Ultrasound-triggered imaging and drug delivery using microbubble-self-aggregate complexes

References

• Riess JG. Fluorocarbon-based injectable gaseous microbubbles for diagnosis and therapy. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2003;8(3):259–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner JR. Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(6):527–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer RS, Tickner EG, Sahines TP, et al. The source of ultrasound contrast effect. J Clin Ultrasound. 1980;8(2):121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentacker I, De Smedt SC, Sanders NN. Drug loaded microbubble design for ultrasound triggered delivery. Soft Matter. 2009;5(11):2161–2170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara K, Pollard R, Borden M. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9(1):415–447.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu H-L, Fan C-H, Ting C-Y, et al. Combining microbubbles and ultrasound for drug delivery to brain tumors: current progress and overview [review]. Theranostics. 2014;4(4):432–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay LM, Xu C. Coating microbubbles with nanoparticles for medical imaging and drug delivery. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2017;12(2):91–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernot S, Klibanov AL. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(10):1153–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger E, Porter T, Lindner J, et al. Cardiovascular drug delivery with ultrasound and microbubbles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:110–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon YI, Kwon Y-S, Cho H-S, et al. Ultrasound-Mediated gene and drug delivery using a microbubble-liposome particle system [short research communication]. Theranostics. 2014;4(11):1133–1144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JJ, Feshitan JA, Baseri B, et al. Microbubble-size dependence of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in mice in vivo. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57(1):145–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song J, Cottler PS, Klibanov AL, et al. Microvascular remodeling and accelerated hyperemia blood flow restoration in arterially occluded skeletal muscle exposed to ultrasonic microbubble destruction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;287(6):H2754–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yu J, Bomba HN, et al. Mechanical force-triggered drug delivery. Chem Rev. 2016;116(19):12536–12563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki R, Klibanov AL. Co-administration of microbubbles and drugs in ultrasound-assisted drug delivery: comparison with drug-carrying particles. Adv Exp Mel Biol. 2016;880:205–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S-H, Yoon YI, Moon H, et al. Development of a novel microbubble-liposome complex conjugated with peptide ligands targeting IL4R on brain tumor cells. Oncol Rep. 2016;36(1):131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardiansyah A, Yang M-C, Liu T-Y, et al. Hydrophobic drug-loaded PEGylated magnetic liposomes for drug-controlled release. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2017;12(1):311–355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He Y, Luo L, Liang S, et al. Influence of probe-sonication process on drug entrapment efficiency of liposomes loaded with a hydrophobic drug. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2019;68(4):193–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong S-S, Kim SH, Lim S-J. Effects of triglycerides on the hydrophobic drug loading capacity of saturated phosphatidylcholine-based liposomes. Int J Pharm. 2015;483(1-2):142–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klibanov AL, Shevchenko TI, Raju BI, et al. Ultrasound-triggered release of materials entrapped in microbubble-liposome constructs: a tool for targeted drug delivery. J Control Release. 2010;148(1):13–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheirolomoom A, Dayton PA, Lum AFH, et al. Acoustically-active microbubbles conjugated to liposomes: characterization of a proposed drug delivery vehicle. J Control Release. 2007;118(3):275–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman K, Böhmer MR, Emmer M, et al. Oil-filled polymer microcapsules for ultrasound-mediated delivery of lipophilic drugs. J Control Release. 2009;133(2):109–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortencarier MJ, Dayton PA, Bloch SH, et al. A method for radiation-force localized drug delivery using gas-filled lipospheres. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004;51(7):822–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S-Y, Chen CC, Tung Y-S, et al. Effects of the microbubble shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-mediated drug delivery to the brain. J Control Release. 2015;212:30–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett SB, Ter Haar GR, Ziskin MC, et al. International recommendations and guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26(3):355–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury SM, Lee T, Willmann JK. Ultrasound-guided drug delivery in cancer. Ultrasonography. 2017;36(3):171–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer RS. Food and drug administration ultrasound device regulation: the output display standard, the “mechanical index,” and ultrasound safety. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1996;9(2):216–220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwon S, Park JH, Chung H, et al. Physicochemical characteristics of self-assembled nanoparticles based on glycol chitosan bearing 5β-cholanic acid. Langmuir. 2003;19(24):10188–10193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SJ, Min HS, Ku SH, et al. Tumor-targeting glycol chitosan nanoparticles as a platform delivery carrier in cancer diagnosis and therapy. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2014;9(11):1697–1713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yhee JY, Son S, Kim SH, et al. Self-assembled glycol chitosan nanoparticles for disease-specific theranostics. J Control Release. 2014;193:202–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JH, Kwon S, Nam J-O, et al. Self-assembled nanoparticles based on glycol chitosan bearing 5beta-cholanic acid for RGD peptide delivery. J Control Release. 2004;95(3):579–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes S, Kirk DN. The bile acids: chemistry. In: Nair PP, Kritchevsky D, editors. Physiology, and metabolism: Volume 4: Methods and Applications. New York: Plenum Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Kang H, Kim J-D, Han S-H, et al. Self-aggregates of poly(2-hydroxyethyl aspartamide) copolymers loaded with methotrexate by physical and chemical entrapments. J Control Release. 2002;81(1-2):135–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raval N, Maheshwari R, Kalyane D, et al. Importance of physicochemical characterization of nanoparticles in pharmaceutical product development. In: Tekade RK. editor. Basic fundamentals of drug delivery. Cambridge: Elsevier. 2019. p. 369–400.
   Google Scholar
• Doinikov AA, Haac JF, Dayton PA. Resonance frequencies of lipid-shelled microbubbles in the regime of nonlinear oscillations. Ultrasonics. 2009;49(2):263–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao R, Liang X, Zhao B, et al. Ultrasound assisted gene and photodynamic synergistic therapy with multifunctional FOXA1-siRNA loaded porphyrin microbubbles for enhancing therapeutic efficacy for breast cancer. Biomaterials. 2018;173:58–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmann JK, Cheng Z, Davis C, et al. Targeted microbubbles for imaging tumor angiogenesis: assessment of whole-body biodistribution with dynamic micro-PET in mice. Radiology. 2008;249(1):212–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan F, Li L, Deng Z, et al. Paclitaxel-liposome-microbubble complexes as ultrasound-triggered therapeutic drug delivery carriers. J Control Release. 2013;166(3):246–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa K, Moriyasu F, Miyahara T, et al. Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(2):318–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min KH, Park K, Kim Y-S, et al. Hydrophobically modified glycol chitosan nanoparticles-encapsulated camptothecin enhance the drug stability and tumor targeting in cancer therapy. J Control Release. 2008;127(3):208–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park K, Kim J-H, Nam YS, et al. Effect of polymer molecular weight on the tumor targeting characteristics of self-assembled glycol chitosan nanoparticles. J Control Release. 2007;122(3):305–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang Y, Kim D, Lee H, et al. Development of an ultrasound triggered nanomedicine-microbubble complex for chemo-photodynamic-gene therapy. Nanomedicine. 2020;27:102194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao W-Y, Li H-J, Chang M-Y, et al. Comprehensive characterizations of nanoparticle biodistribution following systemic injection in mice. Nanoscale. 2013;5(22):11079–11086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradal J, Maudens P, Gabay C, et al. Effect of particle size on the biodistribution of nano- and microparticles following intra-articular injection in mice. Int J Pharm. 2016;498(1-2):119–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen L, Sha X, Jiang X, et al. Pluronic P105/F127 mixed micelles for the delivery of docetaxel against taxol-resistant non-small cell lung cancer: optimization and in vitro, in vivo evaluation. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:73–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu C-F, Balakrishnan P, Cui F-D, et al. The effects of mixed MPEG-PLA/Pluronic copolymer micelles on the bioavailability and multidrug resistance of docetaxel . Biomaterials. 2010;31(8):2371–2379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo AN, Min KH, Lee HJ, et al. Tumor accumulation and antitumor efficacy of docetaxel-loaded core-shell-corona micelles with shell-specific redox-responsive cross-links. Biomaterials. 2012;33(5):1489–1499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JH, Cho YW, Son YJ, et al. Preparation and characterization of self-assembled nanoparticles based on glycol chitosan bearing adriamycin. Colloid Polym Sci. 2006;284(7):763–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang EH, Shim MK, Kim GL, et al. Hypoxia-responsive folic acid conjugated glycol chitosan nanoparticle for enhanced tumor targeting treatment. Int J Pharm. 2020;580:119237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sukamporn P, Baek SJ, Gritsanapan W, et al. Self-assembled nanomicelles of damnacanthal-loaded amphiphilic modified chitosan: preparation, characterization and cytotoxicity study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;77:1068–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar