the integrity of chloroplast DNA molecules in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(10):2575–2588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley SA, Nielsen BL. Chloroplast DNA copy number changes during plant development in Organelle DNA polymerase mutants. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe S, Noda A, Ohbayashi R, et al. ParA-like protein influences the distribution of multi-copy chromosomes in cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. Microbiology. 2018;164(1):45–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata K, Hagiwara S, Kimori Y, et al. Ultrastructure of compacted DNA in cyanobacteria by high-voltage cryo-electron tomography. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long BM, Badger MR, Whitney SM, et al. Analysis of carboxysomes from Synechococcus PCC7942 reveals multiple Rubisco complexes with carboxysomal proteins CcmM and CcaA. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(40):29323–29335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee PS, Grossman AD. The chromosome partitioning proteins Soj (ParA) and Spo0J (ParB) contribute to accurate chromosome partitioning, separation of replicated sister origins, and regulation of replication initiation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2006;60(4):853–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Real G, Autret S, Harry EJ, et al. Cell division protein DivIB influences the Spo0J/Soj system of chromosome segregation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2005;55(2):349–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallet-Gely I, Boccard F. Chromosomal organization and segregation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(5):e1003492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogel MA, Waldor MK. A dynamic, mitotic-like mechanism for bacterial chromosome segregation. Genes Dev. 2006;20(23):3269–3282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadoya R, Baek JH, Sarker A, et al. Participation of chromosome segregation protein ParAI of Vibrio cholerae in chromosome replication. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(7):1504–1514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage DF, Afonso B, Chen AH, et al. Spatially ordered dynamics of the bacterial carbon fixation machinery. Science. 2010;327(5970):1258–1261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCready JS, Hakim P, Young EJ, et al. Protein gradients on the nucleoid position the carbon-fixing organelles of cyanobacteria. Elife. 2018;7:e39723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher MA, Henderson M, Zhang H. Structures of maintenance of carboxysome distribution Walker-box McdA and McdB adaptor homologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(11):5950–5962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graumann PL. SMC proteins in bacteria: condensation motors for chromosome segregation? Biochimie. 2001;83(1):53–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobry JR. Asymmetric substitution patterns in the two DNA strands of bacteria. Mol Biol Evol. 1996;13(5):660–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank AC, Lobry JR. Asymmetric substitution patterns: a review of possible underlying mutational or selective mechanisms. Gene. 1999;238(1):65–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo H, Gao F. DoriC 10.0: an updated database of replication origins in prokaryotic genomes including chromosomes and plasmids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D74–D77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arakawa K, Tomita M. Measures of compositional strand bias related to replication machinery and its applications. Curr Genomics. 2012;13(1):4–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arakawa K, Suzuki H, Tomita M. Quantitative analysis of replication-related mutation and selection pressures in bacterial chromosomes and plasmids using generalised GC skew index. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arakawa K, Tomita M. The GC skew index: a measure of genomic compositional asymmetry and the degree of replicational selection. Evol Bioinform Online. 2007;3:159–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arakawa K, Kido N, Oshita K, et al. G-language genome analysis environment with REST and SOAP web service interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(Web Server issue):W700–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu Y, Tsinoremas NF. An unusual gene arrangement for the putative chromosome replication origin and circadian expression of dnaN in Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942. Gene. 1996;172(1):105–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Chen WL, Wang L, et al. Identification of the oriC region and its influence on heterocyst development in the filamentous cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120. Microbiology. 2011;157(Pt 7):1910–1919.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohbayashi R, Watanabe S, Ehira S, et al. Diversification of DnaA dependency for DNA replication in cyanobacterial evolution. Isme J. 2016;10(5):1113–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao F. Bacteria may have multiple replication origins. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao F. Recent advances in the identification of replication origins based on the Z-curve method. Curr Genomics. 2014;15(2):104–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen BL, Cupp JD, Brammer J. Mechanisms for maintenance, replication, and repair of the chloroplast genome in plants. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(10):2535–2537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maréchal A, Brisson N. Recombination and the maintenance of plant organelle genome stability. New Phytol. 2010;186(2):299–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu WL, Sears BB. Electron microscopic localization of replication origins in oenothera chloroplast DNA. Mol Gen Genet. 1992;232(1):33–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kunnimalaiyaan M, Nielsen BL. Fine mapping of replication origins (Ori A and ori B) in Nicotiana tabacum chloroplast DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(18):3681–3686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodner RD, Tewari KK. Chloroplast DNA from higher plants replicates by both the cairns and the rolling circle mechanism. Nature. 1975;256(5520):708–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JD, Levin PA. Metabolism, cell growth and the bacterial cell cycle. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(11):822–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa H, O’Sullivan A, Sueoka N. Sequential replication of the Bacillus subtilis chromosome. 3. Regulation of initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964;52:973–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivatsan A, Han Y, Peng J, et al. High-precision, whole-genome sequencing of laboratory strains facilitates genetic studies. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(8):e1000139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kono N, Arakawa K, Sato M, et al. Undesigned selection for replication termination of bacterial chromosomes. J Mol Biol. 2014;426(16):2918–2927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen AH, Afonso B, Silver PA, et al. Spatial and temporal organization of chromosome duplication and segregation in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain IH, Vijayan V, O’Shea EK. Spatial ordering of chromosomes enhances the fidelity of chromosome partitioning in cyanobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(34):13638–13643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlatzky IA, Rouvinski A, Ben-Yehuda S. Spatial organization of a replicating bacterial chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(37):14136–14140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niki H, Yamaichi Y, Hiraga S. Dynamic organization of chromosomal DNA in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 2000;14(2):212–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider D, Fuhrmann E, Scholz I, et al. Fluorescence staining of live cyanobacterial cells suggest non-stringent chromosome segregation and absence of a connection between cytoplasmic and thylakoid membranes. BMC Cell Biol. 2007;8:39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin BE, Wetmore KM, Price MN, et al. The essential gene set of a photosynthetic organism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(48):E6634–6643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katayama T, Ozaki S, Keyamura K, et al. Regulation of the replication cycle: conserved and diverse regulatory systems for DnaA and oriC. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(3):163–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarstad K, Katayama T. Regulating DNA replication in bacteria. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5(4):a012922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarstad K, Boye E, Steen HB. Timing of initiation of chromosome replication in individual Escherichia coli cells. Embo J. 1986;5(7):1711–1717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyamura K, Abe Y, Higashi M, et al. DiaA dynamics are coupled with changes in initial origin complexes leading to helicase loading. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(37):25038–25050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyamura K, Fujikawa N, Ishida T, et al. The interaction of DiaA and DnaA regulates the replication cycle in E. coli by directly promoting ATP DnaA-specific initiation complexes. Genes Dev. 2007;21(16):2083–2099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishida T, Akimitsu N, Kashioka T, et al. DiaA, a novel DnaA-binding protein, ensures the timely initiation of Escherichia coli chromosome replication. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(44):45546–45555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter S, Hagemann M, Messer W. Transcriptional analysis and mutation of a dnaA-like gene in Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(18):4946–4949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran L, Larsson J, Vigil-Stenman T, et al. Genome erosion in a nitrogen-fixing vertically transmitted endosymbiotic multicellular cyanobacterium. PLoS One. 2010;5(7):e11486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama T, Kamikawa R, Tanifuji G, et al. Complete genome of a nonphotosynthetic cyanobacterium in a diatom reveals recent adaptations to an intracellular lifestyle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(31):11407–11412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriyama T, Sato N. Enzymes involved in organellar DNA replication in photosynthetic eukaryotes. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casadesús J. Bacterial DNA methylation and methylomes. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;945:35–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wion D, Casadesús J. N6-methyl-adenine: an epigenetic signal for DNA-protein interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4(3):183–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erova TE, Kosykh VG, Sha J, et al. DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam) controls the expression of the cytotoxic enterotoxin (act) gene of Aeromonas hydrophila via tRNA modifying enzyme-glucose-inhibited division protein (GidA). Gene. 2012;498(2):280–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Løbner-Olesen A, Skovgaard O, Marinus MG. Dam methylation: coordinating cellular processes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8(2):154–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw BR, Marinus MG. Isolation and characterization of Dam+ revertants and suppressor mutations that modify secondary phenotypes of dam-3 strains of Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Gen Genet. 1980;178(2):309–315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marinus MG. Recombination is essential for viability of an Escherichia coli dam (DNA adenine methyltransferase) mutant. J Bacteriol. 2000;182(2):463–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickman BW, Radman M. Escherichia coli mutator mutants deficient in methylation-instructed DNA mismatch correction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980;77(2):1063–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harinarayanan R, Gowrishankar J. A dnaC mutation in Escherichia coli that affects copy number of ColE1-like plasmids and the PriA-PriB (but not Rep-PriC) pathway of chromosomal replication restart. Genetics. 2004;166(3):1165–1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghunathan N, Goswami S, Leela JK, et al. A new role for Escherichia coli Dam DNA methylase in prevention of aberrant chromosomal replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(11):5698–5711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demarre G, Chattoraj DK. DNA adenine methylation is required to replicate both Vibrio cholerae chromosomes once per cell cycle. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(5):e1000939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan ES, Waldor MK. Distinct replication requirements for the two Vibrio cholerae chromosomes. Cell. 2003;114(4):521–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Val ME, Soler-Bistué A, Bland MJ, et al. Management of multipartite genomes: the Vibrio cholerae model. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2014;22:120–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duigou S, Knudsen KG, Skovgaard O, et al. Independent control of replication initiation of the two Vibrio cholerae chromosomes by DnaA and RctB. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(17):6419–6424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharnagl M, Richter S, Hagemann M. The cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 expresses a DNA methyltransferase specific for the recognition sequence of the restriction endonuclease PvuI. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(16):4116–4122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemann M, Gärtner K, Scharnagl M, et al. Identification of the DNA methyltransferases establishing the methylome of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. DNA Res. 2018;25(4):343–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matveyev AV, Young KT, Meng A, et al. DNA methyltransferases of the cyanobacterium Anabaena PCC 7120. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(7):1491–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngernprasirtsiri J, Kobayashi H, Akazawa T. DNA methylation as a mechanism of transcriptional regulation in nonphotosynthetic plastids in plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85(13):4750–4754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngernprasirtsiri J, Kobayashi H, Akazawa T. DNA methylation occurred around lowly expressed genes of plastid DNA during tomato fruit development. Plant Physiol. 1988;88(1):16–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngernprasirtsiri J, Chollet R, Kobayashi H, et al. DNA methylation and the differential expression of C4 photosynthesis genes in mesophyll and bundle sheath cells of greening maize leaves. J Biol Chem. 1989;264(14):8241–8248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fojtová M, Kovarík A, Matyásek R. Cytosine methylation of plastid genome in higher plants. Fact or artefact? Plant Sci. 2001;160(4):585–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlert D, Stegemann S, Kahlau S, et al. Insensitivity of chloroplast gene expression to DNA methylation. Mol Genet Genomics. 2009;282(1):17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marano MR, Carrillo N. Chromoplast formation during tomato fruit ripening. No evidence for plastid DNA methylation. Plant Mol Biol. 1991;16(1):11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas R, Vera A, Martin M, et al. Changes in protein synthesis without evidence of DNA methylation in barley chloroplasts during leaf growth and development. Plant Sci. 1992;85(1):71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishiyama R, Wada Y, Mibu M, et al. Role of a nonselective de novo DNA methyltransferase in maternal inheritance of chloroplast genes in the green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genetics. 2004;168(2):809–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishiyama R, Ito M, Yamaguchi Y, et al. A chloroplast-resident DNA methyltransferase is responsible for hypermethylation of chloroplast genes in Chlamydomonas maternal gametes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(9):5925–5930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura Y, Misumi O, Matsunaga S, et al. The active digestion of uniparental chloroplast DNA in a single zygote of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is revealed by using the optical tweezer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(22):12577–12582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura Y, Misumi O, Kato K, et al. An mt(+) gamete-specific nuclease that targets mt(-) chloroplasts during sexual reproduction in C. reinhardtii. Genes Dev. 2002;16(9):1116–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umen JG, Goodenough UW. Chloroplast DNA methylation and inheritance in Chlamydomonas. Genes Dev. 2001;15(19):2585–2597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohbayashi R, Yamamoto JY, Watanabe S, et al. Variety of DNA replication activity among cyanobacteria correlates with distinct respiration activity in the dark. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017;58(2):279–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohbayashi R, Watanabe S, Kanesaki Y, et al. DNA replication depends on photosynthetic electron transport in cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013;344(2):138–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciąg M, Nowicki D, Janniere L, et al. Genetic response to metabolic fluctuations: correlation between central carbon metabolism and DNA replication in Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact. 2011;10:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jannière L, Canceill D, Suski C, et al. Genetic evidence for a link between glycolysis and DNA replication. PLoS One. 2007;2(5):e447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills KV, Perler FB. The mechanism of intein-mediated protein splicing: variations on a theme. Protein Pept Lett. 2005;12(8):751–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novikova O, Topilina N, Belfort M. Enigmatic distribution, evolution, and function of inteins. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(21):14490–14497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topilina NI, Novikova O, Stanger M, et al. Post-translational environmental switch of RadA activity by extein-intein interactions in protein splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(13):6631–6648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon CW, Stanger M, Belfort M. Protein splicing of a recombinase intein induced by ssDNA and DNA damage. Genes Dev. 2016;30(24):2663–2668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitter JN, Cousin CE, Nicastri MC, et al. Salt-dependent conditional protein splicing of an intein from Halobacterium salinarum. Biochemistry. 2016;55(9):1279–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrokovski S. A new intein in cyanobacteria and its significance for the spread of inteins. Trends Genet. 1996;12(8):287–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams NK, Prosselkov P, Liepinsh E, et al. In vivo protein cyclization promoted by a circularly permuted Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 DnaB mini-intein. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(10):7790–7798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XQ, Hu Z. Identification and characterization of a cyanobacterial DnaX intein. FEBS Lett. 1997;408(3):311–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorbalenya AE. Non-canonical inteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26(7):1741–1748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopf M, Klähn S, Pade N, et al. Comparative genome analysis of the closely related Synechocystis strains PCC 6714 and PCC 6803. DNA Res. 2014;21(3):255–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura Y, Kaneko T, Sato S, et al. Complete genome structure of Gloeobacter violaceus PCC 7421, a cyanobacterium that lacks thylakoids. DNA Res. 2003;10(4):137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Hu Z, Liu XQ. Protein trans-splicing by a split intein encoded in a split DnaE gene of Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(16):9226–9231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi J, Amitai G, Belenkiy O, et al. Distribution of split DnaE inteins in cyanobacteria. Mol Microbiol. 2003;50(5):1569–1577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta RS, Mathews DW. Signature proteins for the major clades of cyanobacteria. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah NH, Dann GP, Vila-Perelló M, et al. Ultrafast protein splicing is common among cyanobacterial split inteins: implications for protein engineering. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(28):11338–11341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheriyan M, Pedamallu CS, Tori K, et al. Faster protein splicing with the Nostoc punctiforme DnaE intein using non-native extein residues. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(9):6202–6211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zettler J, Schütz V, Mootz HD. The naturally split Npu DnaE intein exhibits an extraordinarily high rate in the protein trans-splicing reaction. FEBS Lett. 2009;583(5):909–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WJ, Lee SM, Um Y, et al. Development of SyneBrick vectors as a synthetic biology platform for gene expression in Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaerli Y, Gili M, Isalan M. A split intein T7 RNA polymerase for transcriptional AND-logic. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(19):12322–12328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens AJ, Sekar G, Shah NH, et al. A promiscuous split intein with expanded protein engineering applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(32):8538–8543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley DS, Lennon CW, Li Z, et al. Mycobacterial DnaB helicase intein as oxidative stress sensor. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar