Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced fields in different brain models

References

• Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Lancet. 1985;325:1106–1107.
   Google Scholar
• Picht T, Krieg SM, Sollmann N, et al. A comparison of language mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and direct cortical stimulation during awake surgery. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:808–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rösler J, Niraula B, Strack V, et al. Language mapping in healthy volunteers and brain tumor patients with a novel navigated TMS system: evidence of tumor-induced plasticity. Clin. Neurophysiology. 2014;125:526–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deletis V, Rogić M, Fernández-Conejero I, et al. Neurophysiologic markers in laryngeal muscles indicate functional anatomy of laryngeal primary motor cortex and premotor cortex in the caudal opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus. Clin. Neurophysiology. 2014;125:1912–1922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogić M, Deletis V, Fernández-Conejero I. Inducing transient language disruptions by mapping of Broca’s area with modified patterned repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol. J. Neurosurgery. 2014;120:1033–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossini P, Barker A, Berardelli A, et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalography Clin. Neurophysiology. 1994;91:79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes MG, Chambers CD, Gould IC, et al. Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation. J. Neurophysiology. 2005;94:4520–4527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knecht S, Sommer J, Deppe M, et al. Scalp position and efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiology. 2005;116:1988–1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossini P, Burke D, Chen R, et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an IFCN Committee. Clin. Neurophysiology. 2015;126:1071–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye RE, Rotenberg A, Ousley M, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in child neurology: current and future directions. J. Child Neurology. 2008;23:79–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajapakse T, Kirton A. Non-invasive brain stimulation in children: applications and future directions. Translational Neurosci. 2013;4:1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller K, Hömberg V. Development of speed of repetitive movements in children is determined by structural changes in corticospinal efferents. Neurosci. Lett. 1992;144:57–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller K, Hömberg V, Aulich A, et al. Magnetoelectrical stimulation of motor cortex in children with motor disturbances. Electroencephalography Clin. Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. 1992;85:86–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyre J, Miller S, Clowry G, et al. Functional corticospinal projections are established prenatally in the human foetus permitting involvement in the development of spinal motor centres. Brain. 2000;123:51–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvey MA, Mall V. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in children. Clin. Neurophysiology. 2008;119:973–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan C, Santos L, Peterson MD, et al. Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents. Brain Stimulation. 2015;8:76–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvey MA, Gilbert DL. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in children. Eur. J. Paediatric Neurology. 2004;8:7–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mall V, Berweck S, Fietzek U, et al. Low level of intracortical inhibition in children shown by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropediatrics. 2004;35:120–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and its applications in children. Chang Gung Med. J. 2002;25:424–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ziemann U, Muellbacher W, Hallett M, et al. Modulation of practice-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex. Brain. 2001;124:1171–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel S, Lau R, Gabriel C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. Phys. Med. Biol. 1996;41:2251–2269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid G, Überbacher R. Age dependence of dielectric properties of bovine brain and ocular tissues in the frequency range of 400 MHz to 18 GHz. Phys. Med. Biol. 2005;50:4711–4720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyman A, Holden S, Watts S, et al. Dielectric properties of porcine cerebrospinal tissues at microwave frequencies: in vivo, in vitro and systematic variation with age. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007;52:2229–2245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyman A, Gabriel C, Grant E, et al. Variation of the dielectric properties of tissues with age: the effect on the values of sar in children when exposed to walkie--talkie devices. Phys. Med. Biol. 2008;54:227–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grehl S, Viola HM, Fuller-Carter PI, et al. Cellular and molecular changes to cortical neurons following low intensity repetitive magnetic stimulation at different frequencies. Brain Stimulation. 2015;8:114–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weise K, Di Rienzo L, Brauer H, et al. Uncertainty analysis in transcranial magnetic stimulation using nonintrusive polynomial chaos expansion. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2015;51:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gomez L, Yucel A, Hernandez-Garcia L, et al. Uncertainty quantification in transcranial magnetic stimulation via high-dimensional model representation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015;62:361–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruohonen J, Karhu J. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clin. Neurophysiology. 2010;40:7–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner T, Zahn M, Grodzinsky A, et al. Three-dimensional head model simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2004;51:1586–1598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoykov NS, Lowery MM, Taflove A, et al. Frequency- and time-domain FEM models of EMG: capacitive effects and aspects of dispersion. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2002;49:763–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butson C, McIntyre C. Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiology. 2005;116:2490–2500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey B, Williams M. Computationally efficient bioelectric field modeling and effects of frequency-dependent tissue capacitance. J. Neural Eng. 2011;8:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossetti CA, Birdno MJ, Grill WM. Analysis of the quasi-static approximation for calculating potentials generated by neural stimulation. J. Neural Eng. 2008;5:44–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geeter N, Crevecoeur G, Dupré L, et al. A DTI-based model for TMS using the independent impedance method with frequency-dependent tissue parameters. Phys. Med. Biol. 2012;57:2169–2188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvetković M, Poljak D, Haueisen J. Analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation based on the surface integral equation formulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015;62:1535–1545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvetković M, Poljak D. Electromagnetic-thermal dosimetry comparison of the homogeneous adult and child brain models based on the SIE approach. J. Electromagnet. Waves Appl. 2015;29:2365–2379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman JD, Epstein CM, Davey KR. Magnetic brain stimulation and brain size: relevance to animal studies. Electroencephalography Clin. Neurophysiology. 1992;85:215–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu M, Ueno S. A comparison of induced electric fields in child and adult head models by transcranial magnetic stimulation; General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, 2011; XXXth URSI. Istanbul, Turkey; 2011 Aug; p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Cvetkovic M, Poljak D. Comparison of a TMS induced fields in homogeneous adult and child brain models using the surface integral equation approach; In: International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA); 2015 Sep; Torino, Italy: IEEE; 2015, p. 199–202.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington R. Boundary integral formulations for homogeneous material bodies. J. Electromagnet. Waves Appl. 1989;3:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggio AJ, Miller EK. Integral equation solutions of three-dimensional scattering problems. In: Mittra R, editor. Computer techniques for electromagnetics. 2nd ed. Chapter 4; Washington (DC): Hemisphere; 1987. p. 159–264.
   Google Scholar
• Cvetković M, Poljak D. An efficient integral equation based dosimetry model of the human brain. In: Proceedings of 2014 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC EUROPE); 2014 Sep 1--4; Gothenburg, Sweden; p. 375–380.
   Google Scholar
• Chen M, Mogul DJ. Using increased structural detail of the cortex to improve the accuracy of modeling the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on neocortical activation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010;57:1216–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opitz A, Windhoff M, Heidemann RM, et al. How the brain tissue shapes the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage. 2011;58:849–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenroos M, Hunold A, Haueisen J. Comparison of three-shell and simplified volume conductor models in magnetoencephalography. NeuroImage. 2014;1–12. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda PC, Hallett M, Basser PJ. The electric field induced in the brain by magnetic stimulation: a 3-D finite-element analysis of the effect of tissue heterogeneity and anisotropy. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2003;50:1074–1085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golestanirad L, Mattes M, Mosig J, et al. Effect of model accuracy on the result of computed current densities in the simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2010;46:4046–4051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nummenmaa A, Stenroos M, Ilmoniemi RJ, et al. Comparison of spherical and realistically shaped boundary element head models for transcranial magnetic stimulation navigation. Clin. Neurophysiology. 2013;124:1995–2007. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.04.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottauscio O, Chiampi M, Zilberti L, et al. Evaluation of electromagnetic phenomena induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2014;50:1033–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blinkov SM, Glezer II. The human brain in figures and tables. A quantitative handbook. New York (NY): Plenum Press; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Bit-Babik G, Guy AW, Chou CK, et al. Simulation of exposure and SAR estimation for adult and child heads exposed to radiofrequency energy from portable communication devices. Radiat. Res. 2005;163:580–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiart J, Hadjem A, Wong MF, et al. Analysis of RF exposure in the head tissues of children and adults. Phys. Med. Biol. 2008;53:3681–3695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ A, Kuster N. Differences in RF energy absorption in the heads of adults and children. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005;26:31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel C. Compilation of the dielectric properties of body tissues at RF and microwave frequencies. Brooks Air Force Base, TX. Report: AL/OE-TR-1996-0037; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Peyman A, Rezazadeh AA, Gabriel C. Changes in the dielectric properties of rat tissue as a function of age at microwave frequencies. Phys. Med. Biol. 2001;46:1617–1629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid G, Neubauer G, Mazal PR. Dielectric properties of human brain tissue measured less than 10 h postmortem at frequencies from 800 to 2450 MHz. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;24:423–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shock N, Watkin D, Yiengst M, et al. Age differences in the water content of the body as related to basal oxygen consumption in males. J. Gerontology. 1963;18:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang J, Fujiwara O, Watanabe S. Approximation of aging effect on dielectric tissue properties for SAR assessment of mobile telephones. IEEE Trans. Electromagnet. Compat. 2006;48:408–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski T, Silny J, Buchner H. Current density threshold for the stimulation of neurons in the motor cortex area. Bioelectromagnetics. 2002;23:421–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Phys. 1952;117:500–544.
   Google Scholar
• Roth BJ, Basser PJ. A model of the stimulation of a nerve fiber by electromagnetic induction. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1990;37:588–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattay F. The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system. Neuroscience. 1999;89:335–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung MG, Lo WD. Noninvasive brain stimulation: the potential for use in the rehabilitation of pediatric acquired brain injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2015;96:S129–S137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar