Assessment of FEM simulations in EMC test setups for small aeronautical platforms

References

• HIRF SE (HIRF Synthetic Environment) – Final Report Summary. [Cited 2018 Mar]. Available from: http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/140447_en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia SG, Pirinoli P, Francavilla MA. EV55: a numerical workbench to test TD/FD codes in HIRF EMC assessment. EUROEM 2012; 07/2012; Toulouse, France; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rasek GA, Pascual-Gil E, Schroder A, et al. HIRF transfer functions of a fuselage model: measurements and simulations. IEEE Trans Electromagn C. 2014;56(2):311–319. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2013.2287049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez J, Angulo L, Bandinelli M, et al. HIRF interaction with metallic aircrafts. a comparison between TD and FD methods. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC EUROPE), 2012 International Symposium on; 2012 Sept; p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Romero SF, Morales AL, Cancela MA, et al. Validation procedure of low level coupling tests on real aircraft structure. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC EUROPE), 2012 International Symposium on 2012 Sept; p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Junqua I, Parmantier JP, Ridel M. Modeling of high frequency coupling inside oversized structures by asymptotic and PWB methods. Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), 2011 International Conference on 2011 Sept; p. 68–71.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez GG, Alvarez J, Pascual-Gil E, et al. HIRF virtual testing on the C-295 aircraft: on the application of a pass/fail criterion and the FSV method. IEEE Trans Electromagn C. 2014;56(4):854–863. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2013.2291680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroder A, Rasek GA, Bruns HD, et al. Analysis of high intensity radiated field coupling into aircraft using the method of moments. IEEE Trans Electromagn C. 2014;56(1):113–122. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2013.2278208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor AK, Venneri SL, Paul DB, et al. Structures technology for future aerospace systems. Comput Struct. 2000;74(5):507–519. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004579499900067X. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00067-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangalgiri PD. Composite materials for aerospace applications. Bull Mater Sci. 1999;22(3):657–664. doi: 10.1007/BF02749982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak NV. Composite materials in aerospace applications. Int J Sci Res Publ. 2014;4(10):2250–3153.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa IMD, Sarasini F, Sarto MS, et al. EMC impact of advanced carbon fiber/carbon nanotube reinforced composites for next-generation aerospace applications. IEEE Trans Electromagn C. 2008;50(3):556–563. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2008.926818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabello MR, Fernández S, Pous M, et al. SIVA UAV: a case study for the EMC analysis of composite air vehicles. IEEE Trans Electromagn C. 2017;59(4):1103–1113. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2017.2648507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EASA Notice of Proposed Amendment 2017-05 (A). Introduction of a regulatory framework for the operation of drones. Unmanned aircraft system operations in the open and specific category. [Cited 2018 Mar]. Available from: https://www.easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/NPA%202017-05%20%28A%29_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy AP, Martin AJM, Orlandi A, et al. Feature selective validation (FSV) for validation of computational electromagnetics (CEM). part I-the FSV method. IEEE Trans Electromagn C. 2006;48(3):449–459. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2006.879358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlandi A, Duffy AP, Archambeault B, et al. Feature selective validation (FSV) for validation of computational electromagnetics (CEM). part II- assessment of FSV performance. IEEE Trans Electromagn C. 2006;48(3):460–467. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2006.879360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSYS Simulation Software Products. [Cited 2018 Mar]. Available from: https://www.ansys.com/products/electronics/ansys-hfss.
   Google Scholar
• Jin J. The finite element method in electromagnetics. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley-IEEE Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• SCR (Sistemas de Control Remoto S.L.): SCRAB-II. [Cited 2018 Mar]. Available from: http://www.scrtargets.es/index.php/en/products/scra.
   Google Scholar
• BASF Products - Styrodur. [Cited 2018 Mar]. Available from: www.styrodur.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto nacional de técnica aeroespacial (INTA). [Cited 2018 Mar]. Available from: http://www.inta.es.
   Google Scholar
• Sheng XQ, Jin JM, Song J, et al. On the formulation of hybrid finite-element and boundary-integral methods for 3-D scattering. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 1998;46(3):303–311. doi: 10.1109/8.662648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speag: DAK - Dielectric Assessment Kit Product Line. [Cited 2018 Mar]. Available from: https://www.speag.com/products/dak/dielectric-measurements/.
   Google Scholar
• Ganchev S, Qaddoumi N, Bakhtiari S, et al. Calibration and measurement of dielectric properties of finite thickness composite sheets with open-ended coaxial sensors. Instrum Meas IEEE Trans. 1995;44(6):1023–1029. doi: 10.1109/19.475149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEEE standard for validation of computational electromagnetics computer modeling and simulations. IEEE Std 15791. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Grupo de Compatibilidad Electromagntica (GCEM) – UPC. [Cited 2018 Mar]. Available from: http://www.upc.edu/web/gcem/.
   Google Scholar
• Jauregui R, Aragon M, Silva F. The role of uncertainty in the feature selective validation (FSV) method. IEEE Trans Electromagn C. 2013;55(1):217–220. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2012.2227262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar