Grease oil humidity sensor by using metamaterial

References

• Tian L, Zhao K, Zhao S, et al. (2011, July). Investigation of lubricating grease using terahertz transmission spectroscopy. In Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Electronics and Optoelectronics (Vol. 4, pp. V4-254). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Donahue CJ. Lubricating grease: A chemical primer. J Chem Educ. 2006;83(6):862. doi: 10.1021/ed083p862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyriac F, Lugt PM, Bosman R, et al. Impact of water on EHL film thickness of lubricating greases in rolling point contacts. Tribol Lett. 2016;61(3):23. doi: 10.1007/s11249-016-0642-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Istry A. (2005). Performance of lubricating greases in the presence of water. In NLGI Spokesman-Including NLGI Annual Meeting-National Lubricating Grease Institute (Vol. 68, No. 12, pp. 8-15). [Kansas City, Mo.] National Lubricating Grease Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Cyriac F, Lugt PM, Bosman R. Impact of water on the rheology of lubricating greases. Tribology Transactions. 2016;59(4):679–689. doi: 10.1080/10402004.2015.1107929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittes N. (2013). Water in grease condition monitoring literature review.
   Google Scholar
• Duncanson M. (2005). Machinery lubrication: detecting and controlling water in oil. Machinery Lubrication.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Spurlock M. Strategic oil analysis: instrument-based on-site lubricant analysis. Tribol Lubr Technol. 2010;66(7):26.
   Google Scholar
• Stellman CM, Ewing KJ, Bucholtz F, et al. Monitoring the degradation of a synthetic lubricant oil using infrared absorption, fluorescence emission and multivariate analysis: a feasibilty study. Tribol Lubr Technol. 1999;55(10):42.
   Google Scholar
• Besser C, Dörr N, Novotny-Farkas F, et al. Comparison of engine oil degradation observed in laboratory alteration and in the engine by chemometric data evaluation. Tribol Int. 2013;65:37–34. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2013.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher L, Edelson E. Evaluating lubricant condition. Turbomachinery Int. 2006;47(1):40–41.
   Google Scholar
• Stark MS, Wilkinson JJ, Lee PM. The degradation of lubricants in gasoline engines: lubricant flow and degradation in the piston assembly. In: Smith JL, Priest M, Taylor RI, et al., editors. Tribology and Interface Engineering series. Vol. 48. Elsevier; 2005. p. 779–786. doi:10.1016/S0167-8922.
   Google Scholar
• Noronha I, Francimeire Cintra Veloso G, Eduardo Borges da Silva L. “Detecting moisture in transformer-oil using acoustic emission,” COMADEM 2013 conference paper.
   Google Scholar
• Du L, Zhe J. On-line wear debris detection in lubricating oil for condition-based health monitoring of rotary machinery. Recent Pat Electr Electron Eng (Formerly Recent Pat Electr Eng). 2011;4(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Poley J. Oil analysis in the real world: part VII. Tribol LubrTechnol. Mar 2011;67(3):77–79.
   Google Scholar
• Du L, Zhe J. Parallel sensing of metallic wear debris in lubricants using undersampling data processing. Tribol Int. 2012;53:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akgol O, Altintas O, Unal E, et al. Linear to left-and right-hand circular polarization conversion by using a metasurface structure. Int J Microwave Wireless Technol. 2018;10(1):133–138. doi: 10.1017/S1759078717001192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogue R. Sensing with metamaterials: a review of recent developments. Sensor Review. 2017;37(3):305–311. doi: 10.1108/SR-12-2016-0281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veselago VG. The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative values of permittivity and permeability. Sov. Phys. Usp. 1968;10(4):509–514. doi: 10.1070/PU1968v010n04ABEH003699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendry JB, Holden AJ, Stewart WJ, et al. Extremely low frequency plasmons in metallic mesostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 1996;76(25):4773. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Zhou J, Koschny T, et al. Chiral metamaterials: simulations and experiments. J Optics A: Pure Appl Optics. 2009;11(11):114003. doi: 10.1088/1464-4258/11/11/114003
   Google Scholar
• Schurig D, Mock JJ, Justice BJ, et al. Metamaterial electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies. Science. 2006;314(5801):977–980. doi: 10.1126/science.1133628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkurt FO, Karaaslan M. Pattern reconfigurable metasurface to improve characteristics of low-profile antenna parameters. Int J RF and Microwave Comput-Aided Eng. 2019;29(12):e21790. doi: 10.1002/mmce.21790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrekenhamer D, Chen WC, Padilla WJ. Liquid crystal tunable metamaterial absorber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;110(17):177403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.177403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ünal E, Bağmancı M, Karaaslan M, et al. Strong absorption of solar energy by using wide band metamaterial absorber designed with plus-shaped resonators. Int J Modern Phy B. 2018: 1850275. doi: 10.1142/S0217979218502752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akgol O, Unal E, Altintas O, et al. Design of metasurface polarization converter from linearly polarized signal to circularly polarized signal. Optik (Stuttg). 2018;161:12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.02.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarz A, Vafapour Z. Water-based terahertz metamaterial for skin cancer detection application. IEEE Sens J. 2018;19(4):1519–1524. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2882363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi KK, Palai G, Sarkar P. Realization of accurate blood glucose sensor using photonics based metamaterial. Optik (Stuttg). 2018;168:296–301. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.04.091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakır M, Karaaslan M, Karadag F, et al. Metamaterial sensor for transformer Oil, and Microfluidics. Appl Comput Electromagn Soc J. 2019;34(5).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altıntaş O, Aksoy M, Ünal E, et al. (2019, November). Metamaterial inspired sensor for detection of engine lubricant oil condition. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2178, No. 1, p. 030010). AIP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Saadeldin AS, Hameed MFO, Elkaramany EM, et al. Highly sensitive terahertz metamaterial sensor. IEEE Sens J. 2019;19(18):7993–7999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altintas O, Aksoy M, Unal E, et al. A split meander line resonator-based permittivity and thickness sensor design for dielectric materials with flat surface. J Elect Mater 2018;47(10):6185–6192. doi: 10.1007/s11664-018-6528-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalgaç Ş, Bakır M, Karadağ F, et al. Characterization of chiral metamaterial sensor with high sensitivity. Optik (Stuttg). 2019;202:163673. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gric T, Gorodetsky A, Trofimov A, et al. Tunable plasmonic properties and absorption enhancement in terahertz photoconductive antenna based on optimized plasmonic nanostructures. J Infrared, Millimeter, Terahertz Waves. 2018;39(10):1028–1038. doi: 10.1007/s10762-018-0516-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis T, Gric T, Rafailov E. Surface plasmon polariton waves propagation at the boundary of graphene based metamaterial and corrugated metal in THz range. Optical Quantum Electron. 2020;52(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s11082-019-2128-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu MF, Meng FY, Wu Q, et al. (2005, December). A compact equivalent circuit model for the SRR structure in metamaterials. In 2005 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 4-pp). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Bakır M, Dalgaç Ş, Ünal E, et al. High sensitive metamaterial sensor for water treatment centres. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2019;230(12):304. doi: 10.1007/s11270-019-4355-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar