References
- Saettone MF. Progress and problems in ophthalmic drug delivery. Pharmatechnology. 2002:1–6.
- Schoenwald RD. Ocular pharmacokinetics. In: Zimmerman TJ, Kooner KS, editors. Textbook of ocular pharmacology. Philadelphia, PA: Lipincott-Raven Publishers; 1997. p. 119–138.
- Winfiled AJ, Jessiman D, Williams A, Esakowitz L. A study of the causes of non-compliance by patients prescribed eye drops. Br. J. Ophthamol. 1990;74:477–480.
- White CJ, Byrne ME. Expert opinion: molecularly imprinted therapeutic contact lenses. Expert Opin. Drug Delivery. 2010;7:765–780.
- Tieppo A, White CJ, Paine AC, Voyles ML, McBride MK, Byrne ME. Sustained in vivo release from imprinted therapeutic contact lenses. J. Controlled Release. 2012;157:391–397.
- White CJ, McBride MK, Pate KM, Tieppo A, Byrne ME. Extended release of high molecular weight hydroxypropyl methylcellulose from molecularly imprinted, extended wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Biomaterials. 2011;32:5698–5705.
- Kim J, Peng C, Chauhan A. Extended release of dexamethasone from silicone-hydrogel contact lenses containing vitamin E. J. Controlled Release. 2010;148:110–116.
- Venkatesh S, Sizemore SP, Byrne ME. Biomimetic hydrogels for enhanced loading and extended release of ocular therapeutics. Biomaterials. 2007;28:717–724.
- White CJ, Tieppo A, Byrne ME. Controlled drug release from contact lenses: a comprehensive review from 1965-present. J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 2011;21:369–384.
- Karlgard CCS, Wong NS, Jones LW, Moresoli C. In vitro uptake and release studies of ocular pharmaceutical agents by silicon containing and p-HEMA hydrogel contact lens materials. Int. J. Pharm. 2003;257:141–151.
- Karlgard CCS, Jones LW, Moresoli C. Ciprofloxacin interaction with silicon-based and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. Eye & Contact Lens. 2003;29(2):83–89.
- Kannurpatti AR, Anseth JW, Bowman CN. A study of the evolution of mechanical properties and structural heterogeneity of polymer networks formed by photopolymerizations of multifunctional (meth)acrylates. Polymer. 1998;39:213–250.
- Rhee DJ, Rapuano CJ, Papaliodis GN, Fraunfelder FW, editors. Physicians’ desk reference for ophthalmic medicines. Montvale (NJ): Thomson Healthcare, Inc; 2007.
- Douglas JA, Abdulbaki M, Dunn JP, Marsh MJ. Episcleritis and Scleritis: clinical featuers and treatment results. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2000;130:469–476.
- Eysteinsson T, Jonasson F, Sasaki H, Arnarsson A, Sverrisson T, Sasaki K, Stefansson E, Reykjavik Eye Study Group. Central corneal thickness, radius of the corneal curvature and intraocular pressure in normal subjects using non-contact techniques: Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Opthalmologica Scandinavica. 2002;80:11–15.
- Glasson MJ, Stapleton F, Keay L, Willcox MD. The effect of short term contact lens wear on the tear film and ocular surface characteristics of tolerant and intolerant wearers. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29:41–47.
- Kim B, Peppas NA. Synthesis and characterization of pH-sensitive slycopolymers for oral drug delivery systems. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2002;13:1271–1281.
- French K. Contact lens material properties. Part 2 – mechanical behavior and modulus. Optician. 2005;230:29–34.
- Silicone Hydrogels [Internet]. Silicone Hydrogels.org. Papas E. Editorial: elastic modulus and silicone hydrogel contact lens fitting; c2002–2011 [revised 2005 Aug; cited 29 May 2013]. Available from: http://www.siliconehydrogels.org/editorials/aug_05.asp
- Ghormley NR. How modulus affects soft contact lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2005:20–24.
- Hong X, Himebaugh N, Thibos LN. On-eye evaluation of optical performance of rigid and soft contact lenses. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2001;78:872–880.
- Jones L, Woods CA, Efron N. Life expectancy of rigid gas permeable and high water content contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 1996;22:258–261.
- Fonn D, Holden BA. Rigid gas-permeable vs. hydrogel contact lenses for extended wear. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 1998;65:613–618.
- Nicolson PC, Vogt J. Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3273–3283.