On the accuracy of an emitter localization method based on multipath exploitation in realistic scenarios

References

• Poisel R. Electronic warfare target location methods. Norwood (MA): Artech House; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Ho KC. An asymptotically efficient estimator in closed-form for 3-D AOA localization using a sensor network. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun. 2015;14:6524–6535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan Y-T, Ho KC. A simple and efficient estimator for hyperbolic location. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 1994;42:1905–1915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KC, Xu W. An accurate algebraic solution for moving source location using TDOA and FDOA measurements. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2004;52:2453–2463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Ho KC. Unified near-field and far-field localization for AOA and hybrid AOA-TDOA positionings. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun. 2017;17:1242–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigling BD. Urban RF multipath mitigation. IET Radar Sonar Navig. 2008;2:419–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldmann B, Goetz A, Weigel R. An ultra wideband positioning system enhanced by a short multipath mitigation technique. 2009 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop on Wireless Sensing, Local Positioning, and RFID. IEEE; 2009. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Yu J, Krolik J. MIMO multipath clutter mitigation for GMTI automotive radar in urban environments. IET International Conference on Radar Systems (Radar 2012). IET; 2012. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Guo S, Cui G, Kong L, et al. An imaging dictionary based multipath suppression algorithm for through-wall radar imaging. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2017;54:269–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo S, Yang X, Cui G, et al. Multipath ghost suppression for through-the-wall imaging radar via array rotating. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2018;15:868–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra A, Guidi F, Dardari D. Single-anchor localization and orientation performance limits using massive arrays: MIMO vs. beamforming. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun. 2018;17:5241–5255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wu Y, Shen Y. Joint spatiotemporal multipath mitigation in large-scale array localization. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2019;67:783–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copa EIP, Aziz K, Rykunov M, et al. Radar fusion for multipath mitigation in indoor environments. 2020 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf20). IEEE; 2020. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Seow CK, Tan SY. Localization of omni-directional mobile device in multipath environments. Prog Electromagn Res. 2008;85:323–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Win MZ. On the use of multipath geometry for wideband cooperative localization. GLOBECOM 2009 – 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference; 2009. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lui KW, So HC. Range-based source localisation with pure reflector in presence of multipath propagation. Electron Lett. 2010;46:957–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agate CS, Varble M, Ezal KO. Ground-based emitter location in the presence of multipath. 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference; 2019. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner P, Witrisal K. Multipath-assisted single-anchor indoor localization in an office environment. 2012 19th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP); 2012. p. 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Setlur P, Smith GE, Ahmad F, et al. Target localization with a single sensor via multipath exploitation. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 2012;48:1996–2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muqaibel AH, Amin MG, Ahmad F. Target localization with a single antenna via directional multipath exploitation. Int J Antennas Propag. 2015: e510720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor A, Setlur P, Devroye N. Single-sensor RF emitter localization based on multipath exploitation. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 2015;51:1635–1651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacometti R, Baussard A, Jahan D, et al. Localization of radar emitters from a single sensor using multipath and TDOA-AOA measurements in a naval context. 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO); 2016. p. 692–696.
   Google Scholar
• Nikoo MS, Behnia F. Single-site source localisation using scattering data. IET Radar Sonar Navig. 2017;12:250–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa Md, Thoma RS. Single sensor RF emitter location using ray tracing multipath exploitation. 2018 15th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS); 2018. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dalveren Y, Kara A. Multipath exploitation in emitter localization for irregular terrains. Radioengineering. 2019;27:473–482.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Guo F, Yang L, et al. An improved algebraic solution for TDOA localization with sensor position errors. IEEE Commun Lett. 2015;19:2218–2221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polka LA, Balanis CA, Polycarpou AC. High-frequency methods for multiple diffraction modeling: application and comparison. J Electromagn Waves Appl. 1994;8:1223–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam K-Y, Chew L-Y, Li L-W. Multipath propagation of radio waves in 3-dimensional terrains. J Electromagn Waves Appl. 2001;15:411–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabakcioglu MB, Kara A. Comparison of improved slope uniform theory of diffraction with some geometrical optic and physical optic methods for multiple building diffractions. Electromagnetics. 2009;29:303–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabakcioglu MB, Kara A. Improvements on slope diffraction for multiple wedges. Electromagnetics. 2010;30:285–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabakcioglu MB. S-UTD-CH model in multiple diffractions. Int J Electron. 2016;103:765–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azpilicueta L, Aguirre E, López-Iturri P, et al. An accurate UTD extension to a ray-launching algorithm for the analysis of complex indoor radio environments. J Electromagn Waves Appl. 2016;30:43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizk K, Valenzuela R, Chizhik D, et al. Application of the slope diffraction method for urban microwave propagation prediction. VTC ‘98 48th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference Pathway to Global Wireless Revolution (Cat No. 98CH36151); 1998. vol. 2, p. 1150–1155.
   Google Scholar
• Kouyoumjian RG, Pathak PH. A uniform geometrical theory of diffraction for an edge in a perfectly conducting surface. Proc IEEE. 1974;62:1448–1461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzaras C, Saunders SR. An improved heuristic UTD solution for multiple-edge transition zone diffraction. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2001;49:1678–1682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara DA, Malherbe JAG, Pistorius CW. Introduction to the uniform geometrical theory of diffraction. Norwood (MA): Artech House; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Dalveren Y, Kara A. Comparative analysis of TDOA-based localization methods in the presence of sensor position errors. 2017 4th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT); 2017. p. 0556.
   Google Scholar
• Trivedi KS. Probability and statistics with reliability, queuing, and computer science applications. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley Online Library; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ho KC, Lu X, Kovavisaruch L. Source localization using TDOA and FDOA measurements in the presence of receiver location errors: analysis and solution. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2007;55:684–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp I, Yu K, Guo YJ. GDOP analysis for positioning system design. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2009;58:3371–3382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei Y-P, Gong F-X, Ma Y-Q. Optimal distribution for four-station TDOA location system. 2010 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics. IEEE; 2010. p. 2858–2862.
   Google Scholar
• Levanon N. Lowest GDOP in 2-D scenarios. IEE Proc-Radar Sonar Navig. 2000;147:149–155.
   Google Scholar