Design of an airborne concentric frequency-domain electromagnetic induction system for shallow subsurface geophysical exploration

References

• Zhdanov MS. Electromagnetic geophysics: notes from the past and the road ahead. Geophysics. 2010;75(5):A49–A66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beamish D. Airborne EM footprints. Geophys Prospect. 2003;51(1):49–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberle DG, Siemon B. Identification of buried valleys using the BGR helicopter-borne geophysical system. Near Surf Geophys. 2006;4(2):125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arab-Amiri AR, Moradzadeh A, Fathianpour N, et al. Inverse modeling of HEM data using a new inversion algorithm. J Min Environ. 2010;1(2):9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tumanski S. Induction coil sensors - a review. Meas Sci Technol. 2007;18(3):R31–R46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levaniemi H, Beamish D, Hautaniemi H, et al. The JAC airborne EM system: AEM-05. J Appl Geophy. 2009;67(3):219–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin CC, Huang X, Liu H, et al. Footprint for frequency-domain airborne electromagnetic systems. Geophysics. 2014;79(6):E243–E254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitterman DV, Yin CC. Effect of bird maneuver on frequency-domain helicopter EM response. Geophysics. 2004;69(5):1203–2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemon B, Steuer A, Ullmann A, et al. Application of frequency-domain helicopter-borne electromagnetics for groundwater exploration in urban areas. Phys Chem Earth. 2011;36(16):1373–1385.
   Google Scholar
• Siemon B, Christiansen AV, Auken E. A review of helicopter-borne electromagnetic methods for groundwater exploration. Near Surf Geophys. 2009;7(5-6):629–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanssens D, Waegeman W, Declercq Y, et al. High-resolution surveying with small-loop frequency domain electromagnetic systems: efficient survey design and adaptive progressing. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag. 2021;9(1):167–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin CC, Fraser DC. The effect of the electrical anisotropy on the response of helicopter-borne frequency-domain electromagnetic systems. Geophys Prospect. 2004;52(5):399–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He XP, Wang HJ, Ma SD. Translation algorithm of the apparent conductivity using the frequency-domain electromagnetic method of a magnetic dipole. Appl Geophys. 2017;146:221–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifi F, Arab-Amiri AR, Kamkar-Rouhani A, et al. Development of a novel approach for recovering SIP effects from 1-D inversion of HEM data: case study from the alut area, northwest of Iran. Appl Geophys. 2020;174:103962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng QM, Hu H, Yu QF, et al. Fast approximate inversion of frequency-domain airborne electromagnetic data based on layered earth. In: Xu Y, Xia J, Chen C, editors. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Geophysics; 2006 Jun 04-09; Wuhan, Peoples R China. Geophysical solutions for environment and Engineering, vol 1 and 2; 2006. p. 434-438.
   Google Scholar
• Won IJ, Oren A, Funak F. GEM-2A: a programmable broadband helicopter-towed electromagnetic sensor. Geophysics. 2003;68(6):1888–1895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahl A. Automatic 1D inversion of multifrequency airborne electromagnetic data with artificial neural networks: discussion and a case study. Geophys Prospect. 2003;51(2):89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountain D. 60 years of airborne EM - focus on the last decade. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Airborne Electromagnetics; 2008 May 1 - 5; Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Won IJ, Kaiswetter DA, Henson DR, et al. GEM-3, a monostatic broadband electromagnetic induction sensor. J Environ Eng Geoph. 1997;2(1):53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson HH, Barrow BJ, Bell TH, et al. Characterization of a GEM-3 array for UXO classification. Conference on Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets VIII; 2003 Apr 21-25; Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Balch SJ, Boyko WP, Paterson NR. The aeroTEM airborne electromagnetic system. Lead Edge. 2003;22(6):562–566.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu C, Liang Y, Han F, et al. 3-D full-wave inversion of helicopter transient electromagnetic data in frequency domain. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2020;58(7):4928–4938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang DH, Koh CS. An efficient semianalytic computation method of magnetic field for a circular coil with rectangular cross section. IEEE Trans Magn. 2012;48(1):62–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward SH, Hohmann GW. Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics: volume 1. Tulsa: Society of Exploration Geophysicists; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson WL. A hybird fast Hankel transform algorithm for electromagnetic modeling. Geophysics. 1989;54:263–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong FN. Hankel transform filters for dipole antenna radiation in a conductive medium. Geophys Prospect. 2007;55(1):83–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajesh R, Sarma VS. Dual transmitter-receiver electromagnetic system for lateral boundary detection of subsurface formations. Curr Sci. 2018;114(8):1747–1751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmidi F E, Chakiri S, Hafid M, et al. Electromagnetic survey to constraints ore mining exploration in the eastern Anti-Atlas belt(case of lmiter inlier, Morocco): Application of frequency electromagnetic helicopter-borne method. J Afr Earth Sci. 2019;150:595–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar