An antibacterial dental light-cured glass-ionomer cement with improved hardness

References

• Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 13th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, Inc.; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson CL, Mjör IA. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Chicago: Quintessence Publ Co.; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson AD, McLean JW. Glass-ionomer cements. Chicago: Quintessence Publ Co.; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson JW. Chemistry of glass-ionomer cements: a review. Biomaterials. 1998;19(6):485–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moszner N, Salz U. New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci. 2001;26(4):535–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AD. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Int J Prosthodont. 1990;3(5):425–429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guggenberger R, May R, Stefan KP. New trends in glass-ionomer chemistry. Biomaterials. 1998;19(6):479–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momoi Y, Hirosaki K, Kohno A, et al. Flexural properties of resin-modified "hybrid" glass-ionomers in comparison with conventional acid-base glass-ionomers. Dent Mater J. 1995;14(2):109–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xie D, Wu W, Puckett A, et al. Novel resin modified glass ionomer cements with improved flexural strength and ease of handling. Eur Polym J. 2004;40(2):343–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, et al. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 2000;16(2):129–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias AGA, Magno MB, Delbem ACB, et al. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2018;73:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap AUJ, Pek YS, Kumar RA, et al. Experimental studies on a new bioactive material: HAIonomer cements. Biomaterials. 2002;23(3):955–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu YW, Yap AUJ, Cheang P, et al. Development of zirconia-glass ionomer cement composites. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2005;351(6-7):508–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu YW, Yap AUJ, Cheang P, et al. Zirconia–glass ionomer cement––a potential substitute for Miracle Mix. Scripta Mater. 2005;52(2):113–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice LH, Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. The effect of ytterbium fluoride and barium sulphate nanoparticles on the reactivity and strength of a glass-ionomer cement. Dent Mater. 2006;22(8):746–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney JE, Antonucci JM, Rupp NW. Wear and microhardness of a silver-sintered glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res. 1988;67(5):831–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(10):1382–1390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callister WD. Materials science and engineering – an introduction. 7th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ruys A. Alumina ceramics - biomedical and clinical applications. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Woodhead Publishing; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis, MS: Saunders, Inc; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Zanata RL, Magalhaes AC, Lauris JRP, et al. Microhardness and chemical analysis of high-viscous glass-ionomer cement after 10 years of clinical service as ART restorations. J Dent. 2011;39(12):834–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials-fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007;23(3):343–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosoya Y, Ando S, Yamaguchi K, et al. Quality of the interface of primary tooth dentin bonded with antibacterial fluoride-releasing adhesive. J Dent. 2010;38(5):423–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjor IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002;60(1):25–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forss H, Widstrom E. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults. Acta Odontol Scand. 2004;62(2):82–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F, Hickel R. Direct posterior restorations: clinical results and new developments. Dent Clin North Am. 2002;46(2):303–339.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hafshejani TM, Zamanian A, Venugopal JR, et al. Antibacterial glass-ionomer cement restorative materials: a critical review on the current status of extended release formulations. J Control Release. 2017;262:317–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osinaga PW, Grande RH, Ballester RY, et al. Zinc sulfate addition to glass-ionomer-based cements: influence on physical and antibacterial properties, zinc and fluoride release. Dent Mater. 2003;19(3):212–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Kaneshiro AV, et al. Antibacterial effects and physical properties of glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine for the ART approach. Dent Mater. 2006;22:467–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto K, Ohashi S, Aono M, et al. Antibacterial activity of silver ions implanted in SiO2 filler on oral streptococci. Dent Mater. 1996;12(4):227–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottenbos B, van der Mei HC, Klatter F, et al. In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity of covalently coupled quaternary ammonium silane coatings on silicone rubber. Biomaterials. 2002;23(6):1417–1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thebault P, Taffin de Givenchy E, Levy R, et al. Preparation and antimicrobial behaviour of quaternary ammonium thiol derivatives able to be grafted on metal surfaces. Eur J Med Chem. 2009;44(2):717–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imazato S, Russell RR, McCabe JF. Antibacterial activity of MDPB polymer incorporated in dental resin. J Dent. 1995;23(3):177–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata H, Koepsel RR, Matyjaszewski K, et al. Permanent, non-leaching antibacterial surface-2: how high density cationic surfaces kill bacterial cells. Biomaterials. 2007;28(32):4870–4879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyth N, Yudovin-Farber I, Bahir R, et al. Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles against Streptococcus mutans. Biomaterials. 2006;27(21):3995–4002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie D, Weng Y, Guo X, et al. Preparation and evaluation of a novel glass-ionomer cement with antibacterial functions. Dent Mater. 2011;27(5):487–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makvandi P, Gu JT, Zare EN, et al. Polymeric and inorganic nanoscopical antimicrobial fillers in dentistry. Acta Biomater. 2020;101:69–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makvandi P, Corcione CE, Paladini F, et al. Antimicrobial modified hydroxyapatite composite dental bite by stereolithography. Polym Adv Technol. 2018;29(1):364–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makvandi P, Ghaemy M, Ghadiri AA, et al. Photocurable, antimicrobial quaternary ammonium-modified nanosilica. J Dent Res. 2015;94(10):1401–1407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lattmann E, Dunn S, Niamsanit S, et al. Synthesis and antibacterial activities of 5-hydroxy-4-amino-2(5H)-furanones. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005;15(4):919–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Y, Howard L, Chong VJ, et al. A novel furanone-modified antibacterial dental glass ionomer cement. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(8):3153–3160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Y, Howard L, Chong VJ, et al. A novel antibacterial resin composite for improved dental restoratives. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23(6):1553–1561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen X, Almousa R, Anderson G, et al. Developing a novel antibacterial dental resin composite with improved properties. J Comp Mater. 2019;53(22):3085–3092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira UA, Barbosa LCA, Maltha CRA, et al. γ-alkylidene-γ-lactones and isobutylpyrrol-2(5h)-ones analogues to rubrolides as inhibitors of biofilm formation by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2014;24(4):1052–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayumov AR, Khakimullina EN, Sharafutdinov IS, et al. Inhibition of biofilm formation in bacillus subtilis by new halogenated furanones. J Antibiot. 2015;68(5):297–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imazato S, Ebi N, Takahashi Y, et al. Antibacterial activity of bactericide-immobilized filler for resin-based restoratives. Biomaterials. 2003;24(20):3605–3609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almousa R, Wen X, Anderson G, et al. An improved dental composite with potent antibacterial function. Saudi Dent J. 2019;31(3):367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayadunne RTA, Moad G, Rizzardo E. Multiarm organiccompounds for use as reversible chain-transfer agents inliving radical polymerizations. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43(38):6811–6820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Y, Howard L, Xie D. A novel star-shaped poly(carboxylic acid) for resin-modified glass-ionomer restoratives. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2014;25(10):1076–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaled SM, Sui R, Charpentier PA, et al. Synthesis of TiO(2)-PMMA nanocomposite: using methacrylic acid as a coupling agent. Langmuir. 2007;23(7):3988–3995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Weng Y, Song F, et al. In vitro responses of human pulp cells and 3T3 mouse fibroblasts to six contemporary dental restoratives. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2011;04(01):18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Portilla L, Halik M. Smoothly tunable surface properties of aluminum oxide core-shell nanoparticles by a mixed-ligand approach. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(8):5977–5982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie D, Zhao J, Weng Y. A high-strength cement system for improved dental restoratives. J Mater Sci Chem Eng. 2014;02(03):1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp S, Lewis BG, Wilson AD. Characterization of glassionomer cements. 2. Effect of the powder: liquid ratio on the physical properties. J Dent. 1976;4(6):287–290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xie D, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Microhardness of N-vinylpyrrolidone modified glass-ionomers cements. J Macromol Sci A Pure Appl Chem. 1998;35(4):547–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie D, Zhao J, Weng Y. Synthesis and application of novel multi-arm poly(carboxylic acid)s for glass-ionomer restoratives. J Biomater Appl. 2010;24(5):419–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar