Heat-treated membranes with bioelectricity promote bone regeneration

References

• Li J, Zuo Y, Man Y, Mo A, Huang C, Liu M, Jansen JA, Li Y. Fabrication and biocompatibility of an antimicrobial composite membrane with an asymmetric porous structure. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 2012;23:81–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadsetan M, Hefferan TE, Szatkowski JP, Mishra PK, Macura SI, Lu L, Yaszemski MJ. Effect of hydrogel porosity on marrow stromal cell phenotypic expression. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2193–2202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang HS, La WG, Park J, Kim CS, Im GI, Kim BS. Efficient bone regeneration induced by bone morphogenetic protein-2 released from apatite-coated collagen scaffolds. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 2012;23:1659–1671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee EJ, Shin DS, Kim HE, Kim HW, Koh YH, Jang JH. Membrane of hybrid chitosan-silica xerogel for guided bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2009;30:743–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai HY, Chou SH, Cheng LP, Yu HT, Don TM. Asymmetric composite membranes from chitosan and tricalcium phosphate useful for guided bone regeneration. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 2012;23:1153–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Backly RM, Zaky SH, Muraglia A, Tonachini L, Brun F, Canciani B, Chiapale D, Santolini F, Cancedda R, Mastrogiacomo M. A platelet-rich plasma-based membrane as a periosteal substitute with enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic properties: a new concept for bone repair. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2013;19:152–165.
   Google Scholar
• Yagyik Y, Talwar IM, Lal N, Nagpaul KK, Jethi RK. The electret effect of kidney stones. Biomaterials. 1987;8:503–505.
   Google Scholar
• Balint R, Cassidy NJ, Cartmell SH. Electrical stimulation: a novel tool for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part B. 2013;19:48–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinacci A, Tessari L. A correlation analysis between bone formation rate and bioelectric potentials in rabbit tibia. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1983;35:728–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinacci A, Black J, Brighton CT, Friedenberg ZB. Changes in bioelectric potentials on bone associated with direct current stimulation of osteogenesis. J. Orthopaed. Res. 1988;6:335–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad JB, Obolensky AG, Shinnick P. The biologic effects and the therapeutic mechanism of action of electric and electromagnetic field stimulation on bone and cartilage: new findings and a review of earlier work. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2007;13:485–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson J, Downes E. Clinical aspects of the stimulation of bone healing using electrical phenomena. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1979;17:161–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budiraharjo R, Neoh KG, Kang ET. Enhancing bioactivity of chitosan film for osteogenesis and wound healing by covalent immobilization of BMP-2 or FGF-2. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 2013;24:645–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley TP, Ellis AL, Belousova M, Petersen D, DeCarlo AA. Dense chitosan surgical membranes produced by a coincident compression-dehydration process. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 2013;24:621–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan S, Zhang XL, Lin XM, Liu TQ, Ma XH, Cui ZF. Chitosan/gelatin porous scaffolds containing hyaluronic acid and heparan sulfate for neural tissue engineering. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 2013;24:999–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan J, Yang L, Wang G, Xiao Y, Zhang B, Qi N. Biocompatibility evaluation of chitosan-based injectable hydrogels for the culturing mice mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. J. Biomater. App. 2010;24:625–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster A, Osifo PO, Neomagus HW, Grant DM. A comparison of glycans and polyglycans using solid-state NMR and X-ray powder diffraction. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2006;30:150–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu Y, Man Y, Wang P, Cheng Z, Zhang M, Hong Y, Tian K. Biomimetic mineralization and degradation of bioelectret film in vitro. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. 2005;20:83–85.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Qu Y, Gong P, Li J, Wang P, Man Y. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of chitosan bioelectret membranes for guided bone regeneration. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2010;25:622–633.
   Google Scholar
• Yang C, Zhongfu X. Influence of heat treatment on the electret properties of sol-gel prepared silicon-dioxide films. J. Electrostat. 1996;37:29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Tirkistani F. Thermal analysis of chitosan modified by cyclic oxygenated compounds. Polym. Degr. Stab. 1998;61:161–164.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KY, Ha WS, Park WH. Blood compatibility and biodegradability of partially N-acylated chitosan derivatives. Biomaterials. 1995;16:1211–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Park JK, Hong JH, Jung HS, Hong KS, Lee JH, Park KB, Choi SK, Seo YK. Increase of BM-MSC proliferation using L-DOPA on titanium surface in vitro. J. Biomater. Appl. 2012;27:143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Liu H, Fan H, Wang Y, Toh SL, Goh JC. The interaction between a combined knitted silk scaffold and microporous silk sponge with human mesenchymal stem cells for ligament tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29:662–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tognarini I, Sorace S, Zonefrati R, Galli G, Gozzini A, Carbonell Sala S, Thyrion GD, Carossino AM Tanini A, Mavilia C, Azzari C, Sbaiz F, Facchini A, Capanna R, Brandi ML. In vitro differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on Ti6Al4 V surfaces. Biomaterials. 2008;29:809–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Shi R, Gong P, Li J, Ao D, Wang P, Yang Y, Man Y, Qu Y. Bioelectric effect of a chitosan bioelectret membrane on bone regeneration in rabbit cranial defects. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2012;27:122–132.
   Google Scholar
• Dupoirieux L, Pourquier D, Picot MC, Neves M. Comparative study of three different membranes for guided bone regeneration of rat cranial defects. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2001;30:58–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieri F, Lucarelli E, Corinaldesi G, Aldini NN, Fini M, Parrilli A, Dozza B, Donati D, Marchetti C. Dose-dependent effect of adipose-derived adult stem cells on vertical bone regeneration in rabbit calvarium. Biomaterials. 2010;31:3527–3535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu LM, Yan MG, Yang DH, Sun WW, Zhang JX. The expression of protein inhibitor of activated signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 in the evolutionary process of gastric cancer. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2011;22:e31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Olthuis W, Bergveld P. On the charge storage and decay mechanism in silicon dioxide electrets. IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. 2002;27:691–697.
   Google Scholar
• Cui L, Jiang J, Xia Z, Chen G, Wang Z. Charge storage and transport in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) film. J. Electrostat. 1998;44:61–65.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacson BM, Bloebaum RD. Bone bioelectricity: what have we learned in the past 160 years? J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2010;95:1270–1279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hronik-Tupaj M, Kaplan DL. A review of the responses of two- and three-dimensional engineered tissues to electric fields. Tissue Eng. Part B. 2012;18:167–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson EN, Nordheim A. Linking actin dynamics and gene transcription to drive cellular motile functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;11:353–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons JT, Horwitz AR, Schwartz MA. Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;11:633–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman BD, Grashoff C, Schwartz MA. Dynamic molecular processes mediate cellular mechanotransduction. Nature. 2011;475:316–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams DF. The role of short synthetic adhesion peptides in regenerative medicine; the debate. Biomaterials. 2011;32:4195–4197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura S, Kobayashi T, Nakamura M, Yamashita K. Enhanced in vivo responses of osteoblasts in electrostatically activated zones by hydroxyapatite electrets. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2009;20:99–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chierico A, Valentini R, Majzoub Z, Piattelli A, Scarano A, Okun L, Cordioli G. Electrically charged GTAM membranes stimulate osteogenesis in rabbit calvarial defects. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:415–424.
   Google Scholar
• Lekholm U, Becker W, Dahlin C, Becker B, Donath K, Morrison E. The role of early versus late removal of GTAM membranes on bone formation at oral implants placed into immediate extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 1993;4:121–129.
   Google Scholar