In vivo characterization of a luffa-based composite scaffold for subcutaneous implantation in rats

References

• Ikada Y. Challenges in tissue engineering. J R Soc Interface. 2006;3(10):589–601. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao AS, Mooney DJ. Regenerative medicine: current therapies and future directions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:14452–14459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinkhani M, Mehrabani D, Karimfar MH, et al. Tissue engineered scaffolds in regenerative medicine. World J Plast Surg. 2014;3(1):3–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Augustine R, Dan P, Sosnik A, et al. Electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene)/zinc oxide nanocomposite tissue engineering scaffolds with enhanced cell adhesion and blood vessel formation. Nano Res. 2017;10(10):3358–3376. doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1549-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echeverria Molina MI, Malollari KG, Komvopoulos K. Design challenges in polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:617141. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.617141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egorikhina MN, Timofeeva LB, Linkova DD, et al. biocompatibility study of hydrogel biopolymer scaffold with encapsulated mesenchymal stem cells. Polymers. 2023;15(6):1337. doi: 10.3390/polym15061337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein KH, Park K-M, Kang K-S, et al. Biocompatibility evaluation of tissue-engineered decellularized scaffolds for biomedical application. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;67:766–778. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina S, Ribeiro VP, Marques CF, et al. Scaffolding strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Materials. 2019;12(11):1824. doi: 10.3390/ma12111824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshaaer M, Kailani M, Ababneh N, et al. Fabrication of porous bioceramics for bone tissue applications using luffa cylindrical fibres (LCF) as template. PAC. 2017;11(1):13–20. doi: 10.2298/PAC1701013A.
   Google Scholar
• Mitropoulou A, Markatos DN, Dimopoulos A, et al. Development and evaluation of biodegradable core-shell microfibrous and nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. J Mater Sci. 2024;35(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s10856-024-06777-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Bakhshayesh AR, Asadi N, Alihemmati A, et al. An overview of advanced biocompatible and biomimetic materials for creation of replacement structures in the musculoskeletal systems: focusing on cartilage tissue engineering. J Biol Eng. 2019;13(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13036-019-0209-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viveros-Moreno NG, Garcia-Lorenzana M, Peña-Mercado E, et al. In vivo biocompatibility testing of nanoparticle-functionalized alginate–chitosan scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1295626. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1295626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praphakar RA, Jeyaraj M, Mehnath S, et al. A pH-sensitive guar gum-grafted-lysine-β-cyclodextrin drug carrier for the controlled release of 5-flourouracil into cancer cells. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(10):1519–1530. doi: 10.1039/c7tb02551c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosal K, Augustine R, Zaszczynska A, et al. Novel drug delivery systems based on triaxial electrospinning based nanofibers. React Funct Polym. 2021;163:104895. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.104895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dongre R, Sadasivuni K K, Deshmukh K, et al. Natural polymer based composite membranes for water purification: a review. Polym-Plast Technol Eng. 2019;58:1295–1310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pottathara YB, Tiyyagura H, Ahmad Z, et al. Graphene based aerogels: fundamentals and applications as supercapacitors. J Storage Mater. 2020;30:101549. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101549.
   Google Scholar
• Khan H, Kushwah KK, Singh S, et al. Smart technologies driven approaches to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: a review. 3 Biotech. 2021;11(2):50. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02581-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verma D, Okhawilai M, Nangan S, et al. A sustainable and green approach towards the utilization of biopolymers for effective wound dressing applications: a detailed review. Nano-Struct Nano-Objects. 2024;37:101086. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoso.2023.101086.
   Google Scholar
• Parida C, Dash SK, Das SC. Effect of fiber treatment and fiber loading on mechanical properties of Luffa-resorcinol composites. Indian J Mater Sci. 2015;2015:e658064–6. doi: 10.1155/2015/658064.
   Google Scholar
• Mary Stella S, Vijayalakshmi U. Influence of chemically modified Luffa on the preparation of nanofiber and its biological evaluation for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res. 2019;107:610–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Ma H, Chu B, et al. Super-hydrophobic modification of porous natural polymer “luffa sponge” for oil absorption. Polymer. 2017;126:470–476. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.05.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi X, Lan Y, Peng S, et al. Green fabrication of a multifunctional sponge as an absorbent for highly efficient and ultrafast oil–water separation. ACS Omega. 2020;5(24):14232–14241. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashok KG, Kalaichelvan K, Elango V, et al. Mechanical and morphological properties of luffa/carbon fiber reinforced hybrid composites. Mater Today. 2020;33:637–641.
   Google Scholar
• Gurjar AK, Kulkarni SM, Joladarashi S, et al. Investigation of mechanical properties of luffa fibre reinforced natural rubber composites: Implications of process parameters. J Mater Res Technol. 2024;29:4232–4244. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.02.133.
   Google Scholar
• Alhijazi M, Safaei B, Zeeshan Q, et al. Recent developments in luffa natural fiber composites: review. Sustainability. 2020;12(18):7683. doi: 10.3390/su12187683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Su N, Zhang K, et al. In-depth analysis of the structure and properties of two varieties of natural luffa sponge fibers. Materials. 2017;10(5):479. doi: 10.3390/ma10050479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partap S, Kumar A, Sharma N, et al. Luffa cylindrica: an important medicinal plant. J Nat Prod Plant Resour. 2012;2:127–134.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang P-L, Chien M-Y, Sheu M-T, et al. Dried fruit of the luffa sponge as a source of Chitin for applications as skin substitutes. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:458287–458289. doi: 10.1155/2014/458287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onyegbule FA, Okoye C, Ikeh C, et al. Evaluation of phytochemicals, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of extracts of Luffa cylindrica leaves. Planta Med. 2014;80(16):LP17. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1395077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premalatha N, Saravanakumar SS, Sanjay MR, et al. Structural and thermal properties of chemically modified Luffa cylindrica fibers. J Nat Fibers. 2021;18(7):1037–1043. doi: 10.1080/15440478.2019.1678546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J-P, Yu S-C, Hsu BR-S, et al. Loofa sponge as a scaffold for the culture of human hepatocyte cell line. Biotechnol Prog. 2003;19:522–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed A, Iqbal M. Loofa (Luffa cylindrica) sponge: review of development of the biomatrix as a tool for biotechnological applications. Biotechnol Prog. 2013;29(3):573–600. doi: 10.1002/btpr.1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinwumi KA, Eleyowo OO, Oladipo OO, et al. A review on the ethnobotanical uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological effect of Luffa cylindrinca. In: Natural drugs from plants. [Internet]. IntechOpen; 2021 [cited 2024 Mar 29]. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/78098.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang X, Xiong Y, et al. Extraction optimization, separation and antioxidant activity of Luffa cylindrica polysaccharides. Food Bioprod Process. 2019;116:98–104. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2019.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohapatra B, Rautray TR. Facile fabrication of Luffa cylindrica -assisted 3D hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Bioinspired Biomimetic Nanobiomater. 2021;10(2):37–44. doi: 10.1680/jbibn.20.00011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundu S, Sahi AK, Varshney N, et al. Fabrication and in vitro characterization of luffa-based composite scaffolds incorporated with gelatin, hydroxyapatite and psyllium husk for bone tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci. 2022;33(17):2220–2248. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2022.2101415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patamia V, Fiorenza R, Brullo I, et al. A sustainable porous composite material based on loofah-halloysite for gas adsorption and drug delivery. Mater Chem Front. 2022;6:2233–2243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim AY, Kim Y, Lee SH, et al. Effect of gelatin on osteogenic cell sheet formation using canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Transplant. 2017;26(1):115–123. doi: 10.3727/096368916X693338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afewerki S, Sheikhi A, Kannan S, et al. Gelatin-polysaccharide composite scaffolds for 3D cell culture and tissue engineering: towards natural therapeutics. Bioeng Transl Med. 2019;4(1):96–115. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parın FN, Ullah A, Yeşilyurt A, et al. Development of PVA–psyllium husk meshes via emulsion electrospinning: preparation, characterization, and antibacterial activity. Polymers. 2022;14(7):1490. doi: 10.3390/polym14071490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal PS, Poddar S, Varshney N, et al. Printability assessment of psyllium husk (isabgol)/gelatin blends using rheological and mechanical properties. J Biomater Appl. 2021;35(9):1132–1142. doi: 10.1177/0885328220979473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poddar S, Agarwal PS, Sahi AK, et al. Fabrication and cytocompatibility evaluation of psyllium husk (Isabgol)/gelatin composite scaffolds. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 3 2019;188:750–768. doi: 10.1007/s12010-019-02958-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MUA, Razak SIA, Ansari MNM, et al. Development of biodegradable bio-based composite for bone tissue engineering: synthesis, characterization and in vitro biocompatible evaluation. Polymers. 2021;13(21):3611. doi: 10.3390/polym13213611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimina A, Senatov F, Choudhary R, et al. Biocompatibility and physico-chemical properties of highly porous PLA/HA scaffolds for bone reconstruction. Polymers. 2020;12(12):2938. doi: 10.3390/polym12122938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorramirouz R, Go JL, Noble C, et al. A novel surgical technique for a rat subcutaneous implantation of a tissue engineered scaffold. Acta Histochem. 2018;120(3):282–291. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2018.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu R, Lin Y, Lin J, et al. Blood prefabrication subcutaneous small animal model for the evaluation of bone substitute materials. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4(7):2516–2527. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divakar P, Moodie KL, Demidenko E, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the in vivo biocompatibility and performance of freeze-cast tissue scaffolds. Biomed Mater. 2020;15(5):055003. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ab316a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawidlak-Węgrzyńska B, Fray ME, Janiczak K, et al. In vivo biocompatibility of an innovative elastomer for heart assist devices. Polymers. 2022;14(5):1002. doi: 10.3390/polym14051002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan K, Tamanna N, Haque M. Biochemical and histopathological profiling of Wistar rat treated with Brassica napus as a supplementary feed. Food Sci Hum Wellness. 2018;7(1):77–82. doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2017.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• Huo L, Li Q, Jiang L, et al. Porous Mg–Zn–Ca scaffolds for bone repair: a study on microstructure, mechanical properties and in vitro degradation behavior. J Mater Sci: mater Med. 2024;35(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s10856-023-06754-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazir R, Bruyneel A, Carr C, et al. Mechanical and degradation properties of hybrid scaffolds for tissue engineered heart valve (TEHV). J Funct Biomater. 2021;12(1):20. doi: 10.3390/jfb12010020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhou L, Zhang W. Control of scaffold degradation in tissue engineering: a review. Tissue Eng B. 2014;20(5):492–502. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahraminasab M. Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds. Biomed Eng Online. 2020;19(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00810-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma CH, Zhang HB, Yang SM, et al. Comparison of the degradation behavior of PLGA scaffolds in micro-channel, shaking, and static conditions. Biomicrofluidics. 2018;12(3):034106. doi: 10.1063/1.5021394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shendge PN, Belemkar S. Therapeutic potential of luffa acutangula: a review on its traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicological aspects. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1177. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatakeyama W, Taira M, Sawada T, et al. Bone regeneration of critical-size calvarial defects in rats using highly pressed nano-apatite/collagen composites. Materials. 2022;15(9):3376. doi: 10.3390/ma15093376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasileva R, Chaprazov T. Bone healing of critical-sized femoral defects in rats treated with erythropoietin alone or in combination with xenograft. Vet Sci. 2023;10(3):196. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10030196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Modulevsky DJ, Cuerrier CM, Pelling AE. Biocompatibility of subcutaneously implanted plant-derived cellulose biomaterials. PLOS One. 2016;11(6):e0157894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natsukawa T, Maeda N, Fukuda S, et al. Significant association of serum adiponectin and creatine kinase-MB levels in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017;24(8):793–803. doi: 10.5551/jat.38232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurapati R, Soos MP, CPK-MB: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [cited 2023 Jul 27]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557591/.
   Google Scholar
• Cabaniss CD. Creatine Kinase. In: Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, editors. Clinical methods: the history, physical, and laboratory examinations. 3rd ed. Boston: Butterworths; 1990. [cited 2023 Aug 1]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK352/.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz A, Yalta K, Turgut OO, et al. Clinical importance of elevated CK-MB and troponin I levels in congestive heart failure. Adv Ther. 2006;23(6):1060–1067. doi: 10.1007/BF02850226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikanth G, Prakash P, Tripathy N, et al. Establishment of a rat model of myocardial infarction with a high survival rate: a suitable model for evaluation of efficacy of stem cell therapy. JSRM. 2009;5(1):30–36. doi: 10.46582/jsrm.0501006.
   Google Scholar
• Ota T, Hasegawa Y, Murata E, et al. False-positive elevation of CK-MB levels with chest pain in lung adenocarcinoma. Case Rep Oncol. 2020;13(1):100–104. doi: 10.1159/000505724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delanaye P, Cavalier E, Pottel H. Serum creatinine: not so simple! Nephron. 2017;136(4):302–308. doi: 10.1159/000469669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thammitiyagodage MG, De Silva NR, Rathnayake C, et al. Biochemical and histopathological changes in Wistar rats after consumption of boiled and un-boiled water from high and low disease prevalent areas for chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology (CKDu) in north Central Province (NCP) and its comparison with low disease prevalent Colombo, Sri Lanka. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-1693-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinnappan R, Mir TA, Alsalameh S, et al. Aptasensors are conjectured as promising ALT and AST diagnostic tools for the early diagnosis of acute liver injury. Life. 2023;13(6):1273. doi: 10.3390/life13061273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim H, Han M. Association between serum liver enzymes and metabolic syndrome in korean adults. IJERPH. 2018;15(8):1658. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar