Cotton cellulose nanofiber/chitosan nanocomposite: characterization and evaluation of cytocompatibility

References

• Guo W, Tan C, Shi K, et al. Wireless piezoelectric devices based on electrospun PVDF/BaTiO3 NW nanocomposite fibers for human motion monitoring. Nanoscale. 2018;10:17751–17760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marudova M, Yorov T. Chitosan/poly(lactic acid) blends as drug delivery systems. Int J Polym Mater. 2019;68:99–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral DL, Zanette RS, Almeida CG, et al. In vitro evaluation of barium titanate nanoparticle/alginate 3D scaffold for osteogenic human stem cell differentiation. Biomed Mater. 2019;14:035011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RnR Market Research. 2015. Top 10 medical device technologies market by type (IVD, cardiology, diagnostic imaging, orthopedics, ophthalmology, endoscopy, diabetes care, wound management, kidney/dialysis, and anesthesia & respiratory care devices) – Global forecast to 2020. Available from: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/top-10-medical-device-technologies-96.html. Accessed May 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR, et al. Development and characterization of sugar palm nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced sugar palm starch bionanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;202:186–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abral H, Basri A, Muhammad F, et al. A simple method for improving the properties of the sago starch films prepared by using ultrasonication treatment. Food Hydrocoll. 2019;93:276–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halimatul MJ, Sapuan SM, Jawaid M, et al. Effect of sago starch and plasticizer content on the properties of thermoplastic films: mechanical testing and cyclic soaking-drying. Polymer. 2019;64:32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Shen X, Zhou H, et al. Chemical modification of chitosan film via surface grafting of citric acid molecular to promote the biomineralization. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;370:270–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palem RR, Saha N, Shimoga GD, et al. Chitosan-silver nanocomposites: new functional biomaterial for healthcare applications. Int J Polym Mater. 2018;67:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Vázquez M, Vega-Ruiz B, Ramos-Zúñiga R, et al. Chitosan and its potential use as a scaffold for tissue engineering in regenerative medicine. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho CR, López-Cebral R, Silva-Correia J, et al. Investigation of cell adhesion in chitosan membranes for peripheral nerve regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;71:1122–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Wang K, Gu X, et al. Biophysical regulation of cell behavior-cross talk between substrate stiffness and nanotopography. Engineering. 2017;3:36–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L, Wang K, Yang Y. Adhesion-based tumor cell capture using nanotopography. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016;147:291–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalwani G, Gopalan A, D'Agati M, et al. Porous three-dimensional carbon nanotube scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015;103:3212–3225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR. Isolation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose from sugar palm fibres (Arenga Pinnata). Carbohydr Polym. 2018;181:1038–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR, et al. Sugar palm nanofibrillated cellulose (Arenga pinnata (Wurmb.) Merr): effect of cycles on their yield, physic-chemical, morphological and thermal behavior. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;123:379–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao L, Yuan D, Xu C, et al. Biobased, self-healable, high strength rubber with tunicate cellulose nanocrystals. Nanoscale. 2017;9:15696–15706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia Y, Wang X, Huo M, et al. Preparation and characterization of a novel bacterial cellulose/chitosan bio-hydrogel. Nanomater Nanotechnol. 2017;7:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong X, Wang Y, Chen L. Enhanced emulsifying properties of wood-based cellulose nanocrystals as pickering emulsion stabilizer. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;169:295–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song L, Li Y, Xiong Z, et al. Water-induced shape memory effect of nanocellulose papers from sisal cellulose nanofibers with graphene oxide. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;179:110–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ibrahim R, et al. Sugar palm (Arenga pinnata (Wurmb.) Merr) cellulosic fibre hierarchy: a comprehensive approach from macro to nano scale. J Mater Re Technol. 2019;8:2753–2766.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira MM, Raposo NR, Brayner R, et al. Cytotoxicity and expression of genes involved in the cellular stress response and apoptosis in mammalian fibroblast exposed to cotton cellulose nanofibers. Nanotechnology. 2013;24:075103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD/FAO [Internet]. Paris: “Cotton.” In: OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2016–2025; 2016 [Cited 2019 Jul 11]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/agr_outlook-2016-14-en.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Shu S, Chen R, et al. Functionalization of electrospun nanofibers of natural cotton cellulose by cerium dioxide nanoparticles for ultraviolet protection. J Appl Polym Sci. 2013;130:1524–1529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Abe K, Uetani K, et al. Individual cotton cellulose nanofibers: pre-treatment and fibrillation technique. Cellulose. 2014;21:1517–1528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Liu X, Jin T, et al. Preparation of nanocellulose and its potential in reinforced composites: a review. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2019;30:919–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pooyan P, Kim I, Jacob K, et al. Design of a cellulose-based nanocomposite as a potential polymeric scaffold in tissue engineering. Polymer. 2013;54:2105–2114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyang ML, Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, et al. Bionanocomposites for packaging applications. New York (NY): Springer International Publishing, 2018. Chapter 7, Sugar palm starch-based composites for packaging applications, p. 125–147.
   Google Scholar
• Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR, et al. Sugar palm nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced sugar palm starch composite: Degradation and water-barrier properties. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 2018;368:012006.
   Google Scholar
• Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR, et al. Water transport properties of bionanocomposites reinforced by sugar palm (Arenga Pinnata) nanofibrillated cellulose. J Adv Res Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2018;51:234–246.
   Google Scholar
• Rane AV, Kanny K, Abitha VK, et al. In micro and nano technologies, synthesis of inorganic nanomaterials. London (UK): Woodhead Publishing, 2018. Chapter 5, Methods for synthesis of nanoparticles and fabrication of nanocomposites, p. 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• Jameela SR, Suma N, Jayakrishnan A. Protein release from poly(ε-caprolactone) microspheres prepared by melt encapsulation and solvent evaporation techniques: A comparative study. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1997;8:457–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen RD, Huang CF, Hsu SH. Composites of waterborne polyurethane and cellulose nanofibers for 3D printing and bioapplications. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;212:75–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De France KJ, Babi M, Vapaavuori J, et al. 2.5D Hierarchical structuring of nanocomposite hydrogel films containing cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:6325–6335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi H-Y, Jing X, Salick MR, et al. Carbon nanotube (CNT) and nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) reinforcement effect on thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) scaffolds fabricated via phase separation using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as solvent. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;62:417–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanimozhi K, Basha SK, Kumari VS, et al. In vitro cytocompatibility of chitosan/PVA/methylcellulose – nanocellulose nanocomposites scaffolds using L929 fibroblast cells. Appl Surf Sci. 2018;449:574–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend DFL, Leyva González ME, Caraballo MM, et al. Biological properties of electrospun cellulose scaffolds from biomass. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2019;24:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Wang W, Dhital R, et al. Antimicrobial effect and toxicity of cellulose nanofibril/silver nanoparticle nanocomposites prepared by an ultraviolet irradiation method. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2019;180:212–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwyddion software user guide, version 2.28 [Internet]. Czech Republic: Czech Metrology Institute, Brno; 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 12]. Available from: http://gwyddion.net/
   Google Scholar
• Kouser R, Vashist A, Zafaryab M, et al. Biocompatible and mechanically robust nanocomposite hydrogels for potential applications in tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018;84:168–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee S, Jiang H, Ho CH, et al. Microtubule function in fibroblast spreading is modulated according to the tension state of cell-matrix interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:5425–5430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramoff M, Magalhaes P, Ram S. Image processing with image J. Biophotonics Int. 2004;11:36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy N, Yang Y. Natural cellulose fibers from soybean straw. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:3593–3598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibolla H, Pelissari F, Rodrigues M, et al. Cellulose nanofibers produced from banana peel by enzymatic treatment: study of process conditions. Ind Crops Prod. 2017;95:664–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu S, Wu S, Wu J, et al. Tripolyphosphate cross-linked macromolecular composites for the growth of shape- and size-controlled apatites. Molecules. 2012;18:27–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Zhang H, Wang Y, et al. Modulation of apoptotic pathways of macrophages by surface-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varanasi S, Henzel L, Mendoza L, et al. Pickering emulsions electrostatically stabilized by cellulose nanocrystals. Front Chem. 2018;6:409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin N, Dufresne A. Surface chemistry, morphological analysis and properties of cellulose nanocrystals with gradiented sulfation degrees. Nanoscale. 2014;6:5384–5393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacui IA, Nieuwendaal RC, Burnett DJ, et al. Comparison of the properties of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils isolated from bacteria, tunicate, and wood processed using acid, enzymatic, mechanical, and oxidative methods. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:6127–6138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Wu Q. A novel polyacrylamide nanocomposite hydrogel reinforced with natural chitosan nanofibers. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2011;84:155–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Hu X, Dulińska-Molak I, et al. Discriminating the independent influence of cell adhesion and spreading area on stem cell fate determination using micropatterned surfaces. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray R, Gadegaard N, Tsimbouri P, et al. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. Nat Mater. 2011;10:637–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Oreffo RO. Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. Nature Mater. 2014;13:558–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goreham R, Mierczynska A, Smith L, et al. Small surface nanotopography encourages fibroblast and osteoblast cell adhesion. RSC Adv. 2013;3:10309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Villa-Diaz LG, Sun Y, et al. Nanotopography influences adhesion, spreading, and self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. ACS Nano. 2012;6:4094–4103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu D, Li K, Xie Y, et al. The combined effects of nanotopography and Sr ion for enhanced osteogenic activity of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). J Biomater Appl. 2017;31:1135–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Han S, Qian W, et al. Nanotopography regulates motor neuron differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. Nanoscale. 2018;10:3556–3565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Bae W, Kim Y, et al. Directional matrix nanotopography with varied sizes for engineering wound healing. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2017;6:1700297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandri G, Aguzzi C, Rossi S, et al. Halloysite and chitosan oligosaccharide nanocomposite for wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2017;57:216–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos TCD, Rescignano N, Boff L, et al. Manufacture and characterization of chitosan/PLGA nanoparticles nanocomposite buccal films. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;173:638–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knupp J, Arvan P, Chang A. Increased mitochondrial respiration promotes survival from endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:487–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fangkangwanwong J, Sae-Liang N, Sriworarat C, et al. Water-based chitosan for thymine conjugation: a simple, efficient, effective, and green pathway to introduce cell compatible nucleic acid recognition. Bioconjugate Chem. 2016;27:2301–2306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu LW, Ho YC, Chuang EY, et al. Effects of pH on molecular mechanisms of chitosan-integrin interactions and resulting tight-junction disruptions. Biomaterials. 2013;34:784–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colic M, Mihajlovic D, Mathew A, et al. Cytocompatibility and immunomodulatory properties of wood based nanofibrillated cellulose. Cellulose. 2015;22:763–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Xie H. Nanoparticles in daily life: applications, toxicity and regulations. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2018;37:209–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar