Theories on educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness

References

• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, G. T. (2011). High reliability & leadership for educational change. In McREL, Noteworthy perspectives: High reliability organizations in education (pp. 24–35). Denver, CO: McREL. Retrieved from http://www.mcrel.org/~/media/Files/McREL/Homepage/Products/01_99/prod87_NW_HRO.asha
   Google Scholar
• Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73, 125–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman, K. M., Carter, K., Aladjem, D. K., & LeFloch, K. C. (2004). Challenges for the future of comprehensive school reform. In C. T. Cross (Ed.), Putting the pieces together: Lessons from comprehensive school reform research (pp. 109–150). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Comprehensive School Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24, 409–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, D. (2003). Education production functions using instructional time as an input. Education Economics, 11, 273–292.
   Google Scholar
• Cobern, W., Schuster, D., & Adams, B. (2010, March). Experimental comparison of inquiry and direct instruction in science. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of education opportunity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, A. J., Moolenaar, N. M., & Carrier, N. (2011). Reform at the edge of chaos: Connecting complexity, social networks, and policy implementation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M. (2007). Het spel der neveneffecten: Strategisch gedrag van toezichthouders en scholen [The game of side-effects: Strategic behavior of supervisors and schools]. In F. L. Leeuw, J. S. Kerseboom, & R. Elte (Eds.), Turven, tellen, toetsen; over toezicht, inspectie, handhaving en evaluatie en hun maatschappelijke betekenis in Nederland (pp. 195–203). Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D. (2000). School choice: Do we know enough? Educational Researcher, 29(8), 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, B. (1994). How the leopard changed its spots. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., Fitz, J., & Taylor, C. (2001). School choice impacts: What do we know? Educational Researcher, 30(7), 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, J. (2003). Schools as organizational models: Implications for examining school effectiveness. The Elementary School Journal, 104, 29–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (1984). Principal instructional management rating scale. New York, NY: Leading Development Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Chapman, C., Muijs, D., Reynolds, D., Campbell, C., Creemers, B., … Weinstein, J. (2013). Getting lost in translation? An analysis of the international engagement of practitioners and policy-makers with the educational effectiveness research base. School Leadership and Management, 33, 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, R. H., Hofman, W. H. A., Guldemond, H., & Dijkstra, A. B. (1996). Variation in effectiveness between private and public schools: The impact of school and family networks. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2, 366–394.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., & Mackay, T. (2011). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Bliss, J. R. (1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 260–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J. (2004). The impact of after-school programs: Interpreting the results of four recent evaluations (Working Paper). New York, NY: WT Grant Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, S. A. (1993). Origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M. (1979). Organization of decision-making: A systems-theoretical approach. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kieser, A., & Kubicek, H. (1977). Organisation. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Campbell, R. J., & Gagatsis, A. (2000). The significance of the classroom effect in primary schools: An application of Creemers’ comprehensive model of educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 501–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2008). Using a multidimensional approach to measure the impact of classroom-level factors upon student achievement: A study testing the validity of the dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 183–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., & Tsangaridou, N. (2008). Towards the development of generic and differentiated models of educational effectiveness: A study on school and teacher effectiveness in physical education. British Educational Research Journal, 34, 807–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 315–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luyten, J. W., Scheerens, J., Visscher, A. J., Maslowski, R., Witziers, B., & Steen, R. (2005). School factors related to quality and equity: Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., Creemers, B., Kyriakides, L., Van der Werf, G., Timperley, H., & Earl, L. (2011). State of the art – teacher effectiveness and professional learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Nordenbo, S. E., Elstad, E., Holm, A., Scheerens, J., Soegaard Larsen, M., Uljens, M., … Hauge, T. E. (2009). Research mapping of input, process and learning in primary and lower secondary schools: Technical report. Copenhagen: DPU, Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Education at a glance: OECD indicators 2005. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1978). Organizational design. Arlington Heights, IL: AHM Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Prirogine, I. (1997). The end of certainty: Time, chaos and the new laws of nature. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reezigt, G. J., Guldemond, H., & Creemers, B. P. M. (1999). Empirical validity for a comprehensive model on educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10, 193–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Townsend, T., Van Damme, J., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2011). Educational effectiveness research (EER): A state-of-the-art review. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., Stringfield, S., & Schaffer, G. (2006). The High Reliability Schools Project: Some preliminary results and analyses. In A. Harris & J. H. Chrispeels (Eds.), Improving schools and educational systems (pp. 56–76). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: Research, theory and practice. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (1997). Conceptual models and theory-embedded principles on effective schooling. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 269–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2004). The evaluation culture. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30, 105–124.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2007, March). Conceptual framework for the PISA 2009 context questionnaires and thematic reports. Paper presented to the PISA Governing Board, Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2008). L’istruzione intesa come sistema adattativo complesso: Implicazioni per gli studi sull’efficacia educativa [Education as a complex adaptive system: Implications for the study of educational effectiveness]. In F. Abbona, G. Del Re, & G. Monaco (Eds.), Complessità dinamica dei processi educativi (pp. 136–171). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2012). School leadership effects revisited: Review and meta-analysis of empirical studies. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2013a). Productive time in education: A review of the effectiveness of teaching time at school, homework and extended time outside school hours. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2013b). The ripples and waves of educational effectiveness research: Some comments to “Getting lost in translation”. School Leadership & Management, 33, 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2013c). The use of theory in school effectiveness research revisited. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J., Luyten, H., Steen, R., & Luyten-de Thouars, Y. (2007). Review and meta-analyses of school and teaching effectiveness. Enschede: University of Twente, Department of Educational Organisation and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J., Luyten, H., & Van Ravens, J. (Eds.). (2011). Perspectives on educational quality: Illustrative outcomes on primary and secondary education in the Netherlands ( Springer Briefs in Education). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J., & Maslowski, R. (2008). Autonomie des établissements scolaires: Des moyens à la recherche d’un objectif? [School autonomy: Means looking for a goal?]. Revue francaise de pedagogie, 164, 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1964). Administrative behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, R. E. (1973). Theory construction for research on teaching. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 77–112). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking? New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S. (1998). An anatomy of ineffectiveness. In L. Stoll & K. Myers (Eds.), No quick fixes: Perspectives on schools in difficulties (pp. 209–221). London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S., Reynolds, D., & Schaffer, E. C. (2008). Improving secondary students’ academic achievement through a focus on reform reliability: 4- and 9-year findings from the High Reliability Schools project. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 409–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S. C., Reynolds, D., & Schaffer, E. C. (2011). Toward highly reliable, high-quality public schooling. In McREL, Noteworthy perspectives: High reliability organizations in education (pp. 6–23). Denver, CO: McREL. Retrieved from http://www.mcrel.org/~/media/Files/McREL/Homepage/Products/01_99/prod87_NW_HRO.asha
   Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S. C., & Slavin, R. E. (1992). A hierarchical longitudinal model for elementary school effects. In B. P. M. Creemers & G. J. Reezigt (Eds.), Evaluation of educational effectiveness (pp. 35–39). Groningen: ICO.
   Google Scholar
• Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, W. K. (2004). A systems approach to quality in elementary schools: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 42, 539–554.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, J. C., Cooper, H., Patall, E. A., Tyson, D., & Robinson, J. C. (2010). A method for evaluating research syntheses: The quality, conclusions, and consensus of 12 syntheses of the effects of after-school programs. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 20–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Damme, J., De Fraine B., Opdenakker, M.-C., Van Landeghem, G., & Onghena, P. (2000, September). Effects of schools and classes upon mathematics and language achievement: The importance of group composition. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Werf, G. (1997). Differences in school and instruction characteristics between high-, average-, and low-effective schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 430–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. New York, NY: George Braziller.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar