A new approach for evaluating crack growth resistance curve of mode II delamination by doubly end-notched tension tests

References

• Suemasu H. Analytical approaches to compression after impact (CAI) behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced composite materials. Adv Compos Mater. 2016;25:1–18.10.1080/09243046.2015.1122416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner AJ, Blackman BRK, Davies P. A status report on delamination resistance testing of polymer-matrix composites. Eng Fract Mech. 2008;75:2779–2794.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS). Testing methods for interlaminar fracture toughness of carbon fibre reinforced plastics. JIS K7086; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM. Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. ASTM D5528-94a; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. Fibre-reinforced plastic composites - Determination of mode I interlaminar fracture toughness, GIC, for unidirectionally reinforced materials. ISO 15024; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson LA, Gillespie JW, Pipes RB. On the analysis and design of the end notched flexure (ENF) specimen for mode II testing. J Compos Mater. 1986;20:594–604.10.1177/002199838602000606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM. Standard test method for determination of the mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. ASTM D7905; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Davies P, Blackman BRK, Brunner AJ. Standard test methods for delamination resistance of composite materials: current status. Appl Compos Mater. 1998;5:345–364.10.1023/A:1008869811626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies P, Sims GD, Blackman BRK, et al. Comparison of test configurations for determination of mode II interlaminar fracture toughness results from international collaborative test programme. Plast Rubber Compos. 1999;28:432–437.10.1179/146580199101540600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang WX, Nakata M, Takao Y, et al. Experimental investigation on test methods for mode II interlaminar fracture testing of carbon fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part A. 2009;40:1447–1455.10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kageyama K, Kikuchi M, Yanagisawa N. Stabilized end notched flexure test: characterization of mode II interlaminar crack growth. ASTM STP. 1991;1110:210–225.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Kageyama K, Hojo M. Prestandardization study on mode II interlaminar fracture toughness test for CFRP in Japan. Composites 1995;26:257–267.10.1016/0010-4361(95)93669-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Williams JG. Corrections for mode II fracture toughness specimens of composites materials. Compos Sci Technol. 1992;43:251–256.10.1016/0266-3538(92)90096-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman BRK, Brunner AJ, Williams JG. Mode II fracture testing of composites: a new look at an old problem. Eng Fract Mech. 2006;73:2443–2455.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuecker C, Davidson BD. Evaluation of the accuracy of the four-point bend end-notched flexure test for mode II delamination toughness determination. Compos Sci Technol. 2000;60:2137–2146.10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00113-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Morais AB, Pereira AB. Application of the effective crack method to mode I and mode II interlaminar fracture of carbon/epoxy unidirectional laminates. Compos Part A. 2007;38:785–794.10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson BD, Sun X. Effects of friction, geometry, and fixture compliance on the perceived toughness from three-and four-point bend end-notched flexure tests. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2005;24:1611–1628.10.1177/0731684405050402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Davidson BD. A direct energy balance approach for determining energy release rates in three and four point bend end notched flexure tests. Int J Fract. 2005;135:51–72.10.1007/s10704-005-3746-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Davidson BD. Numerical evaluation of the effects of friction and geometric nonlinearities on the energy release rate in three- and four-point bend end-notched flexure tests. Eng Fract Mech. 2006;73:1343–1361.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson BD, Sun X, Vinciquerra Anthony JJ. Influences of friction, geometric nonlinearities, and fixture compliance on experimentally observed toughnesses from three and four-point bend end-notched flexure tests. J Compos Mater. 2007;41:1177–1196.10.1177/0021998306067304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrese A, Carbajal N, Vargas G, et al. A new method for determining mode II R-curve by the End-Notched Flexure test. Eng Fract Mech. 2010;77:51–70.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakatani H, K Osaka. On the measurement of interlaminar fracture toughness GIIR by using UD-CFRP with fibre discontinuities. Proc. 41th Domestic Symposium on Composite Materials, September 2016 (Kochi, Japan), 2A-04.
   Google Scholar
• Reeder JR, Rews JH. Mixed-mode bending method for delamination testing. AIAA J. 1990;28:1270–1276.10.2514/3.25204
   Google Scholar
• Benzeggagh ML, Kenane M. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus. Compos Sci Technol. 1996;56:439–449.10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson WS. Stress analysis of the cracked-lap-shear specimen: an ASTM round-robin. Journal Test Eval. 1987;15:303–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernlund G, Papini M, McCammond D, et al. Fracture load predictions for adhesive joints. Compos Sci Technol. 1994;51:587–600.10.1016/0266-3538(94)90091-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suemasu H, Kondo A, Gozu K, et al. Novel test method for mixed mode II and III interlaminar fracture toughness. Adv Compos Mater. 2010;19:349–361.10.1163/092430410X504143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suemasu H, Tanikado Y. Damage growth behavior and interlaminar fracture resistance of CFRP laminates under shear fracture mode. Adv Compos Mater. 2015;24:451–466.10.1080/09243046.2014.914998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javidrad F. An investigation into the mixed-mode delamination growth in unidirectional T800/924C laminates. Adv Compos Mater. 2016;25:403–421.10.1080/09243046.2015.1012286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull D, Clyne TW. An introduction to composite materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.10.1017/CBO9781139170130
   Google Scholar
• Yashiro S, Ogi K, Yoshimura A, et al. Characterization of high-velocity impact damage in CFRP laminates: part II – prediction by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Compos Part A. 2014;56:308–318.10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar