Electromagnetic modeling of a reconfigurable graphene-based metasurface using MoM-GEC method for 3D digital holography

References

• Latychevskaia T, Fink H-W. Practical algorithms for simulation and reconstruction of digital in-line holograms. Appl Opt. 2015;54:2424–2434. doi: 10.1364/AO.54.002424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paper I, Yoshikawa H, Yamaguchi T. Computer-generated holograms for 3D display. Chin Opt Lett. 2009;7:1079–1082. doi: 10.3788/COL20090712.1079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuer J. Metasurfaces-based holography and beam shaping: engineering the phase profile of light. Nanophotonics. 2017;6:137–152. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2016-0109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Badawe M, Almoneef TS, Ramahi OM. A true metasurface antenna. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–8. doi: 10.1038/srep19268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WT, Yang K, Wang C, et al. High-efficiency broadband meta-hologram with polarization- controlled dual images. Nano Lett. 2013;14:225–230. doi: 10.1021/nl403811d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Wong AMH, Eleftheriades GV. Optical huygens’ metasurfaces with independent control of the magnitude and phase of the local reflection coefficients. Phys Rev X. 2014;4:041042, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng B, He XY, Tao J, et al. Analysis of graphene TE surface plasmons in the terahertz regime analysis of graphene TE surface plasmons in the terahertz regime. 2013 IOP Publ Nanotechnol. 2013;24:0957–4484.
   Google Scholar
• Nye NS, Swisher A, Bungay C, et al. 2017. Design of broadband anti-reflective metasurfaces based on an effective medium approach. Proceedings SPIE 10181, Advanced Optics for Defense Applications UV Through LWIR II, 101810J, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Pulido-Mancera L, Bowen PT, Imani MF, et al. Polarizability extraction of complementary metamaterial elements in waveguides for aperture modeling. Phys Rev B. 2017;96:235402, 1–14. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.235402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu K, Coquet P, Wang QJ, et al. Modelling of free-form conformal metasurfaces. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3494, 1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05579-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo XF, Qing A, Lee CK. The design of Frequency Selective Surfaces (FSS) using Real-coded Genetic Algorithm (RGA). Fourth International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing, 2003 and the Fourth Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia. Proceedings of the 2003, Joint, IEEE Xplore. 2003:391–395.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Yao K, Xia F, et al. Graphene plasmonic metasurfaces to steer infrared light. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12423, 1–9. doi: 10.1038/srep12423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash S, Patnaik A. Graphene loaded frequency reconfigurable metal antenna. 2017 IEEE International Conference Antenna Innovations & Modern Technologies for Ground, Aircraft and Satellite Applications (iAIM) 2017. 2018;1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Shankar R, Kats MA, et al. Electrically tunable metasurface perfect absorbers for ultrathin mid- infrared optical modulators. Nano Lett. 2014;14:6526–6532. doi: 10.1021/nl503104n
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabidian N, Dutta-Gupta S, Kholmanov I, et al. Electrical tuning of polarization-state using electrical tuning of polarization-state using graphene-integrated metasurfaces. Phil Trans R Soc A. 375 20160061. 2017;1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bang S, Kim J, Yoon G, et al. Recent advances in tunable and reconfigurable metamaterials. Micromachines (Basel). 2018;9:1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhailov SA, Ziegler K. New electromagnetic mode in graphene. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;99:016803, 1–4. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.016803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter R. The method of moments in electromagnetics, by W.C. Gibson. Contemp Phys. 2010;51:183–184. doi: 10.1080/00107510903073302
   Google Scholar
• Hajji M, Mendil S, Aguili T. A new hybrid Mom-Gec asymptotic method for electromagnetic scattering computation in waveguides. Prog Electromagn Res B. 2014;61:197–210. doi: 10.2528/PIERB14101303
   Google Scholar
• Hajji M, Aidi M, Krraoui H, et al. Hybridization of generalized Po and Mom-Gec method for electromagnetic study of complex structures: application to reflectarrays. Prog Electromagn Res M. 2016;45:35–49. doi: 10.2528/PIERM15092203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Wang Y, Pu M, et al. Dispersion management of anisotropic metamirror for super-octave bandwidth polarization conversion. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8434, 1–7. doi: 10.1038/srep08434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Ma X, Pu M, et al. High-efficiency and wide-angle beam steering based on Catenary optical fields in ultrathin metalens. Adv Opt Mater. 2018;6:1800592, 1–8. doi: 10.1002/adom.201800592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu M, Ma X, Guo Y, et al. Theory of microscopic meta-surface waves based on catenary optical fields and dispersion. Opt Express. 2018;26:19555–19562. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.019555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YG. A clustering method based on K-means algorithm. Appl Mech Mater. 2013;380–384:1697–1700. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.380-384.1697
   Google Scholar
• Selvan KT, Janaswamy R. Fraunhofer and Fresnel distances: unified derivation for aperture antennas. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag. 2017;59:12–15. doi: 10.1109/MAP.2017.2706648
   Google Scholar