Cystine dimethyl ester cross-linked PEG-poly(urethane-urea)/nano-hydroxyapatite composited biomimetic scaffold for bone defect repair

References

• Hunsaker FG, Cioffi DA, Amadio PC, et al. The american academy of orthopaedic surgeons outcomes instruments - normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84A (2):208–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez JR, Kouroupis D, Li DJ, et al. Tissue Engineering and Cell-Based Therapies for Fractures and Bone Defects. Front Bioeng Biotech. 2018;6:105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseti L, Parisi V, Petretta M, et al. Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;78:1246–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wubneh A, Tsekoura EK, Ayranci C, et al. Current state of fabrication technologies and materials for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2018;80:1–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu W, Sun X, Meng HY, et al. 3D printed porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a review. Biomater Sci-UK. 2017;5(9):1690–1698.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filardo G, Kon E, Perdisa F, et al. Polyurethane-based cell-free scaffold for the treatment of painful partial meniscus loss. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25 (2):459–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer K, Dearman BL, Wagstaff MJD, et al. A Novel Biodegradable Polyurethane Matrix for Auricular Cartilage Repair: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study. J Burn Care Res. 2016; 37 (4):353–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Lang G, Chen X, et al. Polyurethane scaffold with in situ swelling capacity for nucleus pulposus replacement. Biomaterials. 2016; 84:196–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Xia QQ, Wu Y, et al. 3D-Printed Atsttrin-Incorporated Alginate/Hydroxyapatite Scaffold Promotes Bone Defect Regeneration with TNF/TNFR Signaling Involvement. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2015;4 (11):1701–1708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzec M, Kucińska-Lipka J, Kalaszczyńska I, et al. Development of polyurethanes for bone repair. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater.2017; 80:736–747.
   Google Scholar
• Rekondo A, Martin R, de Luzuriaga AR, et al. Catalyst-free room-temperature self-healing elastomers based on aromatic disulfide metathesis. Mater Horizons.2014; 1 (2):237–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu HX, Sun PY, Zheng Z, et al. Reduction-sensitive rapid degradable poly(urethane-urea)s based on cystine. Polym Degrad Stabil.2012; 97 (4):661–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun JH, Lee SH, Kwak HB, et al. N-acetylcysteine stimulates osteoblastic differentiation of mouse calvarial cells. J Cell Biochem. 2008; 103 (4):1246–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna-Dominguez JH, Tellez-Jimenez H, Hernandez-Cocoletzi H, et al. Development and in vivo response of hydroxyapatite/whitlockite from chicken bones as bone substitute using a chitosan membrane for guided bone regeneration. Ceram Int 2018; 44 (18):22583–22591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi ZL, Huang X, Cai YR, et al. Size effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on proliferation and apoptosis of osteoblast-like cells. Acta Biomater.2009; 5 (1):338–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu JY, Yu HJ, Chen CZ. Biological properties of calcium phosphate biomaterials for bone repair: a review. Rsc Adv. 2018; 8 (4):2015–2033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingos M, Gloria A, Coelho J, et al. Three-dimensional printed bone scaffolds: The role of nano/micro-hydroxyapatite particles on the adhesion and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2017; 231 (6):555–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HN, Li YB, Zuo Y, et al. Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007; 28 (22):3338–3348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan YS, Xiong DS. Friction properties of nano-hydroxyapatite reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) gel composites as an articular cartilage. Wear 2009; 266 (7-8):699–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugan R, Ramakrishna S. Bioresorbable composite bone paste using polysaccharide based nano hydroxyapatite. Biomaterials 2004; 25 (17):3829–3835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janik H, Marzec M. A review: Fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater.2015; 48:586–591.
   Google Scholar
• Burg KJL, Porter S, Kellam JF. Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2000; 21 (23):2347–2359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson BK, Bow AJ, Kannarpady G, et al. Polyurethane/nano-hydroxyapatite composite films as osteogenic platforms. J Biomat Sci-Polym E.2018; 29 (12):1426–1443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawasaki T. Theory Of Chromatography Of Rigid Molecules on Hydroxyapatite Columns with Small Loads - Estimation Of Adsorption Energy Of Nucleoside Polyphosphates. J Chromatogr.1978; 151 (2):95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawasaki T. Theory Of Chromatography on Hydroxyapatite Columns with Small Loads.5. Determination Of Adsorption Energy Of Epsilon-Amino Group Of Poly-L-Lysine And Manner Of Adsorption Of Molecule. J Chromatogr.1978; 157 (Sep):7–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu JH, Xia H, Teramoto A, et al. The effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on mechanical behavior and biological performance of porous shape memory polyurethane scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res. 2018; 106 (1):244–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druecke D, Langer S, Lamme E, et al. Neovascularization of poly(ether ester) block-copolymer scaffolds in vivo: Long-term investigations using intravital fluorescent microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res. 2004; 68A (1):10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laschke MW, Harder Y, Amon M, et al. Angiogenesis in tissue engineering: Breathing life into constructed tissue substitutes. Tissue Eng.2006; 12 (8):2093–2104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grad S, Kupcsik L, Gorna K, et al. The use of biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering: potential and limitations. Biomaterials 2003; 24 (28):5163–5171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Kim BS. Shape Memory Polyurethane Biocomposites Based on Toughened Polycaprolactone Promoted by Nano-Chitosan. Nanomaterials-Basel 2019;9(2)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mou P, Peng HT, Zhou L, et al. A novel composite scaffold of Cu-doped nano calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/multi-(amino acid) copolymer for bone tissue regeneration. IJN. 2019; Volume 14:3331–3343.
   Google Scholar
• Meng D, Dong LM, Wen Y, et al. Effects of adding resorbable chitosan microspheres to calcium phosphate cements for bone regeneration. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater.2015; 47:266–272.
   Google Scholar
• Williams DF. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2008; 29 (20):2941–2953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh HS, Jung SC, Kook MS, et al. In vitro study of 3D PLGA/n-HAp/beta-TCP composite scaffolds with etched oxygen plasma surface modification in bone tissue engineering. Appl Surf Sci.2016; 388:321–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schantz JT, Brandwood A, Hutmacher DW, et al. Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells in computer designed fibrin-polymer-ceramic scaffolds manufactured by fused deposition modeling. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2005; 16 (9):807–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CXF, Savalani MM, Teoh SH, et al. Dynamics of in vitro polymer degradation of polycaprolactone-based scaffolds: accelerated versus simulated physiological conditions. Biomed Mater. 2008; 3 (3):034108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang CM, Li CX, Huang SS, et al. Self-activated luminescent and mesoporous strontium hydroxyapatite nanorods for drug delivery. Biomaterials 2010; 31 (12):3374–3383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laschke MW, Strohe A, Menger MD, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel nanosize hydroxyapatite particles/poly(ester-urethane) composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater.2010; 6 (6):2020–2027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsson AHC, Mitchell SA, Davidson MR, et al. Attachment of Human Primary Osteoblast Cells to Modified Polyethylene Surfaces. Langmuir 2009; 25 (6):3718–3727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlacic-Zischke J, Hamlet SM, Frus T, et al. The influence of surface microroughness and hydrophilicity of titanium on the up-regulation of TGF beta/BMP signalling in osteoblasts. Biomaterials 2011; 32 (3):665–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaquette C, Ivanovski S, Hamlet SM, et al. Effect of culture conditions and calcium phosphate coating on ectopic bone formation. Biomaterials 2013;34 (22):5538–5551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deliormanli AM, Konyali R. Bioactive glass/hydroxyapatite- containing electrospun poly (epsilon-Caprolactone) composite nanofibers for bone tissue engineering. J Aust Ceram Soc 2019; 55 (1):247–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang WX, Both SK, Zuo Y, et al. Biological evaluation of porous aliphatic polyurethane/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res. 2015; 103(7):2251–2259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar