Investigation of wind farm effects on radar multiple target tracking

References

• GWEC/Global Wind Statistics 2013. Global wind energy council; 2013. Available from http://www.tureb.com.tr/tr/bilgi-bankasi/dunya-res-durumu
   Google Scholar
• Theil A, van Ewijk, LJ. Radar performance degradation due to the presence of wind turbines. IEEE Radar Conference 2007; Waltham, MA, USA; 2007. p. 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Effect of windmill farms on military readiness 2006. Technical Report. Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering, Congressional Defense Committees; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, A, Schouten, MW, de Jong, A. Radar and wind turbines: a guide to acceptance criteria. IEEE International Radar Conference 2010; Arlington, TX, USA; 2010. p. 1355–1361.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews JCG, Sarno C, Herring, R. Interaction of wind turbines with radar systems. Loughborough Antennas and Propagation Conference 2008; Loughborough, UK; 2008. p. 461–464.
   Google Scholar
• Borely, M. Guidelines on How to Assess the Potential Impact of Wind Turbines on Surveillance Sensors. Technical Report. EUROCONTROL-GUID-130, Eurocontrol, Brussels, Belgium; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, CA. Wind farm characteristics and their effect on radar systems. IET International Conference 2007; Edinburgh, UK; 2007. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Sergey L, Hubbard O, Ding Z, et al. Advanced mitigating techniques to remove the effects of wind turbines and wind farms on primary surveillance radars. IEEE Radar Conference 2008; Rome, Italy; 2008. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lute C, Wieserman W. ASR-11 radar performance assessment over a wind turbine farm. IEEE Radar Conference; Kansas City, MO; 2011. p. 226–230.
   Google Scholar
• Perry J, Biss A. Wind farm clutter mitigation in air surveillance radar. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 2007;22:35–40.10.1109/MAES.2007.4285990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian W, Lok YF, Hubbard O, et al. Impact of wind turbines on ATC radars and mitigation results. IEEE Radar Conference 2013; Ottawa, ON; 2013. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hood K, Torres S, Palmer R. Automatic detection of wind turbine clutter for weather radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 2010;27:1868–1880.10.1175/2010JTECHA1437.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong F, Zhang Y, Palmer R. Wind turbine clutter mitigation for weather radar by adaptive spectrum processing. IEEE Radar Conference 2012; Atlanta, GA, USA; 2012. p. 471–474.
   Google Scholar
• Wang WQ. Detecting and mitigating wind turbine clutter for airspace radar systems. Sci. World J. 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/385182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nai F, Palmer RD, Torres SM. Range-doppler domain signal processing to mitigate wind turbine clutter. IEEE Radar Conference 2011 RADAR’II; Kansas, MO, USA; 2011. p. 841–845.
   Google Scholar
• Jia Q, Wu R, Wang X. Recognition and supression of wind farm clutter via dynamic clutter map. IEEE Signal Proceeding Conference 2012 (ICSP); Beijing, China; 2012. p. 1949–1952.
   Google Scholar
• Isom BM, Palmer RD, Secrest GS, et al. Characterization and mitigation of wind turbine clutter on the WSR-88D network. Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Radar Meteorology, AMS; Cairns, Australia; 2007. p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, KV, Chandrasekar V. Signal analysis and modeling of wind turbine clutter in weather radars. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS); Honolulu, HI, USA; 2010. p. 3561–3564.
   Google Scholar
• Gallardo-Hernando B, Munoz-Ferreras JM, Perez-Martinez F, et al. Wind turbine clutter observations and theoretical validation for meteorological radar applications. IET Radar Sonar Navig. 2011;5:111–117.10.1049/iet-rsn.2009.0296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabayir O, Yucedag SM, Coskun AF, et al. Wind turbine signal modelling approach for pulse Doppler radars and applications. IET Radar Sonar Navig. 2015;9:276–284.10.1049/iet-rsn.2014.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, K, Thomsen ACK, Riis MA, et al. Detection and tracking of aircraft over wind farms using SCANTER 4002 with embedded tracker 2. IET International Conference on Radar Systems 2012; Glasgow, UK; 2012. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen ACK, Marqversen O, Pedersen MQ, et al. Air traffic control at wind farms with TERMA SCANTER 4000/5000. IEEE Radar Conference; Kansas City, MO, USA; 2011. p. 247–252.
   Google Scholar
• Ling H, Hamilton MF, Bhalla R, et al. Assessment of Offshore Wind Farm Effects on Sea Surface, Subsurface and Airborne Electronic Systems. Final Report for DE-EE0005380. Austin (TX): The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Energy; Sep 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Richards MA. Fundamentals of radar signal processing. Atlanta (GA): McGraw-Hill; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Li XR, Jilkov VP. Survey of maneuvering target tracking. Part I: dynamic models. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2003;39:1333–1364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul E. On the track similarity test in track splitting algorithm. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 1994;30:604–606.10.1109/7.272282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaowei, C, Jiajun L, Jie Z. Performance analysis of track initiation algorithm. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation; Dalian, China; 2006. p. 4239–4243.
   Google Scholar
• Khan J, Niar S, Menhaj A, et al. Multiple target tracking system design for driver assistance application. Conference on Design and Architectures for Signal and Image Processing (DASIP 08); Brussels, Belgium; 2008. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Munkres’ assignment algorithm. Modified for rectangular matrices. Available from http://csclab.murraystate.edu/bob.pilgrim/445/munkres.html
   Google Scholar
• Naidu VPS, Girija G, Raol JR. Evaluation of data association and fusion algorithms for tracking in the presence of measurement loss. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit Austin, TX, USA; 2003. p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar