Dual-polarized metamaterial cavity-backed antennas for mutual coupling reduction

References

• Kildal P, Rosengren K. Correlation and capacity of MIMO systems and mutual coupling, radiation efficiency, and diversity gain of their antennas: simulations and measurements in a reverberation chamber. IEEE Commun Mag. 2004 Dec;42(12):104–112.10.1109/MCOM.2004.1367562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YJ, Yeo J, Mittra R, et al. Application of electro-magnetic bandgap (EBG) superstrates with controllable defects for a class of patch antennas as spatial angular filters. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2005 Jan;53:224–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheype C, Serier C, Thevenot M, et al. An electromagnetic bandgap resonator antenna. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2002 Sep;50:1285–1290.10.1109/TAP.2002.800699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Zhao F, Xiao K, et al. Transmit–receive isolation improvement of antenna arrays by using EBG structures. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag Lett. 2012;11:93–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F, Rahmat-Samii Y. Microstrip antennas integrated with electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structures: a low mutual coupling design for array applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2003 Oct;51(10):2936–2946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajo-Iglesias E, Quevedo-Teruel Ó, Inclán-Sánchez L. Mutual coupling reduction in patch antenna arrays by using a planar EBG structure and a multilayer dielectric substrate. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2008 Jun;56(6):1648–1655.10.1109/TAP.2008.923306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assimonis S, Yioultsis T, Antonopoulos C. Design and optimization of uniplanar EBG Structures for low profile antenna applications and mutual coupling reduction. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2012 Oct;60(10):4944–4949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bait-Suwailam M, Siddiqui O, Ramahi O. Mutual coupling reduction between microstrip patch antennas using slotted-complementary split-ring resonators. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag Lett. 2010;9:876–878.10.1109/LAWP.2010.2074175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu C, Cheng C, Murch R, et al. Reduction of mutual coupling between closely-packed antenna elements. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2007 Jun;55(6):1732–1738.10.1109/TAP.2007.898618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See T, Chen Z. An ultrawideband diversity antenna. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2009 Jun;57(6):1597–1605.10.1109/TAP.2009.2019908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Zhou X, Wu L, et al. A miniaturized dual-band frequency selective surface (FSS) with closed loop and its complementary pattern. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag Lett. 2009;8:1374–1377.
   Google Scholar
• Abdalla M, Ibrahim A. Compact and closely spaced metamaterial MIMO antenna with high isolation for wireless applications. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag Lett. 2013;12:1452–1455.10.1109/LAWP.2013.2288338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsath M, Kanagasabai M, Balasubramanian B. Implementation of slotted meander-line resonators for isolation enhancement in microstrip patch antenna arrays. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag Lett. 2013;12:15–18.10.1109/LAWP.2012.2237156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak A, Rowell C, Murch R. Isolation enhancement between two closely packed antennas. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2008 Nov;56(11):3411–3419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parbat R, Tambe A, Kadu M, et al. Dual polarized triple band 4×4 MIMO antenna with novel mutual coupling reduction approach. 2015 IEEE Bombay Section Symposium (IBSS). Mumbai; 2015. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Chen Z, Qing X, et al. Axial ratio bandwidth enhancement of 60-GHz substrate integrated waveguide-fed circularly polarized LTCC antenna array. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2012 Oct;60(10):4619–4626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Liu X, Zhou X, et al. Reduction of mutual coupling between closely packed patch antennas using waveguided metamaterials. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag Lett. 2012;11:389–391.10.1109/LAWP.2012.2193111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwailam M, Boybay M, Ramahi O. Electromagnetic coupling reduction in high-profile monopole antennas using single-negative magnetic metamaterials for MIMO applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2010 Sep;58(9):2894–2902.10.1109/TAP.2010.2052560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Yang S, Gou Y, et al. Wideband dual-polarized magnetically coupled patch antenna array with high port isolation. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2016 Jan;64(1):117–125.10.1109/TAP.2015.2502264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai G, Chen Z, Qing X. Enhanced isolation of a closely spaced four-element MIMO antenna system using metamaterial mushroom. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2015 Aug;63(8):3362–3370.10.1109/TAP.2015.2434403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang Z, Zheng J, et al. Compact azimuthal omnidirectional dual-polarized antenna using highly isolated colocated slots. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2012 Sep;60(9):4037–4045.10.1109/TAP.2012.2207072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang Z, Feng Z, et al. Design of omnidirectional dual-polarized antenna in slender and low-profile column. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2014 Apr;62(4):2323–2326.10.1109/TAP.2014.2303817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Yang S, Li B, et al. A low profile dual-band dual-polarized antenna array with integrated feeding network for pico-basestation application. Microwave Opt Technol Lett. 2014 Jul;56(7):1594–1600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capet N, Martel C, Sokoloff J, et al. Optimum high impedance surface configuration for mutual coupling reduction in small antenna arrays. Prog Electromagn Res B. 2011;32:283–297.10.2528/PIERB11050506
   Google Scholar