Relationship between water structure and properties of poly(methyl methacrylate-b-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) by solid-state NMR

References

• Okano T, Nishiyama S, Shinohara I, et al. Role of microphase separated structure on the interfacial interaction of polymer with blood. Artif Organs. 1979;3(Suppl):253–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okano T, Nishiyama S, Shinohara I, et al. Effect of hydrophilic and hydrophobic microdomains on mode of interaction between block polymer and blood platelets. J Biomed Mater Res. 1981;15:393–402.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okano T, Uruno M, Sugiyama N, et al. Suppression of platelet activity on microdomain surfaces of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-polyether block copolymers. J Biomed Mater Res. 1986;20:1035–1047.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakashima T, Takakura K. Thromboresistance of graft-type copolymers with hydrophilic-hydrophobic microphase-separated structure. J Biomed Mater Res. 1977;11:787–798.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataoka K, Ito H, Amano H, et al. Minimized platelet interaction with poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-block- 4-bis(trimethylsilyl)methylstyrene) hydrogel showing anomalously high free water content. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1998;9:111–129.10.1163/156856298X00460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermette P, Meagher L. Interaction of phospholipid- and poly(ethylene glycol)-modified surfaces with biological systems: relation to physico-chemical properties and mechanism. Colloids Surf B. 2003;28:153–198.10.1016/S0927-7765(02)00160-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihara K, Aragaki R, Ueda T, et al. Reduced thrombogenecity of polymers having phospholipid polar groups. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990;24:1069–1077.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataoka K, Okano T, Akaike T, et al. Estimation of cell adhesion on polymer surfaces by the use of “column-method”. In: Winter GD, Gibbons DF, Plenk H Jr, editors. Advances in biomaterials, vol 3, biomaterials 1980. New York (NY): Wiley; 1982. p. 493–498.
   Google Scholar
• Senshu K, Yamashita S, Ito M, et al. Surface characterization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate/styrene block copolymers by transmission electron microscopic observation and contact angle measurement. Langmuir. 1995;11:2293–2300.10.1021/la00006a070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukagoshi T, Kondo Y, Yoshino N. Protein adsorption on polymer-modified silica particle surface. Colloids Surf B. 2007;54:101–107.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei Y, Wu T, Xu C, et al. Tuning cell adhesion on gradient poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-grafted surfaces. Langmuir. 2005;21:12309–12314.10.1021/la050668x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa C, Goto A, Tsujii Y, et al. Protein repellency of well-defined, concentrated poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) brushes by size-exclusion effect. Macromolecules. 2006;39:2284–2290.10.1021/ma0520242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morra M, editor. Water in biomaterial surface science. New York (NY): Wiley; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Vogler EA. Water and acute biological response to surface. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1999;10:1015–1045.10.1163/156856299X00667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade JD, Lee HB, Jhon MS, et al. Water as a biomaterial. ASAIO J. 1973;19:1–5.10.1097/00002480-197301900-00001
   Google Scholar
• Gracia C, Anderson JM, Bareneberg SA. Hemocompatibility: effect of structured water. Trans Am Soc Intern Organs. 1980;26:294–298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Volger E. Chapter 1.5 role of water in biomaterials. In: Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE, editors. Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2004. p. 59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka M, Mochizuki A. Clarification of blood compatibility mechanism by controlling water structure at the blood–poly(meth)acrylate interface. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2010;21:1849–1863.10.1163/092050610X517220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka M, Motomura T, Kawada M, et al. Blood compatible aspects of poly(2-methoxyethylacrylate) (PMEA)—relationship between protein adsorption and platelet adhesion on PMEA surface. Biomaterials. 2000;21:1471–1481.10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00031-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka M, Mochizuki A. Effect of water structure on blood compatibility – thermal analysis of water in poly(meth)acrylate. J Biomed Mater Res. 2004;68A:684–695.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka M, Mochizuki A, Ishii N, et al. Study of blood compatibility with poly(2-methoxyethyl acrylate). Relationship between water structure and platelet compatibility in poly(2-methoxyethylacrylate-co-2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate). Biomacromolecules. 2002;3:36–41.10.1021/bm010072y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaoka S, Takiuch H, Yokota K, et al. Interactions between blood components and hydrogels with poly (oxyethylene) chain of various chain length. Koubunsi Ronbunshu. 1982;39:165–171.10.1295/koron.39.165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaoka S, Takiuch H, Yokota K, et al. Effect of higher order structure in hydrogels with poly (oxyethylene) chain on their properties. Koubunsi Ronbunshu. 1982;39:173–178.10.1295/koron.39.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokota K, Abe A, Hosaka S, et al. A 13C nuclear magnetic resonance study of covalently cross-linked gels. Effect of chemical composition, degree of cross-linking, and temperature to chain mobility. Macromolecules. 1978;11:95–100.10.1021/ma60061a017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miwa Y, Ishida H, Saitô H, et al. Network structures and dynamics of dry and swollen poly(acrylate)s. Characterization of high- and low-frequency motions as revealed by suppressed or recovered intensities (SRI) analysis of 13C NMR. Polymer. 2009;50:6091–6099.10.1016/j.polymer.2009.10.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada-Nosaka A, Ishikiriyama K, Todoki M, et al. 1H-NMR studies on water in methacrylate hydrogel. J Appl Polym Sci. 1990;39:2443–2452.10.1002/app.1990.070391117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada-Nosaka A, Tanzawa H. 1H-NMR studies on watert in methacrylate hydrogel II. J Appl Polym Sci. 1991;43:1166–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asakura T, Isobe K, Kametani S, et al. Characterization of water in hydrated Bombyx mori silk fibroin fiber and films by 2H NMR relaxation and 13C solid state NMR. Acta Biomater. 2017;50:322–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kametani S, Sekine S, Ohkubo T, et al. NMR studies of water dynamics during sol-to-gel transition of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) in concentrated aqueous solution. Polymer. 2017;109:287–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miwa Y, Ishida H, Tanaka M, et al. 2H NMR and 13C NMR study of hydration behavior of poly(2-methoxyethyl acrylate), poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and poly(tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate) in relation to their blood compatibility as biomaterials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2010;21:1911–1924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochizuki A, Namiki T, Nishimori Y, et al. Study of the water structure in poly(methyl methacrylate-block-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and its relationship to platelet adhesion on the copolymer surface. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2015;26:750–765.10.1080/09205063.2015.1056457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver JVM, Bannister I, Robinson KL, et al. Stimulus-responsive water-soluble polymers based on 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. Macromolecules. 2004;37:2395–2403.10.1021/ma0356358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weast RC, Astle MJ, Beyer WH. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics: a ready-reference book of chemical and physical data/section 6, fluid properties. 74th ed. Cleveland (OH): CRC Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Asano A, Takegoshi K, Hikichi K. Solid-state NMR study of miscibility and phase-separation of polymer blend: polycarbonate/poly(methyl methacrylate). Polym J. 1992;24:555–562.10.1295/polymj.24.555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torchia DA. The measurement of proton-enhanced carbon-13 T1 values by a method which suppresses artifacts. J Magn Reson. 1978;30:613–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBrierty VJ, Douglass DC. Recent advances in the NMR of solid polymers. J Polym Sci Macromol Rev. 1981;16: 295–366.10.1002/pol.1981.230160105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stejskal EO, Shaefer J, Sefcik MD, et al. Magic-angle carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance study of the compatibility of solid polymeric blends. Macromolecules. 1981;14:275–279.10.1021/ma50003a010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBrierty VJ, Douglass DC, Kwei TK. Compatibility in blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile). 2. An NMR study. Macromolecules. 1978;11:1265–1267.10.1021/ma60066a038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takegoshi K. Miscibility, morphology and molecular motion in polymer blends. Annu Rep NMR Spectrosc. 1995;30:97–130.10.1016/S0066-4103(08)60025-3
   Google Scholar
• Belton PS, Hills BP. The effects of diffusive exchange in heterogeneous systems on NMR line shapes and relaxation processes. Mol Phys. 1987;61:999–1018.10.1080/00268978700101611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi S, Belton P, Nollenberger K, et al. Characterization and prediction of phase separation in hot-melt extruded solid dispersions: a thermal, microscopic and NMR relaxometry study. Pharm Res. 2010;27:1869–1883.10.1007/s11095-010-0185-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morita S, Kitagawa K, Ozaki Y. Hydrogen-bond structures in poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate): infrared spectroscopy and quantum chemical calculations with model compounds. Vib Spectrosc. 2009;51:28–33.10.1016/j.vibspec.2008.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar