Enhanced X-ray absorption for micro-CT analysis of low density polymers

References

• Mould RF. A century of x-rays and radioactivity in medicine: with emphasis on photographic records of the early years. Taylor & Francis: London; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Lu Y. A history of Chinese science and technology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ritman EL. Current status of developments and applications of micro-CT. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2011;13:531–552. doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124717. PubMed PMID: 21756145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock SR. Microcomputed tomography: methodology and applications. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL; 2008.10.1201/9781420058772
   Google Scholar
• Ho ST, Hutmacher DW. A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1362–1376. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DE, Mather ML, Simon CG, et al. Time-optimized x-ray micro-CT imaging of polymer based scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater. 2012;100B:360–367. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizutani R, Suzuki Y. X-ray microtomography in biology. Micron. 2012;43:104–115. doi:10.1016/j.micron.2011.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metscher BD. MicroCT for developmental biology: a versatile tool for high-contrast 3D imaging at histological resolutions. Dev. Dyn. 2009;238:632–640. doi:10.1002/dvdy.21857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac PM, Kley NJ. Iodine-enhanced micro-CT imaging: methodological refinements for the study of the soft-tissue anatomy of post-embryonic vertebrates. J. Exp. Zool. Part B: Mol. Dev. Evol. 2014;322:166–176. doi:10.1002/jez.b.22561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metscher B. MicroCT for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues. BMC Physiol. 2009;9:11–25. PubMed PMID: doi:10.1186/1472-6793-9-11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrett PR, Meshkov SL, Perlmutter GS. Oral contrast agents in CT of the abdomen. Radiology. 1984;153:545–546. doi:10.1148/radiology.153.2.6484186. PubMed PMID: 6484186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landrigan MD, Flatley JC, Turnbull TL, et al. Detection of dentinal cracks using contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2010;3:223–227. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.10.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butzloff PR. Micro-CT imaging of denatured chitin by silver to explore honey bee and insect pathologies. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e27448. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027448.
   Google Scholar
• Heukeshoven J, Dernick R. Simplified method for silver staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels and the mechanism of silver staining. Electrophoresis. 1985;6:103–112. doi:10.1002/elps.1150060302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotton CJ, Hayes B, Alexander R, et al. Ex vivo micro-computed tomography analysis of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis for preclinical drug evaluation. Eur. Respir. J. 2013;42:1633–1645. doi:10.1183/09031936.00182412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verleden SE, Vasilescu DM, Willems S, et al. The site and nature of airway obstruction after lung transplantation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013;189:292–300. doi:10.1164/rccm.201310-1894OC.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusi N, Martinez-Martinez J. Mercury porosimetry as a tool for improving quality of micro-CT images in low porosity carbonate rocks. Eng. Geol. 2013;166:272–282. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005;26:5474–5491. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo SC, Stevenson AW, Wilkins SW. In-line phase-contrast x-ray imaging and tomography for materials science. Materials. 2012;5:937. PubMed PMID: doi:10.3390/ma5050937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djukic LP, Herszberg I, Walsh WR, et al. Contrast enhancement in visualisation of woven composite tow architecture using a microCT scanner. Part 1: fabric coating and resin additives. Composites Part A. 2009;40:553–565. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manickam SS, McCutcheon JR. Characterization of polymeric nonwovens using porosimetry, porometry and X-ray computed tomography. J. Membr. Sci. 2012;407–408:108–115. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vlierberghe S, Cnudde V, Dubruel P, et al. Porous gelatin hydrogels: 1. Cryogenic formation and structure analysis. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:331–337. doi:10.1021/bm060684o.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MH, Baek MH, Cha DS, et al. Freeze–thaw stabilization of sweet potato starch gel by polysaccharide gums. Food Hydrocolloids. 2002;16:345–352. doi:10.1016/S0268-005X(01)00107-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, et al. Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1077–1086. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00630-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickerton P, Jarvis J, Jeffery N. Concentration-dependent specimen shrinkage in iodine-enhanced microCT. J. Anat. 2013;223:185–193. doi:10.1111/joa.12068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin AS, Salazar-Noratto GE, Guldberg RE. EPIC-muCT imaging of articular cartilage. Methods Mol. Biol. (Clifton, NJ). 2015;1226:131–140. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1619-1_11. Epub 2014 Oct 22. PubMed PMID: 25331048.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benders KEM, Malda J, Saris DBF, et al. Formalin fixation affects equilibrium partitioning of an ionic contrast agent-microcomputed tomography (EPIC-μCT) imaging of osteochondral samples. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18:1586–1591. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2010.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minton J, Janney C, Akbarzadeh R, et al. Solvent-free polymer/bioceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: fabrication, analysis, and cell growth. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2014;25:1856–1874. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2014.953016. Epub 2014 Sep 03. PubMed PMID: 25178801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayton E, Purcell M, Aarvold A, et al. A comparison of polymer and polymer–hydroxyapatite composite tissue engineered scaffolds for use in bone regeneration. An in vitro and in vivo study. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2014;102:2613–2624. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones AC, Milthorpe B, Averdunk H, et al. Analysis of 3D bone ingrowth into polymer scaffolds via micro-computed tomography imaging. Biomaterials. 2004;25:4947–4954. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosmi F, Bernasconi A, Sodini N. Phase contrast micro-tomography and morphological analysis of a short carbon fibre reinforced polyamide. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011;71:23–30.10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar