Finite element analysis and experimental investigation on the mechanical behaviours of multifunctional sandwich structures embedded with batteries

References

• Berjoza D, Jurgena I. Influence of batteries weight on electric automobile performance. 16th international scientific conference engineering for rural development. Jelgava. 2017 May 24-26:1388–1394.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2017.16.N316
   Google Scholar
• https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/electric_vehicle_ev (2020 Dec 11).
   Google Scholar
• Attar P, Galos J, Best AS, et al. Compression properties of multifunctional composite structures with embedded lithium-ion polymer batteries. Composite Structures. 2020;237:111937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattarakunnan K, Galos J, Das R, et al. Tensile properties of multifunctional composites embedded with lithium-ion polymer batteries. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2020;136:105966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladpli P, Nardari R, Kopsaftopoulos F, et al. Multifunctional energy storage composite structures with embedded lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources. 2019;414:517–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer K, Meng C, Marshall B, et al. Carbon fiber reinforced structural lithium-ion battery composite: multifunctional power integration for CubeSats. Energy Storage Mater. 2020;24:676–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer K, Boucherbil NA, Zohair M, et al. Polymer reinforced carbon fiber interfaces for high energy density structural lithium-ion batteries. Sustainable Energy Fuels. 2020;4(6):2661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javaid A, Ali MZ. Multifunctional structural lithium ion batteries for electrical energy storage applications. Mater Res Express. 2018;5(5):055701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder JF, Wetzel ED, Hgo EH, et al. Multifunctional structural composite batteries for US army applications. Proceeding of the 2006 Army Science Conference. Orlando, FL, USA, 27–30 November 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Johannisson W, Zenkert D, Lindbergh G. Model of a structural battery and its potential for system level mass savings. Multifunct Mater. 2019;2:035002.2019(2):035002.
   Google Scholar
• Grzesik B, Liao G, Vogt D, et al. Integration of energy storage functionalities into fiber reinforced spacecraft structures. Acta Astronaut. 2020;166:172–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundy ML, Cole DP, Rivera M, et al. Multifunctional structural-energy storage nanocomposites for ultra lightweight micro autonomous vehicles (final report). Army Research Laboratory, ARL-TR-6366, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, February 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Peng C, Zhang W. Thermal analysis of multifunctional structural battery for satellite applications. Appl Therm Eng. 2015;78:209–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saafi M, Gullane A, Huang B, et al. Inherently multifunctional geopolymeric cementitious composite as electrical energy storage and self-sensing structural material. Compos Struct. 2018;201:766–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas JP, Pogue III WR, Pham GT, et al. Flexure and pressure-loading effects on the performance of structure–battery composite beams. J Compos Mater. 2019;53(20):2863–2874. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora S, Shen W, Kapoor A. Review of mechanical design and strategic placement technique of a robust battery pack for electric vehicles. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2016;60:1319–1331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asp LE. Multifunctional composite materials for energy storage in structural load paths. Plast Rubber Compos. 2013;42(4):144–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González C, Vilatela JJ, Molina-Aldareguía JM, et al. Structural composites for multifunctional applications: current challenges and future trends. Prog Mater Sci. 2017;89:194–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam TJ, Liao G, Petersen J, et al. Multifunctional composites for future energy storage in aerospace structures. Energies. 2018;11(2):335. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alia RA, Rao S, Cantwell WJ. Compressive testing of reinforced nomex honeycomb at elevated temperatures. Advanced Composite Materials. 2020;29(4):335–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Syed AK, Ijaz H, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of flexural and impact behaviour of glass/pp sandwich panel for automotive structural applications. Adv Compos Mater. 2018;27(4):367–386. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjunath RN, Khatkar V, Behera BK. Influence of augmented tuning of core architecture in 3D woven sandwich structures on flexural and compression properties of their composites. Adv Compos Mater. 2020;29(4):317–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao L, Miura Y, Kemmochi K. Improving bending characteristics of FRP sandwich structures with reinforcement webs. Adv Compos Mater. 2018;27(2):221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florence A, Jaswin MA, Arul Prakash A MD, et al. Effect of energy-absorbing materials on the mechanical behaviour of hybrid FRP honeycomb core sandwich composites. Mater Res Innovations. 2020;24:244–255.
   Google Scholar
• Hambric SA, Shepherd MR, Schiller NH, et al. Quieting a rib-framed honeycomb core sandwich panel for a rotorcraft roof. J Am Helicopter Soc. 2017;62(1):1–10. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang L, Zhang J, Cheng P. Homogenized modelling methodology for 18650 lithium-ion battery module under large deformation. Plos One. 2017;12(7):e0181882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström J. Mechanics of solid polymers. William A. editor.Theory and computational modeling. USA: Elsevier. p. 353–369.2015. Chapter 7, Plasticity Models.
   Google Scholar
• M-m P-A, Roure-Fernández F, Ayneto-Gubert X, et al. Elastic asymmetry of PLA material in FDM-Printed Parts: considerations concerning experimental Characterisation for use in numerical simulations. Materials. 2020;13:15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• https://www.tribology-abc.com/abc/cof.htm (2020 Dec 11).
   Google Scholar
• Przekop RE, Kujawa M, Pawlak W, et al. Graphite modified polylactide (PLA) for 3D printed (FDM/FFF) sliding elements. Polymers. 2020;12(6):1250. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• https://github.com/superjamie/lazyweb/wiki/3D-Printing-Filament-Properties (2020 Dec 11
   Google Scholar
• Easey N, Chuprynyuk D, Syazwan Wan Musa WM, et al. Dome-shape auxetic cellular metamaterials: manufacturing, modeling, and testing. Front Mater. 2019;6:86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D695-15. Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plastics. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM; 2015.
   Google Scholar