Biological properties of electrospun cellulose scaffolds from biomass

References

• Williams CK, Hillmyer MA. Polymers from renewable resources: a perspective for a special issue of polymer reviews. Polymer Revs. 2008;48:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini A. Polymers from renewable resources: a Challenge for the future of macromolecular materials. Macromolecules. 2008;41:9491–9504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu P, Sarkar P, Bhowmick AK. Design of a molecular architecture via a green route for an improved silica reinforced nanocomposite using bioresources. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2018;6:6599–6611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valerio O, Misra M, Mohanty AK. Poly(glycerol-co-diacids) polyesters: from glycerol biorefinery to sustainable engineering applications, a review. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2018;6:5681–5693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Fliert E, Braun AR. Conceptualizing integrative, farmer participatory research for sustainable agriculture: from opportunities to impact. Agric Human Values. 2002;19:25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues GS, Campanhola C, Kitamura PC. An environmental impact assessment system for agricultural R&D. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2003;23:219–244.
   Google Scholar
• Chen G-Q, Patel MK. Plastics derived from biological sources: present and future: a technical and environmental review. Chem Rev. 2012;112:2082–2099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cateto CA, Barreiro MF, Rodrigues AE. Monitoring of lignin-based polyurethane synthesis by FTIR-ATR. Ind Crops Prod. 2008;27:168–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briassoulis D, Babou E, Hiskakis M, et al. Review, mapping and analysis of the agricultural plastic waste generation and consolidation in Europe. Waste Manag Res. 2013;31:1262–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis G, Song JH. Biodegradable packaging based on raw materials from crops and their impact on waste management. Ind Crops Prod. 2006;23:147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halterman D, Guenthner J, Collinge S, et al. Biotech potatoes in the 21st century: 20 years since the first biotech potato. Am J Potato Res. 2016;93:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang S, McDonald AG. Chemical and thermal characterization of potato peel waste and its fermentation residue as potential resources for biofuel and bioproducts production. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62:8421–8429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smerilli M. Valorization of potato-processing residues for the production of lactic acid. ChemBiochemEngQ. 2016;30:255–263.
   Google Scholar
• Kang HJ, Min SC. Potato peel-based biopolymer film development using high-pressure homogenization, irradiation, and ultrasound. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 2010;43:903–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappalainen K, Kärkkäinen J, Joensuu P, et al. Modification of potato peel waste with base hydrolysis and subsequent cationization. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;132:97–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar VB, Pulidindi IN, Gedanken A. Glucose production from potato peel waste under microwave irradiation. J Mol Catal A Chem. 2016;417:163–167.
   Google Scholar
• Haider A, Haider S, Kang I-K. A comprehensive review summarizing the effect of electrospinning parameters and potential applications of nanofibers in biomedical and biotechnology. Arab J Chem. 2018;11:1165–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey MW. Electrospinning cellulose and cellulose derivatives. Polym Rev. 2008;48:378–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chahal S, Hussain FSJ, Kumar A, et al. Fabrication, characterization and in vitro biocompatibility of electrospun hydroxyethyl cellulose/poly (vinyl) alcohol nanofibrous composite biomaterial for bone tissue engineering. Chem Eng Sci. 2016;144:17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naseri N, Poirier JM, Girandon L, et al. 3-Dimensional porous nanocomposite scaffolds based on cellulose nanofibers for cartilage tissue engineering: Tailoring of porosity and mechanical performance. RSC Adv. 2016;6:5999–6007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naseri N, Mathew AP, Girandon L, et al. Porous electrospun nanocomposite mats based on chitosan–cellulose nanocrystals for wound dressing: effect of surface characteristics of nanocrystals. Cellulose. 2015;22:521–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čolić M, Mihajlović D, Mathew A, et al. Cytocompatibility and immunomodulatory properties of wood based nanofibrillated cellulose. Cellulose. 2015;22:763–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin A, Ahrenstedt L, Fink H, et al. Modification of nanocellulose with a xyloglucan-RGD conjugate enhances adhesion and proliferation of endothelial cells: Implications for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:3697–3704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entcheva E, Bien H, Yin L, et al. Functional cardiac cell constructs on cellulose-based scaffolding. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5753–5762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller FA, Müller L, Hofmann I, et al. Cellulose-based scaffold materials for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3955–3963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatankhah E, Prabhakaran MP, Jin G, et al. Development of nanofibrous cellulose acetate/gelatin skin substitutes for variety wound treatment applications. J Biomater Appl. 2014;28:909–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löbmann K, Svagan AJ. Cellulose nanofibers as excipient for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs. Int J Pharm. 2017;533:285–297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zang S, Zhang R, Chen H, et al. Investigation on artificial blood vessels prepared from bacterial cellulose. Mater Sci Eng C. 2015;46:111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamad R, Nayeri MD, Rahman HS, et al. Potential use of plant fibres and their composites for biomedical applications. BioResources. 2014;9:5688–5706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh BN, Panda NN, Mund R, et al. Carboxymethyl cellulose enables silk fibroin nanofibrous scaffold with enhanced biomimetic potential for bone tissue engineering application. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;151:335–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaihre B, Jayasuriya AC. Fabrication and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose novel microparticles for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;69:733–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen D, Lawton D, Thompson MR, et al. Biocomposites reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals from potato peel waste. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;90:709–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D. Recycle technology for potato peel waste processing: a review. Procedia Environ Sci. 2016;31:103–107.
   Google Scholar
• Saalwächter K, Burchard W, Klüfers P, et al. Cellulose solutions in water containing metal complexes. Macromolecules. 2000;33:4094–4107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes EGR, De Queiroz AA. A bioconjugated polyglycerol dendrimer with glucose sensing properties. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2009;20:473–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue D, Qian X. Isolation and rheological characterization of cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) from coir fibers in comparison to wood and cotton. Polymers (Basel). 2018;10:320–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziabari M, Mottaghitalab V, McGovern ST, et al. A new image analysis based method for measuring electrospun nanofiber diameter. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2007;2:597–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez S, Baldwin PM, Gallant DJ. Structural features of starch granules II. In Starch: chemistry and technology. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Elsevier Inc.; 2009. p. 193–236.
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Hess WM, Weber DJ, et al. Scanning electron microscopy: tissue characteristics and starch granule variations of potatoes after microwave and conductive heating. Food Struct. 1990;9:113–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saka S. Evaluation of the quantitative assay of lignin distribution by SEM-EDXA-technique. Wood Sci Technol. 1982;16:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm J, Rockel B, Lautner S, et al. Lignin distribution in wood cell walls determined by TEM and backscattered SEM techniques. J Struct Biol. 2003;143:77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Singh Negi Y, Choudhary V, et al. Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals produced by acid-hydrolysis from sugarcane bagasse as agro-waste. J Mater Phys Chem. 2014;2:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun XF, Xu F, Sun RC, et al. Characteristics of degraded cellulose obtained from steam-exploded wheat straw. Carbohydr Res. 2005;340:97–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atsushi K, Azuma J. I, Tetsuo K. Lignin-carbohydrate complexes and phenolic acids in bagasse. Holzforschung. 1984;38:141–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, et al. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel. 2007;86:1781–1788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford ENJ, Mendon SK, Thames SF, et al. X-ray diffraction of cotton treated with neutralized vegetable oil-based macromolecular crosslinkers. J Eng Fiber Fabr. 2010;5:10–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kim CW, Kim DS, Kang SY, et al. Structural studies of electrospun cellulose nanofibers. Polymer (Guildf). 2006;47:5097–5107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohkawa K. Nanofibers of cellulose and its derivatives fabricated using direct electrospinning. Molecules. 2015;20:9139–9154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatri Z, Wei K, Kim BS, et al. Effect of deacetylation on wicking behavior of co-electrospun cellulose acetate/polyvinyl alcohol nanofibers blend. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;87:2183–2188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celebioglu A, Uyar T. Electrospun porous cellulose acetate fibers from volatile solvent mixture. Mater. Lett. 2011;65:2291–2294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theron SA, Zussman E, Yarin AL. Experimental investigation of the governing parameters in the electrospinning of polymer solutions. Polymer (Guildf). 2004;45:2017–2030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannutti J, Reneker D, Ma T, et al. Electrospinning for tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C. 2007;27:504–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun B, Long YZ, Zhang HD, et al. Advances in three-dimensional nanofibrous macrostructures via electrospinning. Prog Polym Sci. 2014;39:862–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien FJ. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today. 2011;14:88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghi IC, Girousi ST, Voulgaropoulos AN, et al. Study of interactions between DNA-ethidium bromide (EB) and DNA-acridine orange (AO), in solution, using hanging mercury drop electrode (HMDE). Talanta. 2003;61:103–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskić D, Popović S, Ristić P, et al. Analysis of cycloheximide-induced apoptosis in human leukocytes: fluorescence microscopy using annexin V/propidium iodide versus acridin orange/ethidium bromide. Cell Biol Int. 2006;30:924–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar