A miniaturized rectangular shape narrowband MIMO antenna with reduced mutual coupling for C-band applications

References

• Oppermann I, Hämäläinen M, Iinatti J, eds. UWB: theory and applications. Wiley; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Sharawi MS. Printed MIMO antenna engineering. Boston, London: Artech House; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai G, Chen ZN, Qing X. Enhanced isolation of a closely spaced four-element MIMO antenna system using metamaterial mushroom. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2015;63(8):3362–3370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntaikos DK, Yioultsis TV. Compact split-ring resonator-loaded multiple-input–multiple-output antenna with electrically small elements and reduced mutual coupling. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2013;7(6):421–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu C-C, Lin K-H, Su H-L. Implementation of broadband isolator using metamaterial-inspired resonators and a t-shaped branch for MIMO antennas. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2011;59(10):3936–3939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Du Z. A wideband printed dual-antenna with three neutralization lines for mobile terminals. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2013;62(3):1495–1500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diallo A, Luxey C, Le Thuc P, et al. Study and reduction of the mutual coupling between two mobile phone pifas operating in the DCS1800 and UMTS bands. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2006;54(11):3063–3074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Li W, Yu W. A multi-band/UWB MIMO/diversity antenna with an enhance isolation using radial stub loaded resonator. Appl Comput Electromagn Soc J. 2013;28(1):8–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltani S, Murch RD. A compact planar printed MIMO antenna design. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2015;63(3):1140–1149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak ACK, Rowell CR, Murch RD. Isolation enhancement between two closely packed antennas. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2008;56(11):3411–3419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez RR, De Flaviis F. A mutual coupling study of linear and circular polarized microstrip antennas for diversity wireless systems. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2003;51(2):238–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B. Luk K-M. A 4-port diversity antenna with high isolation for mobile communications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2011;59(5):1660–1667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei K, Li J, Wang L, et al. S-shaped periodic defected ground structures to reduce microstrip antenna array mutual coupling. Electron Lett. 2016;52(15):1288–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo C-M, Hong J-S, Zhong L-L. Isolation enhancement of a very compact UWB-MIMO slot antenna with two defected ground structures. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2015;14:1766–1769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anitha R, Sarin VP, Mohanan P, et al. Enhanced isolation with defected ground structure in MIMO antenna. Electron Lett. 2014;50(24):1784–1786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharawi MS, Numan AB, Khan MU, et al. A dual-element dual-band MIMO antenna system with enhanced isolation for mobile terminals. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2012;11:1006–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren J, Hu W, Yin Y, et al. Compact printed MIMO antenna for UWB applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2014;13:1517–1520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y-S, Chang C-P. Design of a four-element multiple-input–multiple-output antenna for compact long-term evolution small-cell base stations. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2016;10(4):385–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu C-Y, Cheng C-H, Murch RD, et al. Reduction of mutual coupling between closely-packed antenna elements. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2007;55(6):1732–1738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain R, Sharawi MS. Planar meandered-f-shaped 4-element reconfigurable multiple-input–multiple-output antenna system with isolation enhancement for cognitive radio platforms. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2016;10(1):45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikram M, Hussain R, Ghalib A, et al. Compact 4-element MIMO antenna with isolation enhancement for 4g LTE terminals. In: 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI). IEEE; 2016. p. 535–536.
   Google Scholar
• Ikram M, Hussain R, Hammi O, et al. An L-shaped 4-element monopole MIMO antenna system with enhanced isolation for mobile applications. Microw Opt Technol Lett. 2016;58(11):2587–2591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleem R, Bilal M, Bajwa KB, et al. Eight-element UWB-MIMO array with three distinct isolation mechanisms. Electron Lett. 2015;51(4):311–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Goodwill K, Arya AK, et al. A compact narrow band microstrip bandpass filter with defected ground structure (DGS). In: 2012 National Conference on Communications (NCC). IEEE; 2012. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Sinha R, Choubey A, et al. A novel metamaterial electromagnetic band gap (MM-EBG) isolator to reduce mutual coupling in low-profile MIMO antenna. J Electron Mater. 2021;51(2):626–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Ghosh S, Chakarborty U. Compact dual wide-band four/eight elements MIMO antenna for WLAN applications. Int J RF Microw Comput Aided Eng. 2019;29(7):e21749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ho Chae S, il Kawk W, Park S-O, et al. Analysis of mutual coupling in MIMO antenna array by TARC calculation. In: 2006 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference. IEEE; 2006. p. 2090–2093.
   Google Scholar
• Singh AK, Mahto SK, Sinha R. Compact super-wideband MIMO antenna with improved isolation for wireless communications. Frequenz. 2021;75(9-10):407–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazunov AA, Molisch AF, Tufvesson F. Mean effective gain of antennas in a wireless channel. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2009;3(2):214–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena G, Jain P, Awasthi YK. High diversity gain super-wideband single band-notch MIMO antenna for multiple wireless applications. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2020;14(1):109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyka SL. Channel capacity of MIMO architecture using the exponential correlation matrix. IEEE Commun Lett. 2001;5(9):369–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Zetterberg P, He S. Printed MIMO antenna system of four closely-spaced elements with large bandwidth and high isolation. Electron Lett. 2010;46(15):1052–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou X-J, Wang G-M, Wang Y-W, et al. Decoupling antenna array with x-shaped strip. Int J RF Microw Comput Aided Eng. 2019;29(4):e21601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbosh A, Al-Rizzo H, Yahya S, et al. Decoupling and MIMO performance of two planar monopole antennas with protruded strips. Microw Opt Technol Lett. 2018;60(11):2712–2718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac AA, Al-Rizzo H, Yahya S, et al. Miniaturised MIMO antenna array of two vertical monopoles embedded inside a planar decoupling network for the 2.4 GHz ISM band. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2020;14(1):132–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birwal A, Singh S, Kanaujia BK, et al. Low-profile 2.4/5.8 GHz MIMO/diversity antenna for WLAN applications. J Electromagn Waves Appl. 2020;34(9):1283–1299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-C, Huang C-Y. MIMO pcb-integrated slot antenna for ieee 802.11 n WLAN access-point applications. Microw Opt Technol Lett. 2016;58(5):1254–1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu F, Guo J, Zhao L, et al. Dual-band metasurface-based decoupling method for two closely packed dual-band antennas. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2019;68(1):552–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu K, Li Y, Liu X, et al. Mutual coupling reduction of a MIMO antenna array using 3-d novel meta-material structures. Appl Comput Electromagn Soc J. 2018;33(7):758–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang T, Jiao T, Li Y. A low mutual coupling MIMO antenna using periodic multi-layered electromagnetic band gap structures. Appl Comput Electromagn Soc J. 2018;33(3):305–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo S, Li Y, Xia Y, et al. A low mutual coupling antenna array with gain enhancement using metamaterial loading and neutralization line structure. Appl Comput Electromagn Soc J. 2019;34(3):411–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang J, Faraz F, Chen X, et al. A metasurface superstrate for mutual coupling reduction of large antenna arrays. IEEE Access. 2020;8:126859–126867.
   Google Scholar
• Liu F, Guo J, Zhao L, et al. Ceramic superstrate-based decoupling method for two closely packed antennas with cross-polarization suppression. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2020;69(3):1751–1756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang T, Jiao T, Li Y. Array mutual coupling reduction using l-loading e-shaped electromagnetic band gap structures. Int J Antennas Propag. 2016;2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang J, Xia Y, Li Y. High isolated x-band MIMO array using novel wheel-like metamaterial decoupling structure. Appl Comput Electromagn Soc J. 2019;34(12):1829–1836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar