Evaluation of PEEK-TiO₂- SiO₂ nanocomposite as biomedical implants with regard to in-vitro biocompatibility and material characterization

References

• Mishra S, Chowdhary R. PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(1):208–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almasi D, Lau WJ, Rasaee S, et al. Fabrication of a novel hydroxyapatite/polyether ether ketone surface nanocomposite via friction stir processing for orthopedic and dental applications. Prog Biomater. 2020;9(1–2):35–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prithviraj DR, Deeksha S, Regish KM, et al. A systematic review of zirconia as an implant material. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23(5):643–649.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Babu RD, Prakash P, Devaprakasam D. Review on emerging applications of nanobiomaterials in dentistry and orthopaedics. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 2017;31(4):164–171.
   Google Scholar
• Kassem YM, Alshimy AM, El-Shabrawy SM. Mechanical evaluation of polyetheretherketone compared with zirconia as a dental implant material. Alexandria Dent J. 2019;44(2):61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Montanaro L, Palmero P. Functionally graded ceramics for biomedical application: concept, manufacturing, and properties. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 2018;15:820–840,.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Liu X, Wei J, et al. Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:1215–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghomi ER, Khorasani SN, Kichi MK, et al. Synthesis and characterization of TiO2/acrylic acid-co-2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid nanogel composite and investigation its self-healing performance in the epoxy coatings. Colloid Polym Sci. 2020;298(2):213–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal RK, Rokade KA, Kapadia AS, et al. PEEK/SiO2 composites with high thermal stability for electronic applications. Electron Mater Lett. 2013;9(1):95–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo MC, Tsai CM, Huang JC, et al. PEEK composites reinforced by nano-sized SiO2 and A1 2O3^Os particulates. Mater Chem Phys. 2005;90(1):185–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes L, De Carvalho RA, Amaral AC, et al. Mullite cytotoxicity and cell adhesion studies. J Mater Res Technol. 2019;8(3):2565–2572.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JE, Kim H, An SSA, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity of SiO2 or ZnO nanoparticles with different sizes and surface charges on U373MG human glioblastoma cells. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9:235–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaya-Esparza LM, Villagrán-de la Mora Z, Ruvalcaba-Gómez JM, et al. Use of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles as reinforcement agent of polysaccharide-based materials. Processes. 2020;8(11):1395–26.1395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong F, Nie Z, Liu Z, et al. Developments of nano-TiO2 incorporated hydroxyapatite/PEEK composite strut for cervical reconstruction and interbody fusion after corpectomy with anterior plate fixation. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2018;187:120–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziental D, Czarczynska-Goslinska B, Mlynarczyk DT, et al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: Prospects and applications in medicine. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(2):387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brackett MG, Bouillaguet S, Lockwood PE, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity of dental composites based on new and traditional polymerization chemistries. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;81(2):397–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen SG, Yang J, Jia YG, et al. Tio2 and PEEK reinforced 3d printing pmma composite resin for dental denture base applications. Nanomaterials. 2019;9(7):1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díez-Pascual AM, Díez-Vicente AL. Nano-TiO2 reinforced PEEK/PEI blends as biomaterials for load-bearing implant applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(9):5561–5573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas MA, Rodríguez-Páez JE. Facile synthesis of TiO 2 nanoparticles of different crystalline phases and evaluation of their antibacterial effect under dark conditions against E. coli. J Clust Sci. 2019;30(2):379–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams FE, Lee AK, Orandi S, et al. Antibacterial action of functional silicon dioxide: an investigation of the attachment and separation of bacteria. Environ Technol. 2020;41(6):703–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Yang J, Li K, et al. Carboxylic acid-functionalized tio2 nanoparticle-loaded pmma/peek copolymer matrix as a dental resin for 3d complete denture manufacturing by stereolitographic technique. Int J Food Prop. 2018;21(1):2557–2565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaji Ayyanar C, Marimuthu K. Investigation on the morphology, thermal properties, and in vitro cytotoxicity of the fish scale particulates filled high-density polyethylene composite. Polym Polym Compos. 2020;28(4):285–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokare A, Sanap A, Pai M, et al. Antibacterial activities of Nd doped and Ag coated TiO2 nanoparticles under solar light irradiation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;102:273–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talebian N, Zare E. Structure and antibacterial property of nano-SiO2 supported oxide ceramic. Ceram Int. 2014;40(1):281–287. PART A,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathina M, Shinyjoy E, Kavitha L, et al. A comparative study of naturally and synthetically derived bioceramics for biomedical applications. Mater Today Proc. 2020;26:3600–3603.
   Google Scholar
• Souza NLGD, Munk M, Brandão HM, et al. Cytotoxicity and compatibility of polymeric blend: Evaluation of the cytotoxicity in fibroblast bovine cells and compatibility of poly(ɛ-Caprolactone)/poly(methyl methacrylate-co-Butyl methacrylate) blend films. Polym - Plast Technol Eng. 2017;56(10):1076–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecen B, Kozaci D, Yuksel M, et al. Biocompatibility of MG-63 cells on collagen, poly-L-lactic acid, hydroxyapatite scaffolds with different parameters. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2015;13(1):10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao C, Li Y, Tjong SC. Polyetheretherketone and its composites for bone replacement and regeneration. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(12):2858–48.2858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliaz N, Metoki N. Calcium phosphate bioceramics: a review of their history, structure, properties, coating technologies and biomedical applications. Materials. 2017;10(4):334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathina M, Shinyjoy E, Kavitha L, et al. Biowaste-derived hydroxyapatite reinforced with polyvinyl pyrrolidone/aloevera composite for biomedical applications. Int J Appl CeramTechnol.2021;18(1):221–234.
   Google Scholar
• Buzarovska A, Dinescu S, Chitoiu L, et al. Porous poly(l-lactic acid) nanocomposite scaffolds with functionalized TiO2 nanoparticles: properties, cytocompatibility and drug release capability. J Mater Sci. 2018;53(16):11151–11166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili AA, Ahmad MR. A review of cell adhesion studies for biomedical and biological applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(8):18149–18184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramgobin A, Fontaine G, Bourbigot S. A case study of polyether ether ketone (I): investigating the thermal and fire behavior of a high-performance material. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(8):1789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy DR, Ishmah SN, Permana MD, et al. Synthesis of titanium dioxide/silicon dioxide from beach sand as photocatalyst for Cr and Pb remediation. Catalysts. 2020;10(11):1248–1211.,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alamgir M, Nayak GC, Mallick A, et al. Effects of TiO2 and GO nanoparticles on the thermomechanical properties of bioactive poly-HEMA nanocomposites. Iran Polym J. 2021;30(10):1089–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain I, Barimah EK, Iqbal Y, et al. Thermal, mechanical and optical properties of TiO2-doped sodium silicate Glass-Ceramics. Trans Indian Ceram Soc. 2019;78(3):125–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takari A, Ghasemi AR, Hamadanian M, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation and thermo-mechanical characterization for optimization of three-phase epoxy/TiO2/SiO2 nano-composites. Polym Test. 2021;93:106890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick S, Ahmad Z, Touati F, et al. PLA-TiO2 nanocomposites: Thermal, morphological, structural, and humidity sensing properties. Ceram Int. 2018;44(14):16507–16513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun LY, Mubarak NM, Yon LS, et al. Comparative study of acid functionization of carbon nanotube via ultrasonic and reflux mechanism. J Environ Chem Eng. 2018;6(5):5889–5896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Saraswat V. Synthesis and thermal characterization of PMMA-TiO2 nanocomposites. Mat Sci Res India. 2014;11(2):168–172.
   Google Scholar
• Wang M, Bhardwaj G, Webster T. Antibacterial properties of PEKK for orthopedic applications. Int J Nanomed . 2017;12:6471–6476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Melo LP, Salmoria GV, Fancello EA, et al. Influence of processing conditions on the mechanical behavior and morphology of injection molded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) 85:15. Int J Biomater. 2017;2017(2005):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gali NK, Ning Z, Daoud W, et al. Investigation on the mechanism of non-photocatalytically TiO2 -induced reactive oxygen species and its significance on cell cycle and morphology . J Appl Toxicol. 2016;36(10):1355–1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadhesari SM, Alipour S, Akbarpour MR. E ff ects of SiC nanoparticles on synthesis and antimicrobial activity of TiCu nanocrystalline powder. Ceram Int. 2020;46(1):114–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa CF, Santana LR, Silva RM, et al. Antimicrobial activity from polymeric composites-based polydimethylsiloxane/TiO2/GO: evaluation of filler synthesis and surface morphology. Polym Bull. 2017;74(6):2379–2390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizi-Lalabadi M, Ehsani A, Divband B, et al. Antimicrobial activity of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles supported in 4A zeolite and evaluation the morphological characteristic. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayyanar CB, Marimuthu K, Gayathri B, et al. Characterization and in vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of fish scale and seashell derived nano-hydroxyapatite high-density polyethylene composite. Polym Polym Compos. 2020;29(9):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma R, Tang S, Tan H, et al. Preparation, characterization, and in vitro osteoblast functions of a nano-hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone biocomposite as orthopedic implant material. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9(1):3949–3961.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao M, et al. Response of human osteoblast to n-HA/PEEK - quantitative proteomic study of bio-effects of nano-hydroxyapatite composite. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagomonyants KB, Jarman-Smith ML, Devine JN, et al. The in vitro response of human osteoblasts to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) substrates compared to commercially pure titanium. Biomaterials. 2008;29(11):1563–1572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Černochová P, et al. Cell type specific adhesion to surfaces functionalised by amine plasma polymers. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar