Learning-by-examples techniques as applied to electromagnetics

References

• Michie D, Spiegelhalter DJ, Taylor CC. Machine learning, neural and statistical classification. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): PrenticeHall; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Battiti R, Brunato M, Mascia F. Reactive search and intelligent optimization. New York (NY): Springer; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester A, Keane A, Sobester A. Engineering design via surrogate modelling. Chichester: Wiley; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes GF. On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 1968 Jan;14(1):55–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The Elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. New York (NY): Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Stein ML. Interpolation of spatial data. New York (NY): Springer; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York (NY): Springer Verlag; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Scholkopf B, Smola AJ. Learning with kernels. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen C, Williams C. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Rocca P, Benedetti M, Donelli M, et al. Evolutionary optimization as applied to inverse scattering problems. Inverse Prob. 2009;24:1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Rocca P, Oliveri G, Massa A. Differential evolution as applied to electromagnetics. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag. 2011 Feb;53(1):38–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massa A, Rocca P, Oliveri G. Compressive sensing in electromagnetics - a review. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag. 2015;57(1):224–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douvenot R, Lambert M, Lesselier D. Adaptive metamodels for crack characterization in eddy-current testing. IEEE Trans Mag. 2011 Apr;47(4):746–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel S, Ogurtsov S. Antenna design by simulation-driven optimization. New York (NY): Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Massa A, Oliveri G, Rocca P, et al. System-by-design: a new paradigm for handling design complexity. In: the 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2014), The Hague; 2014. p. 1180–1183.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlberg B, Tartakovsky DM, Guadagnini A. Subsurface characterization with support vector machines. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2006 Jan;44(1):47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallam T, Abdel-Rahman AB, Alghoniemy M, et al. A neural-network-based beamformer for phased array weather radar. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2016 Sep;54(9):5095–5104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Moon T. Human detection and activity classification based on micro-Doppler signatures using deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2016 Jan;13(1):8–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massa A, Boni A, Donelli M. A classification approach based on SVM for electromagnetic subsurface sensing. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2005 Sep;43(9):2084–2093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donelli M, Viani F, Rocca P, et al. An innovative multi-resolution approach for DOA estimation based on a support vector classification. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2009 Aug;57(8):2279–2292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulous C, Georgiopoulos M. Applications of neural networks in electromagnetics. Boston (MA): Artech House; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Ramon M, Christodoulou C. Support vector machines for antenna array processing and electromagnetics. Morgan & Claypool; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Couckuyt I, Declercq F, Dhaene T, et al. Surrogate-based infill optimization applied to electromagnetic problems. Int J RF Microw Comput Aided Eng. 2010;20(5):492–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain AK, Mao J, Mohiuddin KM. Artificial neural networks: a tutorial. Computer. 1996 Mar;29(3):31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haykin S. Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hu YH, Wwang J-N. Handbook of neural network signal processing. New York (NY): CRC Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Bertero M, Boccacci P. Introduction to inverse problems in imaging. Bristol: IOP Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Chen S, Cowan CFN, Grant PM. Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial-basis function networks. IEEE Trans Neural Networks. 1991 Mar;2(2):302–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayestaran RG, Campillo MF, Las-Heras F. Multiple support vector regression for antenna array characterization and synthesis. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2007 Sep;55(8):2495–2501.
   Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20(3):273–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Kim S. SVM tutorial - classification, regression and ranking. Handb Nat Comput. 2012;479–506.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik V. Statistical learning theory. New York (NY): Wiley; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lee K-C, Lin T-N. Application of neural networks to analyses of nonlinearly loaded antenna arrays including mutual coupling effects. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2005 Mar;53(3):1126–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang CC, Chu TH. Analysis of wire scatterers with nonlinear or time-harmonic loads in the frequency domain. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 1993 Jan;41(1):25–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel S, Ogurtsov S, Couckuyt I, et al. Variable-fidelity electromagnetic simulations and Co-Kriging for accurate modeling of antennas. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2013 Mar;61(3):1301–1308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs JP, Koziel S. Two-stage framework for efficient Gaussian process modeling of antenna input characteristics. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2014 Feb;62(2):706–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulaganathan S, Koziel S, Bekasiewicz A, et al. Data-driven model based design and analysis of antenna structures. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2016 Oct;10(13):1428–1434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zooghby AHE, Christodoulou CG, Georgiopoulos M. Neural network-based adaptive beamforming for one- and two-dimensional antenna arrays. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 1998 Dec;46(12):1891–1893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantine J, Tawk Y, Barbin SE, et al. Reconfigurable antennas: design and applications. IEEE Proc. 2015 Mar;103(3):424–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Ramon M, Xu N, Christodoulou CG. Beamforming using support vector machines. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag Lett. 2005;4:439–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Ramon M, Rojo-Alvarez JL, Camps-Valls G, et al. Kernel antenna array processing. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2007 Mar;55(3):642–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie N, Zhou Y, Zhang L, et al. Nonlinear optimization for adaptive antenna array receivers with a small data-record size. Wirel Commun Mob Comput. 2008 Feb;9:239–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayestaran RG, Las-Heras F. Support vector regression for the design of array antennas. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2005;4:414–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Chen X, Huang K. Application of support vector machines to the antenna design. Int J RF Microw Comput-Aided Eng. 2010;21(1):85–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel S, Ogurtsov S, Couckuyt I, et al. Cost-efficient electromagnetic-simulation-driven antenna design using co-Kriging. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2012 Nov;6(14):1521–1528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel S, Ogurtsov S. Rapid optimisation of omnidirectional antennas using adaptively adjusted design specifications and kriging surrogates. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2013 Dec;7(15):1194–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel S, Ogurtsov S. Multi-objective design of antennas using variable-fidelity simulations and surrogate models. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2013 Dec;61(12):5931–5939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Aliakbarian H, Ma Z, et al. An efficient method for antenna design optimization based on evolutionary computation and machine learning techniques. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2014 Jan;62(1):7–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel S, Ogurtsov S, Zieniutycz W, et al. Simulation-driven design of microstrip antenna subarrays. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2014 Jul;62(7):3584–3591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel S, Bekasiewicz A, Couckuyt I, et al. Efficient multi-objective simulation-driven antenna design using co-Kriging. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2014 Nov;62(11):5900–5905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel S, Ogurtsov S. Simulation-based design of microstrip linear antenna arrays using fast radiation response surrogates. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2015;14:759–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L-L, Liao C, Lin W, et al. Hybrid-surrogate-model-based efficient global optimization for high-dimensional antenna design. Prog Electromagn Res. 2012;124:85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveri G, Salucci M, Rocca P, et al. Efficient synthesis of complex antenna devices through system-by-design. In: 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Communication Systems and Networks (CIComms), Orlando, FL. 2014. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tenuti L, Salucci M, Oliveri G, et al. Surrogate-assisted optimization of metamaterial devices for advanced antenna systems. In: 2015 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, Cape Town. 2015. p. 1154–1156.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin M, Salucci M, Tenuti L, et al. Complex radome design through the Systems-by-Design approach. In: 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Vancouver, BC. 2015;2015:1324–1325.
   Google Scholar
• Massa A, Oliveri G, Salucci M, et al. Enabling the optimization-based design of complex EM devices through the System-by-Design approach. In: 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Davos, 2016. p. 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Southall HL, Simmers JA, O’Donnell TH. Direction finding in phased arrays with a neural network beamformer. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 1995 Dec;43(12):1369–1374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Zooghby AH, Christodoulou CG, Georgiopoulos M. Performance of radial-basis function networks for direction of arrival estimation with antenna arrays. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 1997 Nov;45(11):1611–1617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Zooghby AH, Christodoulou CG, Georgiopoulos M. A neural network-based smart antenna for multiple source tracking. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2000 May;48(5):768–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shieh C-S, Lin C-T. Direction of arrival estimation based on phase differences using neural fuzzy network. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2000 Jul;48(7):1115–1124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt RO. Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 1986 Mar;34(3):276–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigneshwaran S, Sundararajan N, Saratchandran P. Direction of arrival (DoA) estimation under array sensor failures using a minimal resource allocation neural network. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. Feb 2007;55(2):334–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastorino M, Randazzo A. A smart antenna system for direction of arrival estimation based on a support vector regression. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. Jul 2005;53(7):2161–2168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randazzo A, Abou-Khousa MA, Pastorino M, et al. Direction of arrival estimation based on support vector regression: experimental validation and comparison with MUSIC. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2007;6:379–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizzi L, Oliveri G, Rocca P, et al. Estimation of the direction-of-arrival of correlated signals by means of a SVM-based multi-resolution approach, In: IEEE Antennas Propag Soc Int Symp (APSURSI), 2010 Jul 1--4, Toronto, ON, Canada. p. 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• El Gonnouni A, Martinez-Ramon M, Rojo-Alvarez JL, et al. A support vector machine MUSIC algorithm. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2012 Oct;60(10):4901–4910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia JP, Rebenaque DC, Pereira FDQ, et al. Fast and efficient calculation of the multilayered shielded Green’s functions employing neural networks. Microw Opt Tech Lett. 2004 Nov;44:61–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia JP, Pereira FQ, Rebenaque DC, et al. A neural-network method for the analysis of multilayered shielded microwave circuits. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2006 Jan;54(1):309–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy EK, Yakovlev VV. RBF network optimization of complex microwave systems represented by small FDTD modeling data sets. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2006 Jul;54(7):3069–3083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir H, Wang Y, Yu M, et al. Neural network inverse modeling and applications to microwave filter design. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2008 Apr;56(4):867–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal SK, Sural S, Patra A. ANN- and PSO-Based synthesis of on-chip spiral inductors for RF ICs. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Design Integr Circuits Syst. 2008 Jan;27(1):188–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barmuta P, Avolio G, Ferranti F, et al. Hybrid nonlinear modeling using adaptive sampling. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2015 Dec;63(12):4501–4510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Hu S, Chen R. A combination of FDTD and least-squares support vector machines for analysis of microwave integrated circuits. Microw Opt Tech Lett. 2005;44(3):296–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunes F, Turker N, Gurgen F. Signal-noise support vector model of a microwave transistor”. Int J RF Microw Comput-Aided Eng. 2007;17(4):404–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia L, Xu R-M, Yan B. LTCC interconnect modeling by support vector regression. Prog Electromagn Res. 2007;69:67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angiulli G, De Carlo D, Amendola G, et al. Support vector regression machines to evaluate resonant frequency of elliptic substrate integrated waveguide resonators. Prog Electromagn Res. 2008;83:107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokan NT, Gunes F. Knowledge-based support vector synthesis of the microstrip lines. Prog Electromagn Res. 2009;92:65–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel S, Bandler JW. Reliable microwave modeling by means of variable-fidelity response features. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2015 Dec;63(12):4247–4254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel S, Cheng Q, Bandler J. Feature-based surrogates for low-cost microwave modelling and optimisation. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2015;9(15):1706–1712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel S, Bekasiewicz A. Expedited geometry scaling of compact microwave passives by means of inverse surrogate modeling. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2015 Dec;63(12):4019–4026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel S, Bandler JW. Rapid yield estimation and optimization of microwave structures exploiting feature-based statistical analysis. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2015 Jan;63(1):107–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelrahman MA, Gupta A, Deabes WA. A feature-based solution to forward problem in electrical capacitance tomography of conductive materials. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2011 Feb;60(2):430–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Yu Y, Chen Z, et al. A time-domain collocation meshless method with local radial basis functions for electromagnetic transient analysis. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2014 Oct;62(10):5334–5338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Chan CH. Comparison of interpolating functions and interpolating points in full-wave multilevel Green’s function interpolation method. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2010 Aug;58(8):2691–2699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Chen R, Ye Z. Combination of particle-swarm optimization with least-squares support vector machine for FDTD time series forecasting. Microw Opt Tech Lett. 2005 Nov;48(1):141–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilicz S, Lambert M, Gyimothy S. Kriging-based generation of optimal databases as forward and inverse surrogate models. Inverse Prob. 2010;26(7):074012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caorsi S, Gamba P. Electromagnetic detection of dielectric cylinders by a neural network approach. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 1999 Mar;37(2):820–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermani E, Caorsi S, Massa A, et al. On the training patterns of a neural network for target localization in the spatial domain. Microw Opt Tech Lett. 2000;28(3):207–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernieri A, Ferrigno L, Laracca M, et al. Crack shape reconstruction in eddy current testing using machine learning systems for regression. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2008 Sep;57(9):1958–1968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, O’Neill K, Kong JA, et al. Support vector machine and neural network classification of metallic objects using coefficients of the spheroidal MQS response modes. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2008 Jan;46(1):159–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosado LS, Janeiro FM, Ramos PM, et al. Defect characterization with eddy current testing using nonlinear-regression feature extraction and artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2013 May;62(5):1207–1214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selver MA, Taygur MM, Secmen M, et al. Hierarchical reconstruction and structural waveform analysis for target classification. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2016 Jul;64(7):3120–3129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermani E, Boni A, Caorsi S, et al. An innovative real-time technique for buried object detection. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2003 Apr;41(4):927–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermani E, Boni A, Kerhet A, et al. Kernels evaluation of SVM-based estimators for inverse scattering problems. Prog Electromagn Res. 2005;53:167–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermani E, Boni A, Caorsi S, et al. A multi-source strategy based on a learning-by-examples technique for buried object detection. Prog Electromagn Res. 2004;48:185–200.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Tang Z-X, Zhang B, et al. Permeability measurement of ferromagnetic materials in microwave frequency range using support vector machine regression. Prog Electromagn Res. 2007;70:247–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salucci M, Oliveri G, VIani F, et al. A learning-by-examples approach for non-destructive localization and characterization of defects through eddy current testing measurements. In: Proceeding of the IEEE AP-S International Symposium; 2015 Jul 19--25. Vancouver, BC, Canada; p. 900–901.
   Google Scholar
• Salucci M, Ahmed S, Massa A. An adaptive learning-by-examples strategy for efficient eddy current testing of conductive structures. In: 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Davos: 2016. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Salucci M, Anselmi N, Oliveri G, et al. Real-time NDT-NDE through an innovative adaptive partial least squares SVR inversion approach. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2016 Nov;54(11):6818–6832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bastard C, Wang Y, Baltazart V, et al. Time delay and permittivity estimation by ground-penetrating radar with support vector regression. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2014 Apr;11(4):873–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caorsi S, Anguita D, Bermani E, et al. A comparative study of NN and SVM-based electromagnetic inverse scattering approaches for on-line detection of buried objects. ACES J. 2003 Jul;18(2):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kerhet A, Raffetto M, Boni A, et al. A SVM-based approach to microwave breast cancer detection. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2006;29:807–818.
   Google Scholar
• Viani F, Lizzi L, Rocca P, et al. Object tracking through RSSI measurements in wireless sensor networks. Electron Lett. 2008 May;44(10):653–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viani F, Rocca P, Benedetti M, et al. Electromagnetic passive localization and tracking of moving targets in a WSN-infrastructured environment. Inverse Prob. 2010 Mar;26:074003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viani F, Rocca P, Oliveri G, et al. Electromagnetic tracking of transceiver-free targets in wireless networked environments. In: 6th European Conference on Antennas Propag (EuCAP 2011), Rome, Italy. 2011. p. 3808–3811.
   Google Scholar
• Viani F, Robol F, Giarola E, et al. Passive imaging strategies for real-time wireless localization of non-cooperative targets in security applications. In: 2015 9th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Lisbon. 2015. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Amendola S, Bianchi L, Marrocco G. Movement detection of human body segments: passive radio-frequency identification and machine-learning technologies. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag. 2015 Jun;57(3):23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bilicz S, Vazquez E, Lambert M, et al. Characterization of a 3D defect using the expected improvement algorithm. COMPEL. 2009;28(4):851–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilicz S, Lambert M, Gyimothy S, et al. Solution of inverse problems in nondestructive testing by a kriging-based surrogate model. IEEE Trans Magn. 2012 Feb;48(2):495–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Fernandez NJ, Aires F, Richaume P, et al. Soil moisture retrieval using neural networks: application to SMOS. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2015 Nov;53(11):5991–6007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill M, Asefa T, Kemblowski M, et al. Soil moisture prediction using support vector machines. J Amer Water Res Assoc. 2006;42(4):1033–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, Jin R, Li X. Regression Kriging-based upscaling of soil moisture measurements from a wireless sensor network and multiresource remote sensing information over heterogeneous cropland. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2015 Jan;12(1):92–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao W, Bouzerdoum A, Phung SL, et al. Automatic classification of ground-penetrating-radar signals for railway-ballast assessment. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2011 Oct;49(10):3961–3972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Mahallawy MS, Hashim M. Material classification of underground utilities from GPR images using DCT-based SVM approach. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2013 Nov;10(6):1542–1546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeu CWT, Lim M-H, Huang G-B, et al. A new machine learning paradigm for terrain reconstruction. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2006 Jul;3(3):382–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannakis I, Giannopoulos A, Yarovoy A. Model-based evaluation of signal-to-clutter ratio for landmine detection using ground-penetrating radar. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2016 Jun;54(6):3564–3573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potin D, Vanheeghe P, Duflos E, et al. An abrupt change detection algorithm for buried landmines localization. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2006 Feb;44(2):260–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliamiri A, Stalnaker J, Miller EL. Statistical classification of buried unexploded ordnance using nonparametric prior models. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2007 Sep;45(9):2794–2806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin T, Zhou Z. Ultrawideband synthetic aperture radar landmine detection. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2007 Nov;45(11):3561–3573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Ha S, Kwon J. Human detection using doppler radar based on physical characteristics of targets. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2015 Feb;12(2):289–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brahimi R, Kornaga A, Bensetti M, et al. Postprocessing of near-field measurement based on neural networks. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2011 Feb;60(2):539–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Doncker P, Dricot J, Meys R, et al. Electromagnetic fields estimation using spatial statistics. Electromagnetics. 2006;26(2):111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschrijver D, Vanhee F, Pissoort D, et al. Automated near-field scanning algorithm for the EMC analysis of electronic devices. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2012 Jun;54(3):502–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Deschrijver D, Pissoort D, et al. Accurate hotspot localization by sampling the near-field pattern of electronic devices. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2013 Dec;55(6):1365–1368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jouvie F, Lecointe D, Briend P, et al. Computation of the field radiated by a FM transmitter by means of ordinary Kriging. Ann Telecomunn. 2011;66(7–8):429–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susanto F, Budi S, de Souza P, et al. Design of environmental sensor networks using evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2016 Apr;13(4):575–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias R, Ares F, Fernandez-Delgado M, et al. Element failure detection in linear antenna arrays using case-based reasoning. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag. 2008 Aug;50(4):198–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen PM, Chung J-Y. Characterization of antenna substrate properties using surrogate-based optimization. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2015 Jun;9(9):867–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar