Application of empirical mode decomposition for denoising and ground clutter removal on weather radar signals

References

• Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 1998;454:903–995. doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0193
   Google Scholar
• Molla MKI, Hirose K. Single-mixture audio source separation by subspace decomposition of hilbert spectrum. IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech Lang Process. 2007;15:893–900. doi:10.1109/TASL.2006.885254.
   Google Scholar
• Donoho DL, Johnstone IM. Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika. 1994;81(3):425–455. doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjileontiadis, LJ. Empirical mode decomposition and fractal dimension filter. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. Jan. 2007: 30–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jing-Tian T, Qing Z, Yan T, et al. Hilbert-huang transform for ECG denoising, in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Bioinf. Biomed.Eng. (ICBBE 2007), 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Gao Y, Wang L, et al. The removal of wall components in Doppler ultrasound signals by using the empirical mode decomposition algorithm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54:1631–1642. doi:10.1109/TBME.2007.891936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Wei G. An integrated EMD adaptive threshold denoising method for reduction of noise in ECG. Plos One. 2020, July 15;15(7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudraa AO, Cexus JC. EMD-based signal filtering. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2007;56(6):2196–2202. doi:10.1109/TIM.2007.907967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopsinis Y, McLauglin S. Investigation and performance enhancement of the empirical mode decomposition method based on a heuristic search optimization approach. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2008;56:1–13. doi:10.1109/TSP.2007.901155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Que P. Noise suppression and flaw detection of ultrasonic signals via empirical mode decomposition. Rus. J. NondestructTest. 2007;43:196–203. doi:10.1134/S1061830907030096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning B, Qiyu S, Zhihua Y, et al. Robust image watermarking based on multiband wavelets and empirical mode decomposition. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2007;16:1956–1966. doi:10.1109/TIP.2007.901206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsolis GS, Xenos TD. Signal denoising using empirical mode decomposition and higher order statistics. International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition. 2011;4(2):91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Boudraa AO, Cexus JC, Saidi Z. EMD-based signal noise reduction. Int J Signal Process. 2004;1(1):33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Boudraa AO, Cexus JC. “Denoising via empirical mode decomposition”, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Control, Communications and Signal Processing (ISCCSP’ 06), p. 4, Marrakech, Morocco, March 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Byung Jun Yoon P, Vaidyajnathan P. Wavelet-based denoising by customized thresholding. ICASP. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Donoho DL. De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans Inform Theory. 1995;14(3):612–627.
   Google Scholar
• Huang HC, Cressie N. Deterministic/stochastic wavelet decomposition for recovery of signal from noisy data. Technometrics. 2000;42:262–276. doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10486047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagha M, Tikhemirine M, Bergheul S, et al. Denoised estimation of the weather Doppler spectrum by the wavelet method. Digit Signal Process. 2013;23:322–328. doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2012.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopsinis Y, Mclanglin S. Development of EMD-based denoising methods inspired by wavelet thresholding. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2009;57(4):1351–1362. doi:10.1109/TSP.2009.2013885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopsinis Y, McLaughlin S. Empirical Mode Decomposition Based Soft-Thresholding, in Proc. 16th Eur. Signal Process. Conf. (EUSIPCO), Lausanne, Switzerland, 2008, Aug. 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kopsinis Y, McLauglin S. Empirical mode decomposition based denoising techniques, in Proc. 1st IAPR Workshop Cogn. Inf. Process. (CIP), Santorini, Greece, Jun. 9–10, 2008, pp. 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Yang G, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. EMD interval thresholding denoising based on similarity measure to select relevant modes. Signal Processing. 2015;109:95–109. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.10.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Li HJ, Xiong XL. A novel EMD selecting thresholding method based on multiple iteration for denoising LIDAR signal. Opt. Rev. 2015;22(477):477–482.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Huang NE. A study of the characteristics of white noise using the empirical mode decomposition method. Proc Roy Soc London A. 2004;460:1597–1611. doi:10.1098/rspa.2003.1221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng ZK, Peter WT, Chu FL. A comparison study of improved hilbert–huang transform and wavelet transform: application to fault diagnosis for rolling bearing. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2005;19(5):974–988. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayenu-Prah A, Attoh-Okine N. A criterion for selecting relevant intrinsic mode functions in empirical mode decomposition. Adv Adapt Data Anal. 2010;02(1):1–24. doi:10.1142/S1793536910000367.
   Google Scholar
• Bringi VN, Chandrasekar V. Polarimetric Doppler weather radar: principles and applications. Cambridge University Press. 2001: 636 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Dong X, Hu J, Hu C, et al. Rapid identification and spectral moment estimation of Non-Gaussian weather radar signal. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2022;60:1–12, Art no. 5112912. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2022.3168153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flandrin P, Rilling G, Gonçalves P. Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank. IEEE Signal Process Lett. 2004;11:112–114. doi:10.1109/LSP.2003.821662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flandrin P, Rilling G, Goncalces P. EMD equivalent filter banks, from interpretations to application. In: NE Huang, S Shen, editor. Hilbert-Huang transform and its application (1st ed.). Singapore: World Scientific; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrand PH, Sekhon RS. Objective determination of the noise level in Doppler spectra. J Appl Meterol. 1974;13:808–811. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1974)013<0808:ODOTNL>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Huang NE, Wu Z. Statistical significance test of intrinsic mode functions. In: NE Huang, S Shen, editors. Hilbert-Huang transform and its applications (1st ed.). Singapore: World Scientific; 2005. p. 107–125.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbert JC, Dixon M, Ellis SM, et al. Weather radar ground clutter. part I: identification, modeling, and simulation. J Atmos Ocean Technol. 2009;26:1165–1180. doi:10.1175/2009JTECHA1159.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbert JC, Dixon M, Ellis SM, et al. Weather radar ground clutter. part II: real-time identification and filtering. J Atmos OceanTechnol. 2009;26:1181–1197. doi:10.1175/2009JTECHA1160.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ice RL, Rhoton RD, Krause JC, et al. Automatic clutter mitigation in the WSR-88D, design, evaluation, and implementation. In Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Radar Meteorology,Williamsburg, VA, USA, 5–9 October 2009; p. 5.3.
   Google Scholar
• Ivic IR, Torres SM. Online determination of noise level in weather radars. Proc. Sixth European Conf. on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrology (ERAD 2010), Sibiu, Romania, Meteo Romania, 2010, 7 pp. Available online at http://www.Erad2010.org/pdf/oral/monday/6_ERAD2010_0094.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ivic IR, Curtis C, Torres SM. Radial-Based noise power estimation for weather radars. J Atmos Ocean Techn. 2013;30(12):2737–2753. doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00008.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komaty A, Boudraa AO, Dare D. EMD-based filtering using the Hausdoff distance. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Komaty A, Boudraa AO, Augier B, et al. EMD-Based Filtering using similarity measure between probability density functions of IMFs. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2014;63(1):27–34. doi:10.1109/TIM.2013.2275243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang G, Doviak RJ, et al. A new approach to detect ground clutter mixed with weather signals. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2013;51:2373–2387. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2012.2209658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang G, Doviak RJ, et al. Scan-to-Scan correlation of weather radar signals to identify ground clutter. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2013;10:855–859. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2012.2226233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu CS, Lu TZ, Tan Y. A modified empirical mode decomposition method in Applications to signal de-noising [J]. Acta Autom Sin. 2010;36(1):67–73. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1004.2010.00067
   Google Scholar
• Ramyakrishna Enugonda V, Anandan K, Ghosh B. Higher order spectral analysis of weather signals. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications. 2023;37:69–92. doi:10.1080/09205071.2022.2112762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard JD, Dušan SZ. Doppler radar and weather observations. Academic Press; 1984. p. 130–140.
   Google Scholar
• Rilling G, Flandrin P. One or two frequencies? The empirical mode decomposition answers, “IEEE trans. Signal Process. Jan. 2008;56:85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siggia AD, Passarelli RE. Gaussian model adaptive processing (GMAP) for improved ground clutter cancellation and moment calculation. Third European Conference on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrology (ERAD) together with the COST 717 Final Seminar, Copernicus GmbH, 2004, 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Tang YW, Tai CC, Su CC. A correlated empirical mode decomposition method for partial discharge signal denoising. Meas Sci Technol. 2010;21(8):85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yinguang L, Guifu Z, Doviak RJ. A new approach to detect the ground clutter mixed with weather echoes. IEEE Radar Conference (RADAR), Kansas City, MO, USA. 2011, May 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Doviak RJ. Ground clutter detection using the statistical properties of signals received with a polarimetric radar. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2014;62(3):597–606. doi:10.1109/TSP.2013.2293118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urkowitz H, Nespor JD. Obtaining spectral moments by discrete Fourier transform with noise removal in radar meteorology, IGARSS ‘92: International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium; International Space Year, 1992, IEEE, 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Zrnic DS. Simulation of weatherlike Doppler spectra and signals. J Appl Meteorol 1975;14(4):619.<0619:SOWDSA>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Yu TY, Rondinel RR, Palmer RD. Investigation of Non-Gaussian Doppler spectra observed by weather radar in a tornadic supercell. J Atmos Ocean Technol. 2009;26(3):444–461. doi:10.1175/2008JTECHA1124.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar