pH-sensitive curcumin conjugated micelles for tumor triggered drug delivery

References

• Marin JJ, Romero MR, Blazquez AG, et al. Importance and limitations of chemotherapy among the available treatments for gastrointestinal tumours. Anti-Cancer Agents Med Chem (Formerly Curr Med Chem Anti-Cancer Agents). 2009;9(2):162–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blagosklonny MV. Overcoming limitations of natural anticancer drugs by combining with artificial agents. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2005;26(2):77–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upponi JR, Jerajani K, Nagesha DK, et al. Polymeric micelles: theranostic co-delivery system for poorly water-soluble drugs and contrast agents. Biomaterials. 2018;170:26–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giang I, Boland EL, Poon GM. Prodrug applications for targeted cancer therapy. AAPS J. 2014;16(5):899–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girase ML, Patil PG, Ige PP. Polymer-drug conjugates as nanomedicine: a review. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2020;69(15):925–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandare J, Minko T. Polymer–drug conjugates: progress in polymeric prodrugs. Prog Polym Sci. 2006;31(4):359–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo C, Sun J, Sun B, et al. Prodrug-based nanoparticulate drug delivery strategies for cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2014;35(11):556–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bildstein L, Dubernet C, Couvreur P. Prodrug-based intracellular delivery of anticancer agents. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63(1–2):3–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng H, Huang X, Melle A, et al. Redox-responsive degradable prodrug nanogels for intracellular drug delivery by crosslinking of amine-functionalized poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) copolymers. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;540:612–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu Y, Chu B, Wei X, et al. Redox/pH dual-stimuli responsive camptothecin prodrug nanogels for “on-demand” drug delivery. J Controll Release. 2019;296:93–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei SJT, Sarijloo E, Rashidzadeh H, et al. pH-triggered prodrug micelles for cisplatin delivery: preparation and in vitro/vivo evaluation. React Funct Polym. 2020;146(104399):104399.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei SJT, Amani V, Nabid MR, et al. Folate-decorated polymeric Pt (ii) prodrug micelles for targeted intracellular delivery and cytosolic glutathione-triggered release of platinum anticancer drugs. Polym Chem. 2015;6(15):2844–2853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei SJT, Sarbaz L, Niknejad H. Folate-decorated redox/pH dual-responsive degradable prodrug micelles for tumor triggered targeted drug delivery. RSC Adv. 2016;6(67):62630–62639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao J, Li Y, Wu T, et al. A simple dual-pH responsive prodrug-based polymeric micelles for drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(27):17109–17117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Xu F, Li D, et al. Bioinspired phospholipid polymer prodrug as a pH-responsive drug delivery system for cancer therapy. Polym Chem. 2013;4(6):2004–2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S-Y, Liu L-H, Jia H-Z, et al. A pH-responsive prodrug for real-time drug release monitoring and targeted cancer therapy. Chem Commun. 2014;50(80):11852–11855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Wang B, Ma X, et al. Tailor-made pH-responsive poly(choline phosphate) prodrug as a drug delivery system for rapid cellular internalization. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17(6):2223–2232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang D, Zhuang Y, Shen H, et al. Acetal-linked PEGylated paclitaxel prodrugs forming free-paclitaxel-loaded pH-responsive micelles with high drug loading capacity and improved drug delivery. Mater Sci Eng C. 2018;82:60–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei SJ, Malekzadeh AM, Ramazani A, et al. pH-sensitive magnetite nanoparticles modified with hyperbranched polymers and folic acid for targeted imaging and therapy. Curr Drug Deliv. 2019;16(9):839–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei SJT, Norouzi K, Hesami A, et al. Au (III) complexes loaded pH-responsive magnetic nanogels for cancer therapy. Appl Organomet Chem. 2018;32(4):e4303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei SJT, Abandansari HS, Nabid MR, et al. pH-responsive unimolecular micelles self-assembled from amphiphilic hyperbranched block copolymer for efficient intracellular release of poorly water-soluble anticancer drugs. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;425:27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abas F, Lajis NH, Shaari K, et al. A Labdane diterpene glucoside from the rhizomes of Curcuma mangga. J Nat Prod. 2005;68(7):1090–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagetia GC, Rajanikant G. Role of curcumin, a naturally occurring phenolic compound of turmeric in accelerating the repair of excision wound, in mice whole-body exposed to various doses of gamma-radiation. J Surg Res. 2004;120(1):127–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunnumakkara AB, Guha S, Krishnan S, et al. Curcumin potentiates antitumor activity of gemcitabine in an orthotopic model of pancreatic cancer through suppression of proliferation, angiogenesis, and inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB-regulated gene products. Cancer Res. 2007;67(8):3853–3861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunnumakkara AB, Anand P, Aggarwal BB. Curcumin inhibits proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis of different cancers through interaction with multiple cell signaling proteins. Cancer Lett. 2008;269(2):199–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlström B, Blennow G. A study on the fate of curcumin in the rat. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol. 1978;43(2):86–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhutani MK, Bishnoi M, Kulkarni SK. Anti-depressant like effect of curcumin and its combination with piperine in unpredictable chronic stress-induced behavioral, biochemical and neurochemical changes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009;92(1):39–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashidzadeh H, Salimi M, Sadighian S, et al. In vivo antiplasmodial activity of curcumin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers. Curr Drug Deliv. 2019;16(10):923–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar B, Priyadarshi R, Deeba F, et al. Redox responsive xylan-SS-curcumin prodrug nanoparticles for dual drug delivery in cancer therapy. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;107:110356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang C, Jung E, Hyeon H, et al. Acid-activatable polymeric curcumin nanoparticles as therapeutic agents for osteoarthritis. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2020;23:102104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar SU, Kumar V, Priyadarshi R, et al. pH-responsive prodrug nanoparticles based on xylan-curcumin conjugate for the efficient delivery of curcumin in cancer therapy. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;188:252–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muangnoi C, Jithavech P, Ratnatilaka Na Bhuket P, et al. A curcumin-diglutaric acid conjugated prodrug with improved water solubility and antinociceptive properties compared to curcumin. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2018;82(8):1301–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song J, Liu Y, Lin L, et al. Glycyrrhetinic acid modified and pH-sensitive mixed micelles improve the anticancer effect of curcumin in hepatoma carcinoma cells. RSC Adv. 2019;9(68):40131–40145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Guo C, Dong X, et al. In vivo evaluation of reduction-responsive alendronate-hyaluronan-curcumin polymer-drug conjugates for targeted therapy of bone metastatic breast cancer. Mol Pharmaceut. 2018;15(7):2764–2769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillarisetti S, Maya S, Sathianarayanan S, et al. Tunable pH and redox-responsive drug release from curcumin conjugated γ-polyglutamic acid nanoparticles in cancer microenvironment. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017;159:809–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang X-B, Zhang J-M, Xie X, et al. pH-sensitive micelles based on acid-labile pluronic F68-curcumin conjugates for improved tumor intracellular drug delivery. Int J Pharmaceut. 2016;502(1–2):28–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarika P, James NR, Nishna N, et al. Galactosylated pullulan-curcumin conjugate micelles for site specific anticancer activity to hepatocarcinoma cells. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015;133:347–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feast WJ. Ring-opening polymerization. Edited by K. J. Ivin and T. Saegusa. Elseview Applied Science Publishers. Barking, Essex, 1984. Brit Polym J. 1984;16(3):160.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel MB, Grant LR, Flanagan JE. Historical development of glycidyl azide polymer. J Propul Power. 1992;8(3):560–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abazari M, Ghaffari A, Rashidzadeh H, et al. Current status and future outlook of nano-based systems for burn wound management. J Biomed Mater Res. 2020;108(5):1934–1952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosrati H, Salehiabar M, Bagheri Z, et al. Preparation, characterization, and evaluation of amino acid modified magnetic nanoparticles: drug delivery and MRI contrast agent applications. Pharmaceut Dev Technol. 2018;23(10):1156–1167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naguib YW, Cui Z. Nanomedicine: the promise and challenges in cancer chemotherapy. In: Nanomaterial. Springer; 2014. p. 207–233.
   Google Scholar
• Aghajanzadeh M, Zamani M, Rashidzadeh H, et al. Amphiphilic Y shaped miktoarm star copolymer for anticancer hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs codelivery: synthesis, characterization, in vitro, and in vivo biocompatibility study. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2018;106(11):2817–2826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajabi S, Ramazani A, Hamidi M, et al. Artemia salina as a model organism in toxicity assessment of nanoparticles. DARU J Pharmaceut Sci. 2015;23(1):20.
   Google Scholar
• Nabid MR, Rezaei SJT, Sedghi R, et al. Self-assembled micelles of well-defined pentaerythritol-centered amphiphilic A4B8 star-block copolymers based on PCL and PEG for hydrophobic drug delivery. Polymer. 2011;52(13):2799–2809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei SJT, Nabid MR, Niknejad H, et al. Multifunctional and thermoresponsive unimolecular micelles for tumor-targeted delivery and site-specifically release of anticancer drugs. Polymer. 2012;53(16):3485–3497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malekzadeh AM, Ramazani A, Rezaei SJT, et al. Design and construction of multifunctional hyperbranched polymers coated magnetite nanoparticles for both targeting magnetic resonance imaging and cancer therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;490:64–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaei Rezaei SJ, Hesami A, Khorramabadi H, et al. Pt (II) complexes immobilized on polymer-modified magnetic carbon nanotubes as a new platinum drug delivery system. Appl Organomet Chem. 2018;32(7):e4401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saranya T, Rajan V, Biswas R, et al. Synthesis, characterisation and biomedical applications of curcumin conjugated chitosan microspheres. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;110:227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Gao M, Chen C, et al. Triggered-release polymeric conjugate micelles for on-demand intracellular drug delivery. Nanotechnology. 2015;26(11):115101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei SJT, Nabid MR, Niknejad H, et al. Folate-decorated thermoresponsive micelles based on star-shaped amphiphilic block copolymers for efficient intracellular release of anticancer drugs. Int J Pharmaceut. 2012;437(1–2):70–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin K, Dannenfelser R. In vitro hemolysis: guidance for the pharmaceutical scientist.
   Google Scholar
• Guideline OO. 425: acute oral toxicity—up-and-down procedure. In OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. Vol. 2. 2001. p. 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Song CW, Park H, Ross BD. Intra- and extracellular pH in solid tumors. Antiangiogenic agents in cancer therapy. Springer; 1999. p. 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Kato Y, Ozawa S, Miyamoto C, et al. Acidic extracellular microenvironment and cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2013;13(1):89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becelli R, Renzi G, Morello R, et al. Intracellular and extracellular tumor pH measurement in a series of patients with oral cancer. J Craniofac Surg. 2007;18(5):1051–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albatany M, Ostapchenko VG, Meakin S, et al. Brain tumor acidification using drugs simultaneously targeting multiple pH regulatory mechanisms. J Neuro-Oncol. 2019;144(3):453–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svastová E, Hulíková A, Rafajová M, et al. Hypoxia activates the capacity of tumor-associated carbonic anhydrase IX to acidify extracellular pH. FEBS Lett. 2004;577(3):439–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Ryu KH, Kang MS, et al. Effect of hyperthermia on the lactic acid and beta-hydroxybutyric acid content in tumour. Int J Hypertherm. 1986;2(2):213–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar