Improving biological and mechanical properties of bioprinted PCL-alginate-chondrocyte scaffolds for patellofemoral cartilage tissue regeneration

References

• Flanigan DC, Harris JD, Trinh TQ, et al. Prevalence of chondral defects in athletes’ knees: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(10):1795–1801. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d9eea0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartrain NA, Gilchrist KH, Ho VB, et al. 3D bioprinting for the repair of articular cartilage and osteochondral tissue. Bioprinting. 2022;28:e00239. doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00239.
   Google Scholar
• Hu G, Liang Z, Fan Z, et al. Construction of 3D-bioprinted cartilage-mimicking substitute based on photo-crosslinkable Wharton’s jelly bioinks for full-thickness articular cartilage defect repair. Mater Today Bio. 2023;21:100695. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100695.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rahmani Del Bakhshayesh A, Babaie S, Tayefi Nasrabadi H, et al. An overview of various treatment strategies, especially tissue engineering for damaged articular cartilage. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2020;48(1):1089–1104. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2020.1809439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade R, Nunes J, Hinckel BB, et al. Cartilage restoration of patellofemoral lesions: a systematic review. Cartilage. 2021;13(1_suppl):57S–73S. doi: 10.1177/1947603519893076.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuwabara A, Cinque M, Ray T, et al. Treatment options for patellofemoral arthritis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022;15(2):90–106. doi: 10.1007/s12178-022-09740-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kallingal N, Ramakrishnan R, Krishnan VK. Formulation and characterization of gelatin methacrylamide-hydroxypropyl methacrylate based bioink for bioprinting applications. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2023;34(6):768–790. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2022.2145867.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zheng X, Huang J, Lin J, et al. 3D bioprinting in orthopedics translational research. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2019;30(13):1172–1187. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2019.1623989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostamani H, Fakhraei O, Zamirinadaf N, et al. An overview of nasal cartilage bioprinting: from bench to bedside. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2024;35:1273–1320.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiesa-Estomba CM, Aiastui A, González-Fernández I, et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting scaffolding for nasal cartilage defects: a systematic review. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2021;18(3):343–353. doi: 10.1007/s13770-021-00331-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahani PK. Application of tissue engineering and biomaterials in nose surgery. JPRAS Open. 2023;40:262–272. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.11.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lan X, Liang Y, Erkut EJN, et al. Bioprinting of human nasoseptal chondrocytes-laden collagen hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. FASEB J. 2021;35(3):e21191. doi: 10.1096/fj.202002081R.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch F, Thaden O, Conrad S, et al. Mechanical properties of polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds for hybrid 3D-bioprinting with alginate-gelatin hydrogel. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022;130:105219. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebhodaghe SO. Natural polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2021;32(16):2144–2194. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2021.1958185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abedi G, Sotoudeh A, Soleymani M, et al. A collagen–poly (vinyl alcohol) nanofiber scaffold for cartilage repair. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2011;22(18):2445–2455. doi: 10.1163/092050610X540503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farasati Far B, Naimi-Jamal MR, Jahanbakhshi M, et al. Synthesis and characterization of chitosan/collagen/polycaprolactone hydrogel films with enhanced biocompatibility and hydrophilicity for artificial tendon applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;253(Pt 8):127448. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127448.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alimohammadi M, Fakhraei O, Moradi A, et al. Controlled release of azithromycin from polycaprolactone/chitosan nanofibrous membranes. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 2022;71:103246. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barceló X, Eichholz KF, Garcia O, et al. Tuning the degradation rate of alginate-based bioinks for bioprinting functional cartilage tissue. Biomedicines. 2022;10(7):1621. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10071621.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borkar T, Goenka V, Jaiswal AK. Application of poly-ε-caprolactone in extrusion-based bioprinting. Bioprinting. 2021;21:e00111. doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00111.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Kennedy P, Bonazza N, et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting of articular cartilage: a systematic review. Cartilage. 2021;12(1):76–92. doi: 10.1177/1947603518809410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang EJ, Patel R, Sankpal NV, et al. Alginate, hyaluronic acid, and chitosan-based 3D printing hydrogel for cartilage tissue regeneration. Eur Polym J. 2023;202:112651. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112651.
   Google Scholar
• Kundu J, Shim JH, Jang J, et al. An additive manufacturing-based PCL–alginate–chondrocyte bioprinted scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2015;9(11):1286–1297. doi: 10.1002/term.1682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng D, Li J, Ai C, et al. Electrospun PCL/Gel-aligned scaffolds enhance the biomechanical strength in tendon repair. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(31):4801–4810. doi: 10.1039/c9tb00837c.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rojas-Murillo JA, Simental-Mendía MA, Moncada-Saucedo NK, et al. Physical, mechanical, and biological properties of fibrin scaffolds for cartilage repair. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(17):9879. doi: 10.3390/ijms23179879.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Navarro R, Burillo G, Adem E, et al. Effect of ionizing radiation on the chemical structure and the physical properties of polycaprolactones of different molecular weight. Polymers. 2018;10(4):397. doi: 10.3390/polym10040397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh C-C, Chen C-N, Li Y-T, et al. The effect of polymer molecular weight and UV radiation on physical properties and bioactivities of PCL films. Cell Polym. 2011;30(5):261–276. doi: 10.1177/026248931103000503.
   Google Scholar
• Lam CX, Savalani MM, Teoh S-H, et al. Dynamics of in vitro polymer degradation of polycaprolactone-based scaffolds: accelerated versus simulated physiological conditions. Biomed Mater. 2008;3(3):034108. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/3/3/034108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersons J, Modniks J, Leterrier Y, et al. Evaluation of toughness by finite fracture mechanics from crack onset strain of brittle coatings on polymers. Theor Appl Fract Mech. 2008;49(2):151–157. doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2007.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Shirvanimoghaddam K, Balaji KV, Yadav R, et al. Balancing the toughness and strength in polypropylene composites. Compos Part B Eng. 2021;223:109121. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109121.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Cantu L, Gleadall A, Faris C, et al. Characterisation of the surface structure of 3D printed scaffolds for cell infiltration and surgical suturing. Biofabrication. 2016;8(1):015016. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao B, Peng R, Li Z, et al. Effects of spreading areas and aspect ratios of single cells on dedifferentiation of chondrocytes. Biomaterials. 2014;35(25):6871–6881. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui T, Wang C, Ye L. Comments on ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid contained in trypsin detaching cells for apoptosis detection. Stem Cells. 2014;32(7):1993–1994. doi: 10.1002/stem.1712.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarró E, Lecina M, Fontova A, et al. Electrical impedance spectroscopy measurements using a four-electrode configuration improve on-line monitoring of cell concentration in adherent animal cell cultures. Biosens Bioelectron. 2012;31(1):257–263. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.10.028.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mutin M, George F, Lesaule G, et al. Reevaluation of trypsin-EDTA for endothelial cell detachment before flow cytometry analysis. Endothelium. 1996;4(4):289–295. doi: 10.3109/10623329609024704.
   Google Scholar
• Yamashita Y, Kinoshita K, Yamazaki M. Low concentration of DMSO stabilizes the bilayer gel phase rather than the interdigitated gel phase in dihexadecylphosphatidylcholine membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1467(2):395–405. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(00)00237-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim MS, Kim G. Three-dimensional electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL)/alginate hybrid composite scaffolds. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;114:213–221. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaram A, Schreyer DJ, Chen DX. Use of the polycation polyethyleneimine to improve the physical properties of alginate–hyaluronic acid hydrogel during fabrication of tissue repair scaffolds. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2015;26(7):433–445. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2015.1016383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpande MV, Girase A, King MW. Degradation of poly (ε-caprolactone) resorbable multifilament yarn under physiological conditions. Polymers. 2023;15(18):3819. doi: 10.3390/polym15183819.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernando IS, Kim D, Nah J-W, et al. Advances in functionalizing fucoidans and alginates (bio) polymers by structural modifications: a review. Chem Eng J. 2019;355:33–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Yun EJ, Kim S, et al. Efficacy of acidic pretreatment for the saccharification and fermentation of alginate from brown macroalgae. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2016;39(6):959–966. doi: 10.1007/s00449-016-1575-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jirofti N, Mohebbi-Kalhori D, Masoumi R. Enhancing biocompatibility of PCL/PU nano-structures to control the water wettability by NaOH hydrolysis treatment for tissue engineering applications. J Ind Text. 2022;51(2_suppl):3278S–3296S. doi: 10.1177/1528083720963268.
   Google Scholar
• Varaprasad K, Nùñez D, Ide W, et al. Development of high alginate comprised hydrogels for removal of Pb(II) ions. J Mol Liq. 2020;298:112087. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.112087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragana DM, Jasmina JS, Bojana MO. Controlled swelling and degradation studies of alginate microbeads in dilute natrium-citrate solutions. Hem Ind. 2010;64:253–263.
   Google Scholar
• Satheesh Kumar KV, Bindu M, Suresh S, et al. Investigation on swelling behavior of sodium alginate/black titania nanocomposite hydrogels and effect of synthesis conditions on water uptake. Results Eng. 2023;20:101460. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101460.
   Google Scholar
• Elberry A, Maarouf N, Solouma N, et al. FEM simulation of human eardrum to control the mechanical effect of noise in housing using insulating architectural materials. Civ Eng Res Mag. 2009;30:939–954.
   Google Scholar
• Mahapatra C, Jin G-Z, Kim H-W. Alginate-hyaluronic acid-collagen composite hydrogel favorable for the culture of chondrocytes and their phenotype maintenance. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13(5):538–546. doi: 10.1007/s13770-016-0059-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stojkovska J, Bugarski B, Obradovic B. Evaluation of alginate hydrogels under in vivo–like bioreactor conditions for cartilage tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21:2869–2879.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fakhraei O, Hesaraki S, Alizadeh M. Fracture toughness and R-curve behavior of BCP/YTZP nanocomposites produced using the spark plasma sintering process. J Alloys Compd. 2017;725:623–631. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.194.
   Google Scholar
• Fakhraei O, Hesaraki S, Alizadeh M. Evaluation of biphasic calcium phosphate/nanosized 3YSZ composites as toughened materials for bone substitution. Ceram Int. 2016;42(9):11201–11208. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.030.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Li J, Yu S, et al. The mechanical properties of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral articular cartilage in compression depend on anatomical regions. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6128. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85716-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerin AJ, Wisnom MR, Adams MA. The compressive strength of articular cartilage. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1998;212(4):273–280. doi: 10.1243/0954411981534051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless BM, Sadeghi H, Temple DK, et al. Viscoelasticity of articular cartilage: analysing the effect of induced stress and the restraint of bone in a dynamic environment. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;75:293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi H, Espino DM, Shepherd DE. Variation in viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage below, up to and above healthy gait-relevant loading frequencies. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2015;229(2):115–123. doi: 10.1177/0954411915570372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones B, Hung CT, Ateshian G. Biphasic analysis of cartilage stresses in the patellofemoral joint. J Knee Surg. 2015;29(2):92–98. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1568989.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fakhraei O, Hesaraki S, Alizadeh M, et al. Mechanical properties of PSZ-reinforced biphasic calcium phosphate bone substitute sintered in a conventional furnace and by microwave irradiation. Ceram Int. 2017;43(2):2403–2412. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naseri N, Poirier J-M, Girandon L, et al. 3-Dimensional porous nanocomposite scaffolds based on cellulose nanofibers for cartilage tissue engineering: tailoring of porosity and mechanical performance. RSC Adv. 2016;6(8):5999–6007. doi: 10.1039/C5RA27246G.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Frith JE, Dehghan-Manshadi A, et al. Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of porous titanium scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;75:169–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar