Prediction of mechanical properties for three-dimensional woven composites considering interference between tows

References

• Mouritz AP, Cox BN. A mechanistic interpretation of the comparative in-plane mechanical properties of 3D woven, stitched and pinned composites. Compos Part A. 2010;41(6):709–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritz AP, Bannister MK, Falzon PJ, et al. Review of applications for advanced three-dimensional fibre textile composites. Compos Part A. 1999;30(12):1445–1461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansar M, Xinwei W, Couwei Z. Modeling strategies of 3D woven composites: a review. Compos Struct. 2011;93(8):1947–1963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyker ED, Morestin F, Boisse P, et al. Simulation of 3D interlock composites preforming. Compos Struct. 2009;88(2):615–623.
   Google Scholar
• Neale G, Dahale M, Yoo SH, et al. Improved crush energy absorption in 3D woven composites by pick density modification. Compos Part B. 2020;192(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zako M, Uetsuji Y, Kurashiki T. Finite element analysis of damaged woven fabric composite materials. Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63(3–4):507–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page BH, Guild FJ, Ogin SL, et al. Finite element simulation of woven fabric composites. Compos Part A. 2004;35(7–8):861–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomov SV, Ivanov DS, Verpoest I, et al. Meso-FE modelling of textile composites: road map, data flow and algorithms. Compos Sci Technol. 2007;67(9):1870–1891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green SD, Matveev MY, Long AC, et al. Mechanical modelling of 3D woven composites considering realistic unit cell geometry. Compos Struct. 2014;118:284–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wucher B, Hallstrom S, Dumas D, et al. Nonconformal mesh-based finite element strategy for 3D textile composites. J Compos Mater. 2016 0 ;1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Siddgonde N, Ghosh A. Thermo-mechanical modeling of C/C 3D orthogonal and angle interlock woven fabric composites in high temperature environment. Mech Mater. 2020;148:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai S, Cunningham PR. Multi-scale damage modelling of 3D woven composites under uni-axial tension. Compos Struct. 2016;142:298–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun JH, Chou TW. Elastic properties of three-dimensional angle-interlock fabric preforms. J Tex Inst. 1990;81(4):538–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox BN, Dadkhah MS. The macroscopic elasticity of 3D woven composites. J Compos Mater. 1995;29(6):785–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreger AF, Teters GA. Use of averaging methods to determine the viscoelastic properties of spatially reinforced composites. Mechanics of Composite Materials. 1980;15(4):377–383
   Google Scholar
• Kalidindi SR, Franco E. Numerical evaluation of isostrain and weighted-average models for elastic moduli of three-dimensional composites. Compos Sci Technol. 1997;57(3):293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik RA, Jarmon DC, Logan CP. Characterization and modeling of angle interlock woven composites. 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ACS Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Material Conference and Exhibit, Long Beach, CA, USA. 1998;962–971.
   Google Scholar
• Pochiraju K, Chou TW. Three-dimensionally woven and braided composites. I: a model for anisotropic stiffness prediction. Polym Composites. 1999;20(4):565–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu ZJ, Brown D, Davies JM. An analytical modeling method for predicting the stiffness of 3-D orthotropic laminated fabric composites. Compos Struct. 2002;56(4):407–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan S, Grigorash A, Archer E, et al. Analytical elastic stiffness model for 3D woven orthogonal interlock composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2010;56(11):1597–1604.
   Google Scholar
• Hallal A, Youns R, Fardoun F, et al. Improved analytical model to predict the effective elastic properties of 2.5D interlock woven fabrics composite. Compos Struct. 2012;94(10):3009–3028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamis CC. Simplified composite micromechanics equation for hygral thermal and mechanical properties. NASA Technical Memorandum. 1983;83320:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Herakovich CT. Mechanics of fibrous composites. USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International. ASTM D3039/D3039M – 17: standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials (USA). 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rudov-Clark S, Mouritz AP, Lee L, et al. Fibre damage in the manufacture of advanced three-dimensional woven composites. Compos Part A. 2003;34(10):963–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdikhani M, Steensels E, Standaert A, et al. Multi-scale digital image correlation for detection and quantification of matrix cracks in carbon fiber composite laminates in the absence and presence of voids controlled by the cure cycle. Composite Part B. 2018;154:138–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar