Genetic algorithm-based mathematical morphology for clutter removal in airborne radars

References

• Stimson GW. Introduction to airborne radar. New Jersey: SciTech Publishing Inc.; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Maisel L. Performance of sidelobe blanking systems. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 1968;AES-4(2):174–180.
   Google Scholar
• Finn HM, Johnson RS, Peebles PZ, et al. Fluctuating target detection in clutter using sidelobe blanking logic. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 1971;AES-7(1):147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Farina A, Gini F. Design of slb systems in the presence of correlated ground clutter. IEE Proc Radar Sonar Navig. 2000;147(4):199–207.
   Google Scholar
• Coşkun O, Candan C. Design of Maisel sidelobe blankers with a guarantee on the gap to optimality. IET Radar Sonar Navig. 2016;10(9):1619–1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger W. Space-time adaptive processing: fundamentals. Advanced radar signal and data processing. Neuenahrer: NATO STO; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt SD, Metcalf J, Jakabosky J, et al. Multi-waveform space-time adaptive processing. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 2017;53(1):385–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Liao G, Qu Y. Compensation of clutter spectrum for airborne forward-looking radar based on the clutter subspace transformation. 2009 International Radar Conference “Surveillance for a Safer World” (RADAR 2009); 2009 Oct 12–16; Bordeaux (France): IEEE; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rangaswamy M, Lin FC, Gerlach KR. Robust adaptive signal processing methods for heterogeneous radar clutter scenarios. Signal Process. 2004;84(9):1653–1665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wang W, Zheng X, et al. A clutter suppression method based on SOM-SMOTE random forest. 2019 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf); 2019 Apr 22–26; Boston (MA): IEEE; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital image processing. Noida (India): Dorling Kingsley; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Shih FY. Image processing and mathematical morphology: fundamentals and applications. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sagar BSD. Mathematical morphology in geomorphology and GISci. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Koosha M, Hajsadeghi K, Koosha M. Fine logarithmic adaptive soft morphological algorithm for synthetic aperture radar image segmentation. IET Image Process. 2014;8(2):90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seshagiri D, Dyana A, Ray KP, et al. Mathematical morphology for clutter removal in airborne radars. 2021 21st International Radar Symposium (IRS); 2021 June 21–22; Berlin (Germany): IEEE; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Masci J, Angulo J, Schmidhuber J. A learning framework for morphological operators using counter-harmonic mean. In: Mathematical morphology and its applications to signal and image processing. ISMM 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7883. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 329–340.
   Google Scholar
• Franchi G, Fehri A, Yao A. Deep morphological networks. Pattern Recognit. 2020;102:107246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal R, Dey MS, Chanda B. Image restoration by learning morphological opening- closing network. Math Morphol - Theory Appl. 2020;4(1):87–107.
   Google Scholar
• Nogueira K, Chanussot J, Mura MD, et al. An introduction to deep morphological networks. IEEE Access. 2021;9:114308–114324.
   Google Scholar
• Golberg DE. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. [place unknown]: Addison Wesley; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Eiben AE, Smith JE. Introduction to evolutionary computing. Heidelberg (Germany): Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey NR, Marshall S. Using genetic algorithms in the design of morphological filters. IEE Colloquium on Genetic Algorithms in Image Processing and Vision; 1994 Oct 20; London (UK): IET; 2002, p. 6/1–6/5.
   Google Scholar
• Haralick RM, Sternberg SR, Zhuang X. Image analysis using mathematical morphology. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1987;PAMI-9(4):532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana MI, Poli R, Claridge E. Morphological algorithm design for binary images using genetic programming. Genet Program Evolvable Mach. 2006;7(1):81–102.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Tan Y. A novel genetic programming algorithm for designing morphological image analysis method. In: ICSI 2011, Part I, LNCS 6728; 2011. p. 549–558.
   Google Scholar
• Pedrino EC, Saito JH, Roda VO. A genetic programming approach to reconfigure a morphological image processing architecture. Int J Reconfigurable Comput. 2011;2011(5):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Shih FY, Wu YT. Decomposition of binary morphological structuring elements based on genetic algorithms. Comput Vision Image Understanding. 2005;99(2):291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar