Functionalized acellular periosteum guides stem cell homing to promote bone defect repair

References

• Liu H, Shi Y, Zhu Y, et al. Bioinspired piezoelectric periosteum to augment bone regeneration via synergistic immunomodulation and osteogenesis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(9):12273–12293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dai K, Deng S, Yu Y, et al. Construction of developmentally inspired periosteum-like tissue for bone regeneration. Bone Res. 2022;10(1):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thitiset T, Damrongsakkul S, Yodmuang S, et al. A novel gelatin/chitooligosaccharide/demineralized bone matrix composite scaffold and periosteum-derived mesenchymal stem cells for bone tissue engineering. Biomater Res. 2021;25(1):19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen K, Lin X, Zhang Q, et al. Decellularized periosteum as a potential biologic scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2015;19:46–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Liu W, Liu Y, et al. Nano artificial periosteum PLGA/MgO/Quercetin accelerates repair of bone defects through promoting osteogenic − angiogenic coupling effect via Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Mater Today Bio. 2022;16:100348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colnot C, Zhang X, Tate KM. Current insights on the regenerative potential of the periosteum: molecular, cellular, and endogenous engineering approaches. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(12):1869–1878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher JN, Tessaro I, Bertocco T, et al. The application of stem cells from different tissues to cartilage repair. Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017:2761678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Wang N, Yang M, et al. Periosteum and development of the tissue-engineered periosteum for guided bone regeneration. J Orthop Translat. 2022;33:41–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak SF, Freytes DO, Gilbert TW. Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: structure and function. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmaeili A, Biazar E, Ebrahimi M, et al. Acellular fish skin for wound healing. International Wound Journal. 2023. doi:10.1111/iwj.14158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasarudin NA, Razali M, Goh V, et al. Expression of interleukin-1β and histological changes of the three-dimensional oral mucosal model in response to Yttria-stabilized nanozirconia. Materials. 2023;16(5):2027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazloomnejad R, Babajani A, Kasravi M, et al. Angiogenesis and re-endothelialization in decellularized scaffolds: Rrecent advances and current challenges in tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges MF, Maurmann N, Pranke P. Easy-to-assembly system for decellularization and recellularization of liver grafts in a bioreactor. Micromachines. 2023;14(2):449–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funamoto S, Nam K, Kimura T, et al. The use of high-hydrostatic pressure treatment to decellularize blood vessels. Biomaterials. 2010;31(13):3590–3595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Maawi S, Orlowska A, Sader R, et al. In vivo cellular reactions to different biomateri-als-physiological and pathological aspects and their consequences. Semin Immunol. 2017;29:49–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibacher J, Henschler R. Biodistribution, migration and homing of systemically applied mesenchymal stem/stromal cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7:7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Yang C, Yang P. The promotional effect of mesenchymal stem cell homing on bone tissue regeneration. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;12(5):365–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Wang X, Wang X, et al. Functionalized self-assembling peptide nanofiber hydrogels mimic stem cell niche to control human adipose stem cell behavior in vitro. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(6):6798–6805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Yin H, Wang Y, et al. In situ articular cartilage regeneration through endogenous reparative cell homing using a functional bone marrow-specific scaffolding system. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(45):38715–38728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin T, Gu Y, Cheng R, et al. Inorganic strengthened hydrogel membrane as regenerative periosteum. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(47):41168–41180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Wang Y, Zhang W, et al. Biomimetic periosteum-bone substitute composed of pre-osteoblast-derived matrix and hydrogel for large segmental bone defect repair. Acta Biomater. 2020;113:317–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He J, Li Z, Yu T, et al. In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility study on acellular sheep periosteum for guided bone regeneration. Biomed Mater. 2020;15(1):015013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angele P, Abke J, Kujat R, et al. Influence of different collagen species on physicochemical properties of crosslinked collagen matrices. Biomaterials. 2004;25(14):2831–2841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Ren N, Qiu J, et al. Carbodiimide crosslinked collagen from porcine dermal matrix for high-strength tissue engineering scaffold. Int J Biol Macromol. 2013;61:69–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rault I, Frei V, Herbage D, et al. Evaluation of different chemical methods for crosslinking collagen gel, films and sponges. J Mater Sci: mater Med. 1996;7(4):215–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin SS, He DQ, Luo D, et al. A biomimetic hierarchical nanointerface orchestrates macrophage polarization and mesenchymal stem cell recruitment to promote endogenous bone regeneration. ACS Nano. 2019;13(6):6581–6595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu P, Li M, Chen K, et al. Periosteal matrix-derived hydrogel promotes bone re-pair through an early immune regulation coupled with enhanced angio- and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2020;227:119552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Song J, Zhu G, et al. Periosteum tissue engineering-a review. Biomater Sci. 2016;4(11):1554–1561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollinger JO, Kleinschmidt JC. The critical size defect as an experimental model to test bone repair materials. J Craniofac Surg. 1990;1(1):60–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borie E, Fuentes R, Del Sol M, et al. The influence of FDBA and autogenous bone particles on regeneration of calvaria defects in the rabbit: a pilot study. Ann Anat. 2011;193(5):412–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CY, Chang YH, Kao CY, et al. Augmented healing of critical-size calvarial defects by baculovirus-engineered MSCs that persistently express growth factors. Biomaterials. 2012;33(14):3682–3692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naito Y, Terukina T, Galli S, et al. The effect of simvastatin-loaded polymeric microspheres in a critical size bone defect in the rabbit calvaria. Int J Pharm. 2014;461(1-2):157–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee J, Byun H, Madhurakkat Perikamana SK, et al. Current advances in immunomodulatory biomaterials for bone regeneration. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2019;8:1801106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar