Shear strength and failure modes of double-lap bi-material CFRP/Ni-Cr alloy joint under severe environmental conditions

References

• Christensen RM. Mechanics of composite materials. North Chelmsford, Massachusetts: Courier Corporation; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Banea MD, Da Silva LF. Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: an overview. Proc Inst Mech Eng L J Mat Des Appl. 2009;223(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pramanik A, Basak AK, Dong Y, et al. Joining of carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites and aluminium alloys–A review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2017;101:1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchkara NH, Albedah A, and Benyahia F, et al. Experimental and numerical analyses of the effects of overload on the fatigue life of aluminum alloy panels repaired with bonded composite patch. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci. 2021 22 5 ;1075–1084 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasheminia SM, Park BC, Chun HJ, et al. Failure mechanism of bonded joints with similar and dissimilar material. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;161:702–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TC, Bai Y, Zhao XL, et al. Mechanical characterization of steel/CFRP double strap joints at elevated temperatures. Compos Struct. 2011;93(6):1604–1612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban CS, Lee YH, Choi JH, et al. Strength prediction of adhesive joints using the modified damage zone theory. Compos Struct. 2008;86(1–3):96–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordes M, Davies P, Cognard JY, et al. Prediction of long term strength of adhesively bonded steel/epoxy joints in sea water. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2009;29(6):595–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozel A, Yazici B, Akpinar S, et al. A study on the strength of adhesively bonded joints with different adherends. Compos Part B Eng. 2014;62:167–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnaraj V, Zitoune R, Collombet F. Comprehensive review on drilling of multimaterial stacks. J Mach Forming Technol. 2010;2(3–4):1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker LE. Alloys 625 and 725: trends in properties and applications. Superalloys. 2005;718(625):409–418.
   Google Scholar
• Pethrick RA. Design and ageing of adhesives for structural adhesive bonding–a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng L J Mat Des Appl. 2015;229(5):349–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe LH, Schonhorn H. Theory gives direction to adhesion work. Chem Eng News. 1963;41(15):67–68.
   Google Scholar
• Voiutskii SS. Autohesion and adhesion of high polymers. 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Pizzi A, and Mittal KL, editors. Handbook of adhesive technology. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Gent AN, Schultz J. Effect of wetting liquids on the strength of adhesion of viscoelastic material. J Adhes. 1972;3(4):281–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comyn J Adhesion and the formulation of adhesives (Second edition) . International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 1983; 3(3): 125 .
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield JR. Treatment of composite surfaces for adhesive bonding. Int J Adhes Adhes. 1993;13(3):151–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang G, Yang T, Yuan W, et al. The influence of surface treatment on the tensile properties of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites-bonded joints. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;160:446–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SM, Roy R, Kweon JH, et al. Strength and failure modes of surface treated CFRP secondary bonded single-lap joints in static and fatigue tensile loading regimes. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2020;134:105897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Real JC, Ballesteros Y, Chamochin R, et al. Influence of surface preparation on the fracture behavior of acrylic adhesive/CFRP composite joints. J Adhes. 2011;87(4):366–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Encinas N, Oakley BR, Belcher MA, et al. Surface modification of aircraft used composites for adhesive bonding. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2014;50:157–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Landeros VH, Vargas-Islas SY, Cruz-González CE, et al. Studies on the influence of surface treatment type, in the effectiveness of structural adhesive bonding, for carbon fiber reinforced composites. J Manuf Processes. 2019;39:160–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao R, Alfano M, Lubineau G. In situ analysis of interfacial damage in adhesively bonded composite joints subjected to various surface pretreatments. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2019;116:216–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva Neto A, Cruz DT, Ávila AF. Nano-modified adhesive by graphene: the single lap-loint case. Mater Res. 2013;16(3):592–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akpinar IA, Gültekin K, Akpinar S, et al. Research on strength of nanocomposite adhesively bonded composite joints. Compos Part B Eng. 2017;126:143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Li C, Tie Y, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of adhesively bonded CFRP single-lap joints subjected to tensile loads. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019;95:102402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park YB, Song MG, Kim JJ, et al. Strength of carbon/epoxy composite single-lap bonded joints in various environmental conditions. Compos Struct. 2010;92(9):2173–2180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Cheng X, Zhang Q, et al. An investigation of hygrothermal effects on adhesive materials and double lap shear joints of CFRP composite laminates. Compos Part B Eng. 2016;91:431–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viana GM, Costa M, Banea MD, et al. A review on the temperature and moisture degradation of adhesive joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng L J Mat Des Appl. 2017;231(5):488–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvez P, Abenojar J, Martinez MA. Effect of moisture and temperature on the thermal and mechanical properties of a ductile epoxy adhesive for use in steel structures reinforced with CFRP. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;176:107194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinloch AJ, Korenberg C, Tan KT, et al. Durability of structural adhesive joints. London (UK): Applied Science Publication; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Vassilopoulos AP, Keller T. Environmental effects on fatigue behavior of adhesively-bonded pultruded structural joints. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69(7–8):1022–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Freitas ST, Sinke J. Failure analysis of adhesively-bonded metal-skin-to-composite-stiffener: effect of temperature and cyclic loading. Compos Struct. 2017;166:27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtane M, Tarfaoui M, Sassi S, et al. An investigation of hygrothermal aging effects on high strain rate behaviour of adhesively bonded composite joints. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;172:111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D5573-99. Standard practice for classifying failure modes in fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) joints. West Conshohocken, USA: ASTM International; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D3528-96. Standard test method for strength properties of double lap shear adhesive joints by tension loading. West Conshohocken, USA: ASTM International; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Spaggiari A, Dragoni E. Effect of mechanical surface treatment on the static strength of adhesive lap joints. J Adhes. 2013;89(9):677–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorworth LC, Dillingham G. Fundamentals of adhesive bonding of composite materials. AeroDef Manufacturing Conference, Fort Worth, Texas, USA; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Akman E, Erdoğan Y, Bora MÖ, et al. Investigation of accumulated laser fluence and bondline thickness effects on adhesive joint performance of CFRP composites. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019;89:109–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MIL-STD-810F. Environmental engineering considerations and laboratory tests.
   Google Scholar
• 3M Scotch-WeldTM structural adhesive film AF 163-2, technical datasheet. 3M; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tomblin J, McKenna J, Ng. Y, et al. Advanced general Aviation transport experiments, AGATE NASA-INDUSTRY-FAA. Wichita State University, USA; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Crank J. The mathematics of diffusion. Oxford, England: Oxford university press; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• MIL-STD-810H. Environmental engineering considerations and laboratory tests. Department of defense test method standard, United States Military Standard, USA; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• MIL-STD-883E. Microcircuits, test standard. Department of defense test method standard. United States Military Standard, USA; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kumazawa H, Kasahara T. Analytical investigation of thermal and mechanical load effects on stress distribution in adhesive layer of double-lap metal-composite bonded joints. Adv Compos Mater. 2019;28(4):425–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray BC. Temperature effect during humid ageing on interfaces of glass and carbon fibers reinforced epoxy composites. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;298(1):111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsenoglou CJ, Pavlidou S, Papaspyrides CD. Evaluation of interfacial relaxation due to water absorption in fiber–polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2006;66(15):2855–2864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morimoto T, Fujimoto A, and Katoh H, et al. Mechanism of weak bond formation in CFRP epoxy adhesion joints. Adv Compos Mater. 2020;30(4) ;396–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Chao Y, Zhang W, et al. Study on the effect of post curing on the mode II fracture energy of structural adhesive using a parameter identification approach. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019;95:102398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbas RJ, Da Silva LF, Marques EA, et al. Effect of post-cure on the glass transition temperature and mechanical properties of epoxy adhesives. J Adhesi Sci Technol. 2013;27(23):2542–2557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar DS, Shukla MJ, Mahato KK, et al. Effect of post-curing on thermal and mechanical behavior of GFRP composites. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2015;75(1):012012.
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Pang B, Han X, et al. Predicting the strength of adhesively bonded T-joints under cyclic temperature using a cohesive zone model. J Adhes. 2016;92(11):892–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hexcel IM7/8552 laminate. Product data sheet. HexPly®. Stamford, USA: Hexcel Corporation; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Inconel 625. Ni-Cr Alloy, Technical datasheet. Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea: Comtech International Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh MN, Saeedifar M, Zarouchas D, et al. Stress analysis of double-lap bi-material joints bonded with thick adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2020;97:102480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar